Publication:
Do Workers in Chile Choose Informal Employment? A Dynamic Analysis of Sector Choice
dc.contributor.author | Packard, Truman G. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-06-05T16:12:26Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-06-05T16:12:26Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2007-05 | |
dc.description.abstract | The degree to which a labor market is segmented and jobs in the formal sector of the economy are rationed is critical to the analysis of coverage of social insurance and pensions. Using unique panel data spanning the 1998-99 contraction in Chile, the author finds little evidence that self-employment is the residual sector of a dualistic labor market, as is often depicted in the literature. Data on transitions between sectors show that self-employment is not a free-entry sector, and that entrepreneurs can be "pushed" out of self-employment just as others are pushed out of formal employment during economic downturns. But employment without a contract does exhibit many of the features of the free-entry, employment safety net depicted in the dualistic literature. An annex to this paper presents supportive evidence from static analysis of selection-corrected wage differentials and a comment on the drawbacks of this approach. | en |
dc.identifier | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2007/05/7585352/workers-chile-choose-informal-employment-dynamic-analysis-sector-choice | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10986/7121 | |
dc.language | English | |
dc.publisher | World Bank, Washington, DC | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Policy Research Working Paper; No. 4232 | |
dc.rights | CC BY 3.0 IGO | |
dc.rights.holder | World Bank | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ | |
dc.subject | AGGREGATE DEMAND | |
dc.subject | AGGREGATE INCOME | |
dc.subject | BONUSES | |
dc.subject | DISABILITY | |
dc.subject | DISCUSSIONS | |
dc.subject | ECONOMIC GROWTH | |
dc.subject | ECONOMIC SLOWDOWN | |
dc.subject | EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT | |
dc.subject | EMPLOYERS | |
dc.subject | EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES | |
dc.subject | EMPLOYMENT TRENDS | |
dc.subject | ENTREPRENEURIAL ABILITY | |
dc.subject | ENTREPRENEURSHIP | |
dc.subject | HOUSEHOLD CHARACTERISTICS | |
dc.subject | HOUSEHOLD STRUCTURE | |
dc.subject | HOUSEHOLD SURVEY | |
dc.subject | HUMAN CAPITAL | |
dc.subject | INCOME SECURITY | |
dc.subject | INFORMAL ECONOMY | |
dc.subject | INFORMAL EMPLOYMENT | |
dc.subject | INFORMAL SECTOR | |
dc.subject | JOB SATISFACTION | |
dc.subject | JOB SECURITY | |
dc.subject | JOB SEEKERS | |
dc.subject | JOB TRAINING | |
dc.subject | JOBS | |
dc.subject | LABOR ECONOMICS | |
dc.subject | LABOR FORCE | |
dc.subject | LABOR MARKET | |
dc.subject | LABOR MARKET CONDITIONS | |
dc.subject | LABOR MARKET FUNCTIONS | |
dc.subject | LABOR MARKET OUTCOME | |
dc.subject | LABOR MARKET SEGMENTATION | |
dc.subject | LABOR MARKETS | |
dc.subject | LABOR MOVEMENT | |
dc.subject | LABOR PRODUCTIVITY | |
dc.subject | LABOR REGULATIONS | |
dc.subject | LABOR SUPPLY | |
dc.subject | LABOR UNIONS | |
dc.subject | LONG TERM UNEMPLOYMENT | |
dc.subject | MANDATED BENEFITS | |
dc.subject | MINIMUM WAGE | |
dc.subject | NATIONAL UNEMPLOYMENT | |
dc.subject | OCCUPATION | |
dc.subject | PAYING JOBS | |
dc.subject | PRELIMINARY EVIDENCE | |
dc.subject | PREVIOUS SECTION | |
dc.subject | PRIMARY EDUCATION | |
dc.subject | RETIREMENT | |
dc.subject | SAFETY NET | |
dc.subject | SALARIED EMPLOYEES | |
dc.subject | SALARIED EMPLOYMENT | |
dc.subject | SALARIED WORKERS | |
dc.subject | SELFEMPLOYMENT | |
dc.subject | SERVICE PROVIDERS | |
dc.subject | SMALL BUSINESSES | |
dc.subject | SOCIAL PROTECTION | |
dc.subject | SOCIAL SECURITY | |
dc.subject | TRAINING COSTS | |
dc.subject | TRAINING INSTITUTION | |
dc.subject | TURNOVER | |
dc.subject | UNEMPLOYED | |
dc.subject | UNEMPLOYMENT | |
dc.subject | WAGE DIFFERENTIALS | |
dc.subject | WAGE EMPLOYMENT | |
dc.subject | WAGE SET | |
dc.subject | WORK EXPERIENCE | |
dc.subject | WORK IN PROGRESS | |
dc.subject | WORKER | |
dc.subject | WORKERS | |
dc.subject | WORKING | |
dc.subject | WORKING POPULATION | |
dc.subject | YOUNGER WORKERS | |
dc.title | Do Workers in Chile Choose Informal Employment? A Dynamic Analysis of Sector Choice | en |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
okr.crosscuttingsolutionarea | Jobs | |
okr.doctype | Publications & Research :: Policy Research Working Paper | |
okr.doctype | Publications & Research | |
okr.docurl | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2007/05/7585352/workers-chile-choose-informal-employment-dynamic-analysis-sector-choice | |
okr.globalpractice | Education | |
okr.globalpractice | Social Protection and Labor | |
okr.identifier.doi | 10.1596/1813-9450-4232 | |
okr.identifier.externaldocumentum | 000016406_20070504135015 | |
okr.identifier.internaldocumentum | 7585352 | |
okr.identifier.report | WPS4232 | |
okr.language.supported | en | |
okr.pdfurl | http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2007/05/04/000016406_20070504135015/Rendered/PDF/wps4232.pdf | en |
okr.region.administrative | Latin America & Caribbean | |
okr.region.country | Chile | |
okr.topic | Social Protections and Labor :: Labor Management and Relations | |
okr.topic | Social Protections and Labor :: Labor Markets | |
okr.topic | Education :: Educational Policy and Planning | |
okr.topic | Social Protections and Labor :: Labor Standards | |
okr.topic | Work and Working Conditions | |
okr.unit | Development Research Group (DECRG) | |
okr.volume | 1 of 1 | |
relation.isSeriesOfPublication | 26e071dc-b0bf-409c-b982-df2970295c87 |
Files
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1