Publication:
Gender Dimensions of Roma Inclusion : Perspectives from Four Roma Communities in Bulgaria
dc.contributor.author | World Bank | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-04-01T17:57:21Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-04-01T17:57:21Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014-01 | |
dc.description.abstract | This study employs a qualitative approach to inform the development of effective Roma inclusion policies and programs in Bulgaria. The Roma are currently among the least integrated minority group in Bulgaria. This study investigates the key factors and mechanisms that promote or inhibit social inclusion of the Roma with the wider Bulgarian society by examining their social norms, agency, and strategic life choices from a gender perspective. The study pursues three research questions to deepen the understanding of Roma communities and their inclusion. These are: (i) what are the key gender-related social norms that influence agency in the Roma communities included in the research, and how do they vary across and within these communities?; (ii) what does agency mean in respect to making strategic life choices, and how does if differ in terms of women and men, and across the communities?; and (iii) what can be drawn from understanding of norms, agency, and life choices that can inform stakeholders in developing policies that will support their inclusion, and thereby the implementation of Bulgaria's national strategy for Roma integration? The study uses the European Union's (EU's) working definition of social inclusion as a lens to analyze Roma communities. This study brings to the fore Roma perspectives while focusing on gender roles that are shaped by their social norms. Further, this study looks at how these norms (and roles) are changing as they encounter the values and practices of the modernization of Bulgaria. This study is organized as follows: chapter one gives introduction and background; chapter two depicts the framework of the study and the methodological approach. Chapter three discusses the findings of the study in terms of gender roles and social norms. Chapter four delves into understanding how social norms and agency influence the strategic life choices of Roma men and women, and consequently if these aid in integrating with the broader Bulgarian society. Chapter five concludes the study by pointing to areas that may be explored further for the development of inclusive policies that will benefit the Roma in Bulgaria. | en |
dc.identifier | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2014/01/19128468/gender-dimensions-roma-inclusion-perspectives-four-roma-communities-bulgaria | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10986/17545 | |
dc.language | English | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Washington, DC | |
dc.rights | CC BY 3.0 IGO | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ | |
dc.subject | ABORTION | |
dc.subject | ABUSE | |
dc.subject | ACCESS TO HEALTH | |
dc.subject | ACCESS TO HEALTH CARE | |
dc.subject | ACCESS TO HEALTH SERVICES | |
dc.subject | ACCESS TO SERVICES | |
dc.subject | ACCESSIBILITY | |
dc.subject | ADOLESCENT GIRLS | |
dc.subject | ADOLESCENTS | |
dc.subject | AGE AT MARRIAGE | |
dc.subject | AGE OF MARRIAGE | |
dc.subject | AID | |
dc.subject | ALCOHOLISM | |
dc.subject | ANTHROPOLOGY | |
dc.subject | ARRANGED MARRIAGES | |
dc.subject | BASIC HUMAN NEEDS | |
dc.subject | BELIEFS | |
dc.subject | BIG CITIES | |
dc.subject | CHILD REARING | |
dc.subject | CHRISTIANS | |
dc.subject | CHURCH | |
dc.subject | CITIZENS | |
dc.subject | COHABITATION | |
dc.subject | CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK | |
dc.subject | CONDOMS | |
dc.subject | CONTRACEPTIVE METHODS | |
dc.subject | CONTRACEPTIVES | |
dc.subject | CREATION | |
dc.subject | CULTURAL PROCESSES | |
dc.subject | CULTURAL VALUES | |
dc.subject | CUSTOMARY PRACTICES | |
dc.subject | DEVELOPMENT POLICIES | |
