Private Sector Development, Privatization, and Industrial Policy

96 items available

Permanent URI for this collection

Items in this collection

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    From Technological Catch-up to Innovation : The Future of China’s GDP Growth
    (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2012-01-02) Yusuf, Shahid
    This report stats that income gaps among countries are largely explained by differences in productivity. By raising the capital/labor ratio and rapidly assimilating technologies across a wide range of activities, China has increased factor productivity manifold since 1980 and joined the ranks of middle income countries. With the launch of the 12th FYP, China has set its sights on becoming a high income country by 2030 through a strategy combining high levels of investment with rapid advances in technology comparable to that of Japan from the 1960s through the 1970s, and Korea s from the 1980s through the end of the century. The report concludes that the best bet is an innovation system anchored to and drawing its energy from a competitive national economy. Technological progress and the flourishing of innovation in China will be the function of a competitive, globally networked ecosystem constructed in two stages during 2011- 2030. Government technology cum competition policies will provide impetus in the first stage, but success will hinge on the quality of the workforce, the initiative and policies of firms, the emergence of supporting services.
  • Thumbnail Image
    China : Integration of National Product and Factor Markets, Economic Benefits and Policy Recommendations
    (Washington, DC, 2005-06) World Bank
    Lack of market integration has been a long-standing concern in China. The existing empirical evidence on the degree and trend in local protectionism and market fragmentation, has painted a mixed picture - some concluding to increasing fragmentation, others pointing at increasing integration. This report uses a comprehensive set of survey data, and a provincial data set to examine the extent and trends in market fragmentation. It finds mixed results across the three key markets in product, labor and capital: Since the early 1990s, the product market is increasingly integrating, with converging prices across the country, and increasing regional specialization. The survey data suggests strongly that regional protectionism declined significantly over the past 10 years. The labor market, while getting more integrated over the reform period, still shows significant fragmentation across regions and across sectors. The remains of the hukou system, the limited access migrants have to social services, and the highly uneven quality of public services reinforce labor market segmentations. The capital markets still show large misallocations in capital across industries, and across China's regions. More significantly, the empirical evidence indicates that the degree of capital market fragmentation has actually increased in the 1990s compared to the 1980s. As China is moving towards a Xiaokang Society, national market integration takes on increasing prominence. Indeed, the gains for China of better integration of goods and factor markets can be huge - much larger than the gains expected from the World Trade Organization (WTO) accession for which the country worked so hard. The report conducts policy simulations to estimate these gains. The report also estimates the economic gains from greater financial market integration. It conducts a simulation by changing the long standing urban bias policy through the movement of investment from cities to rural areas, while keeping the total amount investment constant. As a continental economy, it is time China starts its own determined effort to more rapidly integrate its markets, to maximize efficiency and growth, and ensure that the welfare gains get distributed more evenly across the nation.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Indonesia : Private Sector Development Strategy
    (Washington, DC, 2001-01-04) World Bank
    The report reviews the Bank's private sector development strategy in Indonesia, stipulating that the country's potential will not be realized without a pattern of private sector activity, - different from the past - but, taking the opportunity offered by the crisis to make fundamental changes in the business environment, and in how business is conducted. The first priority calls for the banking, and corporate sectors to speed up the resolution of corporate debt, and ease financial flows for investment, and working capital to resume. Second, the structural inefficiencies, partly conducive to the crisis, and to its long lasting effect, need to be overcome; therefore, reforms should enable Indonesia to become a modern market economy, able to avoid future crises. This encompasses fighting corruption in the public administration, ensuring the rule of law through the court system, reinforcing property rights, and dispute resolution mechanisms, and, ensuring transparency and corporate governance. Third, broad-based, and sustainable economic growth need to be ensured by measures such as removal of obstacles to small, and medium enterprise (SME) activity, as well as SME development promotion, including physical, and social infrastructure building. Finally, the creation of an infrastructure, and regulatory framework to take full advantage of new information/communications technologies, is paramount.