Publication: Serbia and Montenegro : An Agenda for Economic Growth and Employment
Loading...
Published
2004-12-06
ISSN
Date
2013-07-23
Author(s)
Editor(s)
Abstract
Upon resumption of its transition to a market economy in late-2000, Serbia made good initial progress across a range of areas. This progress began from a very difficult starting point which reflected the legacy of a decade of isolation, conflict, and poor economic management. However, deep structural weaknesses remain. Growth rates of around 4 percent per year will not suffice to produce a rapid convergence of living standards towards historical levels. Moreover, the positive elements of Serbia's recent performance are not sustainable without further adjustment and sustained reform. This report analyzes Serbia's recent performance and near-term reform priorities, in five areas which are particularly important for growth and employment creation. Eight themes emerge as the key reform priorities for enhancing growth and employment generation in Serbia: enhanced political stability and improved governance are key prerequisites for sustained growth; reduction of the public sector, thus reducing spending and fiscal burdens; promotion of export development, addressing the anti-export bias, through adequate institutional framework, tariff reform, and a strong trade policy; completion of enterprises and banks privatization; enhanced financial discipline and competitiveness; enabling an improved business environment; foster an enhanced, flexible formal labor market; enhance quality of, and access to education and training. The report demonstrates in great detail the outlined package of substantial and permanent fiscal adjustment, and sustained progress in structural reform, in order to generate the higher investment rates and a more competitive economy which can prod sustainable growth, and improved living standards over the medium-term. Such policies need to be implemented with urgency and unwavering commitment.
Link to Data Set
Citation
“World Bank. 2004. Serbia and Montenegro : An Agenda for Economic Growth and Employment. © World Bank. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/14487 License: CC BY 3.0 IGO.”
Digital Object Identifier
Associated URLs
Associated content
Other publications in this report series
Journal
Journal Volume
Journal Issue
Collections
Related items
Showing items related by metadata.
Publication Serbia and Montenegro : Republic of Montenegro, Economic Memorandum, A Policy for Growth and Competitiveness(Washington, DC, 2005-10)Beginning in the late 1990s, Montenegro's economic reform program reached momentum in the early 2000s. Its reform program rested on two broad pillars: macroeconomic stabilization, and market-oriented structural reforms. However, the macroeconomic and structural reforms have yielded modest economic recovery and transition, holding a current account deficit, which although still high, is improving; yet its principal human welfare indicators such as poverty, life expectancy, and adult literacy remained moderate and stable. But significant challenges remain. Three key challenges confront policy makers in Montenegro. First, past economic growth has been inadequate. Second, the limited growth recovery has not been accompanied by employment growth. Third, despite reforms, Montenegro has become less competitive over the last four years: its real exchange rate, based on movements in unit labor costs, has risen much faster than that of the European Union (EU) zone and the United States. Therefore, recommendations suggest key labor market reforms need to be undertaken to increase employment, growth, and competitiveness, through specific measures to: control the rapid wage growth witnessed in recent years; relax some aspects of the labor regulations; and, reduce the high rates of labor taxation, in a fiscally responsible way to encourage formal employment. Enterprise privatization and restructuring needs to: speed up the restructuring of the mass-voucher- privatized companies, and, speed up the consolidation into majority shares of the companies' shares being traded on stock exchanges. Furthermore, key constraints facing the emerging private sector, including businesses in the informal sector, must be removed, reducing specific governance and regulatory bottlenecks, and the backlog of commercial court cases, to speed up contract enforcement; while in addition, land title transparency and property rights must be improved. The cost of capital needs to be reduced, and financial intermediation improved, while employment creation, growth, and competitiveness should be increased through Government's help, by undertaking fiscal reforms. Finally, tourism holds considerable promise for Montenegro's export-oriented growth, and employment creation.Publication Russian Economic Report, No. 29, Spring 2013 : Recovery and Beyond(Washington, DC, 2013-02)Russia's economy grew 3.4 percent in 2012, down from 4.3 percent in 2011. The economy of Russia slowed in the second half of the year due to weak net exports, negative base effects, and destocking at the end of the year. More than four years after the global financial crisis hit, the world economy remains sluggish. Industrial production lost momentum throughout last year, exports expanded only at a moderate pace, and imports even declined for three month during autumn 2012. Growth declined mainly due to weaker performance of investment. Inventories were flat as the restocking cycle after the crisis came to an end, and fixed investment expanded only moderately as business remained cautious about future prospects. The weaker performance of the tradable sectors reflects sluggish global demand and the poor agricultural harvest but also low competitiveness in parts of the industry, as growth declined for all three subsectors. The capital account strengthened in 2012 as net capital outflows decreased. According to preliminary estimates, the capital account deficit amounted to US$40.9 billion or 2 percent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in 2012, compared to US$76.2 billion or 4 percent of GDP in 2011. The labor market remains tight. The unemployment rate declined across the country, and vacancy and replacement rates increased. The number of poor people in Russia reached a record