dc.subject | DIGNITY | |
dc.subject | DISABLED | |
dc.subject | DISABLED PEOPLE | |
dc.subject | DISCRIMINATION | |
dc.subject | DISSEMINATION | |
dc.subject | DOMESTIC VIOLENCE | |
dc.subject | DOWRIES | |
dc.subject | DOWRY | |
dc.subject | EARLY CHILDHOOD | |
dc.subject | EARLY MARRIAGE | |
dc.subject | EARLY PREGNANCIES | |
dc.subject | EARLY PREGNANCY | |
dc.subject | ECONOMIC CHANGE | |
dc.subject | ECONOMIC SITUATION | |
dc.subject | ECONOMIC TRANSITION | |
dc.subject | ECONOMIC TRENDS | |
dc.subject | EDUCATED MEN | |
dc.subject | EDUCATED WOMEN | |
dc.subject | EDUCATION LEVELS | |
dc.subject | ELDERLY | |
dc.subject | EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES | |
dc.subject | ENVIRONMENT FOR WOMEN | |
dc.subject | EQUAL ACCESS | |
dc.subject | EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES | |
dc.subject | EQUAL PAY | |
dc.subject | EQUAL WORK | |
dc.subject | ESSENTIAL DRUGS | |
dc.subject | ETHNIC STUDIES | |
dc.subject | ETHNICITY | |
dc.subject | ETHNOGRAPHIC STUDIES | |
dc.subject | ETHNOGRAPHY | |
dc.subject | FAMILIES | |
dc.subject | FAMILY INCOME | |
dc.subject | FAMILY PLANNING | |
dc.subject | FAMILY PLANNING METHODS | |
dc.subject | FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES | |
dc.subject | FAMILY SUPPORT | |
dc.subject | FERTILITY | |
dc.subject | FINANCIAL CONSTRAINTS | |
dc.subject | FIRST PREGNANCY | |
dc.subject | FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSIONS | |
dc.subject | FORCED PROSTITUTION | |
dc.subject | FORMAL EDUCATION | |
dc.subject | FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS | |
dc.subject | GENDER | |
dc.subject | GENDER DIMENSION | |
dc.subject | GENDER DIMENSIONS | |
dc.subject | GENDER DISPARITIES | |
dc.subject | GENDER EQUALITY | |
dc.subject | GENDER FOCUS | |
dc.subject | GENDER NORMS | |
dc.subject | GENDER PERSPECTIVE | |
dc.subject | GENDER RELATIONS | |
dc.subject | GENDER ROLES | |
dc.subject | GOVERNMENT AGENCIES | |
dc.subject | GOVERNMENT OFFICES | |
dc.subject | HEALTH EDUCATION | |
dc.subject | HOUSEHOLD CHORES | |
dc.subject | HOUSEHOLDS | |
dc.subject | HUMAN DEVELOPMENT | |
dc.subject | HUSBANDS | |
dc.subject | IDENTITY | |
dc.subject | ILLITERACY | |
dc.subject | INCLUSION | |
dc.subject | INEQUALITY | |
dc.subject | INFORMAL SECTOR | |
dc.subject | INTEGRITY | |
dc.subject | INVESTMENTS IN EDUCATION | |
dc.subject | IUD | |
dc.subject | JOB OPPORTUNITIES | |
dc.subject | JOB TRAINING | |
dc.subject | JOBS | |
dc.subject | LABOR MARKET | |
dc.subject | LABOR MARKETS | |
dc.subject | LABORERS | |
dc.subject | LACK OF FOOD | |
dc.subject | LEGAL PROTECTION | |
dc.subject | LEGAL STATUS | |
dc.subject | LEVEL OF EDUCATION | |
dc.subject | LIFESTYLES | |
dc.subject | LITERACY RATES | |
dc.subject | LIVING CONDITIONS | |
dc.subject | LOCAL AUTHORITIES | |
dc.subject | MAINSTREAM | |
dc.subject | MAINSTREAMING | |
dc.subject | MALNUTRITION | |
dc.subject | MANHOOD | |
dc.subject | MARKET ECONOMY | |
dc.subject | MARRIAGES | |
dc.subject | MASCULINITY | |
dc.subject | MEDIA | |
dc.subject | METHOD OF BIRTH CONTROL | |
dc.subject | MIGRATION | |
dc.subject | MINISTRY OF EDUCATION | |
dc.subject | MINORITIES | |
dc.subject | MINORITY | |
dc.subject | MODERN CONTRACEPTIVES | |
dc.subject | MODERNIZATION | |
dc.subject | MONOGAMY | |
dc.subject | MORALITY | |
dc.subject | MOTHER | |
dc.subject | MOVEMENTS | |
dc.subject | MUSLIMS | |
dc.subject | NATIONAL ACTION | |
dc.subject | NATIONAL ACTION PLAN | |
dc.subject | NATIONAL COUNCIL | |
dc.subject | NATIONAL STRATEGY | |
dc.subject | NUMBER OF CHILDREN | |
dc.subject | NUTRITION | |
dc.subject | OLDER WOMEN | |
dc.subject | OPEN SOCIETY | |
dc.subject | PARTICIPATION IN DECISION | |
dc.subject | PERSISTENT POVERTY | |
dc.subject | PLACE OF RESIDENCE | |
dc.subject | POLICY DEVELOPMENT | |
dc.subject | POPULATION CENSUS | |
dc.subject | POPULATION PRESSURE | |
dc.subject | PREGNANCY | |
dc.subject | PRIMARY EDUCATION | |
dc.subject | PRIMARY SCHOOL | |
