Publication: Payment by Results in Development Aid: All That Glitters Is Not Gold
Date
2016-08
ISSN
1564-6971
Published
2016-08
Author(s)
Clist, Paul
Abstract
Payment by Results (PbR), where aid is disbursed conditional upon progress against a pre-agreed measure, is becoming increasingly important for various donors. There are great hopes that this innovative instrument will focus attention on ultimate outcomes and lead to greater aid effectiveness by passing the delivery risk on to recipients. However, there is very little related empirical evidence, and previous attempts to place it on a sure conceptual footing are rare and incomplete. This article collates and synthesises relevant insights from a wide range of subfields in economics, providing a rich framework with which to analyze Payment by Results. I argue that the domain in which it dominates more traditional forms is relatively small and if it is used too broadly, many of the results it claims are likely to be misleading. The likelihood of illusory gains stems from the difficulty of using a single indicator to simultaneously measure and reward performance: ‘once a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure.’ This does not mean PbR should not be used (indeed it will be optimal in some settings), but it does mean that claims of success should be treated with caution.
Citation
“Clist, Paul. 2016. Payment by Results in Development Aid: All That Glitters Is Not Gold. World Bank Research Observer. © Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the World Bank. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/29310 License: CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 IGO.”
Report Series
Other publications in this report series
Journal
Journal
Journal Volume
Journal Volume
Journal Issue
Journal Issue
Collections
Associated URLs
Associated content
Citations
-
Cited 14 times in Scopus (View citations)