Publication: Ecuador : Country Financial Accountability Assessment
Loading...
Published
2005-06
ISSN
Date
2012-06-19
Author(s)
Editor(s)
Abstract
Despite positive economic signals in 2002 and 2003, Ecuador's public finances remain precarious because of weaknesses in government systems and oversight for the non-financial public sector and dependence on volatile fiscal revenue from oil. More than 96 percent of total public expenditure is fixed (public sector wages and salaries, social security benefits, debt service, and other contractual arrangements), reducing the scope for discretionary spending. The strategic objective of the present CFAA is to contribute to strengthening of Ecuador's economic governance, and associated social and economic development, identifying weaknesses and recommending remedial action in areas where current public financial management institutional arrangements, practices and systems, limit the efficiency and transparency of public sector management. This being the first CFAA for Ecuador, the study reviewed the practices and systems of the Central administration of Government. The report's main recommendations include consolidating existing laws and regulations on public financial management and modernizing the legal framework; preparing and implementing supporting regulations on budget management and performance, and enhancing civil society's capacity to scrutinize public finances; upgrading information systems; improving operational procedures; designing and implementing a capacity building program to upgrade the accounting framework; elaborating a borrowing policy and developing procedural manuals; strengthening internal audit units; strengthen the Supreme Audit Institution; improve legislative scrutiny of government spending; upgrade the Government's Internet portal, and provide more user-friendly access to information on budget execution and financial performance.
Link to Data Set
Citation
“World Bank. 2005. Ecuador : Country Financial Accountability Assessment. © World Bank. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/8451 License: CC BY 3.0 IGO.”
Digital Object Identifier
Associated URLs
Associated content
Other publications in this report series
Journal
Journal Volume
Journal Issue
Collections
Related items
Showing items related by metadata.
Publication Brazil : Country Financial Accountability Assessment(Washington, DC, 2002-06-30)This Country Financial Accountability Assessment (CFAA) is also a "fiduciary" assessment, given it examines Brazil's Public Financial Management system, to form a judgment on the risk to Bank, and country funds within the Brazilian budget, and the level of accountability and transparency concerning such spending. Moreover, this CFAA will feed into the Bank's lending program, in particular a second Fiscal Reform and Structural Adjustment Loans in FY03. Partly reflecting the lack of a Public Expenditure Review, this CFAA also focuses on upstream budget development issues, including linkages with the government planning systems, as well as downstream budget execution issues. The Brazilian Government appears strongly committed to improving its public financial management, in particular, two major initiatives have been recently undertaken, which significantly impacts on public financial management: a) the Multi-Annual Plan for 2000-2003 adopted a new approach, aimed at improving resource allocation through a program-based approach covering all budget expenditures, involving the setting of program objectives, and measuring performance; and, b) the Law on Fiscal Responsibility, which appears likely to significantly impact on reinforcing commitments to fiscal discipline at the federal government level, and enforcing greater fiscal discipline on sub-national government. Nevertheless, the budget system is fragmented, and complex, hampering resource allocation in line with stated priorities, and, its execution does not reflect program priorities. Notwithstanding needed improvements, the overall conclusion of this assessment is that the Brazilian public financial management system, provides reliable information, adequate systems exist to manage funds at the national level, and, there is a high level of fiscal transparency, both supporting an adjustment lending program.Publication Georgia - Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability (PEFA) : Joint World Bank-European Commission Public Financial Management Assessment, Programmatic Public Finance Policy Review(Washington, DC, 2008-11)This Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability (PEFA) assessment provides an updated and systematic diagnostic of the Public Financial Management (PFM) system in Georgia and provides mid-2007 as a base line for complementing the Government's efforts to monitor progress in the PFM reforms going forward. This summary presents: (i) an assessment of Georgia's PFM performance in applying the PEFA Performance Measurement Framework structured across six dimensions; (ii) an assessment of the impact of PFM weaknesses; and (iii) an assessment of the institutional framework underpinning the prospects for PFM reform. There are, however, areas in the existing internal and external control system, personnel and payroll, public procurement, and reporting of high quality