Publication: Rapid Social Response Multi-Donor Trust Fund (RSR) Retrospective
Loading...
Published
2025-12-22
ISSN
Date
2026-01-07
Author(s)
Editor(s)
Abstract
This report provides a brief overview of the achievements of the Rapid Social Response Multi-Donor Trust Fund (RSR) in the fifteen years from its inception during the global financial crisis of 2008/9 to its closing in 2024. Over these fifteen years, the RSR awarded $149.8 million in 420 grants to World Bank teams. These teams represent a wide swath of practice areas, including infrastructure, social development, gender, agriculture, education, and health, as well as social protection. RSR grants have enabled greater dialogue with clients, provided analytical and diagnostic information to strengthen program design, supported teams to innovate and take risks with new ideas, and financed the development of new tools and other public goods that have enhanced social protection and labor programming around the world.
Link to Data Set
Citation
“World Bank. 2025. Rapid Social Response Multi-Donor Trust Fund (RSR) Retrospective. © World Bank. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/44138 License: CC BY-NC 3.0 IGO.”
Digital Object Identifier
Associated URLs
Associated content
Other publications in this report series
Journal
Journal Volume
Journal Issue
Collections
Related items
Showing items related by metadata.
Publication Multi-Donor Trust Fund for the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative(Washington, DC: World Bank Group, 2011-02-18)The main finding of this review is that the Multi-Donor Trust Fund-Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (MDTF-EITI) program is in the process of achieving its objective of increasing transparency of revenues in resource-dependent countries. Given the resilience and pervasiveness of the resource curse, the achievement of this narrowly defined objective in a few critical countries is a notable accomplishment that has created the momentum needed to attract a growing number of countries, donors, enterprises and Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) a testimony of their hope that, in spite of the uncertainty and risks, the benefits will be forthcoming in due course. The findings of the present review suggest that to ensure that tangible benefits in terms of improved revenue management and accountability can be achieved, the program needs to satisfactorily address the emerging doubts about the adequacy of the program in the absence of complementary measures, tackle issues with the scope and quality of the EITI reports, manage the tensions between authority and accountability, and face up to the tradeoff between expanding the number of EITI candidates and improving results in countries that are already implementing EITI. The EITIapos;s stakeholders are aware of these issues, which have already been discussed at several Board meetings and workshops. What is needed now is a roadmap for the second phase built around a unifying principle that can help to reconcile and prioritize among competing demands.Publication Trust Fund Support for Development : An Evaluation of the World Bank's Trust Fund Portfolio(Washington, DC: World Bank Group, 2011)In the changing global environment of development cooperation, trust funds have emerged as a significant pillar of the global aid architecture, used to address limitations in bilateral aid and fill perceived gaps in the operations of existing multilateral institutions. They currently account for about 11 percent of official development assistance (ODA), and they finance a substantial part of the World Bank's business. The activities they fund are highly varied, ranging from huge global programs with their own governance structures to conventional development projects, debt and disaster relief operations, and technical assistance. This IEG evaluation, undertaken at the request of World Bank executive directors, assesses the value of the trust fund vehicle as a way of delivering aid and the effectiveness and efficiency of the deployment of trust fund resources. In addition, the evaluation assesses the Bank's management and accountability for the use of trust fund resources and the impact of trust funds on the Bank's development role. The evaluation finds that donors, recipients, and the World Bank have considerable overlapping interests in this vehicle, but their interests may diverge on specific issues such as how trust fund allocation decisions are made and how trust funds are governed and managed. Furthermore, while trust funds can add value by providing coordinated grant financing for specific countries, development issues, and especially global public goods, the deployment of trust fund resources does not consistently work in accordance with the Paris Declaration aid principles of country ownership and donor coordination. Notably, many trust funds of global scope involve insufficient recipient participation and lack clear outcome objectives. For other trust funds, a three-pillar approach consisting of country-specific trust funds; global and regional partnership programs; and multi-donor, multi-recipient umbrella facilities will allow the Bank to strengthen the effectiveness, efficiency, and accountability for results.Publication Delivering the Goods : Multi-Donor Approaches to Project Development and Funding(World Bank, Washington, DC, 2009-09)In 2000 the UK government, through the Department for International Development (DFID), reached the conclusion that it made sense to use aid financing to help mitigate risks that constrained private-sector investment in badly needed infrastructure development, improvement, and expansion in developing countries. In seeking to develop an approach, DFID decided to bring in as many like-minded donors as possible so as to provide a single interface for both governments and potential private investors for the development and financing of infrastructure projects. As a result, the Private Infrastructure Development Group (PIDG) was launched in 2002. The World Bank Group has been a member since its inception, first through the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD) window and, since 2007, through the IFC. Current members are Austria, Ireland, Sweden, Switzerland, The Netherlands, the UK, and the International Finance Corporation (IFC).Publication Poverty and Policy Selectivity of World Bank Trust Funds(World Bank, Washington, DC, 2016-06)Over the past decade, donors of foreign aid quadrupled their annual contributions to trust funds at the World Bank. This earmarking of contributions to donors' preferred recipient countries and issues has raised concerns about the alignment of trust funds with the performance-based allocations of aid by the International Development Association, the World Bank's concessional lending arm, and raises the question of the role of this new "multi-bi" aid channel. This study finds that the cross-country allocations of aggregate trust fund aid are poverty- and policy-selective. In this respect, they are much more similar to allocations from the International Development Association than from bilateral donors. The allocations of trust fund types that are more closely controlled by donor countries—recipient-executed and single-donor trust funds—are more strongly related to the strategic interests of donor countries than trust fund aid in general. Trust funds for health and education aid are poverty selective and positively correlated with the World Bank's assessment of the quality of countries' sector policies, while environmental trust funds are neither poverty selective nor correlated with the assessed quality of countries' environmental policies. Overall, the evidence indicates that multi-bi funds administered by the World Bank do not undermine the International Development Association’s allocation criteria.Publication Immunization Finance Toolkit : A Resource for Policy-Makers and Program Managers(World Bank, Washington, DC, 2010-12)Financing is a critical component of a sustainable Immunization program. The Immunization Financing Toolkit is a series of short briefs on different options for financing national immunization programs and vaccines. It is intended to serve as a resource for program managers and decision---makers in ministries of health, planning, and finance. The Toolkit brings together the most up---to---date knowledge on the characteristics of various types of= financing mechanisms as well as information on how the mechanisms are being implemented in practice, their potential benefits, and their limitations. Where possible, case studies on specific financing options are included. The field of immunization financing continues to evolve and the Toolkit will therefore be web---based and easily downloaded from the internet. As a web---based tool, the Toolkit contains links to other relevant websites for further understanding. The Toolkit is also available on a CD Rom. This version of the Toolkit is an update of the Immunization Financing Options produced by the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI Alliance) in 2001. Health sector funding and management have evolved over the last decade, making the previous document out---of---date. New and innovative financing mechanisms to support immunization and the health sector have been developed and the types and costs of vaccines have changed. In addition, policy---makers and development partners have become much more knowledgeable about health financing.
Users also downloaded
Showing related downloaded files
No results found.