Publication: Bosnia and Herzegovina : Country Financial Accountability Assessment
Loading...
Published
2003-06-10
ISSN
Date
2013-07-31
Author(s)
Editor(s)
Abstract
This Country Financial Accountability Assessment (CFAA) was prepared on the basis of the findings of a World Bank mission to Bosnia and Herzegovina in 2001, and reflects developments through early 2002. The CFAA was a constituent element of the Public Expenditure and Institutional Review (PEIR) published in June 2002 on the basis of work carried out in 2001-2002, and the key findings of the CFAA on the public expenditure policy and institutional framework form a significant part of the PEIR section dealing with financial management in the government sector. While some of the diagnosis presented in this CFAA may have been overtaken by events since early 2002, most of its recommendations remain valid and the report provides a sound analytical framework for ongoing reforms in the field of public expenditure management. The country is in transition not only to a market and a post-war economy, but also to a peculiar (and still fragile) conception of statehood. Public administration in BiH combines pre-war, wartime and post-war institutions, often exercising overlapping administrative authority. The administrative organs operating within a complex governmental structure, the international strategy focus is on building the institutional base of BiH's democracy and fiscal management, using international influence to protect key institutions during their vulnerable early phase, and bring them to a point where they can sustain themselves after international support is withdrawn. At the same time, the way to Europe being the creation of a single free economic space in BIH, harmonization and creation of common institutions are crucial. Statehood needs to be reinforced and specific areas need to be strengthened in the two Entities in view of the requirements for EU accession. The CFAA recommends support of the shift of key institutions and processes from the Entities to the State as advocated by the IC. Such a shift would empower State institutions with stable and predictable budgetary resources and ensure harmonized fiscal management and oversight. At the same time, to mitigate concerns about over-centralization, effective governance should be promoted at the cantonal and municipal levels, where financial accountability is also weak.
Link to Data Set
Citation
“World Bank. 2003. Bosnia and Herzegovina : Country Financial Accountability Assessment. © World Bank. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/14690 License: CC BY 3.0 IGO.”
Associated URLs
Associated content
Other publications in this report series
Journal
Journal Volume
Journal Issue
Collections
Related items
Showing items related by metadata.
Publication Russian Federation : Country Financial Accountability Assessment(Washington, DC, 2003-09-16)This CFAA concentrates, by design, on federal-level public sector financial management in the Russian Federation. Its results feed into the fiduciary discussion presented in the new Russian Federation Country Assistance Strategy (CAS), and into the Core Integrative Fiduciary Assessment (CIFA). In budget management the CFAA recommends 1) strengthening the strategy phase of budget preparation to link macroeconomic resource constraints and sectoral and program targets; 2) adopting a uniform, simplified budget coding structure; 3) adopting a more participatory approach to budget planning and formulation; 4) introducing accounting principles by entities with extra-budgetary funds and preparing reports that are compatible with Treasury accounts and fiscal reporting; 5) preparing a program of institutional development for the MOF and applying modem information technology; and 6) amending the chart of accounts (COA) to fully reflect the budget classification. The development and implementation of a full-function Treasury system will take several years and is not expected to become fully operational before 2004/05. In the interim, the CFAA recommends immediate implementation of an improved system of expenditure monitoring, extension of Treasury control of expenditure commitments to all items of the economic expenditure classification, and replacement of weekly cash finding limits by monthly funding of established expenditure commitments. In accounting and financial reporting, some recommendations are to 0 review of existing budget classifications and coding structures and design of a revised structure and COA that conform with the IMF GFS classification; and to integrate the two existing coding systems. To improve internal controls and internal auditing, the report recommends regarding the internal audit as an important management tool, shifting to a new model, based on service orientation and performance/risk assessment, internal audit functions becoming independent from other organizational and functional departments, staff reporting directly to the head of the organization, regulating the entity by an audit charter, and audit functions be carried out by multi-disciplinary teams. As for external audits, the CFAA strongly supports the Chambers' program of institutional and methodological improvements, in particular its preparation of a long- term plan to assess public institutions' performance (value for money) in the use of public funds. Finally, the CFAA finds that the World Bank is adequately discharging its financial management fiduciary responsibilities with respect to its lending operations. The CFAA risk assessment concludes that the current ring-fencing approach to project implementation arrangements should be maintained, recognizing that--based on the effective operationalization of the reforms being introduced in public financial accountability--the present arrangements could in due course be subject to revision.Publication A Review of World Bank Support for Accountability Institutions in the Context of Governance and Anticorruption(World Bank, Washington, DC, 2011-12)The focus of this paper is on the institutions outside the executive branch that include supreme audit institutions, legislative oversight bodies (such as parliamentary public