consolidated financial statements that are in need of continued reform to further enhance the effectiveness of the PFM. It is envisaged that this assessment will contribute to the government reform agenda by highlighting the areas in which reform has succeeded and those in which weaknesses remain. The assessment will also serve the donor community in directing its assistance programs in those areas of public financial management where the Government's PFM strategy can be further strengthened.Publication Bhutan - Public Financial Management Accountability Assessment(World Bank, 2010-06-01)This summary assessment uses indicator-led analysis to provide an integrated assessment of the Public Financial Management (PFM) system which draws on international standards developed by various development partners. The purpose is to measure PFM performance across a wide range of development over time. The Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability (PEFA) methodology includes the best conditions that some Organization for Economic cooperation and Development (OECD) countries demonstrate and in this assessment it is important to consider the Bhutanese context, that it is a small country, traditionally with an agricultural base society with relatively lesser industry and commerce. It is unable to support a financial sector infrastructure in terms of accountancy and audit standard setting and the availability of international standards is of great assistance. The 31 indicators for the PFM system focus on the basic qualities of a PFM system operating to existing good international practices, and assessments are classified A (excellent), B (good), C (opportunities for some improvement) and D (in need of substantial improvement in some areas or information not available for the assessment). Each indicator may have 1-4 dimensions each of which is assessed independently. The overall score for the indicator is based on the scores for the constituent dimensions in accordance with scoring rules established in the PEFA PFM framework document. In some circumstances a plus sign is added where the indicator takes on the score of the lowest scoring dimension but other dimensions have higher scores.Publication Province of Santa Fe, Republic of Argentina : Public Financial Management Assessment(CC BY 3.0 Unported, 2012-07)The assessment for the Province of Santa Fe was prepared jointly by the Ministry of Finance of the Province of Santa Fe and the World Bank (WB) on the basis of findings from missions. It seeks to: (i) provide the provincial government with a reference tool for dialogue and action to strengthen their public financial management systems; (ii) assess the province's PFM systems and identify and address their main fiduciary issues, as well as their impact on the implementation of World Bank operations; and (iii) contribute in a broader sense to the dialogue between the Bank and Argentina's national and provincial authorities regarding fiduciary portfolio management and reliance on the country's systems. The assessment is not a fully fledged PFM performance report using all PEFA performance indicators. As agreed with the provincial government and the World Bank s Country Management Unit, the team selected and used 19 PFM performance indicators (PI 1, PI 4, PI 5-7, PI 9-12, PI 16-18, and PI 20-26) to review the status of PFM in the province. The report was prepared based on the findings of the missions that visited Argentina in the first semester of 2009 and refers to the 2006-2008 fiscal years. The report was completed in June 2012 and highlights the progress and improvement in some PFM areas since 2009 whenever provided by the Province (in footnotes wherever appropriate).Publication Iraq Public Expenditure and Institutional Assessment, Volume 1(Washington, DC, 2008-06)The public expenditure and institutional assessment (PEIA) were motivated by a number of factors. First, both the Government of Iraq (GoI) and its international development partners have recognized the critical importance of sound management of Iraq's substantial public financial resources. Both parties support the reform and modernization of public financial management (PFM), as articulated in the International Compact for Iraq (ICI). Secondly, international experience demonstrates the importance of establishing a baseline against which progress in PFM over time can be measured. This implies the need for an assessment which provides the information necessary to measure the performance of a country's PFM system. Thirdly, the devastating circumstances in Iraq during the past 5 years have made the institutional arrangements for PFM the subject of considerable uncertainty. The PEIA can help to shape and prioritize the necessary development program. The report is organized in two main parts. Volume one contains a summary of the main issues to emerge from the public expenditure and financial accountability (PEFA) assessment and a discussion of a number of specific PFM issues of current importance to Iraq, including: capital investment budgeting (CIB), oil revenue management, the Iraq financial management information system (IFMIS), public accounting and accountability, and payroll management. Volume two contains a detailed technical analysis behind the PEFA assessment.