low. In the first nine months of 2012, some 17.2 million of people were below the poverty line, three million less than a year ago and the lowest number in the last two decades. The weak external environment, high inflation, flat oil prices and sluggish domestic demand are set to postpone a pickup in growth towards the second half of 2013. Nevertheless, modest growth and lower inflation are projected to reduce poverty further.Publication Middle East and North Africa Economic Developments and Prospects, October 2012 : Looking Ahead After a Year in Transition(Washington, DC, 2012-10-01)The Arab Republic of Egypt, Tunisia, Libya and the Republic of Yemen are recovering after a period of economic growth decelerations accompanying the Arab Spring uprisings of 2011. Economic recovery was relatively quick, with industrial production recovering in a matter of months and, in the cases of Egypt and Tunisia, the growth dips of 2011 were smaller than the average growth declines observed around the year of transition during past transitions to democracy. Importantly, the growth decelerations and recovery have taken place in a weak global environment, with events in the Euro zone posing particular challenges to Tunisia, and to a lesser extent, Egypt. The report focuses on the economic developments and short-term outlook for four Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Economies, Tunisia, Egypt, the Republic of Yemen and Libya. These four countries are given special attention because each of them experienced a revolution and a major political change in 2011 and is undergoing a process of political transition toward democracy. The sudden change had important economic consequences. While other countries in the Middle East and North Africa are undergoing political change, the economic ramifications were muted as compared with the changes observed in the four MENA post-revolutionary economies.Publication Bosnia and Herzegovina : Country Economic Memorandum(Washington, DC, 2005-05)This Country Economic Memorandum (CEM) takes stock of economic developments in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BH) since the end of the 1995 war, and, discusses potential sources of high, sustained growth that BH could exploit, as European Union integration advances. The report formulates policy recommendations that would help maximize the potential of the country's economy to achieve higher real GDP growth, and increased job generation. In doing so, the CEM focuses on four priority policy areas: macroeconomic management, international trade policy, business environment and enterprise reform, and, labor market policies. The report conveys the need to significantly build human capital, strengthen the institutional framework, particularly focusing on social sectors, and, develop infrastructure. Despite the country's recent macroeconomic stability, there are still uneven structural policies, and a largely unfinished agenda. The single most important macroeconomic imbalance is the persistent current account deficit. The analysis presented in this report suggests that it is the result of low domestic savings rates, rather than high investment. The rate of investment is not above the average for transition economies, whereas the share of domestic savings that can finance it is particularly low. The need for higher domestic savings raises the question of the adequacy of BH's current fiscal policy stance to serve economic growth. In the area of trade, the recent sluggish performance can hardly be attributed to a policy stance that has pursued liberalization and integration. The real constraints to a more dynamic export performance lie in the business environment and investment climate. The challenges of broad-based enterprise reforms essentially center around two main issues a) removal of structural barriers to the creation, and functioning of competitive markets; and, b) establishment of rules, procedures and related institutions that create incentives to facilitate business transactions. Challenges in the labor market are numerous: unemployment is high and rising, and, jobs being created are scarce, mainly in the informal sector. The report provides several recommendations, among which some suggest the need for changes in privatization regulations, of increased labor market flexibility, of fundamental changes in corporate ownership rules, as well as in the rules for privatization of investment funds, and most importantly, for adequate sequencing of reforms and improved governance.Publication Philippines - Discussion Notes : Challenges and Options for 2010 and Beyond(World Bank, 2011-06-09)With the global economy on the way to recovery from the financial crisis, the Asian economies appear poised to bounce back strongly. For most people in the Philippines, however, a return to the status quo ante will offer little consolation. That is because when economic growth accelerated during 2002-08, poverty did not decline as hoped. With a third of the population currently below the poverty line, and high and rising inequality in incomes, the country's main development challenge is to achieve growth that is much more widely shared to make growth work for the poor. Making growth work for the poor in the Philippines is a significant development challenge, but one that is worth pursuing vigorously. The new administration not only has the mandate but the historic opportunity to deliver on this goal as well as other election platforms on which it was voted to power. These include 'the organized and widely-shared rapid expansion of the economy through a government dedicated to honing and mobilizing the people's skills and energies as well as the responsible harnessing of natural resources; moving to well-considered programs that build capacity and create opportunity among the poor and the marginalized in the country; policies that create conditions conducive to the growth and competitiveness of private businesses, big, medium and small; and making education the central strategy for investing in people, reducing poverty and building national competitiveness.' In addition, the new administration is committed to fight corruption. These goals are fully echoed in the strategy and policy actions identified above and elaborated in the accompanying discussion notes.