accounts and budget committees, and ombudsmen), related independent bodies, and civil society organizations. Through their support for accountability, donor countries and international financial institutions seek to help countries: promote voice and accountability as an intrinsic human right, and improve development outcomes in terms of poverty reduction, sustainable development. The report is organized as: first, provide a brief literature review of research on accountability, and how donors and other actors can work to improve it, including a review of the experience of other bilateral and multilateral donors in supporting domestic accountability through their policies, strategies, and behaviors as well as through direct support to accountability actors and systems. Second, briefly review the guidance prepared for Bank staff toward enhancing accountability. Third, review some examples of the Bank's experience in supporting domestic accountability. Finally, we present some conclusions and accountability-related questions for further analysis.Publication Georgia : Country Financial Accountability Assessment(Washington, DC, 2003-09-26)A number of in-depth studies were conducted between the time of the preparation of the first draft CFAA report in May 2002 and the final mission in February 2003. These included a PER, CPAR and an IMF Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC) mission. Each of these missions identified a number of serious weaknesses and made recommendations to address them. Some of these weaknesses had been identified in the CFAA report and others represented new findings. These new findings and their associated recommendations have been reflected in the final CFAA report, sometimes by explicit inclusion, other times by reference. As a result, this final report has a strong emphasis on the internal control framework and fiduciary risks and presents specific short- and medium-term recommendations to mitigate them. In conducting its mission, the team noted that the availability and reliability of financial information beyond routine budget utilization data is severely limited, precluding analysis in a number of areas. Improving the quality of reliable, complete and accurate financial information is essential for sound management decision-making. This report makes four priority and an additional twenty-one recommendations. They are designed to strengthen the legal foundation for internal financial control, construct a modem internal control framework, and develop the human capacity to administer them successfully. Internal controls must be the priority of the Government if it is to reduce its fiduciary risk. The four priority most areas of risk for the Government of Georgia include: implement a sound legal foundation for effective financial controls, build the internal audit function, strengthen the external audit function, and build staff capacities in financial management and auditing.Publication Ukraine : Country Financial Accountability Assessment(Washington, DC, 2001-10-15)Ukraine has several strengths, such as an educated workforce, strong bookkeeping skills, and commitment to reforms, and a long-term vision of joining the European Union. In order to strengthen existing public financial accountability, Ukraine will need to build on its strength by undertaking several measures. Experience in many other countries shows that several required changes entail reaching political consensus, reforming existing institutions, or creating new institutions. This suggests that a realistic timetable for improvement in public financial accountability will have to stretch over several years and will depend on strong leadership from the top. The most important areas for action are: bringing revenues under the scope of independent external auditors; introducing the concept of internal audit; strengthening the capacity of the Accounting Chamber to conduct financial statement audits; strengthening the accountability of state owned enterprises; introducing international accounting standards for selected enterprises; adopting international best practices for licensing of audit professionals; and strengthening the disciplinary committee of the Chamber of Auditors to provide effective oversight. Other measures needed are to: train deparmtnetal staff in implementing program budgeting; fully implementing the Budget Code; expediting the implementing of the Treasury modernization project; and implementing standardized automated accounting and reporting systems.Publication Moldova : Public Economic Management Review(Washington, DC, 2003-03-24)Unfavorable initial conditions, and extreme vulnerability to external shocks, as experienced by Moldova's economic transition, culminated in the 1998 regional financial crisis, which fostered the need for radical fiscal retrenchment, namely, reductions in social sectors expenditures. Currently, and despite a seemingly reasonable, attainable growth, the challenge for the Government is to improve basic outcomes in social sectors, and address inequities in access to basic social services. Key recommendations in this report suggest: a) launching a major program of public service reform; b) strengthening the government decision-making process, through the introduction of a system of Cabinet Committees, and the restructuring of the State Chancellery into a non-political Government Secretariat; c) strengthening strategic prioritization in budget formulation, through a structured approach to developing, and implementing the Medium Term Expenditure Framework; d) strengthening the budget process, through increased budget coverage - deepening Treasury coverage - and setting a stronger, internal/external accountability framework. Similarly, recommendations call for a strengthened civil service management, by amending the Civil Service Law, securing the application of key merit principles, and de-politicization, while launching a functional program to rationalize government structures. Furthermore, sector-specific reforms in the social sectors should be accelerated, particularly for education and social assistance, balancing basic education, primary health care, and emergency services.
