Publication:
Growing Together or Growing Apart? A Village Level Study of the Impact of the Doha Round on Rural China
dc.contributor.author | Kuiper, Marijke | |
dc.contributor.author | van Tongeren, Frank | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-06-20T21:27:09Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-06-20T21:27:09Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2005-09 | |
dc.description.abstract | Most studies of the opening of the Chinese economy focus at the national level. The few existing disaggregated analyses are limited to analyzing changes in agricultural production. The authors use an innovative village equilibrium model that accounts for nonseparability of household production and consumption decisions. This allows them to analyze the impact of trade liberalization on household production, consumption, and off-farm employment, as well as the interactions among these three aspects of household decisions. They use the village model to analyze the impact of price changes and labor demand, the two major pathways through which international trade affects households. Analyzing the impact of trade liberalization for one village in the Jiangxi province of China, the authors find changes in relative prices and outside village employment to have opposite impacts on household decisions. At the household level the impact of price changes dominates the employment impacts. Comparing full trade liberalization and the more limited Doha scenario, reactions are more modest in the latter case for most households, but the response is nonlinear to increasing depth of trade reforms. This is explained by household-specific transaction (shadow) prices in combination with endogenous choices to participate in the output markets. Rising income inequalities are a growing concern in China. Whether trade liberalization allows incomes to grow together or to grow apart depends on whether one accounts for the reduction in consumption demand when household members migrate. Assessing the net effect on the within-village income distribution, the authors find that poorer households that own draught power gain most from trade liberalization. The households that have to rely on the use of own labor for farm activities and are not endowed with traction power, nor with a link to employment opportunities in the prospering coastal regions, have fewer opportunities for adjustment. | en |
dc.identifier | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2005/09/6252170/growing-together-or-growing-apart-village-level-study-impact-doha-round-rural-china | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10986/8595 | |
dc.language | English | |
dc.publisher | World Bank, Washington, DC | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Policy Research Working Paper; No. 3696 | |
dc.rights | CC BY 3.0 IGO | |
dc.rights.holder | World Bank | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ | |
dc.subject | ACCOUNTING | |
dc.subject | AGRICULTURAL OUTPUT | |
dc.subject | AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION | |
dc.subject | AGRICULTURE | |
dc.subject | BANKING SECTOR | |
dc.subject | BENCHMARK | |
dc.subject | CAPITAL FLOWS | |
dc.subject | COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE | |
dc.subject | CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK | |
dc.subject | CONSUMPTION LEVELS | |
dc.subject | CONSUMPTION PATTERNS | |
dc.subject | ECONOMIC GROWTH | |
dc.subject | ECONOMICS RESEARCH | |
dc.subject | EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS | |
dc.subject | EMPLOYMENT | |
dc.subject | EQUILIBRIUM | |
dc.subject | EQUILIBRIUM MODELS | |
dc.subject | EQUIVALENT VARIATION | |
dc.subject | EXPENDITURES | |
dc.subject | FEMALES | |
dc.subject | FISH | |
dc.subject | FIXED PRICES | |
dc.subject | FOOD PRODUCTION | |
dc.subject | GDP | |
dc.subject | GENDER | |
dc.subject | GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM MODEL | |
dc.subject | GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION | |
dc.subject | GROWTH RATE | |
dc.subject | HOUSEHOLD ANALYSIS | |
dc.subject | HOUSEHOLDS | |
dc.subject | INCOME | |
dc.subject | INCOME DISTRIBUTION | |
dc.subject | INCOME EFFECT | |
dc.subject | INCOME EFFECTS | |
dc.subject | INCOME INEQUALITY | |
dc.subject | INHERITANCE | |
dc.subject | INPUT USE | |
dc.subject | INSURANCE | |
dc.subject | INTEREST RATES | |
dc.subject | INTERMEDIATE INPUTS | |
dc.subject | INTERNATIONAL TRADE | |
dc.subject | LABOR COSTS | |
dc.subject | LABOR FORCE | |
dc.subject | LABOR MARKET | |
dc.subject | LABOR MARKETS | |
dc.subject | MARGINAL VALUE | |
dc.subject | MARKET EQUILIBRIUM | |
dc.subject | MARKET FAILURES | |
dc.subject | MARKET INTEGRATION | |
dc.subject | MIGRATION | |
dc.subject | PRICE CHANGES | |
dc.subject | PRICE INCENTIVES | |
dc.subject | PRICE INCREASES | |
dc.subject | PRICE INDEX | |
dc.subject | PRODUCTION FUNCTION | |
dc.subject | PRODUCTION FUNCTIONS | |
dc.subject | PRODUCTION PATTERNS | |
dc.subject | PURCHASE PRICE | |
dc.subject | RENTING | |
dc.subject | RURAL AREAS | |
dc.subject | SALES | |
dc.subject | SHADOW PRICES | |
dc.subject | STATE ENTERPRISES | |
dc.subject | SUBSTITUTION | |
dc.subject | SUBSTITUTION ELASTICITIES | |
dc.subject | SUPPLIERS | |
dc.subject | SUPPLY CURVE | |
dc.subject | SUPPLY FUNCTIONS | |
dc.subject | SURPLUS | |
dc.subject | TRADE LIBERALIZATION | |
dc.subject | TRADE REFORMS | |
dc.subject | TRANSACTION COSTS | |
dc.subject | TRANSACTIONS COSTS | |
dc.subject | URBAN AREAS | |
dc.subject | URBAN GROWTH | |
dc.subject | VALUE ADDED | |
dc.subject | VILLAGES | |
dc.subject | WAGES | |
dc.subject | WELFARE GAINS | |
dc.subject | WTO | |
dc.title | Growing Together or Growing Apart? A Village Level Study of the Impact of the Doha Round on Rural China | en |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
okr.doctype | Publications & Research :: Policy Research Working Paper | |
okr.doctype | Publications & Research | |
okr.docurl | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2005/09/6252170/growing-together-or-growing-apart-village-level-study-impact-doha-round-rural-china | |
okr.globalpractice | Macroeconomics and Fiscal Management | |
okr.globalpractice | Social, Urban, Rural and Resilience | |
okr.globalpractice | Environment and Natural Resources | |
okr.globalpractice | Finance and Markets | |
okr.globalpractice | Finance and Markets | |
okr.globalpractice | Trade and Competitiveness | |
okr.identifier.doi | 10.1596/1813-9450-3696 | |
okr.identifier.externaldocumentum | 000016406_20050826103422 | |
okr.identifier.internaldocumentum | 6252170 | |
okr.identifier.report | WPS3696 | |
okr.language.supported | en | |
okr.pdfurl | http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2005/08/26/000016406_20050826103422/Rendered/PDF/wps3696.pdf | en |
okr.region.administrative | East Asia and Pacific | |
okr.region.country | China | |
okr.topic | International Economics and Trade :: Access to Markets | |
okr.topic | Banks and Banking Reform | |
okr.topic | Housing and Human Habitats | |
okr.topic | Economic Theory and Research | |
okr.topic | Environmental Economics and Policies | |
okr.topic | Communities and Human Settlements | |
okr.topic | Finance and Financial Sector Development | |
okr.topic | Macroeconomics and Economic Growth | |
okr.topic | Environment | |
okr.unit | Development Research Group (DECRG) | |
okr.volume | 1 of 1 | |
relation.isSeriesOfPublication | 26e071dc-b0bf-409c-b982-df2970295c87 |
Files
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1