Users also downloaded
Showing related downloaded files
Publication Jobs in a Changing Climate: Insights from World Bank Group Country Climate and Development Reports Covering 93 Economies(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2025-11-05)The World Bank Group’s Country Climate and Development Reports (CCDRs) provide a crosscutting look at how countries’ development prospects, and the job opportunities they offer to their people, can be threatened by climate impacts and supported by climate policies. Climate change and policies affect jobs through impacts on productivity, energy and material efficiency, and physical, human, and natural capital. They can also transform employment opportunities, especially through complementary measures that help workers and firms adapt to and benefit from new technologies and production practices. Prepared by the World Bank, the International Finance Corporation (IFC), and the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA), CCDRs integrate country perspectives, climate science and economic modeling, private sector information, and policy analysis to assess how countries can successfully grow and develop their economies and create jobs despite increasing climate risks and while achieving their climate objectives and commitments. Each CCDR starts from the country’s development priorities, opportunities, and challenges, and is developed in close consultation with governments, businesses, and civil society, ensuring the recommendations reflect national priorities. By combining evidence on adaptation, resilience, and emissions pathways, CCDRs highlight where climate action can reinforce development and job creation, and where targeted policies are needed to manage risks and smooth labor market transitions. Taken together, these elements can help create local jobs, ensure economic transitions are just and inclusive, and equip workers and firms to navigate the disruptions and opportunities of a changing climate and changing technologies.Publication Guinea-Bissau Country Climate and Development Report(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2024-10-23)Guinea-Bissau is endowed with a wealth of natural resources, with the highest natural capital per capita in West Africa (US3,874 dollars per capita), which could be leveraged for sustainable and resilient growth. However, Guinea-Bissau faces significant development hurdles, such as high poverty rates, political instability, and economic challenges, including an over-reliance on cashew nuts. Rural poverty has increased, and the nation's infrastructure, education, and health care systems are underdeveloped. Climate change poses a severe threat, potentially impacting agriculture, fisheries, and infrastructure. Without adaptation, it could lead to a significant cut in real GDP per capita (minus 7.3 percent by 2050) and increase in poverty (with up to over 200,000 additional poor by 2050, that is, 5 percent of the expected population, in the worst scenario). The country's low greenhouse gas emissions are expected to rise, mainly due to agriculture and land-use changes, with deforestation being a major contributing factor. Although Guinea-Bissau is a low emitter, it has high mitigation ambitions, targeting a 30 percent reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2030. The Nationally Determined Contribution outlines significant climate actions, with initiatives focused on forest conservation, sustainable agriculture, and community development. However, the country's political instability, institutional weaknesses, and limited financial resources pose challenges to implementing these climate commitments, which depend heavily on external funding. The financial sector's underdevelopment and vulnerability to external shocks limit its ability to support green investments, though reforms could enhance resilience. Guinea-Bissau must consider its climate financing as development financing and vice-versa, engage the private sector, and integrate climate goals with national development plans to ensure a sustainable future. Concessional climate financing is vital due to the underdeveloped financial sector and the government’s limited borrowing capacity. Addressing Guinea-Bissau's vulnerability to climate change and its structural issues requires a cohesive approach that integrates development and climate strategies. This could involve improving governance, diversifying the economy, protecting natural capital, developing human capital, and investing in sustainable agriculture and infrastructure. The transition to a more sustainable and inclusive development pathway that supports economic growth is possible, but requires focusing on key strategic sectors, enhancing institutional capacity, and creating the conditions to mobilize finance. As a highly vulnerable country, there are myriad needs in the different sectors; however, to be more efficient and effective, Guinea-Bissau should prioritize actions in a few sectors, especially actions on biodiversity, agriculture, and social protection. Low carbon development, especially in energy and forestry sectors, could provide cost-efficient solutions and attract climate finance, including from the private sector, which will support the overall development agenda.Publication Comoros Country Climate and Development Report(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2025-06-18)The Union of the Comoros (The Comoros) has significant vulnerability to climate change-related risks but has considerable opportunities to strengthen preparedness and resilience against these challenges. According to the Notre Dame Global Adaptation Index, the Comoros is the 29th-most vulnerable country to climate change and the 163rd most