Users also downloaded
Showing related downloaded files
Publication World Development Report 2011(World Bank, 2011)The 2011 World development report looks across disciplines and experiences drawn from around the world to offer some ideas and practical recommendations on how to move beyond conflict and fragility and secure development. The key messages are important for all countries-low, middle, and high income-as well as for regional and global institutions: first, institutional legitimacy is the key to stability. When state institutions do not adequately protect citizens, guard against corruption, or provide access to justice; when markets do not provide job opportunities; or when communities have lost social cohesion-the likelihood of violent conflict increases. Second, investing in citizen security, justice, and jobs is essential to reducing violence. But there are major structural gaps in our collective capabilities to support these areas. Third, confronting this challenge effectively means that institutions need to change. International agencies and partners from other countries must adapt procedures so they can respond with agility and speed, a longer-term perspective, and greater staying power. Fourth, need to adopt a layered approach. Some problems can be addressed at the country level, but others need to be addressed at a regional level, such as developing markets that integrate insecure areas and pooling resources for building capacity Fifth, in adopting these approaches, need to be aware that the global landscape is changing. Regional institutions and middle income countries are playing a larger role. This means should pay more attention to south-south and south-north exchanges, and to the recent transition experiences of middle income countries.Publication Digital Africa(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2023-03-13)All African countries need better and more jobs for their growing populations. "Digital Africa: Technological Transformation for Jobs" shows that broader use of productivity-enhancing, digital technologies by enterprises and households is imperative to generate such jobs, including for lower-skilled people. At the same time, it can support not only countries’ short-term objective of postpandemic economic recovery but also their vision of economic transformation with more inclusive growth. These outcomes are not automatic, however. Mobile internet availability has increased throughout the continent in recent years, but Africa’s uptake gap is the highest in the world. Areas with at least 3G mobile internet service now cover 84 percent of Africa’s population, but only 22 percent uses such services. And the average African business lags in the use of smartphones and computers as well as more sophisticated digital technologies that catalyze further productivity gains. Two issues explain the usage gap: affordability of these new technologies and willingness to use them. For the 40 percent of Africans below the extreme poverty line, mobile data plans alone would cost one-third of their incomes—in addition to the price of access devices, apps, and electricity. Data plans for small- and medium-size businesses are also more expensive than in other regions. Moreover, shortcomings in the quality of internet services—and in the supply of attractive, skills-appropriate apps that promote entrepreneurship and raise earnings—dampen people’s willingness to use them. For those countries already using these technologies, the development payoffs are significant. New empirical studies for this report add to the rapidly growing evidence that mobile internet availability directly raises enterprise productivity, increases jobs, and reduces poverty throughout Africa. To realize these and other benefits more widely, Africa’s countries must implement complementary and mutually reinforcing policies to strengthen both consumers’ ability to pay and willingness to use digital technologies. These interventions must prioritize productive use to generate large numbers of inclusive jobs in a region poised to benefit from a massive, youthful workforce—one projected to become the world’s largest by the end of this century.Publication World Development Report 2020(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2020)Global value chains (GVCs) powered the surge of international trade after 1990 and now account for almost half of all trade. This shift enabled an unprecedented economic convergence: poor countries grew rapidly and began to catch up with richer countries. Since the 2008 global financial crisis, however, the growth of trade has been sluggish and the expansion of GVCs has stalled. Meanwhile, serious threats have emerged to the model of trade-led growth. New technologies could draw production closer to the consumer and reduce the demand for labor. And conflicts among large countries could lead to a retrenchment or a segmentation of GVCs. This book examines whether there is still a path to development through GVCs and trade. It concludes that technological change is, at this stage, more a boon than a curse. GVCs can continue to boost growth, create better jobs, and reduce poverty provided that developing countries implement deeper reforms to promote GVC participation; industrial countries pursue open, predictable policies; and all countries revive multilateral cooperation.Publication World Development Report 2021(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2021-03-24)Today’s unprecedented growth of data and their ubiquity in our lives are signs that the data revolution is transforming the world. And yet much of the value of data remains untapped. Data collected for one purpose have the potential to generate economic and social value in applications far beyond those originally anticipated. But many barriers stand in the way, ranging from misaligned incentives and incompatible data systems to a fundamental lack of trust. World Development Report 2021: Data for Better Lives explores the tremendous potential of the changing data landscape to improve the lives of poor people, while also acknowledging its potential to open back doors that can harm individuals, businesses, and societies. To address this tension between the helpful and harmful potential of data, this Report calls for a new social contract that enables the use and reuse of data to create economic and social value, ensures equitable access to that value, and fosters trust that data will not be misused in harmful ways. This Report begins by assessing how better use and reuse of data can enhance the design of public policies, programs, and service delivery, as well as improve market efficiency and job creation through private sector growth. Because better data governance is key to realizing this value, the Report then looks at how infrastructure policy, data regulation, economic policies, and institutional capabilities enable the sharing of data for their economic and social benefits, while safeguarding against harmful outcomes. The Report concludes by pulling together the pieces and offering an aspirational vision of an integrated national data system that would deliver on the promise of producing high-quality data and making them accessible in a way that promotes their safe use and reuse. By examining these opportunities and challenges, the Report shows how data can benefit the lives of all people, but particularly poor people in low- and middle-income countries.Publication World Development Report 2012(World Bank, 2012)The main message of this year's World development report: gender equality and development is that these patterns of progress and persistence in gender equality matter, both for development outcomes and policy making. They matter because gender equality is a core development objective in its own right. But greater gender equality is also smart economics, enhancing productivity and improving other development outcomes, including prospects for the next generation and for the quality of societal policies and institutions. Economic development is not enough to shrink all gender disparities-corrective policies that focus on persisting gender gaps are essential. This report points to four priority areas for policy going forward. First, reducing gender gaps in human capital-specifically those that address female mortality and education. Second, closing gender gaps in access to economic opportunities, earnings, and productivity. Third, shrinking gender differences in voice and agency within society. Fourth, limiting the reproduction of gender inequality across generations. These are all areas where higher incomes by themselves do little to reduce gender gaps, but focused policies can have a real impact. Gender equality is at the heart of development. It's the right development objective, and it's smart economic policy. The World development report 2012 can help both countries and international partners think through and integrate a focus on gender equality into development policy making and programming.