Publication:
Case Study 4 - Poland : Participation in Macroeconomic Policy Making and Reform
dc.contributor.author | World Bank | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-08-13T14:44:26Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-08-13T14:44:26Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2003-03 | |
dc.description.abstract | In January 1999, Poland launched a new pension system that was the result of 5-6 years of broad outreach campaigns and complex negotiations within the government and between the government and key stakeholder groups. A number of compromises were made to broaden support for the reform; these changes will significantly increase costs during the transition period but without undermining the long-term viability of the reformed pension system. Post-communist Poland operated on a traditional pay-as-you-go (PAYG) system; payroll taxes of current workers financed the pension benefits of current retirees. Due to a number of policy changes expanding early retirement options and other privileges, pension costs skyrocketed in the mid-1990s and Poland had one of the highest spending rates of any post-communist transition country. In addition, long-term demographic shifts led to a decline in people paying into the system relative to those receiving benefits. Contribution rates (i.e., payroll taxes) had already risen from 25% in 1981 to 45% in 1990. They could not easily be pushed up further. | en |
dc.identifier | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2003/03/2864528/case-study-4-poland-participation-macroeconomic-policy-making-reform | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10986/11317 | |
dc.language | English | |
dc.publisher | World Bank, Washington, DC | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Social Development Notes; No. 80 | |
dc.rights | CC BY 3.0 IGO | |
dc.rights.holder | World Bank | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ | |
dc.subject | MACROECONOMIC POLICY | |
dc.subject | POLICY REFORM | |
dc.subject | PENSION SYSTEMS | |
dc.subject | STAKEHOLDER PARTICIPATION | |
dc.subject | PAYROLL TAXES | |
dc.subject | PENSION PLANS | |
dc.subject | PAYROLL | |
dc.subject | POLICY MAKING PROCESSES | |
dc.subject | GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT | |
dc.subject | GOVERNANCE APPROACH | |
dc.subject | CONSENSUS BUILDING | |
dc.subject | LEGISLATIVE PROCESS | |
dc.subject | OUTREACH ACTIVITIES ADVERTISEMENTS | |
dc.subject | ADVERTISING | |
dc.subject | AGED | |
dc.subject | BUSINESS ASSOCIATIONS | |
dc.subject | CABINET | |
dc.subject | CITIES | |
dc.subject | CIVIC ENGAGEMENT | |
dc.subject | CIVIL SOCIETY | |
dc.subject | CONTRIBUTION RATES | |
dc.subject | DEFINED BENEFITS | |
dc.subject | ELECTIONS | |
dc.subject | ELIGIBLE VOTERS | |
dc.subject | INDIVIDUAL ACCOUNTS | |
dc.subject | INDIVIDUAL BENEFITS | |
dc.subject | LAWS | |
dc.subject | LEARNING | |
dc.subject | LEGISLATION | |
dc.subject | LEGISLATIVE PROCESS | |
dc.subject | MANDATORY SYSTEM | |
dc.subject | MEDIA | |
dc.subject | MULTI-PILLAR SYSTEM | |
dc.subject | PARLIAMENT | |
dc.subject | PARLIAMENTARIANS | |
dc.subject | PENSION COSTS | |
dc.subject | PENSION FUND | |
dc.subject | PENSION FUNDS | |
dc.subject | PENSION PLANS | |
dc.subject | PENSION REFORM | |
dc.subject | PENSION SCHEMES | |
dc.subject | PENSION SYSTEM | |
dc.subject | PENSIONERS | |
dc.subject | PENSIONS | |
dc.subject | POLICY MAKING | |
dc.subject | POLITICAL LEADERS | |
dc.subject | PRIME MINISTER | |
dc.subject | PRIVATE PENSION | |
dc.subject | PRIVATE PENSION FUNDS | |
dc.subject | PRIVATE PILLAR | |
dc.subject | PROGRAMS | |
dc.subject | PUBLIC OPINION | |
dc.subject | RADIO | |
dc.subject | REGULATORY AGENCY | |
dc.subject | REGULATORY MECHANISMS | |
dc.subject | REPRESENTATIVES | |
dc.subject | RETIREES | |
dc.subject | RETIREMENT | |
dc.subject | RETIREMENT AGE | |
dc.subject | RETIREMENT OPTIONS | |
dc.subject | SOCIAL INSURANCE | |
dc.subject | SOCIAL POLICY | |
dc.subject | SOCIAL SECURITY | |
dc.subject | TAX TREATMENT | |
dc.subject | TELEVISION | |
dc.subject | THREE-PILLAR SYSTEM | |
dc.subject | WAGE GROWTH | |
dc.subject | WORKERS | |
dc.subject | YOUNG WORKERS | |
dc.title | Case Study 4 - Poland : Participation in Macroeconomic Policy Making and Reform | en |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
okr.doctype | Publications & Research :: Brief | |
okr.doctype | Publications & Research | |
okr.docurl | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2003/03/2864528/case-study-4-poland-participation-macroeconomic-policy-making-reform | |
okr.globalpractice | Social, Urban, Rural and Resilience | |
okr.globalpractice | Transport and ICT | |
okr.globalpractice | Governance | |
okr.globalpractice | Health, Nutrition, and Population | |
okr.identifier.externaldocumentum | 000090341_20040123153551 | |
okr.identifier.internaldocumentum | 2864528 | |
okr.identifier.report | 27556 | |
okr.language.supported | en | |
okr.pdfurl | http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2004/01/23/000090341_20040123153551/Rendered/PDF/275560PAPER0sdn80.pdf | en |
okr.region.administrative | Europe and Central Asia | |
okr.region.country | Poland | |
okr.topic | Information and Communication Technologies :: ICT Policy and Strategies | |
okr.topic | Pensions and Retirement Systems | |
okr.topic | Health Monitoring and Evaluation | |
okr.topic | Governance :: Parliamentary Government | |
okr.topic | Social Development :: Children and Youth | |
okr.topic | Health, Nutrition and Population | |
okr.unit | Office of the Vice President (ESDVP) | |
okr.volume | 1 of 1 |
Files
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1