ready to adapt (out of 191). The Comoros archipelago is exposed to many natural hazards that adversely affect the country’s natural capital, people, and physical infrastructure. In 2014, the economic cost of climate-related disasters was estimated at 5.7 million dollars annually, equivalent to 9.2 percent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Between 2018 and 2023, as many as 11 tropical depressions or cyclones impacted the country, with Cyclone Kenneth causing the greatest damage, equivalent to 14 percent of GDP, resulting in total economic growth falling from 3.6 percent in 2018 to 1.9 percent in 2019. More than 345,000 people (40 percent of the population) were affected by the cyclone, with 185,000 people experiencing severe impacts and 12,000 people displaced. However, there is an opportunity for the country to grow more robust and shock-responsive, and to establish pre-positioned funding mechanisms to enhance future crisis response efforts. For the Comoros, adaptation and climate-resilient development are the key climate change focus areas, with the country projected to face 836 million dollars 2050 in additional costs due to climate-related impacts. Current plans to adapt to the impacts of climate change in the Comoros include efforts to improve water management, strengthen coastal protection, and develop climate-smart agriculture practices. Given the country’s reliance on its natural resource base for economic growth and mobility, protection of these resources from climate change will be essential for promoting resilient growth and development. In addition to growing the adaptive capacity of the country’s natural resource sectors, strategic economic diversification will be important to help minimize future climate impacts, and development activities will need to be undertaken in such a way as to attract low-carbon co-benefits. The Union of the Comoros is committed to addressing climate change through its Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) and national priorities. The country’s NDC (which was revised in 2021 for a ten-year horizon) sets ambitious targets, with a goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 23 percent by 2030. The country also plans to significantly increase the share of renewable energy in its energy portfolio, reaching 33 MW by 2030. This will not only promote low-carbon development but also reduce the country’s dependency on imported oil and coal, which currently make up 95 percent of the energy mix. Additionally, the Comoros has declared its intention to increase CO2 removals by 47 percent by 2030, compared to BAU.Publication Kyrgyz Republic Country Climate and Development Report(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2025-11-03)This Country Climate and Development Report (CCDR) on the Kyrgyz Republic aims to support the country’s development goals amid a changing climate. The CCDR considers two policy scenarios up to 2050: the business-as-usual (BAU) and high-growth scenarios. As it quantifies the likely impacts of climate change on the Kyrgyz economy between now and 2050, the report highlights key government actions to best prepare for and adapt to climate impacts (referred to as “with adaptation” measures), with a particular focus on the time horizon up to 2030. The CCDR also outlines a path to net zero emissions by 2050 (referred to as “with mitigation” measures, “decarbonization,” or, simply, “net zero 2050”), highlighting associated development co-benefits.Publication Mongolia Country Climate and Development Report(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2024-10-22)Mongolia’s development prospects are uniquely challenged by both the impacts of climate change and the global shift toward a low-carbon economy. The country’s efforts toward decarbonization pose significant challenges given the structurally high-emission intensity of its economy. While challenging, climate action also presents Mongolia with opportunities to achieve important development benefits. The effects of climate risks and the shift away from coal will have diverse impacts across different regions, communities, and socioeconomic levels. The report assesses the critical interconnections between Mongolia’s development ambitions and climate change action and identifies ways to transition to a more economically diversified, inclusive, and resilient development path. It highlights key climate and transition risks affecting Mongolia’s future development and presents a pathway to enhance climate mitigation and adaptation. The report also makes a case for strengthening policies to enhance resilience to climate change and ensure a just transition, particularly for the most vulnerable. The report is structured as follows: section 1 gives introduction. Section 2 delves into the linkages between development and climate in Mongolia and presents model-based findings on the economic and poverty impacts of climate change under different scenarios. Section 3 covers four in-depth sectoral analyses. The first two mainly focus on adaptation to climate change in the agriculture and water sectors. The third considers prospects for the extraction sector, while the fourth sectoral analysis focuses on decarbonizing power and heat generation. Section 4 shifts the focus to how the government can boost resilience for climate-vulnerable populations. Section 5 outlines options for mobilizing private and public financing and private investments to support the green transition. Section 6 examines the existing institutional and governance structure for climate action and presents recommendations to improve its effectiveness, and section 7 concludes with a framework for prioritizing the policy actions outlined in this report.