dc.subject | PRINCIPLES | |
dc.subject | PRIOR TO MARRIAGE | |
dc.subject | PROSTITUTES | |
dc.subject | PROSTITUTION | |
dc.subject | PUBERTY | |
dc.subject | PUBLIC HEALTH | |
dc.subject | PUNITIVE MEASURES | |
dc.subject | PURCHASING POWER | |
dc.subject | QUALITATIVE APPROACH | |
dc.subject | QUALITATIVE INFORMATION | |
dc.subject | QUALITY OF LIFE | |
dc.subject | REALITY | |
dc.subject | RECIPIENT COUNTRIES | |
dc.subject | REFUGEES | |
dc.subject | REGULATORY FRAMEWORKS | |
dc.subject | RELIGION | |
dc.subject | REPRODUCTIVE EDUCATION | |
dc.subject | RESPECT | |
dc.subject | RESPONSIBILITIES | |
dc.subject | RITUALS | |
dc.subject | ROMA | |
dc.subject | RURAL AREAS | |
dc.subject | RURAL COMMUNITIES | |
dc.subject | SAFETY | |
dc.subject | SCHOOL ATTENDANCE | |
dc.subject | SCHOOL CURRICULUM | |
dc.subject | SECONDARY EDUCATION | |
dc.subject | SECONDARY SCHOOL | |
dc.subject | SECONDARY SCHOOLS | |
dc.subject | SERVICE FACILITIES | |
dc.subject | SEX | |
dc.subject | SEX WORK | |
dc.subject | SEXES | |
dc.subject | SINGLE MOTHERS | |
dc.subject | SOCIAL ANTHROPOLOGY | |
dc.subject | SOCIAL ASSISTANCE | |
dc.subject | SOCIAL CHANGE | |
dc.subject | SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT | |
dc.subject | SOCIAL EXCLUSION | |
dc.subject | SOCIAL FACTORS | |
dc.subject | SOCIAL INCLUSION | |
dc.subject | SOCIAL INTEGRATION | |
dc.subject | SOCIAL INTERACTIONS | |
dc.subject | SOCIAL NETWORKS | |
dc.subject | SOCIAL NORMS | |
dc.subject | SOCIAL POLICY | |
dc.subject | SOCIAL SERVICES | |
dc.subject | SOCIAL STATUS | |
dc.subject | SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION | |
dc.subject | STEREOTYPES | |
dc.subject | TRADITIONAL GENDER ROLES | |
dc.subject | TRADITIONAL VALUES | |
dc.subject | TRANSPORTATION | |
dc.subject | UNDP | |
dc.subject | UNEMPLOYMENT | |
dc.subject | UNEMPLOYMENT RATES | |
dc.subject | UNICEF | |
dc.subject | UNITED NATIONS | |
dc.subject | UNSKILLED WOMEN | |
dc.subject | URBAN AREAS | |
dc.subject | URBANIZATION | |
dc.subject | USE OF CONTRACEPTIVES | |
dc.subject | VICTIMS | |
dc.subject | VILLAGES | |
dc.subject | VIRGINITY | |
dc.subject | VOCATIONAL TRAINING | |
dc.subject | VULNERABILITY | |
dc.subject | WAR | |
dc.subject | WDR | |
dc.subject | WOMAN | |
dc.subject | WOMANHOOD | |
dc.subject | WORKING MOTHERS | |
dc.subject | WORTH | |
dc.subject | YOUNG ADULTS | |
dc.subject | YOUNG AGE | |
dc.subject | YOUNG COUPLES | |
dc.subject | YOUNG PEOPLE | |
dc.subject | YOUNG WOMEN | |
dc.title | Gender Dimensions of Roma Inclusion : Perspectives from Four Roma Communities in Bulgaria | en |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
okr.crosscuttingsolutionarea | Gender | |
okr.date.disclosure | 2014-02-26 | |
okr.doctype | Publications & Research :: Working Paper | |
okr.doctype | Publications & Research | |
okr.docurl | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2014/01/19128468/gender-dimensions-roma-inclusion-perspectives-four-roma-communities-bulgaria | |
okr.globalpractice | Social, Urban, Rural and Resilience | |
okr.globalpractice | Social Protection and Labor | |
okr.globalpractice | Health, Nutrition, and Population | |
okr.identifier.externaldocumentum | 000333037_20140226132625 | |
okr.identifier.internaldocumentum | 19128468 | |
okr.identifier.report | 84693 | |
okr.language.supported | en | |
okr.pdfurl | http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2014/02/26/000333037_20140226132625/Rendered/PDF/846930REVISED00lish0Roma0Gender0ENG.pdf | en |
okr.region.administrative | Europe and Central Asia | |
okr.region.country | Bulgaria | |
okr.topic | Social Protections and Labor :: Disability | |
okr.topic | Ethics and Belief Systems | |
okr.topic | Health, Nutrition and Population :: Population Policies | |
okr.topic | Culture and Development :: Anthropology | |
okr.topic | Gender :: Gender and Development | |
okr.unit | Social Development (ECSSO) | |
okr.volume | 1 of 1 |
Files
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1