Users also downloaded
Showing related downloaded files
Publication Economy Profile of Guatemala(World Bank, Washington, DC, 2019-10-24)Doing business 2020 is the 17th in a series of annual studies investigating the regulations that enhance business activity and those that constrain it. Doing business presents quantitative indicators on business regulations and the protection of property rights that can be compared across 190 economies - from Afghanistan to Zimbabwe - and over time. Regulations affecting 12 areas of the life of a business are covered: starting a business, dealing with construction permits, getting electricity, registering property, getting credit, protecting minority investors, paying taxes, trading across borders, enforcing contracts, resolving insolvency, employing workers, and contracting with the government. The employing workers and contracting with the government indicator sets are not included in this year’s ranking on the ease of doing business. Data in doing business 2020 are current as of May 1, 2019. The indicators are used to analyze economic outcomes and identify what reforms of business regulation have worked, where, and why. This economy profile presents indicators for Guatemala; for 2020, Guatemala ranks 96.Publication Test and Treat(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2024-06-28)The COVID-19 pandemic underlined, exposed, and exacerbated vast global inequity in healthcare. Health systems and access to health that was already fragile or precarious was worsened,and existing global dynamics in access to commodities were magnified. In addition to globalvaccine apartheid, access to COVID-19 tests, therapeutics, and other medical interventions thatcould alter the course of the disease and save lives was severely hampered among most of theworld living in marginalized or poor countries and communities.Publication Heat Tariff Reform and Social Impact Mitigation : Recommendations for a Sustainable District Heating Sector in Belarus(Washington, DC, 2014-06)The Government of the Republic of Belarus (GoB) plans to increase district heating (DH) tariffs to cost-recovery levels and gradually phase out subsidies, replacing them with social assistance programs. Residential DH tariffs in Belarus are currently at roughly 10-21 percent of cost-recovery levels. DH subsidies are highly regressive, add costs to business, and create significant fiscal risks and macroeconomic vulnerabilities. The purpose of this report is to analyze the social, sectoral, and fiscal impacts of the proposed tariff reform, and to identify and recommend measures to mitigate adverse impacts of DH tariff increases on the households. The analysis shows that: 1) the burden of higher DH tariffs will fall most heavily on low-income groups; 2) the current system of subsidies is unfair, benefitting wealthy customers more than the poor; 3) cross-subsidies undermine the competitiveness of industries in Belarus; and underpriced residential heat places an increasing fiscal burden on the GoB and risks macroeconomic instability. The analysis shows that a negative social impact is manageable if a tariff increase is accompanied by countervailing measures to compensate for the loss of purchasing power, in particular of the poor, through targeted social assistance and energy efficiency programs. The rest of the report is organized as follows: Section 1 describes the GoB's plans for the sector. Section 2 analyzes the principal challenges in the sector that necessitate tariff reform. Section 3 discusses tariff reform options and the likely impact of pursuing each of these options. Section 4 concludes by recommending a reform action package that includes customer communication and engagement, social protection measures and investments in energy efficiency. The appendices contain material supporting the analysis in each section.Publication Results of Railway Privatization in Australia and New Zealand(World Bank, Washington, DC, 2005-09)This paper has been prepared for the World Bank as one of a series of research papers focusing on rail privatization experience throughout the world. The scope of this paper covers rail privatization experience in Australia and New Zealand, much of which occurred over the ten year period from 1993 to 2003. Overall the rail freight privatization experience in Australia and New Zealand, taken in concert with other market and structural reforms, has been positive, although not uniformly so: In Australia, the largely privatized rail freight industry is markedly stronger today than at any time over the last few decades and is competing aggressively for a greater role in the national transport and logistics market; and In New Zealand, the initial success of privatization with increased rail traffic and increased profits has not been sustained: the government has been obliged to take back the network and to commit significant public funds to address deficiencies in the network assets.Publication Digital Africa(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2023-03-13)All African countries need better and more jobs for their growing populations. "Digital Africa: Technological Transformation for Jobs" shows that broader use of productivity-enhancing, digital technologies by enterprises and households is imperative to generate such jobs, including for lower-skilled people. At the same time, it can support not only countries’ short-term objective of postpandemic economic recovery but also their vision of economic transformation with more inclusive growth. These outcomes are not automatic, however. Mobile internet availability has increased throughout the continent in recent years, but Africa’s uptake gap is the highest in the world. Areas with at least 3G mobile internet service now cover 84 percent of Africa’s population, but only 22 percent uses such services. And the average African business lags in the use of smartphones and computers as well as more sophisticated digital technologies that catalyze further productivity gains. Two issues explain the usage gap: affordability of these new technologies and willingness to use them. For the 40 percent of Africans below the extreme poverty line, mobile data plans alone would cost one-third of their incomes—in addition to the price of access devices, apps, and electricity. Data plans for small- and medium-size businesses are also more expensive than in other regions. Moreover, shortcomings in the quality of internet services—and in the supply of attractive, skills-appropriate apps that promote entrepreneurship and raise earnings—dampen people’s willingness to use them. For those countries already using these technologies, the development payoffs are significant. New empirical studies for this report add to the rapidly growing evidence that mobile internet availability directly raises enterprise productivity, increases jobs, and reduces poverty throughout Africa. To realize these and other benefits more widely, Africa’s countries must implement complementary and mutually reinforcing policies to strengthen both consumers’ ability to pay and willingness to use digital technologies. These interventions must prioritize productive use to generate large numbers of inclusive jobs in a region poised to benefit from a massive, youthful workforce—one projected to become the world’s largest by the end of this century.