93438 A WORLD BANK STUDY Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy THE CASE OF DISTRIBUTION Marcelino Madrigal and Robert Uluski Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy A WO R L D BA N K S T U DY Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy The Case of Distribution Marcelino Madrigal and Robert Uluski © 2015 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW, Washington DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000; Internet: www.worldbank.org Some rights reserved 1 2 3 4 17 16 15 14 World Bank Studies are published to communicate the results of the Bank’s work to the development com- munity with the least possible delay. The manuscript of this paper therefore has not been prepared in accordance with the procedures appropriate to formally edited texts. This work is a product of the staff of The World Bank with external contributions. The findings, inter- pretations, and conclusions expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect the views of The World Bank, its Board of Executive Directors, or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Nothing herein shall constitute or be considered to be a limitation upon or waiver of the privileges and immunities of The World Bank, all of which are specifically reserved. Rights and Permissions This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 IGO license (CC BY 3.0 IGO) http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo. Under the Creative Commons Attribution license, you are free to copy, distribute, transmit, and adapt this work, including for commercial purposes, under the following conditions: Attribution—Please cite the work as follows: Madrigal, Marcelino, and Robert Uluski. 2015. Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy: The Case of Distribution. World Bank Studies. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6. License: Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 3.0 IGO Translations—If you create a translation of this work, please add the following disclaimer along with the attribution: This translation was not created by The World Bank and should not be considered an official World Bank translation. The World Bank shall not be liable for any content or error in this translation. Adaptations—If you create an adaptation of this work, please add the following disclaimer along with the attribution: This is an adaptation of an original work by The World Bank. Views and opinions expressed in the adaptation are the sole responsibility of the author or authors of the adaptation and are not endorsed by The World Bank. Third-party content—The World Bank does not necessarily own each component of the content contained within the work. The World Bank therefore does not warrant that the use of any third-party-owned individual component or part contained in the work will not infringe on the rights of those third parties. The risk of claims resulting from such infringement rests solely with you. If you wish to re-use a compo- nent of the work, it is your responsibility to determine whether permission is needed for that re-use and to obtain permission from the copyright owner. Examples of components can include, but are not lim- ited to, tables, figures, or images. All queries on rights and licenses should be addressed to the Publishing and Knowledge Division, The World Bank, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA; fax: 202-522-2625; e-mail: pubrights@worldbank.org. ISBN (paper): 978-1-4648-0410-6 ISBN (electronic): 978-1-4648-0411-3 DOI: 10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 Cover photo: © Thinkstock/Spectral-Design. Used with permission. Further permission required for reuse. Cover design: Debra Naylor, Naylor Design, Inc. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data has been requested Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 Contents Acknowledgments ix About the Authors xi Executive Summary xiii Abbreviations xvii Chapter 1 The Concept, Role, and Priorities of Smart Grids 1 Introduction: Smart Grids and Their Function 1 High-Level Description of a Smart Grid 3 Examples of Electric Utilities’ Smart Grid Road Maps 5 The Importance of Defining Priorities: Elements of a Road Map 10 Note 14 Chapter 2 The Evolution of Electric Distribution Systems 15 The Smart Grid in the Distribution Segment 15 The Traditional Distribution System and the System of the Future 16 Before the 1980s 17 The 1980s and Early 1990s 19 The Mid- to Late 1990s and Early 2000s 20 The Mid-2000s to the Present (the “Smart Grid Era”) 22 Chapter 3 Technology Innovations in Distribution Grids 25 Distribution System Monitoring and Control 25 Distribution Management Systems 26 Distribution Protection Systems 28 Volt/VAr Optimization 29 Intelligent Line Switching 32 Outage Management Systems 33 Management of Distributed Energy Resources 33 Demand Response 36 Data Analytics for Managing “Big Data” 36 Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy  v http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 vi Contents Chapter 4 Defining a Distribution-Level Grid Modernization Strategy and Investment Plan 39 Getting Started 39 Grid Modernization Levels 41 Grid Modernization Risks 61 Summary of Grid Modernization Projects 65 Defining a Smart Grid Investment Plan 74 Modernizing the Grid: Gradual Transitions versus Leapfrogging 80 Chapter 5 Regulatory and Financing Issues 85 Cost Recovery and Funding 85 Smart Grid Standards and Interoperability 87 Note 89 Chapter 6 Planning Practices to Further Benefit from Grid Modernization 91 DER Analysis (Steady-State and Dynamic Studies) 92 Advanced Distribution Automation and Reclosing 92 Sequential Simulation and Batch Processes 93 Advanced Distribution Reliability Modeling and Analysis 93 Interfacing with Utility Information Systems 93 Advanced Load Forecasting 94 PEV Modeling and Analysis 94 Joint Modeling of Transmission and Distribution Systems 95 Power Quality Modeling and Analysis 95 Advanced System Component Modeling 95 Appendix A More on Road Map Methodology Approaches 97 Sandia National Laboratory 97 Electric Power Research Institute 98 International Energy Agency 99 Appendix B Additional Examples of Road Maps from Electric Utilities 101 California Utilities: Pacific Gas and Electric 101 California Utility: San Diego Gas and Electric 103 U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology 103 Canada–Toronto Hydro-Electric System Ltd 104 China 105 Thailand: Provisional Electricity Authority 107 Ireland 108 France 109 Note 110 Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 Contents vii Appendix C Some Guidelines on the Cost-Benefit Analysis of Smart Grid Applications 111 Glossary 113 Bibliography 119 Box 1.1 Key Definitions 10 Figures 1.1 The Role of Smart Grids in the Overall Electricity Sector 3 1.2 Visualization of the Smart Grid by Pacific Gas and Electric 4 1.3 Smart Grid Drivers for More Developed and Developing Power Systems 6 1.4 The Strategic Framework of China’s Smart Grid 7 1.5 Toronto Hydro-Electric System Ltd.: A Smart Grid Road Map 8 1.6 Columbia’s Electricity Sector: A Road Map 9 1.7 Five Basic Steps in Defining Priorities of a Road Map 11 1.8 Smart Grid Vision and Pillars 13 2.1 Traditional Distribution System 16 2.2 Distribution System of the Future 17 2.3 Electromechanical Protective Relays and Meters 19 2.4 Substation SCADA System 20 2.5 Simple Loop Control System 21 2.6 SCADA “Rule-Based” Volt/VAr Control System 21 2.7 Advanced Model-Driven VVO System 23 2.8 High-Level DMS Configuration Block Diagram 24 3.1 Vision for Data Monitoring and Control 26 3.2 Conceptual DMS Architecture 27 3.3a Traditional Paper-Driven Control Center and Operator Console Design 27 3.3b Modern Computer-Based Control Center and Operator Console Design 27 3.4 Protection Relay and Controller Technologies 28 3.5 Reducing Technical Losses with Switched Capacitor Banks 30 3.6 Reducing the Voltage to Improve Efficiency 30 3.7 Energy Conservation and Peak Shaving Using Voltage Reduction 31 3.8 Automatic Service Restoration (FLISR) 32 3.9 Dynamic Voltage Fluctuations Caused by Solar PV 34 3.10 Voltage Fluctuations Associated with Solar PV 35 3.11 Volt/VAr Characteristic of a Smart Inverter 35 3.12 Demand Response Management System 37 4.1 The Basic Building Blocks of Grid Modernization 40 4.2 Level 0 Grid Modernization 43 Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 viii Contents 4.3 Standalone Local Controller Used for Volt/VAr Control 45 4.4 Impact of Voltage Upgrades on Losses 45 4.5 Impact of Load Balancing on Electrical Losses 47 4.6 Impact of Reverse Power Flow on Voltage Regulation 48 4.7 Level 1 Grid Modernization 48 4.8 A Modern IED-Based Substation 50 4.9 SCADA “Rule-Based” Approach 51 4.10 Level 2 Grid Modernization 54 4.11 Predictive Fault Location 56 4.12 Optimal Network Reconfiguration 57 4.13 Level 3 Grid Modernization 59 4.14 Flowchart for Creating an Investment Plan 75 A.1 EPRI Smart Grid Road Map Process 98 A.2 IEA Smart Grid Road Map Process 99 B.1 Pacific Gas and Electric’s Vision and Pillars of Action 102 B.2 SGCC’s Main Smart Grid Characteristics 106 Tables 1.1 A Smart Grid: Various Definitions 2 2.1 Modernizing the Distribution Grid: A Timeline 18 4.1 Level 1 Costs, Benefits, and Risks 53 4.2 Level 2 Benefits, Costs, and Risks 58 4.3 Level 3 Activities, Costs, Benefits, and Risks 62 4.4 Summary of Grid Modernization Projects (Level 0) 66 4.5 Summary of Grid Modernization Projects (Level 1) 68 4.6 Summary of Grid Modernization Projects (Level 2) 71 4.7 Summary of Grid Modernization Projects (Level 3) 73 B.1 SDG&E’s Deployment Plan: Pillars of Action 104 B.2 THESL’s Smart Grid Deployment Plan Phases and Pillars of Action 106 B.3 Provisional Electricity Authority’s Smart Grid Deployment Plan Phases and Pillars of Action 108 Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 Acknowledgments This book is a result of work by World Bank staff and consultants. The task team leader was Marcelino Madrigal (senior energy specialist, Sustainable Energy Department Energy unit [SEGEN]). The main contributors are Robert Uluski (Utility Integration Solutions Inc.) and Marcelino Madrigal. Contributions were provided also by Nader Farah (ESTA International, LLC). Silvia Martinez Romero and Almudena Mateos Merino (Energy Sector Management Assistance Program [ESMAP]) provided substantive support to the team. The authors give thanks to Thomas Nikolakakis (SEGEN) and Gunjan Gautam (consultant, SEGEN) for supporting the team. The work was informed by interactions with clients in the process of developing smart grid programs and capacity-building activities. The team thanks peer reviewers Waleed Saleh Alsuraih, Peter Johansen, and Makoto Takeuchi (World Bank). The work was conducted under the overall guidance of Vivien Foster (sector manager, SEGEN) and Rohit Khanna (program manager, ESMAP). The team thanks ESMAP for financial support provided for this work. Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy   ix http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 About the Authors Marcelino Madrigal is a senior energy specialist in the World Bank’s Energy and Extractives Global Practice. He has previously held positions at the Inter- American Development Bank and the Ministry of Energy, Energy Regulatory Commission, and Morelia Institute of Technology in Mexico. He holds a B.Sc., M.Sc., and Ph.D. in electrical engineering. His analytical work has focused on power system and markets’ operations, and planning. His regulatory, policy, and financing work has focused on transmission and distribution investments and regulation, cross-border trade and market design, electricity tariffs, and renew- able energy regulation and integration into the grids. Robert (Bob) Uluski has more than 35 years of electric utility experience, with a focus on planning and implementing distribution automation systems. He cur- rently leads the distribution automation and distribution management system consulting practice at Utility Integration Solutions and serves as an officer for the IEEE PES Working Group on smart distribution. In 2010, he was awarded IEEE’s Douglas M. Staszesky Distribution Automation Award for significant contribu- tions in the field of distribution automation. Mr. Uluski is a 1973 graduate of the University of Wisconsin with an MSEE degree in electric power systems. Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy   xi http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 Executive Summary There is no one definition of the smart grid concept. Instead, smart grids are defined differently around the world to reflect local requirements and goals. What is clear, however, is that the grids of today will not support the energy goals of the future. The integration of large shares of renewable energy, improve- ments in the reliability of services, and the achievement of higher levels of energy efficiency across the value chain will require power grids that are largely different from those of today. What Are Smart Grids and Why Are They Relevant to Utilities in All Countries? To support the policy goals of the energy sector, electricity grids require constant updates. The so-called “smart” grid should be understood as a conceptual vision of a grid that will enable the achievement of sector goals. Grid updates may be routine in nature or comprehensive, but they should always be carefully planned to align with sector goals. Planners would also do well to take note of interna- tional experience. In many cases, operators will be able to save significant time and money by understanding the lessons learned elsewhere around the globe. Necessary updates encompass grid modernization using conventional infra- structure as well as advanced digital information and telecommunication tech- nologies. Improvements in grid monitoring, protection, and control will enable the delivery of electricity services in a more efficient, reliable, and sustainable manner. The resulting smart grids are therefore key to achieving sustainability goals in the power sector. Both the “soft” and “hard” components of grids need be modernized to enable the integration of renewable energy resources, facilitate more active consumer participation, and improve the quality of services and the resiliency of grids in varied and challenging operational environments. The soft components relate to operational rules and regulations that support grid operation and development. The hard components involve the grid infrastructure itself and the introduction of new control and communication technologies. The concept of the smart grid is relevant to any grid regardless of its stage of development. What varies are the magnitude and type of the incremental steps Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy   xiii http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 xiv Executive Summary toward modernization that will be required to achieve a specific smart grid vision. For instance, a grid that intends to integrate 40 percent of renewables will require different modernization steps from a grid that plans to integrate a small- er amount of renewables but also improve its reliability. What Can Utilities Do to Define Their Smart Grid Vision and Plans? Defining a smart grid vision that is aligned with broader power sector goals is key to determining which modernization steps should be taken. The current state of the grid, the desired vision, and available technologies—properly prioritized by their costs, benefits, and risks—should then be used to define the incremental steps needed to move forward. This document provides some practical guidance on how utilities can define their own smart grid vision, identify priorities, and structure investment plans. While most of these strategic aspects apply to any area of the electricity grid (transmission, distribution, off grid), the document focuses on the segment of distribution. The guidance includes key building blocks that are needed to modernize the distribution grid. One such block is the intelligent electronic device (IED) that, when installed in substations and feeder locations, will enable the electric distri- bution utility to visualize and control the electric distribution system in ways that were not possible with previous-generation electromechanical devices. Another key building block is a two-way communication network that will enable the electric distribution utility to monitor and control the performance of its electric distribution assets from its headquarters or a distribution control center. How Can Smart Grids Benefit the Distribution Sector? Smart grids impact electric distribution systems significantly and sometimes more than any other part of the electric power grid. At many electric utilities, the operation of the electric distribution system is being transformed from mostly manual, paper-driven business processes through the introduction of electronic, computer-assisted decision making. Advances in control and communication technology now permit the automatic or semi-automatic and remote operation of distribution equipment and facilities that in the past could only be operated manually. In developing countries, modernizing the distribution grid promises to benefit the operation of electric distribution utilities in many and various ways. These benefits include improved operational efficiency (reduced losses, lower energy consumption, and so on), reduced electrical demand during peak load periods, better overall service reliability, and ability to accommodate additional distrib- uted generating resources without adversely impacting overall power quality. Benefits of distribution grid modernization also include improved asset utiliza- tion (allowing operators to “squeeze” more capacity out of existing assets) and Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 Executive Summary xv workforce productivity improvement. These benefits can provide more than enough monetary gain for electric utility stakeholders in developing countries to offset the cost of grid modernization. Some of these core smart grid benefits may be achieved by electric distribu- tion utilities that have not, as yet, advanced very far in their process of grid modernization. For example, lowering the voltage set point on an existing elec- tromechanical voltage regulator can reduce electrical demand and improve the overall efficiency of the distribution system. Which Funding and Regulatory Issues Should Be Taken into Consideration? The amount of effort and investment needed to accomplish a high level of grid modernization depends upon the current level of modernization, which can range from having manual control only (no automation at all) to fully automated control and continuous monitoring of all available distribution assets. Four levels of grid modernization are outlined in this report. The guidance suggests how electric utilities in developing countries can progress from their current level of grid modernization to an advanced level, and identifies projects that may be accomplished at each level to achieve valuable benefits such as higher efficiency, lower demand, improved reliability, better ability to accommodate distributed generation (including distributed renewables), and improved asset utilization overall. The report also provides examples of grid modernization projects and explains the potential benefits that can be achieved (in monetary terms) for a given investment range. Importantly, a utility that is at a relatively low level of grid modernization may “leapfrog” across one or more levels of modernization to achieve some of the benefits offered by the highest levels of grid modernization. Finally, the report describes some funding and regulatory issues that may need to be taken into account when developing smart grid plans. Traditional capital investment plants in the power sector need be informed and complemented by the costs and funding requirements of appropriate levels of grid modernization. With regard to funding, the report suggests that some level of modernization should always be part of utilities’ capital expenditure programs. Only higher levels of modernization that use untested technologies or will radically transform a grid’s business bottom line may require special regulatory treatment. Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 Abbreviations AMI advanced metering infrastructure AMR automatic meter reading BESS Battery Energy Storage Systems CBA cost-benefit analysis CES community energy storage CFL compact fluorescent lamp CHP combined heat and power C&I commercial and industrial CICS Customer Information Control System ckm circuit kilometer (used for transmission and distribution line) CPP critical peak pricing CPUC California Public Utilities Commission CVR conservation voltage reduction DA distribution automation DER distributed energy resource DG distributed generation DLC direct load control DMS distribution management system DOE U.S. Department of Energy DR demand response DSCADA distribution supervisory control and data acquisition DSM demand side management ECIS energy, climate, and infrastructure security EE energy efficiency EEGI European Electricity Grid Initiative EMS energy management system ENS energy not supplied EPRI Electric Power Research Institute ES energy storage Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy   xvii http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 xviii Abbreviations ESB Electricity Supply Board EV electrical vehicle FACTS flexible AC transmission system FAN field area network FCI faulted circuit indicator FERC Federal Energy Regulatory Commission FLISR fault location isolation and service restoration GHG greenhouse gas GIS geographic information system HVAC central heating, ventilation, and air conditioning IEA International Energy Agency IED intelligent electronic device IHM in-home display IP Internet Protocol IPP independent power producer ISGAN International Smart Grid Network ISO independent system operator IT Information technology IVR interactive voice response LAN local area network LDC line drop compensation LED light-emitting diode LTC load tap changer LTV load to voltage MEF Major Economies Forum NEETRAC National Electric Energy Testing Research and Applications Center NGO nongovernmental organization NIST National Institute of Standards and Technology NNSA National Nuclear Security Administration OECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development OLPF on-line power flow OMS outage management system ONR optimal network reconfiguration OPGW optical ground wire PEV plug-in electric vehicle PMU phasor measurement unit PNNL Pacific Northwest National Labs PV photovoltaic Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 Abbreviations xix R&D research and development RES renewable energy source RTO regional transmission organization RTP real time pricing RTU remote terminal unit SAIDI System Average Interruption Duration Index SAIFI System Average Interruption Frequency Index SCADA Supervisory control and data acquisition SDG&E San Diego Gas and Electric Company SG smart grid SGCC State Grid Corporation of China SGIP Smart Grid Interoperability Panel SNL Sandia National Laboratories SOM switch order management STATCOM static synchronous compensator SVC static VAr compensator THD total harmonic distortion THESL Toronto Hydro-Electric System Ltd. TLM transformer load management TOU time of use UHV ultrahigh voltage UISOL utility integration solutions VVO volt/VAr optimization WAN wide area network Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 CHAPTER 1 The Concept, Role, and Priorities of Smart Grids Introduction: Smart Grids and Their Function As the energy industry embraces the concept of smart grids and the benefits they can offer to the environment, consumers, utilities, grid operators, and other stakeholders, it is essential that well-designed plans be developed to ensure the successful materialization of smart grid goals and objectives. The smart grid is variously defined to reflect specific requirements and needs around the globe. A number of organizations and governments have published their own definitions (table 1.1), including characteristics and objec- tives. Developing a clear vision is very important in the planning process. Regardless of the country context or overall level of development, grid mod- ernization promises to help electric distribution utilities achieve many catego- ries of benefits and solutions to core business problems. Such benefits include improved efficiency by reducing electrical losses (technical and nontechnical) and promoting energy conservation, reduced electrical demand during peak load periods, improved reliability, better utilization of existing assets, and more effective integration of a high penetration of distributed generation with vari- able output. With a smart grid in place, customers will be better informed and may receive incentives to voluntarily modify their energy consumption pat- terns as needed to help address the utility company’s operational problems from the demand side. Some of the core benefits may be achieved by electric distribution utilities that are just starting to modernize their grid. For example, lowering the volt- age set point on an existing electromechanical voltage regulator can reduce electrical demand and improve the overall efficiency of the distribution system. While there is no common definition of a smart grid, there is a clear consensus that the grids of today will not be able to meet the energy demands of the future. Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy  1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 2 The Concept, Role, and Priorities of Smart Grids Table 1.1  A Smart Grid: Various Definitions The Smart Grid European Technology Platform The U.S. Department of Energy The Smart Grid European Technology Platform defines In the U.S. Department of Energy definition, a smart grid a smart grid as an electricity network that can intel- uses digital technology to modernize the electric ligently integrate the actions of all users connected system—from large generation, through the delivery sys- to it—generators, consumers, and those that do tems to electricity consumption—and is defined by seven both—to efficiently deliver sustainable, economic, enabling performance-based functionalities: and secure electricity supply. • Customer participation • Integration of all generation and storage options • New markets and operations • Power quality for the twenty-first century • Asset optimization and operational efficiency • Self-healing from disturbances • Resiliency against attacks and disasters The World Economic Forum The International Energy Agency (IEA) The World Economic Forum defines the smart grid by The International Energy Agency (IEA) states that a smart key characteristics: grid is an electricity network that uses digital and other • Self-healing and resilient advanced technologies to monitor and manage the trans- • Integrating advanced and low-carbon technologies port of electricity from all generation sources to meet the • Asset optimization and operational efficiency varying electricity demands of end-users. Smart grids co- • Inclusion ordinate the needs and capabilities of all generators, grid • Heightened power quality operators, end-users, and electricity market stakeholders • Market empowerment to operate all parts of the system as efficiently as possible, minimizing costs and environmental impacts while maxi- mizing system reliability, resilience, and stability. Source: World Bank compilation. A smart grid is an enabler of overall energy sector objectives and should not be viewed in isolation. Figure 1.1 outlines the role of a smart grid within sample policy and regulatory requirements. For example, an overall energy goal might be to reduce fossil-fuel consumption. One way to reduce fossil-fuel consumption is through the introduction of renewable energy (such as solar or wind energy) in the power sector. Some renewable sources may require special policy support mechanisms such as economic incentives, technology-specific auctions, feed-in tariffs, or others. To ensure that these sources are reliably and efficiently integrat- ed, the power grid will need to be “smarter” as the share of these sources grows in the grid, that is, a smart grid is needed to implement higher-level policy goals. The integration of larger shares of renewables requires better grids, new technologies, and regulations such as interconnection performance requirements. Without these transformations the grid will be a barrier to achieving sector goals. A smart grid is therefore a conceptual goal whose achievement will require continuous grid modernization through the use of conventional and advanced digital technologies. Better monitoring, protection, and control of the grid will in turn enable the delivery of electricity services in a more efficient, reliable, and sustainable manner. Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 The Concept, Role, and Priorities of Smart Grids 3 Figure 1.1  The Role of Smart Grids in the Overall Electricity Sector Sectorwide Policies Power Sector Goals Reduce Fuel Increase Energy Consumption Efficiency and the Share of Smart Grid Road Map Renewable Sources Monitoring, Awareness, Smarter Metering, Forecasting, and Ensure Supply Expand Intelligent Integration Security and Generation and Restoration … of Renewables… Reliability Grid Capacity Source: World Bank. Smart grids incorporate technology that computerizes the electric utility grid to enable digital communication among grid components. For example, in conventional grids, utilities have to send workers out to read meters, measure voltage, and gather other types of useful data. In a smart grid, the components of the grid—variable and thermal generators, loads, wires, substations, trans- formers, even consumer appliances—have integrated sensors that carry data as well as two-way communication capabilities between the device and the util- ity’s operations center. That way the utility can adjust and control each device or millions of devices from a central location. High-Level Description of a Smart Grid Each individual smart grid of the future will encompass different goals, expecta- tions, and assumptions. The grid is a very complex arrangement of infrastructure that interacts with natural laws. Its functioning depends on a large number of interconnected elements (monitoring, control, protection, telecommunications). A simplified way to visualize a smart grid is to think of it having four major layers (as illustrated in figure 1.2): • “Hard” infrastructure, or all the physical components of the grid, such as the generation, transmission, and distribution assets that produce, transport, and deliver energy to consumers. This includes all generation technologies as well as energy storage facilities. • Telecommunications, that is, all communications services that enable appli- cations to monitor, protect, and control the grid. This includes all forms of communication from wide area networks, field area networks, home area networks, and local area networks. Technologies encompass telephony, opti- cal fiber, leased lines, wireless communications, mesh radio, WiFi, and others. Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 4 The Concept, Role, and Priorities of Smart Grids Figure 1.2  Visualization of the Smart Grid by Pacific Gas and Electric Dashboards and Analytics Smart Grid Applications Layer Electric Vehicle Integration Distributed Generation Renewable Integration Micro-Grid Integration Energy Mgmt Systems Billing and Settlement Outage Management Power Quality Mgmt Condition Based AM Market Transactions Demand Response HAN Enablement T&D Automation Fault Prediction Variable Pricing Energy Storage DR Integration Grid E ciency Load Control Integrated Cyber Security Smart Energy Markets Smart Utilities Engaged Consumers Management Data Data Management and Integration Communications LAN WAN FAN/AMI HAN Layer Local Area Network Wide Area Network Field Area Network Home Area Network (Utility enterprise (Cellular (2G/3G), private wireless, (RF mesh, RF point to multipoint, (WiFi, ZigBee, HomePlug, network) backhaul, satellite, BPL, WiMax) WIMAX, ber, BPL/PLC) 6LoWPAN, Z-Wave) Network Gateway Smart Meter Physical Security Infrastructure Energy Generation Transmission Substation Distribution Home/building Distributed Generation and Storage Source: PG&E 2011. Note: HAN = Home Area Network. • Data—with the abundance of data and information across various levels, data management techniques are necessary to ensure proper data mining and uti- lization of data to facilitate smart grid applications. The smart grid has given rise to collections of data sets so large and complex (also known as “big data”) that it becomes difficult to process this information using available database management tools. Newly developed data-processing tools (grid analytics) permit utilities to analyze large volumes of information that will help im- prove the performance of the electric distribution system. • Applications, or the tools and software technologies that use and process in- formation collected from the grid to monitor it, protect and control the hard infrastructure layer, and reinforce the grid to allow the participation of all forms of renewable energy. These are the tools and applications that enable the electric distribution utility to optimize the performance of the electric system and derive significant benefits, including the provision of solutions to core business problems. Two aims are to promote more efficient energy use among consumers and to make more efficient use of grid infrastructure. Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 The Concept, Role, and Priorities of Smart Grids 5 Elements of these four layers are combined to create grid features that improve the grid’s ability to achieve certain goals, such as integrating more renewables, improving reliability, and further reducing energy consumption among all elements of the grid, including the consumer. Deciding which specific application is required to achieve the smart grid vision is an important part of the planning process. For example, if reliability is an issue at the distribution level, these layers should be combined to produce better automation of the grid and to reduce fault numbers and durations. If there is a need to implement better pricing (for example, time of use or real time) to incentivize consumers to use energy more efficiently or to control nonpaid energy, the grid may need better meters (smart meters) that can track hourly consumption and can collect such data remotely for more efficient billing. A grid that will integrate large shares of solar power at the distribution level may need better monitoring and grid regulations to ensure that distribution generation does not impact grid reliability negatively and that the expected performance is achieved. Since there is an unlimited number of potential applications that combine features of these four layers of the grid to improve performance, it is very impor- tant that priorities are defined. A smart grid vision, which will further develop into specific applications and investments, needs to follow from clearly defined energy sector goals. A popular industry approach to developing smart grid plans involves the development of road (route) maps that (i) facilitate understanding and coopera- tion among the many stakeholders in the smart grid arena; (ii) identify the vision for a particular smart grid as well as the pillars to support this vision; (iii) estab- lish milestones with actionable policy, regulatory, and technology elements; and (iv) define metrics to measure success. This chapter will describe some elements that can be used in general (for any sector, such as transmission and distribution) to define such priorities and meet specific grid challenges. Examples of Electric Utilities’ Smart Grid Road Maps Utilities structure their vision of a smart grid around specific challenges. An international survey carried out in 2010 (figure 1.3) shows that drivers for countries with more developed power grids (including policy and regulation)— such as Canada and the countries of Europe and Oceania—place higher emphasis on the integration of renewable energy, demand response manage- ment, environmental concerns, and enabling consumer participation and choices. Most other countries focus on the basics of improving reliability, restoring power, improving revenue collection, and reducing losses. Some driv- ers were equally important for all the countries, independent of their power sector development stage, such as reducing operating and maintenance costs and improving power quality. It is likely, therefore, that the smart grid vision for each of these countries should be different. Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 6 The Concept, Role, and Priorities of Smart Grids Figure 1.3  Smart Grid Drivers for More Developed and Developing Power Systems Enabling customer choice and participation New/improved services for customers Improve revenue collection and assurance Welfare of the community Environmental concerns Government incentives Regulatory compliance Concerns with aging workforce Reducing human factors/error Labor saving Reducing operating & maintenance costs Concerns with aging infrastructure Aging infrastructure/Better asset utilization Constraints for network/grid improvements Significant increases in energy demand Power quality improvement Reducing technical losses Reliability improvements Improve power system restoration Energy supply constraints/security Enhanced network resiliency to natural and… Micro grid developments Integration of distributed energy resource New technology advances/leapfrogging Increase in electric and hybrid vehicles Improve enterprise solution coordination Energy e ciency Integration of renewable energy Demand (Load) response & management Technology development and export 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Percent Other Regions Canada/Europe/Oceania Source: ESTA Survey on International Smart Grid Drivers, http://www.estainternational.com/ESTA/Home.html. Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 The Concept, Role, and Priorities of Smart Grids 7 The following subsections summarize the main pillars of the smart grid visions in several utilities in select countries. Appendix B describes road maps from other countries and utilities in more detail. China State Transmission Grid The State Grid Corporation of China (SGCC) is the power transmission entity serving the electricity sector throughout most of China, and has focused its smart grid vision on the development of a “strong and smart” grid based on an ultrahigh voltage (UHV) grid backbone to optimize energy resources alloca- tion, improve clean energy access, and meet power demand growth. The SGCC-proposed UHV grid backbone is coordinating the development of sub- ordinate grids at all levels; each is based on information technology (IT), auto- mated, and interactive. Figure 1.4 shows the strategic road map proposed by the SGCC. This comprises the definition of a goal, guidelines for the technology and management ­ of assets, development phases (pilot, rollout, assessment, and improvement), ­ systems, features (characteristics), and domains of action. Canada-Toronto Hydro-Electric System Ltd. The Toronto Hydro-Electric System Ltd. (THESL) approach to smart grid development and long-term plans is depicted in figure 1.5. It is a 25-year road Figure 1.4  The Strategic Framework of China’s Smart Grid One Goal With a grid as the backbone network, and coordinated development of subordinate grids at all levels. Two Technology: IT-Based, Automated, Interactive Guidelines Management: Conglomerated, Intensive, Streamlined, Standardized 2009 10: Planning and Pilot 2011 15: Roll-out Construction Three 2016 20: Improvement Phases Grid Infrastructure, Technical Support, Smart Application, Standard and Code Four Systems Strong and Reliable, Economic and E cient, Clean and Environment-Friendly, Transparent and Open, Friendly and Interactive Five Features Six Generation, Transmission, Transformation, Distribution, Domains Consumption, and Dispatching Source: Developing Strong and Smart Grid: The Best Practice of State Grid Corporation of China, SGCC, 2010. Note: UHV = ultrahigh voltage; IT = information technology. Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 8 The Concept, Role, and Priorities of Smart Grids Figure 1.5  Toronto Hydro-Electric System Ltd.: A Smart Grid Road Map 3 Years 3−10 Years 10−25 Years Smart Grid Vision Bidirectional Energy High Penetration of Decentralized Energy Fault Participatory Climate Protection Power Flow Storage Distributed Energy and Intelligence Anticipation Network Distributed Energy Electric Vehicle Adaptive Line Loss Fully Electrified Microgrid Interface to Grid Protection Minimization Transportation Distributed Energy Phase Distribution Energy Connection Process Balancing Management System Integrated Demand Wide Area Real-Time Network Integrated Volt/var Network Offers Network Simulation Control Optimization Smart Smart Cyber Identity And Access Real-Time Condition- Power Quality Homes Appliances Security Management Based Maintenance Management Energy Pattern Advanced Asset Asset Management Recognition Management Decision Support Home Area Online Call Feeder Station Network Service-Oriented Mobile Network Centre Automation Automation Automation Architecture Computing Self-Healing Integrated Outage Communicating Theft of Power Smart Conservation and In-Home Grid Management Fault Indicators Detection Sensors Demand Management Displays Smart Advanced Metering Transformer Smart Power Line Vault Web Home Energy And Meters Infrastructure Metering Metering Monitoring Services Carbon Management Current State Energy Security Customer Satisfaction Source: Smart Grid Plan Toronto Hydro. map that is expected to be completed in three phases. The vision includes three targets: energy security, increased customer satisfaction, and climate protection. The pillars include fully electrified transportation, the creation of microgrids, and the adding of distributed power, among others. Colombia Electricity Sector The Colombian approach to smart grid development and long-term plans ­ is depicted in figure 1.6. The vision includes clearly defined goals such as increased security, efficiency, reliability, profitability, and environmental quality. The baseline, challenges, and actions to be taken (pillars) have been identified. The focus areas in transmission include increased cooperation with neigh- boring countries, the use of phasor measurement units (PMUs) to improve system monitoring, and overall reliability. On the consumer side, demand-side management and home area networks are included as potential areas of action. On the “soft” side, the plan identifies needs to improve some regulations and work on human resources development. The common elements of these road maps include a clear vision of the objectives being pursued and the areas or pillars of action, and a description of ­ some of the specific actions that will be pursued to modernize the grid. Some Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 The Concept, Role, and Priorities of Smart Grids 9 Figure 1.6  Columbia’s Electricity Sector: A Road Map Current Situation Current situation • Energetic basket • Service coverage • Advanced measurement • Distribution efficiency • • • • Metrics Energetic intensity Number of agents Electrical energy tariff CO2 emissions • Electrical energy/total energy • Reliability • Generation efficiency • Electrical system efficiency • Efficiency label • Transmission efficiency • Asset management • Demand response • Regulatory support Challenges Supports • Energetic efficiency • Energy security • ITCs support • Reliability • Human resources support Vision Develop, operate, and maintain an electric power and energy system in a more secure, e cient, reliable, economic, and environment-friendly form, taking care of the requirements de ning quantitatively and by quality the electric energy supply of an active demand. Objectives Take infrastructure decisions Evolve the consumer to a To plan, develop, operate, and according with the Asset proactive participant in the Improve the efficiency maintain the electric power system Ensure the energy Management criteria to ensure a electrical business, be aware of his in the entire value based on high-reliability criteria, security for the correct use of the assets characteristics and allowing for chain implementing the technological country development conditions maximizing their them to have a structured decision developments capabilities. power Focus Areas Transmission Distribution Generation Consumer Supports • PMUs • Infrastructure • Renewable generation • Home area networks • Regulatory support: • Power electronics development • Centralized generation • Demands-side regulation, • New asset technologies • Flexible network with • Market management: environmental • Advanced operation power electronics • Energetic efficiency regulation, • Smart operation • Electric vehicles standardization • Technical support: communications, information systems • Human resources: future companies, training, I+D+I Source: Aldana and others 2011. road maps include pillars of action for other institutions, or the enabling regula- tory aspects that need to be developed to pursue some of the actions. The following sections provide some guidance on the process of structuring a road map (and investment plan) for smart grids in the distribution sector. Understanding the drivers behind smart grids is key, as is formulating individual visions. Based on global experience and the key concepts discussed earlier, the following section provides further guidance on preparing smart grid road maps and investment plants. Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 10 The Concept, Role, and Priorities of Smart Grids The Importance of Defining Priorities: Elements of a Road Map Smart grid planners should follow the step-by-step procedures necessary to develop a holistic smart grid road map that clearly responds to sector goals (see box 1.1). A road map is a detailed description of actions to be taken by regula- tors, utilities, countries, or regions embarking on smart grid programs. Once a smart grid road map is prepared and approved by stakeholders, it will form the foundation for all future smart grid activities. It should be complemented by detailed implementation plans to realize the ultimate smart grid vision. Box 1.1  Key Definitions Road map A specialized type of strategic plan that outlines activities an ­ organization can undertake over specified time frames to achieve stated goals and outcomes Road mapping The evolving process by which a road map is created, implemented, monitored, and updated as necessary Setting a vision The process of analyzing future scenarios and identifying objectives Stakeholders Relevant individuals who have an interest in seeing the road map developed and implemented, such as representatives from the industry, ­ government, academia, and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) Implementation The process of putting a road map into action, by carrying out projects and initiatives that address road map tasks and priorities, and ­ ­ onitoring progress using a tracking system. by m With the global focus on strategies to develop smarter energy grids, many enti- ties at the national, regional, and local levels are developing plans to capitalize on the benefits that a smarter grid can provide to its stakeholders. A key element of the successful deployment of a technology initiative, such as a smart grid, is the development of a strategic road map. A road map (i) brings to focus the interest of stakeholders into a succinct plan, (ii) sets a vision, (iii) identifies technology needs, (iv) supports better investment decisions, and (v) provides a timeline for achieving goals. The development of a road map—also known as road mapping—is an evo- lutionary process. Road maps must be reviewed and updated regularly to meet changes in requirements, reflect advancements in technology, correlate with workforce development, reflect time constraints, and harmonize with budget- ary constraints. There are many stakeholders in the energy industry, each with special per- spectives on the industry and its services. These stakeholders may include gov- ernmental bodies; regulatory entities; utilities for generation, transmission, and distribution of electricity; independent power producers; merchant transmission companies; industrial complexes; residential, industrial, and commercial Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 The Concept, Role, and Priorities of Smart Grids 11 consumers; technology firms; research organizations; academia; and others. It is important to leverage the knowledge of all stakeholders to develop an all-encom- passing and holistic plan. A review of available literature and the road maps developed by several utili- ties reveals there are several key steps involved in preparing a smart grid road map. Appendix A contains an overview of various road mapping methodologies that have been proposed by organizations such as the International Energy Agency (IEA), the U.S. Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), and the U.S. Sandia National Laboratories (SNL). It is important to mention that smart grid road maps may have various scopes. For example, a road map could be for an entire vertically integrated utility, a transmission company, or a broader country plan where other industrial policy objectives are involved. Figure 1.7 shows some of the basic steps involved in defining the priorities of a road map. Figure 1.7 Five Basic Steps in Defining Priorities of a Road Map Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Establish Establish Establish Propose Develop Vision and Timeline Pillars of Technology Metrics and Identify and Goals for Action and Functional Monitoring Pillars Each Phase Applications 1. Vision statement. The long-term vision for smart grids is established based on energy sector goals. Key roles and responsibilities of actors are defined. 2. Definition of a timeline. The timeline for achieving the smart grid vision is es- tablished—it may be incremental and in phases. Each phase has clear objec- tives and goals. 3. Pillars of action. Based on the vision of the road map, the key pillars of action are established. The current baseline is reviewed to ­leverage achievements and current assets to estimate the ­additional effort needed. Risks, costs, and poten- tial barriers are analyzed. 4. Technology and functional applications. Policies, regulations, and technology for each time period and each pillar are suggested. The challenges associated with smart grid implementation are also addressed. 5. Metrics and monitoring. Performance metrics are developed to measure the success of smart grid implementation. Step 1: The Smart Grid Vision Statement and the Importance of Governance A vision statement is a succinct articulation of the goals and objectives of a smart grid for the nation or the entity engaged in smart grid implementation. The vision Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 12 The Concept, Role, and Priorities of Smart Grids is established by reviewing overall long-term objectives at a national, regional, local, or company level. Examples of broad government objectives for the power sector may include the following: • Active participation by consumers • 25 percent of renewable generation by 2020 • 20 percent reduction in carbon footprint • 20 percent energy-efficiency gains among all classes of consumers • Development of new products, services, and markets (workforce development) • Improved financial health of utilities • Increased reliability and efficiency of electricity transmission and distribution. This vision will form the basis and foundation for all smart grid pillars and activities. Deploying smart grids at the utilitywide level or in specific segments of the sector will require proper coordination of actors. Some form of governance should be established to structure the vision and the rest of the components in a road map. Establishing a steering committee and technical groups is common while developing a road map. Step 2: Establishing a Timeline The smart grid is a concept that should be implemented in phases to allow for refinement and to ensure that the modernization activities with the highest ben- efits are implemented first. Different phases can be identified, and ideally will follow the general timelines set for overall sector or company goals. Actions that can immediately render benefits should be included in the short-term; medium-, and long-term projects include smart grid applications that require feedback from previous phases or actions supporting long-term goals. Not all actions should be performed at the same time, and not all grids require the same level of modernization. Step 3: Pillars of Action A smart grid enables the achievement of a stated vision and objectives. It is convenient to define a pillar that supports each of the vision elements. These pillars will help identify the potential actions to improve the grid. Figure 1.8 provides an example of how each vision objective may be transformed into a pillar. This includes, for example, the objective of managing a certain percent- age of renewables; as a pillar, this will support energy efficiency goals. In devel- oping countries, where demand continues to grow and reliability continues to lag behind, the smart grid vision will most likely include improving grid reli- ability. As such, a pillar of the smart grid plan should include all the actions that can help improve reliability. Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 The Concept, Role, and Priorities of Smart Grids 13 Figure 1.8 Smart Grid Vision and Pillars SMART GRID VISION Increased reliability 20% energy efficiency and efficiency of 25% of renewable gains among all classes electricity transmission Consumer generation by 2020 of consumers and distribution empowerment • Add distributed PV • Implement DSM • Integrate DA • Implement DSM and wind • Integrate • Create microgrids • Implement TOU • Add large scale PV distributed and • Integrate distributed • Implement RTP and wind bulk renewable generation • Implement CPP • Take actions to production • Integrate distributed • Implement DLC increase grid • Integrate AMI storage flexibility • Integrate AMI • Integrate AMI (implement faster • Integrate energy energy markets, • Develop grid markets DSM, add energy standards storage, etc) Source: World Bank. Note: PV = photovoltaic; DSM = demand-side management; AMI = advanced metering infrastructure; DA = distribution automation; TOU = time of use; RTP = real-time pricing; CPP = critical peak pricing; DLC = direct load control; RES = renewable energy source. Step 4: Technologies and Functional Applications Deciding which technologies or functions will be deployed in each pillar requires assessing which of these applications—or their combination—have the best chances of achieving a given goal. This is perhaps the most complex step in defining the priorities of a road map. This step requires knowing the state of the ­ grid, identifying the gaps and potential technologies to improve its performance, analyzing if such applications are cost-effective, making sure risks are identified, and highlighting potential barriers (for example, regulatory) to effective imple- mentation. Not all applications need to be advanced in nature; some applications, already commercially viable and tested in other places, may not need any special regulatory treatment. Some approaches to identifying applications in each pillar are as follows: 1. Gap analysis. Using future goals, the smart grid vision, and the pillars, a gap analysis is conducted to identify the missing or incomplete components be- tween the current baseline and future targets. For example, if a future goal calls Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 14 The Concept, Role, and Priorities of Smart Grids for reducing the duration of outages in a year, it becomes necessary to identify the actions that are needed to achieve this (for example, automatic reclosing, and tree trimming). Another example may include the necessary actions to mit- igate the complexities of the significant penetration of distributed generation. 2. Cost-benefit analysis. This analysis will help identify a high-level estimated cost of the actions necessary to mitigate the gaps identified in the gap analysis. What costs are associated with the various pillars—for example, improving the financial health of a utility? Do the benefits of an application outweigh its costs? 3. Risk analysis. This analysis helps identify the risks associated with taking or not taking a particular action. For example, does infrastructure require an upgrade to meet technology needs, or are there any capacity-building or train- ing needs to deploy a given technology? 4. Highlighting barriers. This analysis identifies the barriers that must be over- come. These may relate to policy, regulations, technology, human resources, finances, and so on. Step 5: Metrics and Monitoring If the smart grid is to meet sector objectives, it is important to monitor perfor- mance metrics. Examples of such metrics include reliability improvements and reduced outage periods (improved System Average Interruption Duration Index and System Average Interruption Frequency Index),1 the percentage of demand response achieved, the amount of renewable generation connected to the grid, jobs created, and so on. Metrics should be used to monitor progress and to evalu- ate when corrective actions or modifications to the plan may be needed. The following chapters in this report will provide further information on how to deploy such procedures in the distribution segment. An important step is defining technologies and functional applications relevant to distribution. The next chapters provide background on how the distribution segment has evolved over time; describe some of the new technologies available in the distribution segment; and, last, outline a procedure for selecting options in a plan. Note 1. System Average Interruption Duration Index and System Average Interruption Frequency Index. Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 CHAPTER 2 The Evolution of Electric Distribution Systems The Smart Grid in the Distribution Segment Grid modernization (to achieve the so-called smart grid) impacts electric distri- bution systems more than any other part of the electric power grid. At many electric utilities, the operation of the electric distribution system is being trans- formed from mostly manual, paper-driven business processes through the intro- duction of electronic, computer-assisted decision making. Advances in control and communication technology now permit the automatic or semi-automatic and remote operation of distribution equipment and facilities that in the past could only be operated manually. Electric distribution utilities have always focused on maintaining “acceptable” conditions out on the distribution feeders. Goals included the following: • Maintain safe conditions for the electric utility workforce and the general public. • Minimize electrical losses on the electric distribution system. This is an espe- cially important objective for electric distribution utilities in developing countries that experience high levels of electrical losses, including both tech- nical (I2R) losses and nontechnical losses (energy theft and unmetered loads). • Protect the electric distribution assets from potentially damaging short circuit currents and voltage surges and sags. • Maintain voltage within established limits (typically nominal voltage, plus or minus 5 percent) for all customers at all times under all loading conditions. • Ensure that the loading of all electrical equipment is well within the estab- lished thermal ratings of the individual devices (often device loading has been limited to half of what the device is physically able to carry). • Ensure reliability of the service—that is, limit interruptions and their severity. Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy   15 http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 16 The Evolution of Electric Distribution Systems All of the above goals continue to be fundamental and essential operating requirements. But today’s electric distribution utilities are seeking to make distri- bution system operation even more efficient and reliable—and improve asset utilization—without compromising safety and the protection of distribution assets. Utility companies are also seeking to accommodate new distributed gen- erators that are powered by clean and renewable energy resources (wind power, solar power, and so on), and to empower end-use customers to make informed decisions about their energy usage. The Traditional Distribution System and the System of the Future The electric distribution system has undergone significant changes over the years. This chapter identifies the changes that have occurred in terms of the level of staffed operation; operating objectives; monitoring and control capabilities; and protection, automation, control, and back-office commercial and technical man- agement systems. The next sections describe the ways distribution systems have changed on a decade-by-decade basis. Not all electric utilities have moved for- ward with these grid modernization efforts at the same pace, however. While many utility companies have moved forward over the decades in the ways described in the following sections (see figure 2.2), some electric utilities con- tinue to rely on mostly manual paper-driven processes, and have yet to deploy the intelligent electronic devices (IEDs) and communication facilities needed for grid modernization (see figure 2.1). As a result, the short-term vision and strate- gic road map for grid modernization will differ for each utility. The progression of electric utility distribution grid modernization over the years is outlined in the following sections. Key aspects of electric utility opera- tions are identified during each time period—for purposes of comparison—in the Figure 2.1  Traditional Distribution System Substation Source: World Bank. Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 The Evolution of Electric Distribution Systems 17 Figure 2.2  Distribution System of the Future Biogas Digesters Microgrid CBS IHD REIT Electric transportation Flow Battery RES EMS CES Feeder EV improvements: Impact Substation CVR/VVO, ASR Simply Sunverge Smart Thermostats Solar DMS, DRMS, AMI, MDMS, AOS, & OMS upgrades/installs Smart Appliances Partner Projects Smart EVSE Charging EMS Advanced lighting CEIT Source: World Bank. following categories: overall level of automation, distribution protection and control, power-generating sources, level of centralized management and control, and the end-use customer. Table 2.1 summarizes the progression of key elements of distribution grid modernization over the years. Before the 1980s Before the 1980s, most electric utilities had very little or no automation and remote monitoring and control on their electric distribution system. Distribution protection, control, and metering (including end-use customer revenue meter- ing) were handled by electromechanical devices. Figure 2.3 shows electrome- chanical devices that are typical of this era. These electromechanical devices performed their basic functions well but did not support automation, remote monitoring, and remote control. As a result, electric utilities were required to travel to the device location to retrieve information and perform maintenance and diagnostic activities. To reduce travel costs, many electric distribution substa- tions were permanently staffed during this period to prepare log sheets, conduct routine inspections, and respond as quickly as possible to distribution outages. Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 Table 2.1  Modernizing the Distribution Grid: A Timeline 18 Mid 2000s to present Before 1980 1980s and early 1990s Mid 1990s to early 2000s (the "smart grid" era) Overall Level of Some manned substations Unmanned substations; some increased Some feeder automation; ­ Growing level of feeder automation; most Automation — No remote monitoring substation SCADA substation SCADA substations automated and control Distirbution System Manual handwritten log Limited information such as Near-real time information provided Many new information sources of near real monitoring and sheets at major substa- ­ "station trouble" alarms for key equipment at distirbu- time data available from substations and analysis tions; monthly meter ­ available at some substations; tion substations; some data feeder equipment; advanced metering readings stored for off more detailed information still acquired from key ­ equipment and systems provide higher resolution meter line analysis limited to manual log sheets bellwether meters located out data from consumer meter locations; new at major substations on feeders; use of relational data- "streaming" data sources such as phasor bases for storing, retrieving, and measurement units being deployed; analyzing serial substation data Introduction of grid analytics software for analyzing lareg and complex data sets Distribution Mostly electromechanical IEDs gradually appearing in IEDs become standard for protection IED based protection and control schemes ­Protection and devices for protection ­ substations; some auto and control; growing use of auto adapt to changing conditions; control Control and control; some local restoration loop schemes ­ restoration schemes; SCADA con- schemes "optimize" system reliability, ef- auto failover schemes in trolled Volt VAR Control schemes ficiency and performance place becoming common Power Generating Centralized generation Some industrial cogeneration; Growing amount of cogeneration; High penetration of solar/wind power in Resources primarily centralized low penetration of solar and wind some areas; energy storage used to miti- generation power; still mostly centralized gate DER consequences; lower depen- generation dence on central generation Centralized Regional management with Regional control centers with Consolidated control centers Growing use of advanced distribution ­Management voice communications; limited SCADA capabilities; equipped with distribution SCADA; management systems; DMS/OMS/GIS and Control paper maps; no remote use of automated mapping use of GIS for asset management integration; model- driven applications for control systems; and Outage management Systems optimal control End customer Manual meter reading Manual meter reading Some C&I Growing use of AMR systems; load Rapid growth of AMI with two way commu- interface Some C&I meters read via meters read via phone management systems; prepay- nications; time of use rates; demand re- phone ment meters sponse used to control selected customer appliances Source: World Bank. Note: SCADA = supervisory control and data acquisition; IEDs = intelligent electronic devices; DER = distributed energy resource; GIS = geographic information system; DMS = distribution manage- ment system; OMS = outage management system; C&I = commercial and industrial; AMR = automatic meter reading; AMI = advanced metering infrastructure. The Evolution of Electric Distribution Systems 19 Figure 2.3  Electromechanical Protective Relays and Meters Source: Uluski 2007. Most electric power was supplied by large-scale central generators connected to the transmission grid. No significant generating sources were connected to the distribution system during this period. The 1980s and Early 1990s During the 1980s and early 1990s, many electric utilities made significant efforts to reduce their dependence on field personnel for performing routine monitoring and control actions. Most, if not all, personnel were removed from distribution substations during this period. The implementation of some microprocessor- based IEDs, automatic data loggers, and supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) facilities at electric distribution substations eliminated many of the manual tasks performed in the past by dedicated substation operators. Figure 2.4 shows a representative substation SCADA system of the early 1990s. Most utili- ties also added reclosing relays to their distribution protection systems to auto- matically restore power quickly following temporary (self-clearing) short circuits. Remote monitoring and control during this era was still limited to the distribu- tion substations at most utilities. During this period, little or no remote monitoring was provided for monitor- ing and controlling devices located out on the feeders themselves (outside the substation fence). But some utilities began deploying loop control schemes­ (a simple form of fault location isolation and service restoration, FLISR) on some feeders. Figure 2.5 illustrates the operation of a 1990s version of a simple loop control scheme. Most electric power was still supplied by large-scale central generators con- nected to the transmission grid. But a growing number of cogeneration facilities were installed by industrial customers on their premises to serve their own load, and sell and deliver excess power to the electric distribution utility. Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 20 The Evolution of Electric Distribution Systems Figure 2.4  Substation SCADA System Link to control center Local User Remote DNP3 Interface Data Concentrator terminal unit RS232 (RTU) Ethernet Switch Ethernet TCP/IP SEL "Interleave" Data Concentrator Data Concentrator Hardwired Inputs and Protocol Outputs RS 232 Vendor-Specific Protocol "(Pass Prot Prot Alarm Controller Meter Controller Alarm Txm through") Relay Relay Annun IED IED IED Annun Monitor IED IED PLC PLC IED DNP3 Source: World Bank. Some commercial and industrial (C&I) customers had communicating reve- nue meters that were being read via telephone circuits. This allowed the C&I meters to be read more than once per month, thus enabling time-of-use (TOU) rates. Residential meters were still being read manually during this period. The Mid- to Late 1990s and Early 2000s During this period, the use of digital IEDs gained widespread acceptance for the protection, metering, and control of electric utilities due to the IED’s improved functionality and flexibility, smaller packaging, and remote monitoring and diag- nostic capabilities. While the majority of installed devices were still electrome- chanical, most utilities had decided to gradually phase out electromechanical devices by installing digital IEDs in all new substations and replacing failed electro- mechanical devices with IEDs. Substation SCADA systems that used these IEDs as data sources had become the standard approach in distribution substations. The level of remote monitoring and control of the distribution feeders them- selves (outside the substation fence) also increased during this period. A consider- able number of utilities deployed distribution SCADA-based FLISR and volt/ VAr control systems to improve reliability, reduce electrical losses, and improve the overall performance of a small number of their worst-performing feeders. Figure 2.6 shows a typical distribution SCADA-based volt/VAr control system from this era. While the remote monitoring, control, and automation of feeder Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 The Evolution of Electric Distribution Systems 21 Figure 2.5  Simple Loop Control System Source I1 I2 I3 F1 F2 F3 S1 Automatic Switches/ Reclosers I4 Intelligent F4 N/O Electronic Devices Source F1 F2 F3 S2 Source: World Bank. Figure 2.6  SCADA “Rule-Based” Volt/VAr Control System VVO/CVR Processor LTC Controller RTU LTC End of Line Voltage Feedback Source: World Bank. Note: VVO = Volt/VAr optimization; CVR = conservation voltage reduction; LTC = load tap changer; RTU = remote terminal unit. devices was not widespread, the feasibility of using grid modernization to improve the overall performance and visibility of the electric distribution system was demonstrated during this period. While most power was still being supplied from large central generators, a growing number of distributed generators were appearing on the distribution system. At this time, most of these units were fossil-fuel fired (diesel, natural gas, and so on), but some generators were powered by renewable generating resources (wind, solar, bio-fuels, and so on). The level of deployment of distributed genera- tion (DG) out on the distribution feeder generally remained small compared to Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 22 The Evolution of Electric Distribution Systems the total load. But in some cases, the power inputs from distributed generators were starting to become significant enough to impact operations, including some high-voltage and protection problems caused by the reverse power flow. During this period, there were a number of advances in residential customer metering. Some distribution utilities began installing automatic meter reading (AMR) systems with one-way communications (including “drive-by” systems). AMR provided the opportunity to read meters more frequently and at a lower cost, and to implement new functions such as prepayment meters. Load manage- ment systems were installed at this time for peak saving purposes to reduce the need for additional generation and transmission facilities. The Mid-2000s to the Present (the “Smart Grid Era”) Electric distribution utilities are experiencing many significant changes during the current period, referred to in this report as the smart grid era. One of the most significant changes is the level of deployment of distributed energy resourc- es (DERs), especially those powered by renewable resources (wind and solar power). High penetrations of wind- and solar-powered generation on the electric distribution system are especially challenging due to the highly variable output from this type of generator. Sudden drop-off of solar power due to passing clouds and of wind power due to lower winds will result in a significant increase in power drawn from the electric utility substation and a resulting voltage reduction that must be countered by voltage regulator and capacitor bank operations. The sudden return of wind and solar power generators may produce high-voltage conditions that must be similarly countered. The potential for reverse power flow caused by a high penetration of DERs on the distribution feeder also poses significant challenges to existing voltage-regulating mechanisms. In addition to providing a mechanism for mitigating the adverse consequences of variable distributed generation, grid modernization will enable electric distri- bution utilities to actively control customer-owned DG units to improve the efficiency, reliability, and overall performance of the electric distribution system. DG units equipped with “smart” AC inverters play a role in managing the voltage profile along the feeder as well as supplying reactive power to improve the power factor and reduce electrical losses. In addition, DG units coupled with energy storage and advanced control systems will enable electric distribution utilities to establish islanded microgrids that can continue to serve customers in the local community even when the microgrid becomes separated from the main grid and/or a widespread power outage occurs. The need to deal with increasing penetration of DERs, coupled with the need to reduce electrical losses and improve overall efficiency, has resulted in the growth of advanced distribution model-driven volt/VAr optimization (VVO) systems. Many utilities have implemented or are currently demonstrating advanced VVO on their distribution systems as a key part of their grid modern- ization strategy. Figure 2.7 shows a representative advanced VVO system. Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 The Evolution of Electric Distribution Systems 23 Figure 2.7  Advanced Model-Driven VVO System Control Room Automated Operator Line Switch “As- Operated” Distribution System Model Geospatial Switched Info System Cap Bank Distribution On-line Power SCADA Flow Line Voltage VVC Regulator Optimizing Engine Substation RTU Substation Substation Load Cap Bank Tap Changer Source: World Bank. Feeder automation schemes for reliability improvement, such as advanced FLISR, are also becoming more prevalent during the smart grid era. Many utilities are also considering implementing a distribution management system (DMS) to assist in decision making and managing the increasingly com- plex distribution system. DMS-based applications are potentially more flexible and effective than the traditional “rule-based” systems that had previously been implemented. Figure 2.8 illustrates the major DMS components. Many utilities are now deploying two-way advanced metering infrastructure (AMI) systems to support a wide variety of revenue-related applications (includ- ing energy theft detection) and to furnish a wealth of new, near-real-time infor- mation about customer behavior and distribution system electrical conditions. AMI systems have allowed the creation of demand-side management (DSM) programs such as demand response, which is becoming an essential system for peak-load management. The addition of AMI and many new intelligent sensors in the field (in substa- tions and out on the feeders themselves), along with high bandwidth communi- cation facilities for integrating these devices, has enabled electric distribution Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 24 The Evolution of Electric Distribution Systems Figure 2.8  High-Level DMS Configuration Block Diagram Field Devices Advanced Metering Sectionalizers System Capacitor Banks Regulators Outage Management Advanced Distribution System Applications SCADA Geographic Information Substation System Devices External Interfaces Source: World Bank. Note: DMS = distribution management system. SCADA = supervisory control and data acquisition utilities to acquire a wealth of new information about the performance of their assets. The deployment of PMUs at the distribution will greatly add to the huge volume of information being collected. In addition to the real-time and near-real- time information that is being collected, there is a wealth of new “geospatial” information that is being stored in the electric utility’s geographic information system (GIS). The result is the collection of data sets so large and complex that it becomes difficult to process this information using available database manage- ment tools or traditional data processing applications. As a result of this massive data-processing problem, many electric distribution utilities are turning to data analytics for managing and analyzing large and com- plex data sets. Data analytics involve the application of computer technologies and statistical models to enable electric utilities to make more effective decisions by transforming data into actionable intelligence. Another element of the smart grid era is the growth of electric vehicles, which pose a significant new type of “mobile” load on the distribution system and also provide opportunities for distribution system management (vehicle-to-grid capa- bilities, vehicle-to-home capabilities, and so on). Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 CHAPTER 3 Technology Innovations in Distribution Grids This chapter covers major technological innovations (relevant to the distribution system) in the following areas: protections; automation for reliability and service improvement; control and optimization (losses/reactive power); distributed gen- eration interconnection, including protections and interfacing issues; and inte- grated supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) or more advanced back-office energy management systems (EMSs). These innovations are some of the building blocks needed to establish a smart grid. While the list is not complete it reflects some of the most important applications being pursued by ­ various utilities. The next section provides an overview of the advanced control systems and decision support systems being deployed on the electric distribution system. Distribution System Monitoring and Control Advanced distribution applications, such as volt/VAr optimization (VVO) and fault location isolation and service restoration (FLISR), require near-real-time data from distribution substations. Required measurements include voltage and current, real and reactive power flows, and equipment status indications. Protective relay and controller intelligent electronic devices (IEDs) can supply the necessary information via substation monitoring and control networks. F ­ igure 3.1 depicts the vision for sources of information on the modern distribution system. Great progress has been made in recent years in migrating from traditional elec- tromechanical devices to substation IEDs, but many utilities have a long way to go to complete this transition. Progress on smart distribution objectives may be slowed until utilities upgrade their substation monitoring and control facilities. Smart distribution also includes numerous measurement and indication devices installed at strategic locations out on the distribution feeders. Distribution sensors include faulted circuit indicators (FCIs) that detect faults and in some cases provide fault direction as well as general-purpose sensors that record key Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy   25 http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 26 Technology Innovations in Distribution Grids Figure 3.1  Vision for Data Monitoring and Control Sectionalizers Distributed Capacitor Regulators Substation Banks Regulators Communication Network SCADA Source: McGranaghan and Uluski 2012. Note: SCADA = supervisory control and data acquisition. electrical parameters and waveform data that can greatly improve visibility and support analytical needs. Distribution sensors include stand-alone devices and sensors that are imbedded in switches and other power apparatus. Distribution Management Systems The “smart” electric distribution system requires management by a system that has a broader, more holistic view of power system conditions: the distribution management system (DMS). The “heart and soul” of the distribution system of the future is a DMS that integrates monitoring (“sensorization”), grid analytics, and control applications into an effective decision support system that will enable distribution dispatch- ers to effectively manage a distribution system of growing complexity during normal and emergency conditions. Figure 3.2 is a diagram of the conceptual DMS architecture. Electric distribution utilities have found that mostly manual, paper-driven processes are not able to address these new operating requirements and chal- lenges. Figure 3.3 (panels a and b) contain photographs that illustrate the transi- tion from a paper-driven control center to a modern control center with comput- er-driven video displays. The distribution system of the future must include computer-assisted decision dispatcher support capabilities. These capabilities will improve the operating efficiency with semi-automated and fully automated con- trols that are able to respond rapidly to varying system requirements. These facili- ties are essential during unplanned events in which the management of many resources is beyond the capability of manual business processes. The transition from traditional manual paper-driven processes to computer-assisted decision support and closed loop control systems is at the core of grid modernization. Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 Technology Innovations in Distribution Grids 27 Figure 3.2  Conceptual DMS Architecture Mobile Data AMI Systems Electronic GIS User Interface Updates Model MODEL VALIDATE CICS BUILD SUB Model Automated Field DSCADA Distribution OMS Devices Operations Model IVR Switching Advanced Management Applications Data Archiving Source: World Bank. Note: GIS = geographic information system; DSCADA = distribution supervisory control and data acquisition; OMS = outage management system; AMI = advanced metering infrastructure; CICS = Customer Information Control System; IVR = interactive voice response. Figure 3.3a  Traditional Paper-Driven Control Center and Operator Console Design Source: Clark 2009. Figure 3.3b  Modern Computer-Based Control Center and Operator Console Design Source: Alabama Power 2014. Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 28 Technology Innovations in Distribution Grids Another reason for the added complexity of today’s distribution system is the greatly increased emphasis on improving (“optimizing”) efficiency, reliability, and asset utilization. Today’s electric distribution utilities are seeking to reduce green- house gas (GHG) emissions through lowering electrical losses and promoting energy conservation, demand reduction, and managed charging of electric vehicles. Utilities are also seeking to “squeeze” more capacity out of existing distribution system assets through increased loading to minimize future capital expenditures. Distribution Protection Systems Like all elements of the electric power grid, the electric distribution system must be protected to minimize the damage that may be caused by high magnitude current flows that may occur following a short circuit on any energized compo- nent of the electric distribution system. And electric distribution protection sys- tem typically includes protective relays, reclosers, and fuses. These devices must be time coordinated so that protective devices located farthest from the substa- tion operate faster than protective devices that are located closer to the substa- tion. Over the years, distribution protection systems have undergone significant changes in the technology used and the functions performed. Traditional protection systems have relied primarily on electromechanical devices, such as the electromechanical protective relay shown in figure 3.4a. Electromechanical protective relays relied on the movement of mechanical com- ponents (spinning disk, electrical solenoid, and so on) to close and open physical electrical contacts that connect to the circuit breaker control circuit. Electromechanical protective relays have served the industry well for many years. But many electric distribution utilities are gradually replacing electrome- chanical devices with microprocessor-based IEDs (see figure 3.4b) that perform protective functions along with other functions that are key to distribution grid modernization. Figure 3.4  Protection Relay and Controller Technologies a. Electromechanical devices b. Intelligent electronic device Source: Cooper Power Systems 2013 product catalogue. Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 Technology Innovations in Distribution Grids 29 The new grid modernization functionality made possible with distribution IEDs includes the following: • Distribution sensor and communication capabilities. Protective relay IEDs store real-time values of current flow, voltage, and other electrical parameters need- ed to perform basic protective functions. These quantities can be telemetered to control systems and system operators for improved visualization and ad- vanced application functions. As such, the protective relays and other IEDs that are installed on the distribution system are considered a basic enabling function for grid modernization. • Adaptive protection functions. The modern distribution grid may experience many changes that impact the protection system requirements. In some cases, the protective relay settings or controller settings may need to be altered to reflect changing system conditions. For example, feeder reconfiguration may require new relay settings to provide complete protection of the feeder. The varying conditions associated with high penetrations of DERs may also dictate the need for dynamic or adaptive relay setting changes. IEDs also help these setting changes to be made via remote control with no intervention by field crews. The transition from electromechanical protection and control devices to IEDs is one of the major steps in the transition to grid modernization. Volt/VAr Optimization Volt/VAr control is a fundamental operating requirement for all electric distribu- tion utilities, but this topic has taken on a whole new dimension. Volt/VAr “con- trol” has become volt/VAr optimization (VVO), which can help electric utilities improve efficiency, reduce demand, and promote energy conservation. VVO can play a major role in reducing the “technical” electrical losses that occur on the electric power delivery system. Technical losses primarily consist of electric power that is consumed by the power delivery facilities themselves (con- ductors, transformers, and so on) in the form of heat. This is energy that must be produced by central and distributed generators, but does not perform any useful work for the end-user or result in any revenue for the electric distribution utility. Many electric utilities in developing countries experience a high level of techni- cal losses, so rescuing these losses is often a key business objective for these utili- ties. VVO can reduce electrical losses by switching capacitor banks on or off to compensate for reactive power drawn by the distribution feeders. Switching in a capacitor bank reduces the amount of reactive power that would otherwise be supplied by the central generators via the transmission system. This reduces the current flow on both the transmission and distribution systems and, as a result, reduces the nontechnical losses given by the formula I2R. Figure 3.5 illustrates how switched capacitor banks can help reduce the current flow and the Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 30 Technology Innovations in Distribution Grids associated heating losses on an electric distribution system. As an example, improving the power factor from an average of 0.80 to near unity would reduce nontechnical losses by approximately 36 percent. Many utilities are considering conservation voltage reduction (CVR), which is the intentional lowering of voltage to the lower portion of the acceptable range of service-delivery voltage. Experience has shown that many appliances use less electricity with slightly reduced voltage. Figure 3.6 shows the impact of voltage reduction on various types of lighting and electric motors. As seen in the figure, the electric power consumed by an incandescent light bulb is reduced by 1.505 percent for every 1 percent of voltage reduction. Energy consumed by a typical Figure 3.5  Reducing Technical Losses with Switched Capacitor Banks ILine XLine RLine XLoad Substation ILoad XCap RLoad Losses = ILine2 × RLine ILine XLine RLine XLoad Substation ILoad XCap RLoad Source: World Bank. Figure 3.6  Reducing the Voltage to Improve Efficiency a. Lighting b. Electric motors 1.10 1.04 1.05 1.02 Real power/unit 1.00 1.00 Watts/unit 0.95 0.98 0.90 0.96 0.85 0.94 0.80 0.92 0.75 0.90 0.70 0.88 0.8 0.85 0.9 114 V 0.95 120V 1 126 V 1.05 1.1 0.85 0.9 114 volts 120 volts 126 volts Voltage Voltage LED CVRf = 1.367 Incandescent CVRf = 1.505 Motor with drive LTV Sensitivity = .303 CFL CVRf = 0.807 Conventional motor LTV Sensitivity = .778 Source: World Bank. Note: LED = light-emitting diode; CVRf = conservation voltage reduction factor; CFL = compact fluorescent lamp; LTV = load to voltage. Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 Technology Innovations in Distribution Grids 31 electric motor can be reduced by .778 percent via a 1 percent voltage reduction. Electric utilities have used voltage reduction for many years during temporary power shortages, such as loss of a major generating facility during a heavy load period. Distribution utilities are now considering activating CVR in nonemer- gency situations to reduce demand during peak-load periods, and some utilities are considering running at reduced voltage around the clock to improve overall energy efficiency. Typically, electric utilities have been able to achieve between 2 percent and 3 percent energy reduction by deploying conservation voltage reduc- tion on their distribution system. Figure 3.7 shows the use of voltage reduction for peak shaving at one electric distribution utility. Figure 3.7  Energy Conservation and Peak Shaving Using Voltage Reduction a. Peak Shaving Using Voltage Reduction Expected or Contracted Load Measured Baseline Reduction Load Electricity usage Deployment Reduction Release Normal instruction deadline operations Time b. Energy Conservation Using Voltage Reduction 16000 15000 Load, kW 14000 13000 12000 11000 0: 8 0: 8 0: 8 0: 8 0: 8 0: 8 0: 8 0: 9 0: 9 0: 9 0: 9 0: 9 :0 –1 :0 –1 :0 –1 :0 –1 :0 –1 :0 –1 :0 –1 :0 –1 :0 –1 :0 –1 :0 –1 :0 –1 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 11 11 13 1 15 11 17 1 19 1 21 11 23 1 01 1 03 11 05 1 07 1 09 11 –1 –1 –1 –1 –1 –1 –1 – – – – – 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 Day AVG-Watt-Actual AVG-Watt-Base AVG-Watt-Delta Source: World Bank. Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 32 Technology Innovations in Distribution Grids Numerous utilities have demonstrated that CVR is a very effective energy- efficiency tool that does not adversely affect electricity consumers. But the industry has learned that voltage reduction does not produce the same benefits on all circuits. Some feeders show significant efficiency improvement when voltage is reduced, while others exhibit a less prominent effect due to differ- ences in load mix and circuit characteristics. Leading research institutions such as the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), Pacific Northwest National Labs (PNNL), and National Electric Energy Testing Research and Applications Center (NEETRAC) are developing ways to predict CVR behavior so that utilities can prioritize their VVO investments. Intelligent Line Switching Electric utilities are giving particular attention to reliability improvement and the “self-healing” grid. There have been numerous developments in the areas of fault anticipation (detection of equipment problems before faults occur) and fault location. When actual faults occur, electric utilities are able to identify fault loca- tion with much improved precision using information from substation protective relay IEDs, FCIs, outage management systems, and short circuit models. These new fault-locating facilities will enable utilities to locate permanent faults as well as recurring temporary faults that have not yet caused an extended outage. Many utilities are implementing systems that automatically detect faults, isolate the damaged portion of the feeder, and restore as much service as possible within seconds as part of their strategy to achieve a “self-healing” grid. Figure 3.8 illustrates the “self-healing” actions by comparing grid status before and after an event. One problem with current FLISR systems is that service restoration is often blocked due to heavy loading on backup feeders. The next generation of automatic restoration systems should take advantage of other advanced control facilities that are being deployed as part of the smart grid. For example, when encountering a load transfer limit, the automatic restoration system may initiate actions to free up capacity on the affected feeders, thus enabling the load transfer to proceed. Capacity release strategies may include initiation of demand response actions, activation of CVR, and temporary reduction of fast charging activities for electric vehicles. Figure 3.8  Automatic Service Restoration (FLISR) a. Before Self-Healing b. After Self-Healing Source: World Bank. Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 Technology Innovations in Distribution Grids 33 Outage Management Systems One of the key systems in the modern control center is the outage management system (OMS), which assists the electric distribution system operator in detect- ing feeder outages, determining the approximate location of the root cause of the outage, dispatching field crews, estimating the expected restoration time, tracking damage assessment and restoration activities, and developing outage statistics (System Average Interruption Duration Index, System Average Interruption Frequency Index, and so on). Traditionally, an electric utility response is triggered by the receipt of telephone calls from customers whose electric power is off. The modern OMS will also accept inputs from advanced customer meters that are capable of detecting and reporting local power outages and from distribution SCADA facilities. Upon receipt of such outage indications, the OMS will use the “as-operated” model of the distribution system to group-related pieces of outage information and predict the approximate location of the expected fault. This information is sent to field crews (first responders) to begin the outage restora- tion process. Management of Distributed Energy Resources Increasing penetration of customer-owned generation sources, especially highly variable “renewables” (such as wind and solar power), have added a high degree of uncertainty (unpredictability) to the day-to-day, hour-to-hour operation of the distribution system. These distributed generating resources can dramati- cally alter the flow of power and the voltage profile along the feeder in a man- ner that is sometimes difficult to predict. Changes to existing protection sys- tems and voltage regulation facilities are needed to ensure that such power fluctuations do not result in unacceptable service levels for distribution cus- tomers or cause a potential safety hazard for field crews. The complexity of integrating solar electric and wind power into the elec- tric distribution system is primarily due to the variable nature of these gener- ating sources. The output of these renewable generating sources rises and falls with passing clouds and changes in wind speed. When clouds block the sun- light, the output of solar photovoltaic (PV) units is reduced, and more power must instantaneously be drawn from the electric utility substation to make up for the lost solar generation. This additional power drawn from the substation results in an additional voltage drop along the feeder, and customers will momentarily experience lower voltage. After a short (intentional) delay, con- ventional voltage regulators and load tap changers at the substation will oper- ate to restore normal voltage on the feeder. When bright sunlight returns, the process is reversed and customers momentarily experience higher than normal voltage until voltage regulators and load tap changers make the necessary volt- age adjustments. With high penetration of renewables, the voltage variations will cause “flickering lights” and will also impose significant wear and tear on Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 34 Technology Innovations in Distribution Grids expensive voltage-regulating equipment. Figure 3.9 illustrates the types of voltage fluctuations that can be experienced on the distribution feeders ­ during power output fluctuations from a large concentration of solar PV units and resulting voltage corrective actions by voltage regulators. Large voltage drops (as shown in the figure) occur when cloud cover causes a large drop-off of solar PV output, and voltage increases occur when solar PV output is restored or corrective actions by voltage regulators occur. To minimize the magnitude of the voltage variations, electric distribution utili- ties have limited the total amount of renewable generating sources that can be connected to a given feeder. This is at best a temporary solution to the problem. To accommodate greater amounts of renewable generation, the distribution sys- tem of the future must include new fast-acting (high-speed) controls that can miti- gate load and voltage fluctuations without tight constraints on the amount of generation that may be connected to the distribution system. Figure 3.10 shows voltage fluctuation over time with and without high penetrations of solar PV exist- ing on the feeder. The figure also shows how voltage fluctuations can be reduced by deploying fast-acting controls to counteract these voltage fluctuations. The electric utility industry is currently demonstrating advanced control capabilities, such as using alternating current on each renewable generator, to mitigate the consequences of load and voltage fluctuations. For example, the next generation of smart AC inverters can include a volt/VAr operating charac- teristic similar to that shown in figure 3.11. When sudden changes in renew- able power output occur, the smart AC inverter can detect this situation and Figure 3.9  Dynamic Voltage Fluctuations Caused by Solar PV B6 Voltage Magnitudes, PU 1.050 Voltage 1.040 1.030 14500 15000 15500 16000 16500 17000 Time (in milliseconds) Source: Dugan 2012. Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 Technology Innovations in Distribution Grids 35 Figure 3.10  Voltage Fluctuations Associated with Solar PV 12 kV Voltage 20% PV 20% PV w/ volt-var control V (pu) Baseline – No PV 0 4 8 12 16 20 Hour Source: Dugan 2012. Figure 3.11  Volt/VAr Characteristic of a Smart Inverter Utility-Defined Curve Shapes Q1 Capacitive VARs Generated Volt/Var System Mode 1 – Q2 Q3 Voltage Normal Regulation V4 V1 V2 V3 Simple Inductive Broadcast Q4 Q1 Capacitive Volt/Var VARs Generated Mode 2 – VAR System Support Q2 Voltage V1 V2 Inductive Source: EPRI 2012. rapidly inject reactive power (VAr) to compensate for the loss of real power output. This will mitigate the voltage swings and reduce the operating duty on conventional voltage-regulating devices. While such control actions by smart AC inverters will be instantaneous and autonomous, the specific control actions that are needed at any given time may vary with current power grid conditions and feeder configuration. Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 36 Technology Innovations in Distribution Grids Demand Response Demand response (DR) involves a reduction in the consumption of electric energy by customers from their expected consumption in response to an increase in the price of electric energy or to incentive payments designed to induce lower consumption of electric energy. DR refers to the ability of cus- tomers to respond to either a reliability trigger or a price trigger from their utility system operator, load-serving entity, regional transmission organization/ independent system operator (RTO/ISO), or other DR provider by lowering their power consumption. Electric utilities in many countries are considering DR as an effective alterna- tive to adding new generation and power delivery facilities. That is, utilities are seeking to reduce the demand during peak-load periods rather than build new generators and power delivery facilities to meet rising loads. DR requires effec- tive mechanisms to initiate DR control actions when needed and verify that the requested DR activities have been performed. Some DR programs signal the customer via a text message, e-mail, or in-home display (IHD) that demand reduction is needed, and leave it to the customer to voluntarily reduce consumption in return for a pricing incentive. In such cases, an effective mechanism is needed to determine that the customer did indeed reduce consumption in response to the signal. Other DR systems directly control end-use appliances via direct on-off controls, programmable thermostats, and other devices to achieve the desired demand reduction. Figure 3.12 is a concep- tual diagram of a typical DR system. Data Analytics for Managing “Big Data” The addition of advanced metering infrastructure (AMI) and many new intelli- gent sensors has enabled electric distribution utilities to acquire a wealth of new information about the performance of its assets. To make such information use- ful, modern database management and mining tools will be required. As noted in chapter 2, data analytics is the application of computer technologies and sta- tistical models to enable electric utilities to make more effective decisions by transforming (often large and complex) data into actionable intelligence. Data analytics software is generally able to extract considerable value from advanced metering data in the following areas: • Revenue protection: Theft detection and case support • Meter operations: Defective meter identification and historical repository • Care center: High bill inquiries • Billing: Estimation support • Distribution operations and planning: Transformer load management, over- load protection and device sizing, improved system planning, and project prioritization Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 Technology Innovations in Distribution Grids 37 Figure 3.12  Demand Response Management System Utility Back Office Back Office Systems Systems Load Hosted AMI Mgmt OpenADR Service Headend Systems Server Providers Communication Cellular/Radio Networks Private Networks Internet Residential Aggregation Customers C&I Customers Customers Home Customers Premise Area Network AMI Meter Home Gateways Building LMS • WiFi EMS Systems • ZigBee Systems • DLC • Other EV/PHV IHD Hot Water AC Source: Triplett 2012. Note: AMI = advanced metering infrastructure; IHD = in-home display; DLC = direct load control. • Energy acquisition: Load forecasting • Finance: Unbilled sales reporting, sales and revenue forecasting • Energy efficiency: Demand response and efficiency targeting, customer usage reporting, data for evaluation and cost recovery. Interval load data from advanced meters can be aggregated to provide a granu- lar view of loading conditions at any point along a feeder. Load data can be analyzed to target customers for demand response to reduce peak loading on distribution transformers. Data analytics can be used to target customers for programs based on individual load characteristics and housing data (for example, peak day kWh/square foot). Data analytics can also be used to measure program impacts and calculate incentives for performance-based programs (for example, DR). AMI/automatic meter reading (AMR) data results can also be used to sup- port regulatory evaluation and cost-recovery. Both near-real-time and historic information on power outages can be derived using a meter’s “last gasp” events and “power out” logs, respectfully, including Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 38 Technology Innovations in Distribution Grids outage count and duration. Outage analytics can be used to identify and verify all customers with an extended outage following a storm. Data analytics can also be used to validate real system outages (indicated by protective relay information and significant changes in consumption) versus false meter outages. Outage data ana- lytics can also be used to screen for an increasing frequency of momentary outages at or near a given location, which possibly indicates a potential reliability issue. Voltage analytics can identify meters whose voltage varies notably from those of other customers on the same transformer, indicating either power quality or customer diversion issues. Power quality issues due to low voltage can be mea- sured directly over time rather than derived through load-flow modeling. Geospatial data can be used to improve the connectivity of distribution sys- tem models. Outliers to a geospatial grouping (such as a customer that is assigned to the incorrect transformer) can be identified with an algorithm. Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 CHAPTER 4 Defining a Distribution-Level Grid Modernization Strategy and Investment Plan This chapter covers recommended strategies for distribution grid modernization. Each utility’s grid modernization strategy will be somewhat different based on the technology starting point, level of available resources, and vision. Electric distribution utilities in developing countries may lack some of the basic building blocks and resources needed for grid modernization. This chapter describes grid modernization strategies for various initial starting points and covers prudent investments that can facilitate the transition to a smart distribution system. The amount of grid modernization that can be accomplished depends on the availability of key equipment including controllable power apparatus (line switches, capacitor banks, voltage regulators, and distributed energy resources [DERs]), the number and locations of distribution sensors, and the availability of reliable and effective telecommunication facilities. And, of course, the grid mod- ernization activities that can be accomplished are constrained by the availability of financial and technical resources. Getting Started As stated earlier, the process of developing a distribution grid modernization strategy begins with a careful assessment of key business drivers and a long-range vision for grid modernization. This should be followed with an assessment of existing technologies that are currently in place at the utility. Use of existing facilities is a key factor in accomplishing grid modernization with available finan- cial and technical resources. In particular, the utility should assess the following technology issues to determine its current level of technology deployment, which in turn will help determine what level of grid modernization can be done with limited financial and technical resources. Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy   39 http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 40 Defining a Distribution-Level Grid Modernization Strategy and Investment Plan Figure 4.1  The Basic Building Blocks of Grid Modernization Sectionalizers Distributed Capacitor Regulators Substation Banks Regulators Communication Network SCADA Source: McGranaghan and Uluski 2010. Figure 4.1 outlines the basic building blocks of grid modernization. These are essential components that are needed to achieve the business objectives estab- lished for the grid modernization project. This is followed by a description of the fundamental elements of each building block. • Controllable, electrically operable power apparatus. The recommended grid modernization strategy requires the ability to control certain key distribution power apparatus based on an assessment of varying operating conditions to meet established reliability, efficiency, and performance objectives. Control- lable components that are fundamental to grid modernization include medi- um voltage (MV: 12 kilovolt to 35 kilovolt) line switches, voltage regulators, and capacitor banks that are located distribution HV/MV substations and out on the feeders themselves. If power apparatus can only be operated manually by field crews and does not support automatic and remote control, the amount of grid modernization that can be accomplished is severely limited. To achieve maximum grid modernization benefits, automatic or remote con- trol of power apparatus is essential. • Intelligent sensors. Most grid modernization application functions require measurements and equipment status indications from power apparatus that can be located anywhere on the distribution system. Many older control sys- tems relied solely on “local” measurements (that is, measurements taken at the device itself) and local controllers that were implemented as part of the associated power apparatus. To achieve grid modernization application ­ ­ nstalled ­functions, the advanced control functions require inputs from devices i at different locations across the power grid. This is needed to permit well-coordinated, system-level control actions (versus control actions based ­ Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 Defining a Distribution-Level Grid Modernization Strategy and Investment Plan 41 solely on local measurements). Grid modernization requires intelligent sen- sors and controllers that are able to acquire “local” measurements and trans- mit these pieces of information to centrally located distribution system op- erators and control systems. • Telecommunication infrastructure. As stated above, the ability to acquire near- real-time (within 5–10 minutes of the actual measurement time) measure- ments and status indications from intelligent sensors (located anywhere on the electric distribution system) and issue control commands to power ap- paratus (that can also be located anywhere on the system) is a cornerstone of grid modernization. Providing digital communications between the distribu- tion control center and HV/MV substations is a starting point. But providing a telecommunication system that is able to reach the extremities of the distri- bution system is often needed to accomplish the ultimate vision for grid mod- ernization. The next section provides guidelines and recommendations for achieving spe- cific grid modernization objectives for different starting points. For each grid modernization level, the section explains what objectives can be achieved and outlines a strategy for achieving them. The section also provides strategies for advancing to the next grid modernization level. Grid Modernization Levels This section describes four levels of grid modernization—that is, the levels of automation that currently exist at a given electric distribution utility and progres- sively more sophisticated levels of grid modernization that may be needed to accomplish the utility’s vision for grid modernization. The levels are listed below: • Level 0: Manual control and local automation define a situation in which most processes are performed manually with little or no automation. This is a situ- ation that exists at many utilities in developing countries. • Level 1: Substation automation and remote control build on level 0 by adding IEDs and data communication facilities to achieve greater monitoring and control capabilities at HV/MV substations. • Level 2: Feeder automation and remote control build on level 1 by extending remote monitoring and advanced control to the feeders themselves (outside the substation fence). This level also includes information from ­communicating meters at some large customers for improved control and decision making. • Level 3: DER integration and control and demand response—the highest level of grid modernization described in this report—add energy storage, static VAr sources, and advanced communication and control facilities to effectively in- tegrate and manage high penetrations of DERs on the distribution feeders. This level of grid modernization also includes deployment of AMI to enable on-demand reading of customer meters along with DR capabilities. Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 42 Defining a Distribution-Level Grid Modernization Strategy and Investment Plan While increasing levels of grid modernization represents a natural progression from manual paper-driven processes to electronic computer-assisted decision making with automation, it is possible (and in many cases recommended) that a utility that is presently at a low level of grid modernization bypass one or more higher levels of automation. That is, a utility at a relatively low level of grid mod- ernization may “leapfrog” one or more levels of grid modernization to achieve some of the benefits offered by the highest levels of grid modernization. Most utilities in developed countries have followed a gradual progression by imple- menting the best available technologies at any given time. But it is not necessary for a utility that is currently using electromechanical technology from the 1970s or earlier to gradually modernize by first installing 1980–90 technology (solid- state devices), and then replace these units at some later date with 21st-century IEDs. Utilities in developing countries that have not completely built out their electric system may elect to bypass some of the traditional modernization steps (see section “Summary of Grid Modernization Projects” for details). The following subsections describe each grid modernization level in more depth, outline a strategy for achieving each level, and identify grid modernization benefits that can be achieved at each level. Level 0: Manual Control and Local Automation At this grid modernization level, operation of the distribution system is mostly manual. Level 0 grid modernization is depicted in figure 4.2. Automatic functions are limited to distribution feeder protection, voltage regulation, and in some cases capacitor bank switching for power factor correction. Protective relays, voltage regulators, and capacitor bank controllers may be electromechanical devices, electronic devices, or IEDs. Most likely, these devices are all electromechanical devices (especially in developing countries), which means they lack the intelli- gence to adapt to varying operating conditions and they lack the ability to supply local measurements to a remote processor for additional analysis and control. Another characteristic of this grid modernization level is the lack of data communication facilities that are needed for more advanced data acquisition and control functions. As a result, all automatic control actions performed by protective relays, voltage regulators, and switched capacitor banks are based on “local” (at the device itself) measurements and equipment status indications. Out on the feeders (outside the substation fence), most (if not all) line switches are manually operated. But some switches may be line reclosers, which are fully automatic fault interrupting devices. It is assumed that most distribution feeders have normally open ties to adjacent feeders, and that these tie switches must be operated manually by field crews. No communication facilities exist for feeder devices; hence, remote monitoring and control of feeder devices is not possible at this level. The grid modernization objectives that can be achieved with this level of automation are somewhat limited due to the lack of communication between devices and availability of information from intelligent sensors. Following are Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 Defining a Distribution-Level Grid Modernization Strategy and Investment Plan 43 Figure 4.2  Level 0 Grid Modernization Biogas Digesters Microgrid CBS IHD REIT Electric transportation Flow Battery RES EMS CES Feeder EV improvements: Impact Substation CVR/VVO, ASR Simply Sunverge Smart Thermostats Solar DMS, DRMS, AMI, MDMS, AOS, & OMS upgrades/installs Smart Appliances Partner Projects Smart EVSE Charging EMS Advanced lighting CEIT Source: World Bank. descriptions of the grid modernization objectives and benefits that may be achieved when the starting point is grid optimization level 0. Reliability Improvement • Limited FLISR. If properly coordinated line reclosers exist on the feeder, and normally open tie switches are available between adjacent feeders, it is possi- ble to obtain some of the benefits of the FLISR grid modernization applica- tion function. The following additional equipment and control logic is needed to provide this functionality: – If normally open tie switches are load-break switches, replace these switch- es with line reclosers that are fully automatic and have fault interrupting capability. – Equip all line reclosers (including normally open tie switches) with loss-of- volt detection (undervoltage relays). If voltage is lost at a normally closed line switch for a specified time period, then this switch would automati- cally open to isolate an “upstream” fault (that is, a fault that is closer to the substation than the switch). If voltage is lost on either side of the normally open tie switch, this switch should close to restore service to the deener- gized component. Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 44 Defining a Distribution-Level Grid Modernization Strategy and Investment Plan This strategy would enable the utility to significantly improve feeder reli- ability. But since the service restoration logic does not verify that sufficient capacity exists on backup sources at the time of the fault, there is a risk that the load transfer will result in an overload on the backup feeder. Another downside to this approach is that the normally open tie switch may close into a faulted section of the feeder, thus subjecting the feeder equipment to addi- tional through fault current. Reduction of Electrical Losses Reducing electrical losses is an especially important business objective for utili- ties in developing countries, where the level of losses may exceed 25 percent of total energy consumption. This is considerably higher than the rest of the world. Electrical losses of concern include both technical losses (I2R heating of energized components) and nontechnical losses (energy theft and unmetered loads). For these utilities, electrical loss reduction should be an integral part of the grid modernization strategy. • Volt/VAr control using local stand-alone controllers. At grid modernization level 0, electric distribution utilities may use stand-alone controllers for op- erating switched capacitor banks, voltage regulators (including substation transformers with under LTCs), and other volt/VAr control devices. In the past, these controllers were in effect switches that turned the associated power apparatus on or off at specified times corresponding to peak load and minimum load conditions. Newer IED-based stand-alone controllers can base their operation on a number of “local” measurements (current, voltage, reactive power flow, ambient conditions, and so on) to improve the overall performance of the volt/VAr control system. This, in turn, allows the utility to further reduce electricity losses and improve overall efficiency. Figure 4.3 depicts the local controller approach to local volt/VAr control. The electric distribution utility should also consider adding new switched capacitor banks to the distribution feeder. Optimal locations for placing new capacitor banks should be determined using distribution engineering analysis software tools (optimal capacitor placement). • Reconductoring of primary and secondary distribution networks. Given that the load losses of the distribution system are directly proportional to the series re- sistance of distribution components, electrical losses can be reduced by replac- ing existing primary and secondary lines with conductors of greater capacity. While it is clear that the larger the conductor’s cross-sectional area, the lower the line losses, the benefits/costs associated with reconductoring depend on the system. Benefits include improving the voltage profile (due to a reduction in the voltage drop along the feeder) and adding available capacity for load transfers to or from neighbor feeders, which also has a positive impact on system reliability. • Voltage upgrading. For some distribution systems (for example, high-load-den- sity areas, long rural feeders), a design practice recommended to economically decrease conductor losses through current reduction is to increase primary Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 Defining a Distribution-Level Grid Modernization Strategy and Investment Plan 45 Figure 4.3  Standalone Local Controller Used for Volt/VAr Control Distribution Current/Voltage Sensor Primary Line Capacitor Bank “Local” Current/ Voltage Measurements On/Off Control Command Signal Stand-alone Controller Source: World Bank. Figure 4.4  Impact of Voltage Upgrades on Losses 100 Percentage of power loss, % 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 Operating voltage, kV Source: World Bank. voltage; this is known as voltage upgrading or voltage conversion. The appar- ent power in a conductor is proportional to voltage and current; doubling primary operating voltage will reduce the conductor current by half for the same feeder power flow. Hence, the resulting load loss is 25 percent that of the original voltage using the same feeder conductor and length, as shown in figure 4.4. Going from 11 kilovolt to 33 kilovolt will reduce the load current by two-thirds, so the load losses will be one-ninth of the original losses. Figure 4.4 illustrates the impact of voltage upgrading on feeder c ­ onductor losses. • Transformer losses. These are an important purchase criterion and make up an appreciable portion of a utility’s overall losses. This applies to both ­ substation transformers and distribution service transformers. The Oak Ridge National Laboratory (Knoxville, TN, United States), a leading re- search institution, e­ stimates that distribution transformers account for 26 Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 46 Defining a Distribution-Level Grid Modernization Strategy and Investment Plan percent of transmission and distribution losses. A current best practice is to install high-efficiency distribution transformers to reduce overall distribu- tion losses. Many utilities in developing countries are replacing old, highly ­ inefficient transformers with modern silicon-steel-core transformers. Moreover, modern transformer load management (TLM) systems are being ­ implemented for tracking transformer loadings (for example, distribution transformers are typically at maximum efficiency when loaded at 50 percent of the nominal rating). This tool allows the more accurate economic evalua- tion of transformer loadings, taking into account several cost components (losses, capital, loss of life, and so on). • Network reconfiguration and load balancing. Network reconfiguration consists in changing the status of distribution switches (from normally open to nor- mally closed and vice versa) to improve the paths of load flow to better serve varying location and time-dependent factors of distribution load. By switch- ing to better distribute load, the system I2R delivery losses will decrease. This is because the total losses on one heavily loaded feeder and one lightly loaded feeder are greater than the total losses on two medium-loaded feeders. Load unbalance is a common occurrence in three-phase distribution systems. It can be harmful to the operation of the network and reduce reliability and safety. Furthermore, measurements and computations reported by the international literature show that losses increase due to unbalanced loads, mostly due to the circulation of unbalanced currents through neutral conductors. For, in- stance, for a 15 percent current unbalance, the losses of a real low-voltage network in Brazil were 4.1 percent more than those of a fully balanced net- work. This problem in distribution networks exists in both three- and four- wire systems due to the fact that loads are switched on and off by end-users. Figure 4.5 shows the impact of feeder load balancing on technical losses. Extreme load unbalance also causes voltage unbalance, which affects sensi- tive electronic equipment and causes the overheating (and the increase of losses) in motor loadings. Though the problem is challenging, the solution is low cost: performing load balancing typically involves only metering equip- ment and labor costs, not capital investments. Load balancing is therefore a primary way that utilities try to reduce losses, and is a highly recommended option for utilities in developing countries. Efficiency Improvement Efficiency improvement refers to the process of accomplishing the same amount of work while consuming less energy to perform this work. Efficiency improve- ment projects can help utilities avoid having to build new generating facilities and add new transmission and distribution power delivery facilities. • Limited conservation voltage reduction. The utility should replace voltage regu- lator controls (as needed) in HV/MV substations and out on the feeders with new controllers that include line drop compensation (LDC) capabilities. The Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 Defining a Distribution-Level Grid Modernization Strategy and Investment Plan 47 Figure 4.5  Impact of Load Balancing on Electrical Losses 2.00 1.75 Reduction in losses, % 1.50 1.25 1.00 0.75 0.50 0.25 0 0 10 20 30 40 Initial feeder imbalance, % Source: World Bank. settings of the new voltage regulators should be lower than normal voltage settings to achieve the benefits of voltage conservation. Due to the lack of voltage feedback from feeder extremities, utilities that deploy this strategy may be forced to build additional operating margins into the voltage regulator settings to avoid unacceptably low voltage when running conservation voltage reduction (CVR) during peak load conditions. DER Integration • Voltage regulation with reverse power flow. The recommended level 0 strategy is to install bidirectional voltage controls (with a cogeneration feature) on volt- age regulators installed out on feeders that have a high penetration of DERs. A high penetration of DERs on a given feeder can produce reverse power flows (back toward the substation) and a potential for voltage rise on feeder loca- tions further from the substation. To avoid potential high-voltage conditions at certain feeder locations due to such reverse power flows, the recommended bidirectional voltage controls take suitable control actions (opposite from the normal control direction) when reverse power flow is detected. The impact of reverse power flow on voltage regulation is shown in figure 4.6. Level 1: Substation Communication and Automation Modernization of HV/MV substations should receive high priority in the distri- bution grid modernization strategy. This is because most of the equipment that is responsible for controlling the performance and protection of the distribution grid resides in the HV/MV substations, and significant grid modernization bene- fits can be achieved through improved monitoring and control of this equipment. Hence, for utilities that are currently at grid modernization level 0 (as is the case in many developing countries), implementation of level 1 grid modernization should be the first step in the utility’s grid modernization strategy. Level 1 mod- ernization enables continuous near-real-time monitoring and advance control of HV/MV substation power apparatus, thus enabling a number of the grid Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 48 Defining a Distribution-Level Grid Modernization Strategy and Investment Plan Figure 4.6  Impact of Reverse Power Flow on Voltage Regulation Voltage Profile Cogeneration mode not always the right choice Direction of Power Flow Electric Utility Electric Utility Substation Substation (Backup) (Primary) Source Load Very side 1:1.02 side strong source 122.4 V 120 V Relatively weak source Source: World Bank. Figure 4.7  Level 1 Grid Modernization Level 1 (Substation Automation and Remote Control) Substation Line Voltage Capacitor Recloser regulator Bank Substation IEDs Substation Automation Facilities Control Center Source: World Bank. modernization applications that have been identified. Level 1 grid modernization is depicted in figure 4.7. Level 1 grid modernization includes the replacement of electromechanical controllers, protection, and metering devices in the substation with substation IEDs, along with substation remote terminal units (RTUs) or data concentrators Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 Defining a Distribution-Level Grid Modernization Strategy and Investment Plan 49 that acquire, store, process, and transmit information acquired from IEDs to a control center. Installing substation IEDs is a resource-intensive process that is often completed over many years at a rate of several substations per year. Strategies for implementing substation IEDs include replacing electromechanical devices as they fail with IED versions of the same device and using IEDs for all new construction work and substation modernization projects. This strategy may take many years to complete due to the limits of available resources to perform the device upgrades. Because the expected lifetime of substation IEDs is 20–25 years, the entire upgrade project should be completed before IEDs installed at the beginning of the project begin to fail. Figure 4.8 depicts the general architec- ture of the modern, IED-based substation. Level 1 also includes the addition of reliable and effective communication facilities between the HV/MV substations and the distribution control center (or equivalent centralized facility). These communication facilities enable tele- metering of information from the IEDs to a control center and the delivery of control commands from the control center to the IEDs. There are many pos- sible choices for the substation communication infrastructure. Choices include public communication infrastructure (leased telephone lines, cellular networks, and so on) and private networks (licensed radio; optical fiber, especially optical ground wires [OPGW]). Level 1: Grid Modernization Applications Grid modernization application functions that can be accomplished with level 1 modernization include: Reliability Improvement • Early detection of service interruption. Protective relay IEDs in the substation are continuously monitored, so when a feeder circuit breaker trips, distribution sys- tem operators are informed immediately so that service restoration activities can begin without waiting for customers to call. This reduces the duration of outages. • Fault location. When a feeder fault occurs, protective relay IEDs are able to compute and report (via the substation communication network) the electri- cal distance to the fault. As a result, field crews can be dispatched to a more precise fault location, resulting in shorter fault investigation time and re- duced outage time. • Fuse-saving schemes. Protective relay IEDs are able to store multiple relay set- ting groups that can be selected as needed by the distribution system operator. During inclement weather, when temporary faults are most likely to occur, the operators can select a “fuse-saving” setting group that will allow the substation circuit breaker to clear a temporary fault and then reclose (reenergize the cir- cuit) before downstream fuses blow to cause a permanent fault. This reduces the duration of outages and also the time needed to r ­ eplace blown fuses. • Intelligent bus failover. The substation automation scheme can be used to implement a medium bus failover scheme at substations that do not have ­ Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 50 Defining a Distribution-Level Grid Modernization Strategy and Investment Plan Figure 4.8  A Modern IED-Based Substation Local HMI SCADA Master ‘2’ SCADA Master ‘1’ CPU NIMs Infoserver TCP / IP WAN RTU ‘A’ I/O RTU ‘B’ Distribution automation I/O IEDs I/O T1 Interface to Voice Alcatel Sonet Conitel serial Circuits Node Connection DS0 for DS0 for Voice Teltone Channel Remote Access Secure Line Sharing Channel Bank Switch (e.g. Teltone Gauntlet) Ops and Non-Ops IP Data VLANs 384kbps Router/Firewall Remote Operational Data & Access Ethernet Switch Non Operational Access to Data IEDs & RTU Dial-Up Modem Surveillance Camera via network (Open LAN Only) with Security IRIG-B IRIG-B GPS Receiver Local (Time Sync) IRIG-B TCP/IP DNP3 User Data Concentrator D20 RTU Interface RS232 DFR/SER Ethernet Switch Ethernet TCP/IP SEL "Interleave" Data Concentrator Data Concentrator Hardwired Inputs Protocol and Outputs Hardwired Inputs RS 232 Vendor Specific Protocol "(Pass SEL SEL Alarm Non-SEL SEL SEL Alarm Non-SEL through") IED IED Annun IED IED IED Annun IED PLC PLC DNP3 Source: World Bank. Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 Defining a Distribution-Level Grid Modernization Strategy and Investment Plan 51 firm capacity. When a substation transformer fails or a bus fault occurs, only those distribution feeders that can be safely transferred to the remaining healthy bus or transformer would be restored to service. • Reliability-centered maintenance. The substation IEDs are able to monitor and report information about the operating and maintenance status of key substation equipment. By tracking parameters such as substation battery condition and circuit breaker contact wear and trip-cycle timing, the utility is able to identify incipient problems that may be corrected before a full-blown failure occurs. Reduction of Electrical Losses • SCADA “rule-based” volt/VAr optimization. Arguably the most common ap- proach to VVO in use today is the SCADA “rule-based” approach. This ap- proach determines what volt-VAR control actions to take by applying a pre- determined set of logical “rules” to a set of real-time measurements from the associated substation and feeder. An example rule is: If the voltage measured at point “X” is less than 120 volts AND the reactive power flow measured at the substation end of the feeder is greater than 900 kVAR (lagging), then switch ca- pacitor bank “1” to the ON position. These rules are determined in advance by the distribution engineers and operators using power flow analysis. Figure 4.9 depicts a distribution SCADA, rule-based volt-VAR control system that might be included in grid modernization level 1. The SCADA rule-based approach is similar to the stand-alone controller approach in that both approaches rely on intelligent controllers to interface with the switched capacitor banks, voltage regulators, LTCs, and other volt/ Figure 4.9  SCADA “Rule-Based” Approach • Substation Remote Terminal Unit (RTU) - handles device monitoring and control • VVO/CVR processor contains “rule” for volt and VAR control • Switched Cap banks & local measurement facilities • Voltage regulators (LTCs) & local measurement facilities • Communication facilities VVO/CVR • End of line voltage feedback (optional) Processor LTC Controller RTU LTC End of Line Voltage Feedback Source: World Bank. Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 52 Defining a Distribution-Level Grid Modernization Strategy and Investment Plan VAr control devices. The most significant difference between the SCADA rule-based approach and the stand-alone controller approach is the addition of communication facilities that are typically part of a distribution supervi- sory control and data acquisition (DSCADA) system. The communication facilities enable the system to base its control actions on overall system condi- tions rather than just on local conditions at the site of the capacitor bank or voltage regulator. The communication facilities also enable the electric distri- bution utility to monitor the operating status of the field voltage control and VAr control equipment so that appropriate actions can be taken immediately when a component failure occurs. • On-line power flow. Substation IEDs are able to monitor and telemeter near- real-time electrical parameters from the substation end of the feeder. These electrical parameters allow the deployment of an on-line power flow (OLPF) program that will improve the operator’s situational awareness. OLPF results can also be compared with customer billing records to assist in identifying technical and nontechnical electrical losses. An application commonly re- ferred to as energy balancing compares energy delivered to the feeder with billing records to determine nontechnical losses. Integration of DERs • Detection of reverse power flow. Continuous monitoring of power flow magni- tude and direction at the substation end of the distribution feeder would en- able the utility to detect reverse power flow conditions at the substation end of the feeder. This may occur on distribution feeders that have a high penetra- tion of DERs, especially when these DERs are operating at maximum capac- ity during light load conditions. Such reverse power flows can produce unac- ceptable high-voltage conditions out on the feeder that must be promptly corrected by regulating voltage or reducing DER output. Level 1: Summary Level 1 activities compose the basic building blocks of distribution grid modern- ization at electric distribution substations. Associated investment in substations will enable an electric distribution utility to improve asset utilization, reliability, efficiency, and overall performance while providing a foundation upon which to build the more advanced levels of grid modernization. Table 4.1 summarizes the grid modernization level 1 activities, qualitative costs and benefits, and risks asso- ciated with level 1 activities. Level 2: Monitoring and Control of Feeder Devices For utilities that have automated some or all of their HV/MV substations (level 1 grid modernization), the next evolutionary step in distribution grid modernization should be to implement remote monitoring and control of distribution power apparatus located out on the distribution feeders themselves (outside the substa- tion fence). In this report, this is referred to as level 2 grid modernization. Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 Table 4.1  Level 1 Costs, Benefits, and Risks Grid Modernization Level Costs (qualitative) Benefits (Qualitative) Risks Level 1 Activities Substation IEDs Purchase and install in substations: • Improve protective relay reliability • Learning curve for field personnel • Intelligent electronic devices (IEDs) through self-diagnostics • Potential information overload for • Data communications network • Wealth of new information for grid operations personnel modernization applications • Increased risk of cyber attack • Remote Terminal Unit (RTU) or Data Concentrator • “Distance-to-fault” information for faster service restoration Equipment Condition • Purchase and implement analytical • Fewer “routine” inspections reduce • Immature technology Monitoring software for equipment condition maintenance costs • “false alarms” for equipment condition monitoring • Detection of incipient problems problems • Develop O&M procedures for • Lower repair costs (fix problems • loss of confidence in Equipment condition-based maintenance proactively while problem is small Condition Monitoring data outputs Dynamic Equipment Rating • Purchase and install new sensors (e.g. • Improved asset utilization • Immature technology transformer winding temperature) • Defer capital expenditures for capacity • Learning curve • Develop and implement application additions • Potential equipment overloading if software for dynamic ratings • Reduce need for load shedding sensor fails • Improved reliability Adaptive Protection Purchase and install: • Reliability improvement due to having • Field personnel uncertainty about • Protective relay IEDs relay settings that match the “as operated” current relay settings conditions • Alternate settings may not apply to all • Substation communication facilities Software to support automatic setting • Labor savings (eliminate need for manual possible reconfiguration options changes setting changes) Voltage reduction • Labor cost to change voltage regulator • Lower peak demand • lost revenue due to lower KWh sales (or LTC) settings to reduced voltage • Improved efficiency • Increased risk of low voltage • lower greenhouse gas emissions • Reduced benefits over time due to changing load characteristics • Voltage reduction benefits may not be realized due to:  existing low voltage  constant power loads   53 Source: World Bank. 54 Defining a Distribution-Level Grid Modernization Strategy and Investment Plan Figure 4.10  Level 2 Grid Modernization Level 2 (Feeder Automation and Remote Control) Substation Line Voltage Capacitor Recloser regulator Bank Field Communication Network Substation IEDs Control Center Source: World Bank. The level 2 grid modernization strategy includes the addition of remote monitoring and automatic control facilities to existing line switches, capacitor banks, voltage regulators, and other utility-owned equipment (see figure 4.10). The remote monitoring and control facilities allow well-coordinated optimal control of the field devices to achieve overall distribution system needs (versus “local” needs). All power apparatus that are included in the level 2 grid mod- ernization strategy must be “electrically operable,” that is, each device must be equipped with an operating mechanism that can be controlled via an electrical trip signal. Devices that can only be operated manually by field crews are not suitable for level 2 grid modernization. To be included in the level 2 strategy, manually operated devices must be retrofit with an electrical operating mecha- nism or replaced with a device that is designed for remote control and fully automatic operation. The level 2 strategy also involves implementing intelligent sensors at many strategic locations on the feeder, such as main feeder branches, major equipment locations, points of connection for large customer-owned DERs, and feeder extremities. Intelligent sensors that are incorporated (embedded) in the electri- cally operable power apparatus and associated controllers should be used to the fullest extent possible. The level 2 grid modernization strategy may also include the addition of separate stand-alone intelligent sensors, such as faulted circuit indicators and end-of-line voltage meters. Level 2 also requires an extensive network to provide one- or two-way com- munications to each intelligent device out on the feeder. Two-way communica- tions are needed for power apparatus that require remote control and data Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 Defining a Distribution-Level Grid Modernization Strategy and Investment Plan 55 acquisition facilities. One-way communications are sufficient for sensors (such as faulted circuit indicators) that only report data (no control needed). Since the end devices mentioned above can be located anywhere in the distribution utility’s service territory (including its furthest extremities), implementing the required communication network is especially challenging. A wide variety of communica- tion technologies are available for accomplishing these communication require- ments. Technologies that may be used include licensed and unlicensed radio (only used where permitted by telecommunication regulations), public telephone net- works (including cellular networks), satellite radio (for extremely remote areas only), optical fiber, and power line carrier. Note that power line carrier commu- nication technologies may not be suitable for implementing FLISR, fault location, and other applications that must perform reliably when line damage is present. In most cases, the communication network for level 2 grid modernization will involve a hybrid design of more than one communication technology. The com- munication strategy should leverage the substation communication network to the fullest extent possible; for example, a feeder device may communicate to the distribution control center via the associated substation that is equipped with a substation communication network (level 1 grid modernization). Because of the enormous technical and financial resources needed to auto- mate all distribution feeders, the recommended practice is a phased approach that automates a portion of the feeders each year. To obtain the maximum incre- mental benefits for the initial investments, priority should be given to the worst- performing feeders (feeders with poor reliability, high losses, and so on). Level 2 Application Functions Grid modernization application functions that can be accomplished with level 2 modernization (in addition to level 0 and level 1 benefits) include the following: Reliability Improvement • Fault location isolation and service restoration (FLISR). Level 2 grid moderniza- tion enables the utility to implement rapid service restoration for customers on healthy sections of the feeder without risking overloads of adjacent backup feeders and without exposing the substation and feeder equipment to addi- tional fault current during unsuccessful reclosures. • Fault location. Telemetered fault detector and faulted circuit indicator outputs from strategic feeder locations allow the utility company to narrow down the possible fault location considerably. This reduces fault investigation and patrol time, and thereby overall outage duration. Figure 4.11 depicts the results of the predictive fault location program. • Improved intelligent bus failover. Further improvements can be made to the intelligent bus transfer scheme proposed for level 1 modernization. When a substation transformer fails or a bus fault occurs during heavy loading condi- tions, some feeders may be transferred (if necessary) to adjacent substations by closing normally open tie switches via remote control. Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 56 Defining a Distribution-Level Grid Modernization Strategy and Investment Plan Figure 4.11  Predictive Fault Location Probable Fault x x x Locations Fault Location Source: World Bank. Reduction of Electrical Losses • Coordinated volt/VAr control. Adding communication facilities and controller IEDs to the feeder voltage regulators and switched capacitor banks enables a true VVO system that provides fully coordinated operation of all volt and VAr control devices. This enables the utilities to achieve various operating objectives, including reduced electrical losses and lower demand. The level 2 VVO system also allows the utility to minimize the quantity of voltage regu- lator tap positions, which in turn can lower maintenance costs and extend the lifetime of this equipment. The level 2 communication system also enables the utility to determine the operating status of voltage and VAr control de- vices, so the failures of such equipment can be detected and corrected as quickly as possible with requiring routine physical inspections by field crews. Efficiency Improvement • Conservation voltage reduction. End-of-line voltage monitoring sensors provide feedback to the CVR application, thus enabling the utility to maximize voltage reduction and associated benefits without the risk of unacceptably low voltage. • Improved online power flow. Intelligent sensors added during level 2 modern- ization improve the accuracy of OLPF results. Improved accuracy enables the utility to operate the feeder with lower operating margins to improve loading, efficiency, and overall performance. • Optimal network reconfiguration. The addition of remote-controlled line switches coupled with numerous new sensors for load and voltage measurement enable the utility to deploy optimal network reconfiguration (ONR) as part of its suite of grid modernization application functions. ONR identifies and executes feeder switching scenarios to achieve better load balance among adjacent feeders, which will lower total electrical losses. Figure 4.12 depicts the operation of ONR. Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 Defining a Distribution-Level Grid Modernization Strategy and Investment Plan 57 Figure 4.12  Optimal Network Reconfiguration a. Before reconfiguration b. After reconfiguration Source: World Bank. Integration of DERs • Bidirectional voltage regulation. Level 2 grid modernization enables the utility presence to detect reverse power flow that occurs out on the feeder due to the ­ of a high penetration of distributed generating sources. This flow results in a voltage rise further from the main substation source of supply, which, in turn, can cause unacceptably high voltage. The use of remote-controlled, bidirec- tional voltage regulators (equipped with a “cogeneration” feature) helps the utility to address this situation and possibly enables a higher penetration of distributed generating resources on the feeder. • Monitoring and transfer tripping of DG units. Level 2 grid modernization in- cludes continuous near-real-time monitoring of DERs, which improves the accuracy of OLPF results and thus operator situational awareness. The avail- ability of feeder communications also allows the transfer tripping of larger DG units when feeder outages occur as part of an anti-islanding scheme. Level 2 Summary The level 2 activities expand the grid modernization investments made in level 1 from the substations to the feeders themselves (that is, to a portion of the feed- ers outside the substation fence). Level 2 grid modernization enables the utility to implement more advanced application functions such as volt/VAr control and FLISR to improve efficiency and reliability. It also establishes an appropriate level of continuous monitoring out on the feeders to support the advanced functions that will be deployed in level 3 grid modernization to optimize the distribution system performance. Table 4.2 summarizes grid modernization level 2 activities and their qualitative costs, benefits, and associated risks. Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 58 Table 4.2  Level 2 Benefits, Costs, and Risks Level 2 Activities Costs Benefits Risks Distribution Feeder Sensors and Purchase and install • Enabler for level 2 applications • Learning curve for field personnel Communication facilities • New sensors out on feeders • Improved visibility of distribution • Information overload • Two-way communication facilities feeder conditions • Increased risk of cyber attack • Maintenance costs for new field equipment SCADA Rule-Based VVO Purchase, install and maintain • Reduce electrical losses and peak • Rules may not work effectively follow- • VVO rules-processor demand ing feeder reconfiguration • Sensors for voltage feedback • Early detection of capacitor bank and • Lost benefits if communication is lost voltage regulator problems learning curve for operators and techni- • 2-way communications to all Volt-VAR control devices • Eliminate routine inspections for cians capacitor banks & voltage regulators • Potential increase in voltage regulator • VVO software tap position changes Fault Location Isolation and Service Purchase, install and maintain • Improve reliability through rapid • Learning curve for operators Restoration (FLISR) • FLISR processor service restoration • increased risk of cyber attack • Automated line switches • Reduce fault investigation time due to better fault location • Fault detectors • 2-way communications • Software containing FLISR logic Source: World Bank. Note: SCADA = supervisory control and data acquisition; VVO = volt/VAr optimization. Defining a Distribution-Level Grid Modernization Strategy and Investment Plan 59 Level 3: Active Control and Management of DERs and Demand Response Level 3 is the highest level of distribution grid modernization that is envisioned at this time. This includes all of the substation automation and feeder automation strategies listed above, plus the addition of devices for active control and manage- ment of DERs, such as energy storage units and static VAr resources. This com- bination of new power apparatus technologies and advanced controllers enable the distribution utility to address many of the adverse impacts associated with DERs, such as the time-varying output of wind-powered and solar photovoltaic (PV) units. This, in turn, enables the utility to accommodate additional DERs on its distribution feeders. Figure 4.13 depicts level 3 grid modernization. The recommended strategy for level 3 grid modernization includes the addi- tion of energy storage (ES) units either in the HV/MV substations or near the customers in the form of community energy storage (CES). The ES units should include advanced controller IEDs that manage the charging and discharging strategy for the ES units based on local settings that can be overridden via remote control by the distribution system operator. The ES units can be used for many purposes that support the utility’s business drivers, including peak shaving on all or part of the distribution feeder, management of power fluctuations from renewable generating resources, and management of microgrid operations. Another controllable resource that is recommended for grid modernization level 3 is static VAr sources. These are able to inject or absorb reactive power from the feeder when needed to mitigate the impact of power and voltage fluctuations caused by DG units with varying output. For example, when the output of the Figure 4.13  Level 3 Grid Modernization Level 3 (DER Control and Demand Side Management) Demand response facilities Substation Meter Data Voltage Line Capacitor Concentrator regulator Recloser Bank Bidirectional Power Flow Field Communication Network Substation IEDs Control Center Source: World Bank. Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 60 Defining a Distribution-Level Grid Modernization Strategy and Investment Plan solar PV units suddenly drops off due to cloud cover, the static VAr source can quickly inject VArs to prevent significant drop-off (or collapse) of distribution feeder sources. It is technically possible to use conventional switched capacitor banks and voltage regulators to perform the necessary voltage adjustments or reactive power compensation. But conventional devices have several problems that limit their effectiveness in responding to such variations: • Switched capacitor banks and voltage regulators have time delays before per- forming the requested actions. By the time the capacitor bank or voltage reg- ulator operates, customers may already be experiencing noticeable low volt- age. Time-varying conditions may change soon thereafter, resulting in another time-delayed control action for the conventional devices. • The frequent operation of switched capacitor banks and voltage regulators increase maintenance requirements and reduce the expected lifetime of these devices. • Frequent capacitor bank switching introduces harmonics into the voltage waveform that could adversely impact customer-owned equipment. The recommended static VAr sources are able to respond rapidly to inject (or absorb) precise amounts of reactive power to address power and voltage fluctua- tions caused by renewables. These devices do not cause waveform distortion (harmonics) and are capable of performing many more operations than conven- tional devices, making them ideally suited to level 3 grid modernization. Level 3 grid modernization should also include the deployment of “smart” AC inverters on customer-owned DERs, such as solar PV units. These smart inverters are able to operate using a wide variety of operating characteristics that enable the customer-owned equipment to respond rapidly to changing feeder require- ments. For example, the volt/VAr smart inverter will supply or absorb VArs automatically based on the changing voltage level. Level 3 Application Functions Grid modernization application functions that can be accomplished with level 3 modernization (providing benefits in addition to those from levels 0, 1, and 2) include the following. Reliability Improvement • Microgrid operation. Energy storage and other fast-acting voltage and frequen- cy control systems, coupled with distributed generating sources, enable “mi- crogrid” operation. This allows (healthy) portions of the distribution system that have become disconnected from the power grid to be reenergized and operated as self-contained islands until the normal grid connection is restored. The advanced controls that are implemented as part of level 3 grid modern- ization will be responsible for balancing energy storage and generating re- sources with existing load, and for maintaining the proper voltage and fre- quency at all times while in the microgrid mode of operation. Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 Defining a Distribution-Level Grid Modernization Strategy and Investment Plan 61 • Energy storage-enhanced FLISR. Conventional FLISR service restoration op- erations are often blocked due to lack of available capacity on backup alterna- tive sources. With energy storage-enhanced FLISR, the system automatically switches available energy storage units to discharge mode to lower the amount of load that needs to be transferred or to raise the available capacity of backup sources. This enables load transfers for service restoration to be performed that would otherwise be prevented due to loading constraints. Efficiency Improvement • Enhanced volt/VAr control and optimization. Distributed static VAr resources enable the distribution utility to supply (or absorb) the precise amounts of reactive needed at each feeder location. This will enable the utility to operate at close to near unity power factor at all times. This reduces electrical losses and improves overall efficiency. In addition, intelligent dispatch of DERs en- ables optimal power flows that further improve efficiency. Integration of DERs • Management of power and voltage fluctuations (dynamic voltage control). The maximum amount of distributed generation that can be deployed on a given distribution feeder is often limited by the potential drop-off in voltage if the DER output suddenly drops off along the feeder. Advanced control of energy storage units and static VAr sources will mitigate the impact of DER power fluctuations and thereby enable the utility to accommodate more distributed generating resources on any given feeder. In addition, DERs can be actively controlled by the utility to improve voltage regulation, improve VAr support, and (in the future) support microgrid island operation to improve reliability during widespread power outages. Level 3 Summary Level 3 builds upon level 1 and level 2 investments to integrate distributed energy resources and enterprise-level application functions into the grid modern- ization strategy. Table 4.3 summarizes level 3 activities, costs, benefits, and risks. Grid Modernization Risks There are significant risks associated with deploying any new technology. Major risks associated with grid modernization are summarized below, along with sug- gested mitigation strategies for each risk. Learning Curve for Field Personnel System operators who are experienced in working with mostly manual paper- driven business processes may have difficulty adapting to an electronic computer- assisted decision support system with a considerable amount of automation. There is a risk that operators will not be very effective and efficient in using the new system. Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 62 Table 4.3  Level 3 Activities, Costs, Benefits, and Risks Level 3 Activities Costs Benefits Risks As-Operated Model of • Identify & correct GIS data errors • Enables implementation of numerous level • Missing or erroneous model information can Distribution system • Build and maintain “as operated” 3 grid modernization applications corrupt results of grid modernization applica- model • Adapts to changing distribution system tions conditions Optimal Network Recon- • Purchase and implement ONR • Reduce electrical losses by balancing the • ONR recommended switching may change figuration (ONR) analytical software load better often with frequent feeder changes and new • Train operators and engineers on • improve voltage profile DERs how to use program • improve reliability • Results may be incorrect if as-operated model contains errors Model-Driven VVO • Purchase and implement VVO • Reduce electrical losses • Learning curve for engineers and operators analytical software • Improve voltage profile • Immature technology • Train operators and engineers on • Peak shaving • Results may be incorrect if as-operated model how to use program contains errors • Improve overall efficiency • Adapt to changing feeder conditions • Voltage reduction benefits may diminish with time due to changing load characteristics • Account for DERs in the VVO control strategy • Voltage reduction benefits may not be real- ized due to existing low voltage conditions Switching Order • Purchase and implement SOM • Generate switching efforts faster and more • Learning curve for system operators and Management (SOM) analytical software accurately during emergencies for faster engineers • Train operators and engineers on service restoration • SOM results may be corrupted if as-operated how to use program • Switch Order validation improves outage model has erroneous or missing data planning (fewer false starts during planned outage work) table continues next page Table 4.3  Level 3 Activities, Costs, Benefits, and Risks (continued) Level 3 Activities Costs Benefits Risks Enhanced Fault • Design, implement and test new • Improved system restoration (fewer • Immature technology Location Isolation software containing “enhanced” blocked restoration efforts) by utilizing • Relies on availability of customer owned and Service Restora- FLISR logic available DERs DERs (less incremental benefit if these are not tion (EFLISR) • Enhanced model driven solution adapts available) better to changing feeder conditions DER Management & Purchase and install: • Mitigate adverse consequences of voltage • Uses new technology that is unfamiliar to Dynamic Volt-VAR • New equipment, software and and power swings caused by Distributed system operators and engineers control communication facilities for moni- generators with variable output • Significant learning curve involved toring and controlling DERs, many • Enable utility to accommodate more dis- • Industry standards needed for voltage control of which are installed at customer tributed generation on existing feeders by DERs premises • Enable deployment of “microgrids” for criti- • Energy storage, static var compen- cal and worst performing portions of the sation, and associated controls distribution grid Demand Response Purchase and install: • Enables peak shaving during critical power • DR concept relies in most cases on voluntary • Automatic metering infrastructure shortages customer behavior (AMI) • Reduces need to build new generating and • DR may not produce the desired amount of • in home displays transmission facilities power reduction for every event • Home automation networks • DR may not produce demand reduction at all specific locations where DR is needed • Demand Response hardware and software at central location Source: World Bank.   63 64 Defining a Distribution-Level Grid Modernization Strategy and Investment Plan The following actions are recommended for mitigating this risk: • Involve the operators in all aspects of the planning and design phases of each application function. This will ensure that each application is designed with the operators’ needs in mind, which, in turn, will improve acceptance and buy-in from system operators. • Provide a comprehensive training program for all operators well in advance of system commissioning. This training program should provide details about how each application works under normal and failure mode conditions. Op- erators should fully understand how to recognize when something is wrong and what to do about it. • Utilize a “train-the-trainer” approach in which most of the training is con- ducted by senior operating staff. This will ensure that the training is presented from an operator’s perspective. • Implement a training simulator to provide each operator with a realistic train- ing environment that does not impact the actual live power system operations. • For fully automated applications, start with a period of semi-automatic (supervised) operation in which the operator must approve all control ­ ­ actions. Then gradually transition to fully automatic operation with no manual ­ intervention as the operator’s comfort level grows. Information Overload Substation IEDs are able to supply a wealth of new information pertaining to the loading, performance, and operating status of each distribution asset. There is a strong risk of providing too much information for distribution system operators to digest. As a result, the operators may elect to ignore information. In the worst case, operators may be confused by the new data and make incorrect operating decisions based on their assessment of the available information. The following actions are recommended for mitigating this risk: • Only provide information that is “actionable.” If no operator response is need- ed following receipt of a piece of information, then the information is most likely unnecessary. • Avoid supplying multiple messages that provide the same information. Often distribution SCADA systems will supply several messages that contain the same data. Only the first message is valuable—the second message is a nui- sance and contributes to information overload. Risk of Cyber Attack (“Hacking”) Several grid modernization applications include communication facilities that enable remote monitoring and control of power apparatus in the distribution substations. Any time communications are introduced, there is increased risk of a cyber-security breach that could result in unauthorized access to sensitive data and control facilities. Unauthorized access to these facilities could disrupt the Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 Defining a Distribution-Level Grid Modernization Strategy and Investment Plan 65 power supply to end-use customers, damage expensive energized high-voltage power apparatus, and pose a serious safety hazard for the field workforce. The following actions are recommended to mitigate this risk: • Develop a security plan early on (not as an afterthought) that will protect remote monitoring and control facilities from unauthorized access. • Provide suitable physical access controls to buildings and control rooms that house consoles and other equipment that could be used to control the power apparatus. • Apply encryption and other suitable security measures as needed. • Prudently apply security measures required for critical infrastructure protection. • Provide suitable training to inform all system users about the risks associated with a breach of security along with practices to protect sensitive information such as passwords. Immature Technology Some advanced software applications associated with grid modernization, such as model-driven volt/VAr optimization, are not yet proven by several years of successful operation in the field. As a result, there is considerable risk that some features may not operate correctly under all circumstances and/or that the soft- ware may stop running altogether (“crash”) during live operation. The following actions are recommended to mitigate this risk: • Avoid implementing applications that are not fully developed and proven by many years of successful operation in the field. In fact, all applications that require a significant amount of development effort should be carefully scruti- nized and tested or avoided altogether if possible. • Conduct extensive testing of each application to verify that the software is ready for deployment. Testing should exercise all capabilities of each applica- tion function, including operation in the presence of bad data. • Prior to placing the advanced software into operation, conduct a lengthy period of supervised operation in which all control actions identified by the software must be approved and manually executed by the operator. This will ensure that any failures encountered do not disrupt ongoing operations. This supervised method will also provide an excellent training opportunity for the application. Summary of Grid Modernization Projects Tables 4.4 through 4.7 summarize the grid modernization projects that are pos- sible at each grid modernization level. The information provided for each project includes an indicator of the general types of benefits the project provides (improved efficiency, reduced demand, improved reliability, the accommodation of additional DG, and others), along with a cost estimate range for project imple- mentation and a monetary estimate of the range of benefits that may be achieved. All monetary benefits are expressed in U.S. dollars. Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 66 Defining a Distribution-Level Grid Modernization Strategy and Investment Plan Table 4.4  Summary of Grid Modernization Projects (Level 0) Project number 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 Project Implement limited Implement volt/ Apply optimal Implement Transition to level 1 name FLISR on worst- VAR control network midline volt- performing (including reconfigura- age regulators feeders conservation tion (ONR) with reverse voltage reduc- software power flow tion) using local and cogenera- “stand-alone” tion features controllers Project Equip existing elec- Add intelligent Use off-line ONR Replace unidirec- Replace electromechanical descrip- trically operable electronic software tional voltage controllers, protection, tion switches (reclos- device (IED) to identify regulators and metering devices ers, load break controllers to feeder recon- with voltage in the substation with switches) with existing capaci- figuration regulators faulted circuit tor banks and switching that can substation IEDs, along indicators and voltage regula- that may be respond with substation remote loss of voltage tors and control performed to properly to terminal units (RTUs) or indicators; if no these devices reduce circuit reverse power data concentrators that switches exist, using local mea- and phase flow due to acquire, store, process, then these need surements and imbalance feeder recon- to be installed (1 control logic in order to figuration or and transmit informa- and 1/2 switches lower electri- due to high tion acquired from IEDs per feeder); use cal losses penetration to a control center; also, local logic to de- of distributed add reliable and effec- termine when to generation tive communication operate switch in question (no facilities between the communications HV/MV substations and required) the distribution control center (or equivalent centralized facility) Benefit Reduce amount Improve feeder Reduce phase Improve voltage Enable level 1 application type: of unserved voltage profile imbalance; profile functions Other energy; reduce balance load fault investiga- between tion and switch- feeders ing time (labor savings) Estimated $50,000–$150,000 $15,000–$25,000 $2,500–$5,000 $8,000–$12,000 $15,000–$20,000 per cost feeder, plus $200,000 range to $500,000 for basic (US$/ master station in control feeder/ center year) table continues next page Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 Defining a Distribution-Level Grid Modernization Strategy and Investment Plan 67 Table 4.4  Summary of Grid Modernization Projects (Level 0) (continued) Project number 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 Estimated $50,000–$75,000 $10,000–$20,000 $2,000–$4,000 $6,000–$10,000 r Specific benefits identified benefit under level 1 projects range (US$/ feeder/ year) Comments Assumes feeders Cost estimate Costs include Costs include ad- Assume 2–3 electrome- have at least one assumes two labor to build dition of volt- chanical devices per tie to backup switched models, age regulator feeder (protective relay, source; low-end capacitor banks run ONR with bidirec- meter IED, and possibly cost assumes are added to program, and tional voltage some switches existing feeder perform rec- controls (with a voltage regulator) exist; benefits along with new ommended cogeneration need to be replaced are derived from controller IEDs switching ac- feature); bene- with substation IEDs; customer outage for capacitor tions (no new fits (including also need substation cost savings banks and volt- equipment); the accom- SCADA facilities and valued at $10/ age regulators; benefits are modation of kWh benefits based reduced by more DG) are communication link on 1% voltage losses, which the savings as- to control center and reduction at are assumed sociated with SCADA master station in peak load with to be 10%– not having control center CVR factor = 15% less than to build new 0.7, and power present tech- centralized factor improve- nical losses generating ment from 0.9 (estimated units to serve to 0.94 at 4% of load total energy consumption) Source: World Bank. Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 68 Defining a Distribution-Level Grid Modernization Strategy and Investment Plan Table 4.5  Summary of Grid Modernization Projects (Level 1) Project number 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 Project name Implement monitor- Implement fault location Implement fuse- Implement intelli- ing of protective application (distance saving protection gent bus failover relays for early to fault) scheme application detection of feeder outages Project description Add alarm points and Acquire distance-to-fault Implement software Implement displays for alert- information, relay tar- to enable control software in sub- ing distribution gets, and other event room operator to station SCADA system operators information from switch between processor to of uncommanded protective relay IEDs, preestablished allow auto- change of state for and report information relay setting groups matic transfer of substation circuit to distribution system to apply fuse- selected feeders breaker operator via substation saving protection for a substation SCADA facilities tranformer fault to backup trans- former without overloading that transformer Benefit type: Other Detect customer Reduce fault investi- Eliminate labor costs Reduce labor costs outages before cus- gation time (labor to replace fuses for for manual tomer calls occur savings) temporary faults switching (customer satisfac- tion improvement) Estimated cost range (US$/feeder/year) Estimated benefit range (US$/feed- er/year) Comments Cost estimate as- sumes benefits based on 1% volt- age reduction at peak load with CVR factor = 0.7, and power factor improvement from 0.9 to 0.94 table continues next page Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 Defining a Distribution-Level Grid Modernization Strategy and Investment Plan 69 Table 4.5  Summary of Grid Modernization Projects (Level 1) (continued) Project number 1.5 1.6 1.7 Project name Implement equipment Implement SCADA “rule-based” Implement an on-line health monitoring volt/VAr optimization power flow to be used (condition-based main- system by distribution system tenance) operator Project description Use substation SCADA pro- Use substation SCADA proces- Implement an on-line power cessor to acquire equip- sor to control substation flow program that uses ment health data from voltage regulator and measurements from the protective relays and substation capacitor bank head end (substation other substation IEDs; for improved volt/VAr end) of the feeder to com- available information control (control still limited pute electrical conditions includes circuit breaker to substation devices due to at all feeder locations (on- timing and contact lack of communication with line power flow requires wear, substation battery field devices–level 2) an “as-operated” model performance, and device of the electric system to counters operate correctly) Benefit type: Other Lower equipment mainte- Monitor condition of substa- Enabler for many advanced nance and repair costs tion volt/VAr equipment for distribution applica- by transitioning from early failure detection tions—greatly improved routine scheduled main- visualization for feeder tenance to “as needed” locations at which no maintenance sensors exist Estimated cost range (US$/feeder/year) Estimated benefit range No direct tangible benefits, (US$/feeder/year) but OLPF enables ad- vanced applications Comments Benefits versus stand-alone Cost includes OLPF controller approach: can use software purchase and on line power flow (project implementation, model 1.7) to identify electri- building, and mainte- cal conditions at feeder nance; no direct tangible extremities and thereby benefits maximize benefits of volt/ VAr optimization by operat- ing closer to limits; also has early failure detection, abil- ity to modify VVO objective based on system conditions, ability to disable following feeder reconfiguration or other abnormal condition. Benefits based on 2% volt- age reduction at peak load with CVR factor = 0.7, and power factor improvement from 0.9 to 0.94. table continues next page Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 70 Defining a Distribution-Level Grid Modernization Strategy and Investment Plan Table 4.5  Summary of Grid Modernization Projects (Level 1) (continued) Project number 1.8 1.9 1.1 Project name Implement predictive Detection of reverse power Transition to level 2 fault location applica- flow at substation end tion function of feeder due to high penetration of DG Project description Add short circuit analysis Monitor real and reactive Add a communication network for software that uses fault power flow at the head supporting two-way commu- magnitude from sub- end of the feeder to nications between substation station IED to pinpoint detect possible adverse and field devices for remote fault location consequence of high penetration of DG, monitoring and control of such as reverse power feeder equipment flow and high phase imbalance Benefit type: Other Reduce fault investigation Enables level 2 functions and time (labor savings) projects Estimated cost range $15,000 to $30,000 per feeder (US$/feeder/year) Estimated benefit range Specific benefits identified under (US$/feeder/year) level 2 projects Comments Cost includes soft- Benefit is that the allow- “Transition” costs include addition ware purchase and able penetration of of two-way communication implementation costs; DG on a given feeder facilities between control benefit includes 5% to may increase do to center/substation and feeder 10% improvement be- improved capability yond what protective to monitor some of devices (switchgear, voltage relay distance-to-fault the potential adverse regulators, switched capaci- calculation supplies consequences of high tor banks, distributed sensors) DG penetration installed outside the substation fence. Estimate based on com- munication facilities to 5–10 field devices per feeder, plus necessary repeaters, collectors, data concentrators, routers, and other equipment needed to implement the communication network Source: World Bank. Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 Defining a Distribution-Level Grid Modernization Strategy and Investment Plan 71 Table 4.6  Summary of Grid Modernization Projects (Level 2) Project number 2.1 2.2 2.3 Project name Implement fault location, Advanced substation bus Coordinated volt/VAr control isolation, and service failover with conservation voltage restoration (FLISR) ap- reduction plication Project ­description Add automated switches, Add control of feeder switches to Add control of switched ca- fault detectors or faulted the intelligent bus failover ap- pacitor banks and mid-line circuit indicators, and soft- plication; feeders that cannot voltage regulators located ware for implementing be transferred to remaining out on the feeder (outside the FLISR functionality healthy transformer due to the substation fence) to loading constraints will be the volt/VAr optimization switched to adjacent feeders algorithm using DA switches Benefit type: Other Reduction in manual switch- Defer adding substation capac- Improved voltage profile ing activities and fault ity to provide firm capacity investigation time (labor ­ (defer capital expenditures) savings) Estimated cost $100,000–$150,000 $10,000–$15,000 range ($/feeder/ year) Estimated benefit range ($/feeder/ year) Comments Costs assume 2 to 3 new Cost included additional Costs include addition of switches per feeder, software only; necessary communication interfaces communication system switches and communication to volt/VAr devices located interface, and fault detec- facilities included in level 2 out on the feeder (control- tors, plus FLISR software for transition costs lable capacitor banks and substation or master sta- voltage regulators added tion (software costs shared during project 0.2). Benefits across many feeders); out- include coordinated control age duration improves by of volt/VAr devices located 50% to 60%. Cost does not in substations and out on include cost to add backup feeder. source to existing feeder. table continues next page Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 72 Defining a Distribution-Level Grid Modernization Strategy and Investment Plan Table 4.6  Summary of Grid Modernization Projects (Level 2) (continued) Project number 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 Project name Improved on-line power Optimal network Monitoring and Transition to level 3 flow reconfiguration transfer tripping of DG units Project Improve the accuracy Add automatic Use two-way commu- Implement active con- ­description of results produced switching to ONR nication facilities trol of distributed by on-line power application (project to monitor and energy resources flow (project 1.7) by 0.3); this will enable control the output (DG, energy storage, using measurements utility to more fre- of larger-scale acquired from feeder quently change the customer-owned demand response devices and distrib- feeder configura- distributed genera- devices) located out uted sensors tion to accomplish tion on the feeder and load-balancing at customer sites objectives (beyond the meter) Benefit type: Enabler for many Reduction of manual Improved power flow Other advanced distribution switching activities results due to accu- applications; greatly (labor savings) by rate measurement improved visual- using remote-con- of DG output ization for feeder trolled switches for locations at which no feeder reconfigura- sensors exist tion Estimated cost range ($/feed- er/year) Estimated benefit No direct tangible Specific benefits identi- range ($/feed- benefits, but OLPF fied under level 3 er/year) enable advanced ap- projects plications Comments Cost includes labor to Cost includes software Costs include moni- Costs include modify feeder models modifications; toring and control implementation of used by OLPF automated switches facilities plus controllers and as- and communica- communication sociated communi- tion facilities added interface at large- during previous scale DG units out cation interfaces at projects. Benefits on distribution DERs. Assume that include loss reduc- feeders. Benefits in- communications will tion and improved clude improvement be done through the phase balance. in allowable DG on feeder, and operat- Internet or through ing advanced DA AMI communication applications closer network (RF mesh or to established other media). operating limits. Source: World Bank. Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 Defining a Distribution-Level Grid Modernization Strategy and Investment Plan 73 Table 4.7  Summary of Grid Modernization Projects (Level 3) Project number 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 Project name Microgrid operation Energy storage-en- DER-enhanced Dynamic volt/VAr control hanced FLISR volt/VAr control and optimization Project Implement a microgrid Deploy enhanced Use smart Use distribution static ­description energy management sys- FLISR software that inverter-based VAr compensators tem that is able to support uses energy stor- distributed en- and/or smart inverters grid-connected and island age capabilities to ergy resources to mitigate voltage modes of operation for reduce occurrences to improve the most critical loads; use of blocked transfers volt/VAr opti- fluctuations and power this system to manage the by “standard” FLISR mization on a swings due to variable operation of available dis- applications given feeder output from distributed tributed energy resources renewables Benefit type: Increased revenue from Reduce wear on Improve voltage quality Other participation in market electrome- and reduce wear on operation chanical volt/ electromechanical VAr devices switching devices (LTCs, switched capacitor banks) Estimated cost Cost of microgrid manage- Enhance standard Implement inter- Add Dstatcom to distribu- range ($/ ment system components FLISR software (see faces to smart tion feeder with high feeder/year) (hardware and software); project 2.1) inverters; penetration of distrib- add switchgear to switch to add software uted renewables island mode to include smart inverter control in VVO algorithm Estimated ben- Resiliency benefit for critical Fewer blocked FLISR Operate VVO Accommodate more DG efit range loads is intangible; DR mar- load transfers (as- closer to oper- (20% or more) on given ($/feeder/ ket benefit is about $40,000 sume 10% blocked ating limits to feeder by addressing year) per MW per year without storage; gain maximum voltage and power 5% blocked with benefit storage) fluctuations Comments Costs include microgrid Costs include software Costs include installing master station (hardware additions to incor- distribution static VAr and software) for manag- porate manage- compensator that can ing available DERs to ment of available respond rapidly to achieve specified business energy storage in objectives; benefits include FLISR application voltage fluctuations. demand response during software. Proj- Communications not re- peak load periods and ect costs do not quired as these devices ability to serve critical loads include installation operate autonomously. during power grid outages of energy storage Benefits include ability (intangible benefit) (assume existing storage is used). to accommodate more Benefits include distributed renewables fewer blocked load (wind, solar) on a given transfers during feeder FLISR operations. Source: World Bank. Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 74 Defining a Distribution-Level Grid Modernization Strategy and Investment Plan Defining a Smart Grid Investment Plan The previous sections outlined four smart grid modernization levels relevant to the distribution sector. Each level is characterized by the incremental use of more advanced applications to progress toward grid objectives such as improved effi- ciency, reduced losses, improved reliability, and the integration of renewable energy resources. Utilities may use the descriptions of the four modernization levels to assess where they are in the process and to identify potential new smart grid applications that could help modernize their grid and achieve strategic objectives. There are many smart grid applications that a utility can choose to promote its modernization level. A utility needs to clearly assess the cost, benefits, and poten- tial risks of implementing new applications to define a sensible investment plan. This section provides guidance on creating such an investment plan to include the specific list of projects to be implemented, their cost, and time frames for their implementation. Creating an investment plan is key to ensuring that the overall budgeting process considers the needs of modernization. The broad steps toward defining the investment plan are described in the fol- lowing subsections. Figure 4.14 illustrates the steps in a flowchart format. Step 1. Identify Business Requirements There is no single investment strategy for grid modernization that applies to all electric distribution utilities (that is, no “one size fits all”). This is because pressing operating needs and challenges differ from utility to utility, due to differences in customer expectations, regulatory climate, geographic constraints, available labor and financial resources, economic conditions, and other such factors that are relevant to distribution grid modernization. The identification of business requirements must address the issues facing the electric distribution utility on a day-to-day basis as well as the unique challenges posed by emergencies, such as widespread storms and natural disasters. An effective grid modernization invest- ment strategy will address the issues and challenges faced by a specific utility. The first step toward creating a grid modernization investment strategy is to develop a thorough understanding of the key business requirements that apply to the electric utility in the short term (the next three to five years) and the long term (beyond a five-year horizon). This will provide a foundation upon which the specific functional and technical requirements of distribution grid modern- ization may be based. While business requirements vary from utility to utility, common objectives include the following: • Improve efficiency—specifically, to satisfy a given amount of electrical load us- ing less electrical energy. Efficiency programs for electric distribution utilities are usually focused on reducing losses (technical and nontechnical) and lowering overall energy consumption without actually shedding any load. ­ Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 Defining a Distribution-Level Grid Modernization Strategy and Investment Plan 75 Figure 4.14  Flowchart for Creating an Investment Plan Start Identify Grid Identify Modernization Level Business Need Efficiency Yes Grid Mod No Grid Mod No Grid Mod No Grid Mod Improvement? Level 0? Level 1? Level 2? Level 3? Yes Yes Yes Yes 0.2 Basic VVC 1.6 SCADA VVC 2.3 VVO/CVR 3.1 Microgrids 0.3 ONR software 1.7 Basic OLPF 2.4 OLPF 3.3 DER Enhanced Projects for Efficiency 2.5 ONR software VVO Improvement Reduce electrical Yes Grid Mod Grid Mod Grid Mod Grid Mod No No No demand? Level 0? Level 1? Level 2? Level 3? Yes Yes Yes Yes 0.2 Basic VVC 1.6 SCADA VVC 2.3 VVO/CVR 3.1 Microgrids 1.7 Basic OLPE 2.4 OLPF 3.3 DER Enhanced Projects for Demand No VVO reduction Improve Grid Mod Grid Mod Grid Mod Grid Mod Reliability? Yes No No No Level 0? Level 1? Level 2? Level 3? Yes Yes Yes Yes 0.1 Basic FLISR 1.1 Prot Relay Monitoring 2.1 Basic FLISR 3.1 Microgrids 1.2 Distance to Fault 2.2 Adv SS bus 3.2 Enhanced 1.3 Fuse saving Failover FLISR Projects for Reliability No 1.4 SS Bus Failover Improvement 1.5 Equip Cond Monitor 1.8 Pred fault location Integrate Grid Mod Grid Mod Grid Mod Grid Mod renewables? Yes No No No Level 0? Level 1? Level 2? Level 3? Yes Yes Yes Yes No 0.2 Basic VVC 1.6 SCADA VVC 2.3 VVO/CVR 3.1 Microgrids 1.7 Basic OLPF Projects to Integrate 2.4 OLPF 3.4 Dynamic VVO Renewables Perform Benefit Cost Analysis on Selected Projects Yes No Yes More Business. Project has Positive Add Project to List of recommended needs to consider? return on investment Recommended Projects projects No Develop Investment Grid Modernization priorities and plan Investment Plan Finish Source: World Bank. Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 76 Defining a Distribution-Level Grid Modernization Strategy and Investment Plan • Reduce demand, with a focus on mechanisms to lower the electrical power requirements during peak loading intervals, when electrical demand is often considerably higher than the average demand. This is an especially important business requirement, because the power generation and delivery infrastruc- ture must be able to serve this load even though the peak demand may last for a only small portion of the day. • Improve reliability, with a focus on the frequency and duration of power out- ages on the electric distribution system. Since most service disruptions on the electric distribution system result in power outages for one or more customers, this requirement is tied closely with overall customer satisfaction. Establishing microgrids to serve critical loads during widespread power outages is becom- ing a key element of the grid modernization strategy of many electric utilities. • Accommodate distributed generation. In an effort to reduce emissions from fossil-fuel-fired central generating units, many jurisdictions are seeking to de- ploy clean energy-generating resources (solar, wind, and so on) on their elec- tric distribution systems. Such “renewable” generating resources may produce abnormal electrical conditions on the distribution feeders (for example, re- verse power flows, voltage fluctuations) that usually limit the amount of such generation that may be implemented. Hence, a growing number of electric distribution utilities are deploying grid modernization measures to allow in- creased amounts of DG without adversely impacting power quality. Other business requirements that may be addressed by distribution grid mod- ernization include safety, security, workforce productivity and training, and dis- tribution asset management and utilization. Understanding the key business requirements should begin by interviewing the persons who “own” the problems: the electric utility executives. These senior- level managers will furnish information on the most important business prob- lems that are facing the utility company as well as a vision for future long-term needs. In addition to management perspectives, the needs of persons who are responsible for planning, designing, constructing, maintaining, and operating the electric distribution system must also be well understood. To this end, interviews should include representatives of the departments that are responsible for per- forming these duties. Step 2. Identify the Current Level of Grid Modernization The grid modernization strategy should leverage the electric distribution utility’s existing assets to the fullest extent possible. This will help ensure that the mod- ernization plan is practical and possible using available resources. Therefore, gain- ing a thorough understanding of where the organization is today is an important first step toward grid modernization. It should be noted that the level of grid modernization may vary at different loca- tions across an organization’s service territory. For example, there may be “pockets of automation” where some grid modernization technologies have been demonstrated Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 Defining a Distribution-Level Grid Modernization Strategy and Investment Plan 77 (that is, pilot projects), and newer technologies installed in only a small portion of existing facilities. The overall strategy should not be based on the assets of only a small number of substations and feeders, but rather on the facilities and operating practices that exist across a majority of substations and distribution feeders. The following is a list of guidelines that may be used to determine the current level of automation. The grid is at level 0 (manual control or local automation) if the following conditions apply to a majority of substations and feeders: • The majority of substations are staffed on a routine basis by operating person- nel who monitor the status of power apparatus and operate the equipment manually when necessary (this does not include personnel stationed only dur- ing construction and maintenance activities or during local emergencies). • Some automatic control devices (line reclosers, capacitor bank controllers, voltage regulators, and so on) may be found on electric distribution feeders, but their control decisions are based solely on local measurements. • There are no permanent data communication facilities between power ap- paratus and supporting facilities or substations/feeders and the control cen- ters associated with these facilities. Voice-only communications may exist. • The majority of protective relays and local controllers are electromechanical or solid-state electronic devices (not IEDs) and are not connected to any com- munication facilities (including dial-up facilities). The grid is at level 1 (substation communication and automation) if the fol- lowing conditions apply to a majority of substations and feeders: • Most of the protective relays, controllers, meters, and other instruments that are currently installed in distribution substations (HV/MV) are IEDs. • Most HV/MV substations include communication facilities and remote ter- minal units (RTUs or equivalent devices) that support remote monitoring and control of the substation power apparatus. • Most HV/MV substations are not permanently staffed for routine operation- al purposes. • Some automatic control devices (line reclosers, capacitor bank controllers, voltage regulators, and so on) may be found on electric distribution feeders, but their control decisions are based solely on local measurements. • No facilities exist for communicating with feeder devices. The grid is at level 2 (monitoring and control of feeder devices) if the follow- ing conditions apply to a majority of substations and feeders: • Most of the protective relays, controllers, meters, and other instruments that are currently installed in distribution substations (HV/MV) are IEDs. Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 78 Defining a Distribution-Level Grid Modernization Strategy and Investment Plan • Most HV/MV substations include communication facilities and RTUs (or equivalent devices) that support remote monitoring and control of the sub- station power apparatus. • Most HV/MV substations are not permanently staffed for routine operation- al purposes. • Some automatic control devices (line reclosers, capacitor bank controllers, voltage regulators, and so on) exist out on the electric distribution feeders. • Some facilities exist for handling two-way data communications between feeder devices and the associated control center. These facilities may be used for remote monitoring and control of feeder devices. The grid is at level 3 (active DER control/demand response) if the following conditions apply to a majority of substations and feeders: • All of the conditions specified for grid modernization level 2 apply. • Some distributed generating units (utility owned or customer owned) are equipped with remote monitoring and control facilities that may be used to manage the output of the DG unit from a utility-operated control center. • Some noncritical loads at customer premises (programmable thermostats, hot water heaters, and so on) may be controlled. Most of the protective relays, controllers, meters, and other instruments that are currently installed in distri- bution substations (HV/MV) are IEDs. Step 3. Generate a List of Potential Projects In this step, the organization should develop a list of potential (candidate) grid modernization applications that appear to have technical merit in addressing the organization’s needs and strategic goals. Such applications should be analyzed further to determine if their expected benefits outweigh the costs required to implement and sustain them. Tables 4.4 through 4.7 list specific projects that can be accomplished at each level of grid modernization. For example, table 4.4 lists recommended projects for grid modernization level 0 (manual control and local automation), including projects that can provide valuable business benefits without additional commu- nication facilities or other major infrastructure improvements. Project 0.2 imple- ments a basic form of VVO (CVR) using existing stand-alone controllers, for example, while project 0.5 involves a transition from level 0 to level 1 (substation communications and automation). Table 4.5, focused on level 1, lists projects using IEDs and SCADA facilities for substation monitoring and control. The 10 recommended projects offer numerous ways to exploit the information supplied by the latest generation of substation IEDs, and one project involves transitioning to level 2 (monitoring and control of feeder devices). Several projects can be accomplished for almost no incremental cost, such as project 1.5, which involves using IED data to imple- ment a reliability-centered maintenance program. Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 Defining a Distribution-Level Grid Modernization Strategy and Investment Plan 79 Similarly, tables 4.6 and 4.7 list project lists for electric utilities that are cur- rently at grid modernization level 2 and level 3 (active DER control and demand response). In each table, a brief project description is followed by general types of func- tional benefits (that align with the strategic goals of planning step 1). The table column under the benefit is shaded if the project makes a significant contribu- tion to the electric distribution network’s aim to: • Improve efficiency by, for example, reducing electrical losses and/or lowering energy consumption for a given load or amount of work. • Reduce demand by, for example, executing demand response events, running distributed generators, and lowering the voltage or reducing losses during peak load conditions. • Improve reliability by reducing the average frequency or duration of outages experienced by end-use customers. This can be accomplished by pinpointing fault location (and thus shortening investigation time), performing automatic sectionalizing and service restoration, and operating in island mode as a “mi- crogrid” when major widespread outages occur. • Integrate renewables by managing voltage problems caused by reverse power flows and voltage fluctuations that are attributable to distributed renewables. • Other benefits, including deferring capital expenditures for capacity addi- tions, reducing maintenance costs for expensive substation equipment, and labor savings. Step 4. Undertake a Cost/Benefit Analysis Once potential grid modernization applications have been identified, it is neces- sary to determine if the cost to implement each application and the associated risks are outweighed by the expected benefits over the life of the investment (10–15 years). As part of this step, the organization should perform a cost/benefit analysis and risk assessment of potential grid modernization applications, then develop a list of applications recommended for implementation. Tables 4.4 through 4.7 provide ranges of specific benefits and costs for each proposed project. The cost figures are expressed in units of U.S. dollars per dis- tribution feeder. The benefit range indicates the cost range per feeder on an annual basis over the life of the project. The following methods were used to convert functional benefits into mone- tary terms: • Reliability improvement benefits were converted into monetary benefits us- ing an assumed customer cost of outage (for example, US$10 per kilowatt- hour, kWh). • Efficiency improvements were converted to dollar amounts using an assumed marginal location pricing (for example, US$50 per megawatt-hour, MWh). Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 80 Defining a Distribution-Level Grid Modernization Strategy and Investment Plan • Demand reduction benefits were converted to dollar amounts using the aver- age cost to add new centralized generation units to serve that demand level (for example, US$50,000 per megawatt of new capacity). • Benefits that allow the utility to accommodate renewables were monetized using the capacity cost of centralized generation displaced by the distributed renewable (for example, US$50,000 per megawatt). Step 5. Create an Investment Plan The final step is to create an investment plan for the recommended applications— using limited organizational resources (including labor and financial resources) in an optimal manner, to achieve maximum payback on investment as quickly as possible, with minimum risk. In almost all cases, a phased implementation strategy is best. Projects that promise the greatest benefits should be completed at the earliest possible date. Also, “foundational” (enabling) elements (communication facilities, controllable devices, and so on) should be put in place to serve the needs of the application functions to be implemented during later phases. Modernizing the Grid: Gradual Transitions versus Leapfrogging The previous section describes how an electric utility may gradually progress to a higher grid modernization level. Most utilities in developed countries have fol- lowed this gradual progression by implementing the best available technologies at any given time. But it is not necessary for a utility that is currently using elec- tromechanical technology from the 1970s or earlier to gradually modernize by first installing 1980–90 technology (solid-state devices), and then replace these units at some later date with 21st-century IEDs. Utilities in developing countries that have not completely built out their electric system may elect to bypass some of the traditional modernization steps through a process called “leapfrogging,” which is described in the following subsections. A Gradual Transition to Smarter Grids: Developed Countries Many electric utility companies (especially those in developed countries) have been delivering electric power to residential, commercial, and industrial custom- ers for decades. In most of these cases, utility companies started out by supplying electric power to customers in the most densely populated areas of their service territory: the cities and surrounding suburban areas. The electric power infra- structure for these electric utilities has evolved significantly over the years to meet the growing expectations of their consumers. Energy consumption has risen dramatically over the years due to the almost universal acceptance of electrical appliances; an increase in the use of central heating, ventilation, and air condi- tioning (HVAC) among residential customers; and new types of loads including (most recently) electric vehicles. In addition to growing to meet new energy demand, the power delivery infrastructure has been expanded geographically out from urban areas to all but the most remote rural locations. Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 Defining a Distribution-Level Grid Modernization Strategy and Investment Plan 81 Electric utilities have met the growth of electricity consumption by increasing the capacity of the existing power delivery infrastructure and by adding new substations and extending transmission and distribution lines to reach new cus- tomers in rural areas far from the metropolitan load centers. In most cases, this transition has taken place gradually over several decades, and has been supported by government agencies such as the U.S. Rural Electrification Administration. As new substations and feeders were built, the electric utilities used the best available technologies at the time. Distribution substations and feeders that were constructed in the 1970s and earlier used mostly electromechanical devices for protective relays, meters, and controllers because that was the only technology available at the time that was field proven and accepted by somewhat conserva- tive electric utilities. Few if any distribution substations were equipped with SCADA and communication facilities, because these technologies were expen- sive at the time and deemed unnecessary for distribution systems. As new communication and control technologies were developed and became widely accepted, electric utilities began to deploy these technologies in new substations and in existing substations during capacity expansion projects. And when the older-style electromechanical relays failed, these devices were often replaced by the latest technology components, including microprocessor-based IEDs. In the past five to ten years, major technology advances have occurred in communication systems, thus making it cost-effective to deploy remote monitor- ing and control facilities for substation equipment and devices located out on the feeders themselves. Since growth patterns for electric utility companies have not been uniform across developed countries, some utilities have not progressed beyond the early days of electromechanical components and have little or no remote management capabilities. But it is expected that when older-style components need replacing, they will be replaced with the latest technology IEDs, thus “leapfrogging” the natural technology-driven progression to modern devices. The Case of Developing Countries Electric utilities in developing countries generally do not have the same decades- long history of growth and geographic expansion. Many electric distribution utilities continue to rely on electromechanical components that were installed many years ago. Most organizations rely exclusively on manual, paper-driven business processes with almost no automation or remote monitoring and control capabilities. In addition, the electric power delivery infrastructure has not been sufficiently built out to provide reliable continuous electricity supply to com- munities that are far from major cities. While this document has presented a strategy for progressing gradually from manual business processes (level 0) to increased levels of grid modernization (levels 1 to 3), it is unnecessary to proceed one step at a time to the next-highest level. In fact, it is possible to “leapfrog” several levels and go directly from grid modernization level 0 to level 2 or 3. This is comparable to transitioning from Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 82 Defining a Distribution-Level Grid Modernization Strategy and Investment Plan having no telephones to implementing cellular telephone technology without going through the tradition steps of building out the infrastructure needed to support a wired telephone system. As an example, it is possible for a utility company that is generally at grid modernization level 0 or level 1 to implement a microgrid/demand response system, which is identified in this report as a grid modernization level 3 project. Most electric utilities in developed countries view the microgrid as a mechanism to supply critical customers when the existing power delivery infrastructure experiences massive damage. For utilities in developing countries, meanwhile, microgrids can be viewed as an effective mechanism to supply power to isolated communities that do not have reliable continuous electricity supply. As in the case of cellular phones, the microgrid example allows utilities to “leapfrog” the traditional step of building a wired power delivery infrastructure. The level 3 microgrid project will use advanced metering, demand response, and available communication facilities (such as the Internet), all of which are level 2 projects, to accomplish the microgrid objectives. There are other steps that a utility at grid modernization level 0 or 1 can take to facilitate an eventual transition to higher levels of grid modernization: • If a manual feeder line switch needs to be installed or replaced, install an electrically operable switch that can later be retrofit with a communication interface to accomplish level 2 projects such as FLISR. • Electromechanical substation protective relays that fail should be replaced with a functionally equivalent IED that will be able to support future applica- tions at levels 1, 2, and 3. • Advanced metering facilities should support two-way communications, thus enabling the future addition of DR capabilities. • Communication facilities that are installed to support new metering systems should be designed to also support communication with distribution automa- tion devices (line switches, voltage regulators, capacitor banks, and distributed generating units) using standard interfaces (for example, IPV6). This will ease the implementation of FLISR, VVO, and other level 2 and 3 projects. • Inverter-based distributed generating units (for example, rooftop solar panels) should be equipped with smart inverters that may be used to support a wide range of advanced projects, such as microgrid management, DER-enhanced FLISR, and DER-enhanced VVO. More on Leapfrogging Analyzing the grid modernization levels helps clarify a logical path to imple- menting grid modernization, beginning with substation modernization (level 1), followed by modernization of the distribution feeders (level 2), and finally the addition of advanced application functions (level 3). As noted in the previous subsection, it is not necessary to implement the entire set of level 1 grid modernization activities before proceeding with level 2 Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 Defining a Distribution-Level Grid Modernization Strategy and Investment Plan 83 modernization. In fact, a very effective strategy is to move forward with some level 2 activities following the partial completion of level 1 activities. For exam- ple, it is possible to proceed with SCADA rule-based volt/VAr optimization (a level 2 activity) following the implementation of feeder protective relay IEDs (one of the numerous level 1 activities). This will enable the utility to derive some of the lucrative level 2 benefits, such as electrical loss reduction, before fully completing all of the level 1 activities. Similarly, it is possible to implement one or more of the level 3 activities prior to completing level 1 and level 2. Level 3 functions such as switch order management (SOM) may be implemented before sensors, controllers, and automated switches are added as part of levels 1 and 2. A regional implementation strategy may also vary the modernization activities implemented across a utility’s total service area, customizing them to meet vari- ous needs. One example of this approach is to invest heavily in the worst-per- forming service areas in order to improve their efficiency and reliability. In this case, the worst-performing areas may rapidly advance to grid modernization level 3 to gain the maximum benefit for the grid modernization investment. Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 CHAPTER 5 Regulatory and Financing Issues Fully realizing the benefits of grid modernization does not depend strictly on tech- nology applications. Technology applications require enabling environments for their deployment—and the assurance, among other things, that (i) companies have the incentive to pursue technologies that improve grid performance, (ii) the tech- nologies introduced comply or surpass technical requirements for their performance on the grid, and (iii) vendors are neutral, and different technologies can communi- cate with one another, allowing network modernization to progress and not stall. Regulatory aspects will be more or less important depending on the current level of grid modernization and the technology applications that are being pursued. Deploying one smart grid vision may require completely different regulations than another vision. For example, deploying certain technologies (such as for storage) may require new add-ons to current regulatory arrangements so that storage pro- viders understand the market or cost-recovery mechanisms that will make their business proposition valuable. Similarly, a grid that should enable vast amounts of PV requires defining clear performance requirements for such technologies to achieve the common goals of maintaining grid reliability and service quality. This chapter does not intend to be a comprehensive review of all regulatory aspects related to smart grid deployment, but provides some suggestions that should help identify when special requirements may be needed, and provides further references. Cost Recovery and Funding Funding grid modernization projects, programs, road maps, and plans requires care- ful consideration of the regulatory aspects related to recovering investments. Grid modernization should be an integral part of the capital expenditure program of utilities. Technologies that have been proven and largely tested in other places and whose risk of deploying somewhere else are low should be part of conventional investment plans and the cost-recovery base. Since a key function of the regulatory process is to make sure investments are efficient, regulators should always question whether the utility is making enough effort to identify modernization possibilities Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy   85 http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 86 Regulatory and Financing Issues that can clearly benefit consumers. Cost-efficiency principles should not be applied in narrow ways that seek to immediately reduce capital costs; instead, the long- term benefits of modernization should be considered. The cost of service regulations should include the cost of proven, lower-risk smart grid technologies as part of utilities’ regular capital expenditure programs. Not all smart grid applications should require special regulatory treatment from the cost-recovery point of view. The modernization costs of basic (proven) technologies should be part of utilities’ capital expenditure programs and, with that, the costs of deployment may be transferred to tariffs. This is especially true for those modernization activities that include applications largely tested in other markets and for which the costs and benefits are robust and the risks are rather limited. For example, reducing losses may require the introduction of automated capacitors. This technology has been largely tested, and while it may not be in use in a country, it has easily verifiable and robust benefits beyond its costs. As discussed in previous chapters, not all utilities start at the same moderniza- tion level. A first step toward modernization might, for example, focus on inte- grating technologies that are well tested in various environments. Thus, recoup- ing costs would not require any special regulatory process beyond widely avail- able cost-recovery models. More advanced, less tested, or larger smart grid deployments require careful attention from the regulatory and funding perspective. Investments in smart grid programs can involve thousands of high-voltage components (voltage regulators, switchgear, capacitor banks, and so on) and pos- sibly millions of secondary devices (meters, controllers, protective devices, sen- sors, and so on). In addition, they may involve new technologies and regulations (for example, real-time pricing via smart metering programs) that have not been tested or piloted and whose risks of not achieving expected benefits may be high. Some smart grid deployment may therefore require special regulatory treatment to ensure costs are rightly allocated. Untested technologies or innovations may require special funding vehicles such as government grants. Programs that involve large reductions in the demand served by utilities, mean- while, may require special regulatory treatment to ensure service providers remain viable despite decreasing energy sales. Highly advanced levels of modern- ization or more ambitious smart grid visions may require an alternative regulatory framework. A number of cost-recovery and performance incentive programs may be needed to ensure utilities have the incentive to apply new technologies that will lead to lower energy sales. The National Action Plan for Energy Efficiency lists several mechanisms that go beyond traditional cost-recovery options: • Performance incentives. Providing financial incentives to a utility to perform well in delivering energy efficiency can change the business model by making efficiency profitable rather than merely a break-even activity. The three major common types of performance incentives center on: Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 Regulatory and Financing Issues 87 ­ – Performance targets. A percentage of the total program budget is set aside to reward the achievement of specific metrics (percentage of losses, average outage duration, and so on) of the smart grid program. –  Shared savings. Utilities are given the opportunity to share, with rate payers, the net benefits resulting from successful implementation of energy effi- ciency programs. • Lost margin recovery. This mechanism is designed to estimate the revenue mar- ­ gin that might be lost due to a successful energy-efficiency program, and com- pensate utilities for any resulting reduction in sales. But the incentive does not change the linkage between sales and profit. Smart Grid Standards and Interoperability The electric grid includes many high- and medium-voltage devices and associ- ated protection and control equipment that are expected to maintain acceptable electrical conditions throughout the distribution system during periods of normal and emergency operation. In the past, this fundamental operating goal could be achieved effectively using stand-alone protection and control devices that were able to determine and initiate appropriate responses to load changes and electri- cal disturbances using “local” measurements made at the device itself. Coordination between these devices was achieved through time delays and other such mea- sures that did not require physical integration of individual components. Today, electric distribution utilities are seeking to satisfy the more stringent needs of electricity consumers and to maintain optimal electrical conditions at all times. Achieving these objectives in today’s operating environment is far more challenging due to the growing presence of distributed generators pow- ered by variable renewable energy sources (especially solar PV and wind power sources). Achieving optimal performance in this environment requires a level of performance that can only be achieved through fully coordinated operation of intelligent and flexible protection and control devices that are able to adapt to meet continuously varying system-level conditions and varying operating objectives. A new generation of communicating sensors and control devices is needed to satisfy the needs of today’s smart grid, along with a reliable, robust, and secure communications infrastructure that allows this new class of protec- tion and control devices to exchange information and “interoperate.” Interoperability1—the ability of diverse systems and their components, sup- plied by a plethora of manufacturers, to work together—is vitally important to the performance of the smart grid at every level. It enables integration, effective cooperation, and two-way communication among the many interconnected ele- ments of the electric power grid. To achieve effective interoperability, a unifying framework of interfaces, protocols, and other consensus standards is needed. The deployment of various smart grid elements—including smart sensors on distribution lines, smart meters in homes, and widely dispersed sources of renew- able energy—is already under way and will be accelerated as a growing number Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 88 Regulatory and Financing Issues of electric utilities worldwide proceeds to implement their smart grid strategy. Without standards, there is the potential for technologies to interoperate poorly in a multivendor environment, to become obsolete prematurely, and to be imple- mented without measures necessary to ensure security. To meet this need, inter- national standards bodies, including the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), are coordinating the development of a framework that includes protocols and model standards for information management to achieve the interoperability of smart grid devices and systems. Standards have been part of the historical development of technology in the electricity sector. In many cases, existing standards will suffice to deploy many applications that are already well proven, but may not be in use in all countries, given their modernization level. For example, there are numerous protocols and standards that have been used very effectively in SCADA systems that require integration and interoperability among a wide variety of protective relays, intel- ligent controllers, and communicating sensors associated with electric distribu- tion transformers, switches, and other conventional power apparatus. Examples include DNP3 (IEC 61850-5) and the IEC 61850 set of standards. The ANSI C12.19/IEEE 1377/MC12.19 standards and data models are becoming widely accepted for use with advanced metering systems, which are a great tool to pro- tect the revenue of utilities and to incentivize demand response. In other cases, however, new standards must be developed for the new interac- tions made possible by the smart grid. For example, important smart grid interoperability standards that are still under development include the following: • Demand response. OpenADR is going through the Smart Grid Interoperabil- ity Panel (SGIP) process, with the expected outcome that the two defined profiles of OpenADR 2.0 will be entered into the SGIP Catalog of Standards. In parallel, the OpenADR Alliance is working with the International Electro- technical Commission (IEC) with a mutual objective to develop an interna- tional automated DR standard. • Smart inverters. To achieve the kind of advanced grid functionality required to accommodate higher levels of solar energy, smart inverters will need to in- clude a range of automated control capabilities that will help smooth out potential grid fluctuations. Various industry stakeholders are currently in- volved in the development of the necessary international standards and regu- latory compliance testing protocols that will help ensure the transition to an advanced, stable grid. • Electric vehicle charging standards. As more and more EVs enter the fleet, and annual sales continue to increase, the question of charging—and charging pro- tocols—becomes ever more critical. While we are still in the early days of the EV adoption cycle, it is important to sort this out. At the end of the day, EV mobility will depend upon the build-out of a network of charging stations. Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 Regulatory and Financing Issues 89 Drivers will want to be able to charge at home, but to overcome range anxiety they will want to charge on the road as well—quickly and conveniently. • Communication standards. Interoperability in most smart grid networks is achieved in the upper layers of the protocol stack. IEC 60870-5-101/104 and DNP3 are the most commonly used SCADA protocols used to implement distribution SCADA and automation applications. IEC 61850 is also begin- ning to see limited use in DA systems and more profound use in high-voltage applications, especially outside the United States. • Internet Protocol (IP). Networks are used extensively in modern DA networks to provide end-to-end connectivity from devices in the field to back-office systems. IP can carry a variety of protocols yet allow the utility build a single network. This eliminates the need for complex or proprietary protocol gate- ways, allows the network designer a great deal of flexibility, and is popular since IP is widely accepted and understood. Furthermore, DA protocols can continue to evolve over time, but the supporting network does not need to be replaced as long as IP continues to be the bearer service. But while IPv6 has made significant inroads into the AMI application space, many smart grid devices are still largely the domain of IPv4. There are hundreds of standards; when analyzing potential applications, it is important to understand if the particular technology will lock in future develop- ments. Researching which standards may be available to help ensure applications deliver their full benefits is a critical step. There are standards that apply for the generation segment, the distribution segment, and system operations across dif- ferent consumption areas. The sources available, such as the Smart Grid Standards Map from the National Institute of Standards, can serve as a good platform to identify related standards that may be of importance to each poten- tial smart grid application. Note 1 The definition of the National Institute of Standards in the United States. Similar definitions apply elsewhere. Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 CHAPTER 6 Planning Practices to Further Benefit from Grid Modernization Advanced monitoring and control facilities provide many new opportunities for power system planners. Innovative uses of these facilities will enable planners to postpone capacity additions and solve complicated power quality problems. New planning tools and methods will be needed to enable planners to exploit the smart grid facilities. This chapter outlines the methods and tools used by distribution system plan- ning engineers across various grid modernization facilities. Capacity planning has always been a major responsibility of the planning engineer. In the past, planners usually addressed growing loads with new facilities (substations, new feeder posi- tions, line upgrades). Grid modernization has provided a number of new ways to address growing loads, including peak-shaving techniques (demand response, voltage reduction), optimal network reconfiguration, and other techniques that enable the planner to postpone adding new power system facilities. Planners must properly account for the presence of new DERs out on the feeders, which may (or may not) help meet the peak load. If DERs can be counted on during peak load conditions, then new construction may be post- poned. But if DERs include a high penetration of (potentially variable) renew- ables or do not largely coincide with peak demand, their contribution to peak shaving will largely be limited. The impact of zero net energy homes on capacity planning must be consid- ered. With zero net energy, utilities must provide capacity to serve each cus- tomer, but may receive no net revenue from kilowatt-hour sales. Planners are responsible for providing advanced controls for dealing with the power swings and voltage fluctuations associated with renewables to mitigate unacceptable impacts on power quality. More networking may be needed to enable higher loading on existing feeders. Software tools used by distribution planning engineers must include many new features to assist in addressing the issues posed by grid modernization. Such features are described below. Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy   91 http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 92 Planning Practices to Further Benefit from Grid Modernization DER Analysis (Steady-State and Dynamic Studies) The capability to conduct combined steady-state and dynamic studies for distrib- uted energy resource (DER) impact and integration analysis is arguably the most urgent need of distribution utilities. High penetrations of DER (particularly PV distributed generation, DG) is rapidly becoming a reality in North America, which differentiates it from other foreseen smart distribution system incipient trends and planning needs. Most commercial software tools provide models of conventional (synchro- nous) DG technologies and mainstream alternative DG technologies (wind and PV). These software tools enable the electric distribution utility to conduct con- ventional DG steady-state analysis, such as power flow studies and short circuit analysis. The types of studies that are deemed critical for planning and designing smart distribution systems include the following: • Ability to conduct sequential (time-series) simulations, which is critical when analyzing variable DG and estimating impacts on distribution line equipment • Support for enhanced models of LTCs and line voltage regulators to include new features provided by equipment and controller manufacturers, including selectable operation modes (cogeneration, bidirectional, and so on) and alter- native feeder configurations (open delta) • Advanced models of DES technologies, particularly of Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS), which are starting to become a feasible alternative for vari- able DG integration, particularly through the introduction of the Commu- nity Energy Storage (CES) concept • Modeling of less common DG technologies, such as microturbines and fuel cells. Planning tools also need to address the dynamic/transient analysis of DER technologies. Advanced Distribution Automation and Reclosing Planning tools must be able to accurately and flexibly model automation schemes for complex control schemes that are being implemented on the distribution system. For instance, accurately modeling a distribution automation (DA) scheme involving more than two feeders (in a flexible manner, without time- consuming customization and programming) would be beyond the capabilities of existing commercially available tools. Here, accurately modeling implies taking into account equipment and feeder ratings, customizing switching times, and keeping track of reliability indices, including MAIFI and MAIFIE. For volt/VAr control and optimization, most of the tools provide solutions for identifying the optimal location of capacitor banks. But very few have specific modeling and simulation capabilities for handling the complex logic associated with advanced volt/VAr optimization schemes, such as DMS model-driven, mul- tiobjective VVO. Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 Planning Practices to Further Benefit from Grid Modernization 93 Sequential Simulation and Batch Processes Planning tools should include a convenient mechanism for performing sequential (time-series) simulation, which is critical for estimating dynamic impacts of vari- able DG over a period of several minutes or evaluating the impact of advanced control systems (for example, VVO) over an extended period of time (for example, one year)—or accurately estimating system losses. Advanced Distribution Reliability Modeling and Analysis Planning tools should be able to estimate expected values of distribution reliability indices. But few programs offer the ability to calibrate the reliability parameters to match the actual field results. In some cases, this function performs well with small systems, but has difficulties with large systems. Therefore, this is an area that needs further improvement. Automated calibration is a desirable feature that would allow planners to conduct simulations in a faster and simpler manner, and would also increase the adoption of this type of analysis. This would also facilitate the implementation of integrated distribution planning (joint capacity and reli- ability planning), which is a very complex task using existing software tools. Another limitation that has been observed is the ability to model the reliabil- ity of individual components, which allows studying the impact of individual deteriorated or aged components. Some of the software tools model reliability using generalized parameters; for example, all distribution lines on a feeder or all switches are assumed to have similar, generic failure rates and repair times. But this approach can produce inaccurate results, and it is usually preferable to assign parameters directly to each component. With this approach, the program should provide the capability to easily select and assign reliability parameters to a group of similar components. Another related area that requires further development is the ability to calculate MAIFI and MAIFIE. This is especially important when advanced DA and reclosing schemes are used. Few software tools are able to perform Monte Carlo analysis or reliability optimization to determine the best locations for protective and switching devices to improve reliability. These are areas that may become more important in the future, as utilities look into risk-based analysis and planning. Finally, another area that is expected to grow in importance alongside the high penetration of combined DG/DES is intentional islanding and microgrid opera- tion. Further, R&D work is required to develop capabilities to model and analyze the impact of islanding and microgrid operation on distribution system reliability and performance. Interfacing with Utility Information Systems Most developers offer some ability to interface with utility enterprise informa- tion systems, particularly SCADA and AMI. But it is difficult to objectively assess such claims. This is a desirable capability not only from a planning point of view Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 94 Planning Practices to Further Benefit from Grid Modernization but also from an operations perspective, since it would allow system operators to conduct off-line “what if” simulations, which is a feature offered by some DMS developers. Interfacing with utility information systems requires the implementation of internal utility procedures for gathering and processing raw data, which is some- thing that general utilities are still discussing or working on (for example, how frequent smart meters should be queried, how these data should be stored and processed, and so on). Advanced Load Forecasting Load forecasting has not been addressed in detail by the software tools for engi- neering, planning, and design that were reviewed in this project. A few tools are able to use the outputs of specialized spatial load forecasting programs and evalu- ate the effect of load growth on distribution system components. Nevertheless, no intrinsic spatial or time-series load forecasting capability was identified in any of the software tools that were evaluated. In general, load growth in many areas has been minimal due, in part, to the global economic turndown. But load forecasting is expected to gain renewed interest, especially in how DER, DR, and PEVs will affect utility infrastructure. One issue of concern is the growing interest in establishments that have near- zero net energy consumption due to the use of consumer-owned distributed generation. But the electric utility must plan on providing sufficient capacity to meet the peak load of the establishment if local customer-owned generation is not available. Another topic of rising interest is reactive load forecasting. This is needed to ensure that the power grid and the distribution system are able to satisfy reactive power requirements (in addition to real energy requirements) under all loading conditions. PEV Modeling and Analysis Another incipient and growing need is the ability to conduct comprehensive modeling and analysis for the integration and impact evaluation of plug-in elec- tric vehicles (PEVs) in distribution systems. Of those evaluated for this report, one engineering software vendor claims to have specific models and simulation features to address this subject. It is possible to conduct this type of analysis using several of the engineering analysis tools, because PEV charging patterns may be modeled by using conven- tional loads with customized load profiles. This can be accomplished using sequential simulations or a script language. But since this alternative approach to PEV modeling and analysis may be time consuming and require advanced pro- gramming skills, the preferred and recommended approach is to add specific features to tools to address PEVs. It is especially important to be able to model Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 Planning Practices to Further Benefit from Grid Modernization 95 PEVs in conjunction with other smart distribution technologies, specifically with DG and DES, since interaction among them is expected. Joint Modeling of Transmission and Distribution Systems There is increasing interest from utilities in jointly modeling and analyzing distri- bution and part of transmission and subtransmission systems. Several of the engineering analysis tools reviewed in this project offer this capability; others require purchasing additional modules for detailed modeling of distribution sub- stations. It should be possible to import transmission and subtransmission models from databases of standard transmission software. Furthermore, analytical tools for electric distribution systems have been designed to handle circuits that are primarily radial in nature or “weakly meshed.” To properly handle transmission and subtransmission networks, the engineering tools must be able to work cor- rectly for networked (heavily meshed) circuits as well as circuits that are primar- ily radial in nature. Power Quality Modeling and Analysis Utilities are increasingly interested in assessing how the increased high penetra- tions of DC/AC inverters used for DG and PEV integration will affect total harmonic distortion (THD) levels in the distribution system. Moreover, there are growing concerns about voltage fluctuations due to variable DG. To address these concerns, several engineering software tools offer harmonic analysis capabilities and some of them offer flicker-level evaluation. Advanced System Component Modeling New components such as static VAr compensators (SVCs), distribution STATCOMs, energy storage devices, “smart” AC inverters, and other devices with advanced controllers are being deployed in greater numbers at the distribution level. These new devices can be fairly complex and provide enhanced abilities for enhanced steady-state and dynamic control to improve efficiency, reliability, and power quality. It is expected that they will become even more commonplace as a means for integrating variable DG and PEVs and increasing the reliability, power quality, and efficiency of distribution systems. But few tools offer specific models of these technologies. Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 APPENDIX A More on Road Map Methodology Approaches This appendix provides pointers to different frameworks that can inform the preparation of the smart grid road map and a brief description of their approach- es. Examples include the work of Sandia National Laboratory (SNL), the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), and the International Energy Agency (IEA). Sandia National Laboratory Since 1949, SNL has developed science-based technologies that support national security missions and include strong portfolios in energy efficiency and renewable energy. SNL develops technologies to sustain, modernize, and protect nuclear arsenals; prevent the spread of weapons of mass destruction; defend against ter- rorism; protect national infrastructure; ensure stable energy and water supplies; and provide new capabilities to armed forces. Sandia’s strategic mission areas include nuclear weapons; energy, climate, and infrastructure security (ECIS); nonproliferation, defense systems, and assessments; and homeland security and defense. SNL is operated and managed by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation. Sandia Corporation operates SNL as a contractor for the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DoE’s) National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) and supports numerous federal, state, and local government agencies, companies, and organizations (SANDIA website). In 1997, Marie L. Garcia and Olin H. Bray from the SNL Strategic Business Development Department published the Fundamentals of Technology Road Mapping. It includes three phases: • Phase 1. Preliminary activities consisting of three elements: – Satisfying essential conditions (for example, confirm the need for a road map) – Providing leadership/sponsorship – Defining the scope and boundaries for the technology road map Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy   97 http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 98 More on Road Map Methodology Approaches • Phase 2. Development of the technology road map: – Identifying the focus of the road map – Identifying critical system requirements and targets – Specifying major technology areas – Specifying drivers and targets – Identifying alternatives – Recommending technology alternatives – Creating a road map report • Phase 3. Follow-up activities: – Critique and validation of road map – Developing an implementation plan – Review and update. Electric Power Research Institute EPRI is an independent nonprofit organization involved in research and develop- ment (R&D) in the electric power industry. The EPRI members fund collabora- tive R&D programs. The EPRI membership includes industry representatives from the United States as well as international entities. In 2012, the EPRI published its methodology for the development of smart grid road maps. The approach consists of five keys steps (EPRI 2012), as described in figure A.1. • Defining the vision. This is a summary of what the utility/ISO intends to ac- complish and why. This step also includes a mission statement that provides “how the vision statement will be accomplished.” The process of defining a vision statement begins with evaluating the essential business objectives and drivers that can be addressed by technology investments. Examples of objec- tives include increasing grid reliability and/or efficiency, ensuring cyber secu- rity, reducing costs, and so on. • Identifying the requirements. One of the key elements of the EPRI approach is the use of cases based on an IntelliGrid approach to identify and define the requirements. It includes the needs and interactions of various actors (persons, applications, processes, and so on). It also includes logical interfaces with the relevant attributes such as timing, accuracy, volume, and so on. Figure A.1  EPRI Smart Grid Road Map Process Roadmap Vision Requirements Assessment Planning Implementation Source: World Bank compilation from EPRI (2012). Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 More on Road Map Methodology Approaches 99 • Assessing and selecting the technology. The EPRI has deployed a number of technology assessment methods that involve ranking a technology by impact and effort. The process has a goal to select technology candidates for road map implementation. The SG road map is responsible for selecting the top candidates based on their rank. A gap analysis follows to identify the gaps between the current and desirable technology state. • Planning. An important element of the EPRI planning process is the establish- ment of fishbone diagrams that show the current situation as the “tail” and the future objective as the “head” of the fish. The steps to be taken are the “scales” of the fish (figure A.1). • Implementing the road map. This includes the delivery of a report document, distribution to stakeholders, and project implementation and governance. International Energy Agency The IEA is a Paris-based intergovernmental organization established in the framework of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) in 1974. It is an autonomous organization that works to ensure reliable, affordable, and clean energy for its 28 member countries and beyond. The IEA’s four main areas of focus are energy security, economic development, environ- mental awareness, and engagement worldwide. The IEA has developed a methodology for its members for the development of a road map and used this methodology to develop a smart grid technology road map for IEA member countries, as shown figure A.2 (IEA 2011). The IEA road map methodology includes the following elements: • Goals. A clear and concise set of targets that, if achieved, will result in the desired outcome • Milestones. The interim performance targets for achieving the goals, pegged to specific dates • Gaps and barriers. A list of any potential gaps in knowledge, technology limi- tations, market structural barriers, regulatory limitations, public acceptance, or other barriers to achieving the goals and milestones Figure A.2  IEA Smart Grid Road Map Process Gaps and Priorities and Goals Milestones Action Items Barriers Timelines Source: World Bank compilation from IEA (2011). Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 100 More on Road Map Methodology Approaches • Action items. Actions that can be taken to overcome any gaps or barriers that stand in the way of achieving the goals • Priorities and timelines. A list of the most important actions that need to be taken to achieve the goals and the time frames, taking into account intercon- nections among those actions and stakeholder roles and relationships. The IEA road map process includes the following phases: • Planning and preparation – Establishing a Steering Committee – Determining the scope, boundaries, and implementation approach – Developing energy, environmental, and economic data to establish a base- line • Vision – Identifying long-term goals and objectives – Analyzing future scenarios for energy and environment • Road map development – Identifying and prioritizing needed technologies, polices, and timelines – Developing a road map document, launch strategy, and tracking system – Conducting review cycles – Assessing potential contribution of technologies to future goals • Road map implementation and revision – Reassessing priorities and timelines as progress is made and new trends emerge – Tracking changes as the road map is implemented. Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 APPENDIX B Additional Examples of Road Maps from Electric Utilities This section briefly describes the smart grid road maps of some power utilities and provides pointers to additional information. California Utilities: Pacific Gas and Electric California state policies of 2009 resulted in smart grid deployment plans for each of the several California utilities. Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E), in col- laboration with the EPRI, Southern California Edison Company, and San Diego Gas and Electric Company (SDG&E), developed a California road map for the state’s smart grid of the future (EPRI 2011). PG&E has developed its own smart grid deployment plant, which was developed according to the state’s future goals (PG&E 2011). Vision PG&E’s vision is to “provide customers safe, reliable, secure, cost-effective, sus- tainable and flexible energy services through integration of advanced communi- cations and control technologies to transform the operations of PG&E’s electric network, from generation to the customer’s premise.” Drivers Drivers of the PG&E smart grid program support California’s energy and envi- ronmental policies: • Safety, reliability, and security • Customer empowerment. PG&E wants customers to be able to control their consumption through demand response (DR) programs and advanced meter- ing infrastructure (AMI) technologies • Efficient and flourishing electricity markets. PG&E envisions open and robust energy markets through a “standards-based platform” to enable the sale of Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy   101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 102 Additional Examples of Road Maps from Electric Utilities smart grid products and services into energy markets on an “equal footing” with traditional generation sources • Environmental sustainability through integrating distributed renewable energy technologies and increasing grid efficiency • Consumer and technological advancement. PG&E envisions its smart grid deployment plan as a continuous journey or a repeating learning process that includes researching, developing, evaluating, and demonstrating new tech- nologies until such technologies become obsolete and replaced by newer ones. Pillars of Action PG&E’s smart grid deployment plan adopts 10 high-priority, strategic smart grid objectives in four program areas to guide PG&E’s smart grid investments and initiatives over the next decade (see figure B.1). Time Frame, Benefits, and Costs The estimated costs of the smart grid projects and initiatives is expected to be approximately US$800 million–US$1.25 billion in capital and US$500 Figure B.1  Pacific Gas and Electric’s Vision and Pillars of Action VISION Cross-Cutting Smart Grid Engaged Customers Smart Energy Markets Smart Utility Infrastructure • Leverage smart • Improved • Enhance grid • Provide Meters technology forecasting outage detection, foundational and • Improve techniques isolation, and cross-cutting demand response • Integrate large restoration utility systems resources scale renewable • Enhance grid facilities and • Support energy resources system monitoring programs electric vehicles and control necessary to • Manage grid system continuously voltage and losses improve the • Manage application of transmission and smart grid distribution asset technologies condition Source: World Bank compilation from PG&E 2011. Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 Additional Examples of Road Maps from Electric Utilities 103 million–US$700 million in cumulative operating expense over the next 20 years. The benefits far exceed the costs and are estimated to be US$600 million to US$1.4 billion in lower procurement costs, US$200 million to US$400 million in avoided capital costs, and US$100 million to US$200 million in avoided oper- ating and maintenance costs over the next 20 years. Estimated nonfinancial benefits include 10–20 percent improvement in system reliability and 1.4–2.1 million metric tons of avoided carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. California Utility: San Diego Gas and Electric Vision and Drivers San Diego Gas and Electric (SDG&E) is another California utility that came with its own smart grid deployment plant (SDG&E 2011) in accordance with California’s future energy goals. SDG&E’s vision is to “create the foundation for an innovative, connected and sustainable energy future, in collaboration with key stakeholders.” SDG&E’s vision is being driven by the following facts: • Solar distributed generation (DG) is growing fast within SDG&E in an effort to help customers reduce their carbon footprint. • Plug-in electric vehicles (PEVs) are currently being introduced into the San Diego market in an effort to help individual customers reduce fuel consump- tion and associated emissions and costs. • There are new technologies that allow customers to manage their energy con- sumption and associated environmental impact. Pillars of Action After discussions with stakeholders and customers, SDG&E identified three areas of interest: customer behavior/education, demand response, and rate design. Its pillars of action were based on these areas (see table B.1). SDG&E’s deployment plan includes implementation of a set of actions before 2015, while completion is expected to happen in 2020. More information can be found in SDG&E (2011). U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology • The NIST engaged the EPRI to prepare a smart grid standards road map. • The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) identified four smart grid functional priorities that include: – Wide area situational awareness – Demand response – Electricity storage – Electric vehicles Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 104 Additional Examples of Road Maps from Electric Utilities Table B.1  SDG&E’s Deployment Plan: Pillars of Action Key Themes of the SDG&E Smart Grid Deployment Plan • Educate customers on energy opportunities and choices. Customer and stakeholder education around smart grid issues is important for the success of the program. This can happen through utilizing peer-to-peer education. • Facilitate energy efficiency and demand response. This can happen through utilizing AMI technolo- gies and launching DR programs. Customers need to be offered cost-based and time-differentiat- ed rates to participate in peak demand reduction schemes and achieve cost reductions. • Enable plug-in electric vehicles (PEVs). Community planning is important to facilitate the construc- tion of charging stations. Also, time-differentiated charge/discharge rates can be an effective way to encourage effective peak reduction during peak hours. • Enable and integrate energy storage as a means to reduce the impact of solar intermittency on the distribution network. • Expand collaboration among SDG&E and its vendors, suppliers, business partners, community organizations, key stakeholders, and academia to enhance exchange of knowledge and enable success of the smart grid plan. • Support workforce readiness. People with new talents and skills are needed to design, implement, manage, and operate the new smart grid technologies. SDG&E will work with the industry and academia to create a new local “reservoir” of talent. • Integrate distributed energy resource (DER) with an emphasis on distributed combined heat and power (CHP) plants. • Expand technology development. In order for the smart grid to succeed, new technologies must be introduced in the market and older technologies must be modernized. Investments should target the development of technologies that interface well with the smart grid. Source: World Bank compilation from SDG&E 2011. • Two additional categories of applications: – Distribution grid management initiatives – Advanced metering infrastructure • Two cross-functional areas: – Cybersecurity – Network communications Canada–Toronto Hydro-Electric System Ltd Vision Drivers and Pillars of Action Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited (THESL) plans to implement a smart grid in accordance with Ontario’s Green Energy Act, which mandates the implementation of a smart grid with the following characteristics (THESL 2009): • Enables the increased use of distributed renewable energy sources • Expands opportunities to provide DR programs driven by the time-varying price of electricity Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 Additional Examples of Road Maps from Electric Utilities 105 • Accommodates the use of new technologies that promote energy efficiency and system control applications • Supports other objectives that may be prescribed by regulations. Additional drivers for THESL’s smart grid program are as follows: • The Ontario Smart Grid Forum that promotes the industry’s vision for the city’s grid of the future • The City of Toronto’s “Change Is in the Air: Clean Air, Climate Change, and Sustainable Energy Action Plan” that has a goal to make Toronto the renew- able energy capital of Canada. THESL’s vision includes three main targets that rest on sets of pillars of identi- fied action: 1. Climate protection and sustainable energy • Accommodate distributed renewable energy and energy storage • Support reliable connection of microgrids, community energy, and virtual power plants • Enable electrified transportation infrastructure • Reduce THESL’s carbon footprint 2. Energy security • Manage risks associated with aging infrastructure • Provide grid control mechanisms • Monitor power quality levels and losses • Improve efficiency and effectiveness of utility operation • Incorporate physical and cyber security measures 3. Customer satisfaction •  Use smart grid technology to enable customers informatively control their electricity consumption and carbon footprint. THESL’s road map implementation has a time horizon of 25 years and is expected to be completed in three phases as shown in table B.2. China The State Grid Corporation of China (SGCC) is planning to build a smart grid with ultra-high-voltage (UHV) lines and subordinate grids coordinated at various voltage levels. As shown in figure B.2 smart grid is planned to be completed by 2020 in three phases (SGCC 2010): • Phase 1 (planning and pilot) is already complete and includes years 2009 and 2010. It was a planning and trial phase where the grid specifications were set and a number of pilot programs took place. Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 106 Additional Examples of Road Maps from Electric Utilities Table B.2 THESL’s Smart Grid Deployment Plan Phases and Pillars of Action Phase 1 (0–3 Years) Phase 2 (3–10 Years) Phase 3 (10–25 Years) • AMI integration • Substantial growth of DG installations • Creations of microgrids • Early DR programs • Integration of distributed energy storage • Fully electrified transportation • Cyber security systems systems • Decentralization of energy • Early DA systems integration (for • Early implementation of V2G ­ generation will be completed example, power line metering and • DA enhancement (for example, Volt/VAr • Fault anticipation integrated outage management) control, phase balancing systems, power • Early DG programs quality management systems) • Use of smart appliances at homes will grow Source: World Bank compilation from THESL 2009. Note: DA = distributed automation; DG = distributed generation; DR = demand response; V2G = vehicle to grid; AMI = Advanced Metering Infrastructure Figure B.2  SGCC’s Main Smart Grid Characteristics One Goal With a UHV grid as the backbone network, and coordinated development of subordinate grids at all levels. Two Technology: IT-Based, Automated, Interactive Guidelines Management: Conglomerated, Intensive, Streamlined, Standardized 2009 10: Planning and Pilot 2011 15: Rollout of Construction Three 2016 20: Improvement Phases Grid Infrastructure, Technical Support, Smart Application, Standard and Code Four Systems Strong and Reliable, Economic and E cient, Clean and Environment-Friendly, Transparent and Open, Friendly and Interactive Five Features Six Generation, Transmission, Transformation, Distribution, Domains Consumption, and Dispatching Source: Developing Strong and Smart Grid: The Best Practice of State Grid Corporation of China, SGCC, 2010. Note: UHV = ultra-high voltage. • Phase 2 (roll out construction) is currently happening and includes the period 2011–15. Main characteristics of this phase are as follows: ­ – Constuction of the UHV grid – Construction of rural/urban distribution networks ­ – Establishment of preliminary smart grid operation and control systems ­ – Extensive use of key technologies ­ Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 Additional Examples of Road Maps from Electric Utilities 107 • Phase 3 (lending and enhancing phase). During this phase (2016–20), the grid constuction will be completed. The progress will be evaluated regularly, and certain enhancements in the area of security and efficiency will take place. Since 2009, the SGCC has started 228 demonstration projects in 21 catego- ries across 26 provinces and municipalities. Types of projects include the following: • Integration of clean energy/energy storage/microgrid technologies • Superconducting transmission • Smart substations • Distribution automation • Electricity quality monitoring • Customized power service • Power consumption information systems • Smart communities/buildings • EV charging and battery-switching facilities • Smart street lamp monitoring systems • Interactive service centers • smart demand management • Fault management systems. Thailand: Provisional Electricity Authority Vision The Thai Provisional Electricity Authority’s goal is to: • Increase energy efficiency and maintain the environment (smart energy) • Improve quality of life (smart life) • Provide intelligent and green community in the future. Drivers Drivers of the SG program include the following: • Energy security and environmental awareness • Customer’s demand for informative decisions • Society’s demand for a safe and ecofriendly grid • Provisional Electricity Authority officers’ demand for a safe and pleasant working environment. Time Plan and Pillars of Action The plan will take place in three phases and is expected to be completed by 2026 (see table B.3). Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 108 Additional Examples of Road Maps from Electric Utilities Table B.3  Provisional Electricity Authority’s Smart Grid Deployment Plan Phases and Pillars of Action Planning and pilot project phase (2012–16) Phase 2 (2017–21) Phase 3 (10–25 years) Microgrids Large expansion of planning Decentralization of power Integration of energy storage technologies and pilot projects started generation during phase 1 Customers can buy or sell AMI implementation to enable two-way communication among grid components electricity and central operations Virtual power plants creation Integration of customer-owned distributed Self-healing network generation technologies with option Two-way power supply of to sell energy to the grid electricity for EVs (V2G) Enable options for informative usage of Peak demand reduction through electricity by customers (DR programs) EVs usage Use of smart appliances Incorporation of EVs and charging stations Electricity generation from waste Increase use of electric transportation like EVs, and electric bus and train systems Source: World Bank compilation from the Provisional Electricity Authority website. Note: AMI = advanced metering infrastructure; DR = demand response; EV = electric vehicle; V2G = vehicle to grid Ireland The Irish electricity industry has one power sector regulator for the country, the Commission for Energy Regulation (CER), and one main dominant electricity supplier and transmission owner and operator, the Electricity Supply Board (ESB), with more than 95 percent government ownership. Ireland defines a smart grid as “an electricity network that can cost efficiently integrate the behaviour and actions of all users connected to it—generators, con- sumers and those that do both—in order to ensure economically efficient, sus- tainable power system with low losses and high levels of quality and security of supply and safety.” Ireland has published three road maps that involve smart grid technologies— one for the smart grid, one for wind energy, and another for electrical vehicles. The Irish smart grid objectives include the following: • Decarbonization of electricity with annual savings of over 13 million tons of CO2 by 2050. Eight million tons of this will be derived directly from the implementation of a smart grid. A further 5 million tons will come from the displacement of fossil fuels due to the electrification of transport and thermal loads, facilitated by the smart grid. • Increased electrification of thermal loads in the residential and services sector. It is estimated that the annual demand in this sector will exceed 28,000 giga- watt-hours by 2050. • Electrification of transport. Domestic transportation sector will be expected to demand close to 8,000 gigawatt-hours by 2050. Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 Additional Examples of Road Maps from Electric Utilities 109 • Renewable energy integration. Overall annual electrical final energy demand will be in excess of 48,000 gigawatt-hours by 2050 with a corresponding peak demand of 9 gigawatts. Onshore wind generation will be able to supply up to 33,000 gigawatt-hours of the total demand. • Reduction of energy imports. Greater integration of indigenous renewable en- ergy sources will see a net reduction in energy imports in excess of 4.3 Mtoe1 (equivalent to ­ € 3.2 billion–€ 7.2 billion savings in direct fuel offsets by 2050). • Increased interconnection. By 2025, Ireland aims at having 1.4 gigawatts of in- terconnection. Analysis indicated that a further 1.6 gigawatts of interconnec- tion will be required by 2040. • Job creation. It is estimated that more than 10,000 Irish jobs will be created by implementation of smart grid infrastructure and its associated technologies. The main components of the Irish smart grid road map to achieve the stated decarbonization goals include the following: • Peak and load shifting and demand-side management (DSM) • Reduced line losses, infrastructure improvements, and volt/VAr management • Integration of renewables • Electrification of transport • Electrification of heating, cooling, and hot water • Electrification of industrial heating/cooling loads. Furthermore, the smart grid road map for Ireland calls for the following actions within the next 10 years: • Establishment of a test-bed facility, strengthening Ireland’s position as a lead- er in smart grid technology research • Development and deployment of training courses in smart grid systems and technologies • Review of policies dealing with energy and CO2 ratings of buildings to en- courage electrification • National rollout of smart meters with DSM and variable time-of-use tariffs • Development of interoperability standards and secure communications and data protocols • The continuation of the grid investment programs Grid-West and Grid 25 • Development of an overlay of secure, high-speed communications onto the electricity system. France In the publication “Road Map for Smart Grids and Electricity Systems Integrating Renewable Energy Sources,” four main challenges are identified in the European context: Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 110 Additional Examples of Road Maps from Electric Utilities • Attain emissions reduction objectives for greenhouse gases (GHG) set for 2020 (20 percent reduction) and for 2050 (factor 4), notably via energy-effi- ciency schemes • Compliance with European objectives for the integration of renewable energy • Maintaining the quality and security of supply in the electricity system • Consideration of social issues related to electricity supply. The road map considers two time frames—up to 2020 and up to 2050: • The time frame up to 2020 is focused on attaining European objectives (20/20/20), while maintaining high-quality supply and system security. • The 2050 time frame allows for contrasting representations of future electric- ity networks and systems, based on the unfolding of trends identified in the 2020 time frame, subject to different regulatory options envisioned for grids and electricity systems. The road map identifies three key drivers that, in the long term, will play a determining role in the form and nature of smart grids and electrical systems: • The degree of intelligence in the electricity system and grids, and the range of products and services associated with this capacity • The degree and type of decentralization in the system and grids • Regulatory choices, business models, and the role of players affecting smart grids and electrical systems. Variation in the parameters of the different key drivers (intelligence, decen- tralization, regulation) leads to four contrasting visions of the electricity system and networks. Two visions for the 2020 timeframe and two visions for the 2050 timeframe are as follows: • Vision 2020—1: Demand flexibility and storage facilities coupled to large- scale variable generating capacity • Vision 2020—2: Demand flexibility and management of dispersed storage • Vision 2050—1: Demand flexibility, storage, and distributed energy resource (DER) in a centralized grid architecture • Vision 2050—2: Demand response and DER in smart clusters. Note 1. Million tons of oil equivalent. Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 APPENDIX C Some Guidelines on the Cost-Benefit Analysis of Smart Grid Applications This sections list some references to useful documents that describe guidelines on the CBA of smart grid applications. Guidelines Brief description U.S. Smart Grid Development and This presentation by Eric Lightner, director of the Smart Grid Task Force to the Global Smart Grid Coordination Board on Global Science and Technology, describes the vision, character- (Eric Lightner 2012) istics, challenges, and key activities of the smart grid of the future in the United States. Additionally, the presentation provides details regarding a metric reporting and analysis process to quantify the monetary benefits related to smart grid functions. Guidelines for Conducting a Cost- This report by European Union’s Joint Research Center, Institute for Energy Benefit Analysis of Smart Grid and Transport, provides step-by-step guidance for conducting CBA of Projects—European Union (CBA smart grid projects. This framework is based on a similar methodological Methodology) (Giordano and oth- approach developed by the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) in the ers 2012) United States. CBA includes three main tasks—the definition of boundary conditions and implementation choices, identification of costs and ben- efits, and sensitivity of CBA results to variations in key parameters. Building a Smart Grid Business Case This guidance brief by the National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL), (NETL 2009) United States, helps in developing regional smart grid road maps. Assessing the gap between the current state and desired future state of the grid, busi- ness cases, and implementation plans can be analyzed and integrated into a road map. Business cases, thus devised, help in disaggregating the costs incurred and benefits accrued by diverse smart grid stakeholders such as consumers, utilities, and society. This document provides guidance for gap analysis, formulation of business cases, and road mapping. Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy   111 http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 Glossary Adaptive relay A protective relay whose internal settings change automati- cally as the portion of the power grid associated with the relay changes Advanced metering An integrated system of smart meters, communications net- infrastructure works, and data management systems that enables two-way communication between utilities and customers Anti-islanding A protective measure to ensure that distributed generating units automatically disconnect from a portion of the power grid that has become separated from the main power grid As-built model A software model representing the normal or nominal status of all electric distribution components As-operated model A software model representing the current operating status of all electric distribution components Asset optimization The practice of achieving the best possible performance of any distribution system component Automatic meter reading Technology for automatically collecting consumption, diag- nostic, and status data from electric meters and transferring that data to a central database for billing, troubleshooting, and analyzing Bidirectional voltage regulator A controller that adjusts its voltage in accordance with the magnitude and direction of load flow Big data Large and complex data sets containing information from smart meters and SCADA systems that are analyzed to deter- mine key performance metrics (see also “data mining”) Capacitor bank controller An autonomous or remotely controlled device that manages capacitor bank switching Community energy storage Small remote-controlled batteries connected to the distribu- tion secondary (LV) circuit Computer-assisted decision A process that uses the results of computer system analysis as making an aid in the operation and overall management of the distri- bution system Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy   113 http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 114 Glossary Conservation voltage reduction Intentional reduction of voltage within established limits, whenever such actions are possible to achieve demand reduc- tion and energy savings Customer participation The process of enabling customers to make voluntary chang- es in their electricity consumption patterns to reduce peak demand and conserve energy Data concentrator A device that collects information from a variety of indepen- dent sources (sensors, meters, and so on) and then transmits this information over a single communication channel Data mining The practice of automatically searching large stores of data to discover patterns and trends that go beyond simple analysis Demand response Processes in which end-use customers reduce their use of electricity in response to power grid needs, economic signals from a competitive wholesale market, or special retail rates Distributed energy resource Small-scale generators, energy storage devices, and controlla- ble loads that are connected to the MV or LV portion of the electric distribution system Distributed generation Small-scale generating units that are connected to the MV or LV portion of the electric distribution Distribution management A computer system and suite of software applications system designed to assist distribution system operators in improving the overall performance of the electric distribution system Drive-by metering systems Process by which electric meters can be read from the street by a passing vehicle Electric vehicles An automobile, van, or truck whose drive train is powered primarily by electricity Electrically operable switch A high-voltage switch that is equipped with a solenoid or motor-operating mechanism that can be opened or closed via a signal from an electric circuit Energy storage A device that is able to store energy and release the energy on demand Energy theft detection Processes of determining that electric energy is flowing to a consumer without being recorded by the meter Fast demand response Automated process of controlling end-use consumer-owned devices with very low latency (less than 5 minutes) to miti- gate the adverse consequences of a power system emergency Fault anticipation The process of detecting an incipient power system short circuit so that corrective action may take place before a full- blown fault occurs Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 Glossary 115 Fault location Analytical techniques for determining the approximate loca- tion of a short circuit Fault location isolation and An automatic or semi-automatic switching system for rapidly service restoration restoring power automatically to as many end-use customers as possible Faulted circuit indicator A sensor that generates a signal when line current flowing through the device exceeds an established threshold Feed-in tariff A method by which end-use customers are compensated financially for supplying energy to the power grid from cus- tomer-owned distributed generation Field communication network An electric distribution telecommunication facility that sup- ports multiple applications such as advanced metering infra- structure (AMI), distribution automation (DA), distributed generation (DG), and workforce automation Fully automated A system that operates with no human intervention Grid modernization The use of computer and communication technologies to improve the overall performance of the electric grid Information technology The study or use of systems (especially computers and tele- communications) for storing, retrieving, and sending information In-home display A home energy monitor that provides prompt, convenient feedback on electrical or other energy use Intelligent electronic device A term used in the electric power industry to describe micro- processor-based controllers of power system equipment, such as circuit breakers, transformers, and capacitor banks Islanding An operating mode in which a portion of the electric system becomes disconnected from the main power grid but remains energized and continues to supply electricity to end-use customers Load balancing The process of transferring electrical load from a heavily loaded facility to a lightly loaded facility to achieve a more even split Managed charging of The process of controlling the charging rate of an electric electric vehicles vehicle to minimize loading on the power grid Mesh radio A wireless method of communication in which information is transmitted through a network of transmitters/receivers en route to its final destination Microgrid A small portion of the electric system that serves the electric- ity needs of the local community (the microgrid may operate while connected to the main grid as well as from a separate island that is disconnected from the main grid) Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 116 Glossary Microprocessor A small computer that enables intelligent electronic devices (IEDs) to operate autonomously or via remote control to achieve a flexible set of business objectives Momentary average A metric that is used to indicate the number of power inter- interruption frequency index ruptions lasting less than five minutes (and less than one minute in some jurisdictions) On-line power flow A computer program that uses a distribution system model for computing the electrical conditions at any point on the electric distribution feeder Optimal network A computer program that determine switching actions that reconfiguration may be performed in a selected portion of the distribution system to accomplish specified business objectives (reduce electric losses, balance load, and so on) Outage management system A computer system for managing the electric utility’s response to power outages; this system typically processes calls from customers, manages field crew activities, and tracks reliability statistics Phasor measurement unit A device that measures the electrical waves on an electricity grid, using a common time source for synchronization Remote terminal unit A SCADA system component that acquires data from a vari- ety of sources (sensors, meters, and hardwired inputs), con- verts data to engineering units, stores this information, and transmits the information automatically or upon request to a central location via available telecommunication facilities Renewable energy Energy that is generated from natural processes that are con- tinuously replenished; sources include sunlight, geothermal heat, wind, tides, water, and various forms of biomass Renewable generation Electricity generators that are powered by renewable energy sources Resilience The ability of a facility to withstand stress and catastrophe; for electrical distribution systems, this generally refers to the ability of the power infrastructure (lines, poles, and so on) to prevent total failure due to severe storms and other emergencies Reverse power flow An electrical condition in which the direction of power flow is opposite to what is normally expected; in today’s context this refers to the reversal of power flow due to the high out- put of distributed generating facilities Rule-based system A solution technique in which decisions are made based on a fixed set of simple logical comparisons (if-then-else) Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 Glossary 117 Self-healing A process by which all or part of the electrical system is restored automatically (without human intervention) follow- ing a power outage or service interruption Semi-automated An approach that uses a combination of fully automated processes (that do not involve human intervention) and manual processes to achieve a desired result Sensor A device that measures an electrical quantity (voltage, cur- rent, and so on) and produces a computer-readable signal that represents the original measurement value Smart AC inverter A device that converts the DC power produced by distrib- uted generators and energy storage devices to the AC power that flows on the power lines; “smart” AC inverters have the ability to dynamically change the way this conversion is per- formed based on distribution system operating conditions Smart grid A conceptual vision of an electric system whose realization requires the use of conventional and advanced computer and communication technology Smart meter A device for measuring end-users’ electricity consumption and other end-use information and transmitting this informa- tion on demand to a central location. Solar photovoltaic power A process for generating electricity directly from sunlight via an electronic process that occurs naturally in certain types of material, called semiconductors Stand-alone device A device that is able to operate autonomously using only “local” measurements Static VAr compensator A set of electrical devices for providing fast-acting reactive power on high-voltage electricity transmission and distribu- tion networks Supervised operation A process that requires human oversight and approval of all computer-based control actions Supervisory control and data A system for continuously monitoring and initiating remote acquisition control actions for field devices over telecommunication facilities System Average Interruption A metric that indicates the total time in a year that the aver- Duration Index age end-user is without power System Average Interruption A metric for indicating how many times the average end-user Frequency Index is without power in a given year Time-of-use rates A tariff system in which the unit cost of electricity to the end- user varies with the time of day; for example, the unit cost is higher during peak load periods Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 118 Glossary Two-way communication A telecommunication facility that is able to transmit informa- network tion to and receive information from a field device Vehicle-to-grid capabilities A system in which plug-in electric vehicles, such as electric cars (BEVs) and plug-in hybrids (PHEVs), communicate with the power grid to deliver electricity to the grid Vehicle-to-home capabilities A system that allows an end-user to deliver energy to the home from an electric vehicle car battery Volt/VAr optimization A process of controlling voltage and reactive power flow on the electric distribution system to improve overall system performance; the process allows a utility to reduce electrical losses, eliminate voltage profile problems, and reduce electri- cal demand Wi-Fi A local area wireless technology that allows an electronic device to exchange data or connect to the Internet over short distances (approximately 66 feet indoors) Wind power Conversion of wind energy into electricity Zero net energy A point at which the total amount of energy used by a par- ticular site (for example, a building) on an annual basis is roughly equal to the amount of renewable energy created on the site Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 Bibliography ADEME (French Agency for Environment and Energy Management). 2009. “Road Map for Smart Grids and Electricity Systems Integrating Renewable Energy Sources.” http://www2.ademe.fr/servlet/getBin?name=EA7316C69FBD6C4A1AF9FD685A4 74A941260278372367.pdf. Alabama Power. 2014. Modern Computer-Based Control Center and Operator Console Design. With permission from Larry Clark, AB Power. Aldana, A., R. Cespedes, E. Parra, R. Lopez, and M. Ruiz. 2011. “Implementation of Smart Grid in the Colombian Electrical Sector.” Paper prepared for the IEEE PES confer- ence, Medellin, Colombia, October 19–21. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/mostRecen- tIssue.jsp?punumber=6073287. Bradford, R., and C. Sandberg. 2012. “The Role of Energy Storage in Development of Smart Grids.” White paper by Altairnano. http://www.altairnano.com/wp-content/ uploads/2012/02/EnergyStorageSmartGridsWP.pdf. California ISO. 2010. “Smart Grid: Road Map and Architecture.” http://www.smartgrid. epri.com/doc/cal%20iso%20road map_public.pdf. Clark, G. L. 2013. “Change Management for Grid Modernization at Alabama Power.” Presentation at the IEEE PES general meeting, Vancouver, BC, July. Colombia Inteligente website. “Bank of Information.” http://www.colombiainteligente. org/banco_informacion/Pages/Flash-Informativo.aspx. Cooper Power Systems. 2013. “Product Catalog, Form 6 Recloser Control.” http://www. cooperindustries.com/content/public/en/power_systems/products/controls_and_ relays/recloser_controls/form_6.html. Dugan, R. 2012. “Impact of Distributed Energy Resources on DA/DMS.” DistribuTECH Utility University Courses course by EPRI, San Diego, January. Energy Information Administration. 2011. “Smart Grid Legislative and Regulatory Policies and Case Studies.” http://www.eia.gov/analysis/studies/electricity/pdf/ smartggrid.pdf. EPRI (Electric Power Research Institute). 2011. “California Utility Vision and Road Map for the Smart Grid of 2020.” Report number: CEC-500-2011-034, Public Interest Energy Research (PIER) program final project, July. http://www.energy.ca. gov/2011publications/CEC-500-2011-034/CEC-500-2011-034.pdf. ———. 2012. “IntelliGrid Smart Grid Road Map Methodology and Lessons Learned.” http://www.smartgridnews.com/artman/uploads/2/000000000001026747.pdf. ———. “Smart Grids Resource Center.” http://www.smartgrid.epri.com/. Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy   119 http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 120 Bibliography ———. “Common Functions for Smart Inverters, Version 3.” 2014 Program 174 Integration of Distributed Renewables. http://www.epri.com/abstracts/Pages/ ProductAbstract.aspx?ProductId=000000003002002233. ESTA International. “ESTA Survey on International Smart Grid Drivers.” http://www. estainternational.com/ESTA/Home.html. ETP (European Technology Platform). “SmartGrids.” http://www.smartgrids.eu/. Eurelectric (Union of the Electricity Industry). 2011. “Regulation for Smart Grids.” http:// www.eurelectric.org/media/25920/eurelectric_report__on_reg_for_sg_final-2011- 030-0131-01-e.pdf. Executive Office of the President of the United States. 2011. “A Policy Framework for the 21st Century Grid: Enabling Our Secure Energy Future.” http://www.whitehouse. gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/nstc-smart-grid-june2011.pdf. FERC (Federal Energy Regulatory Commission). 2009. “Smart Grid Policy.” Policy Statement, Docket No: PL09-4-000. http://www.ferc.gov/whats-new/comm- meet/2009/071609/E-3.pdf. Garcia, Marie L., and Olin H. Bray. 1997. “Fundamentals of Technology Road Mapping.” Report # SAND97-0665, SANDIA National Laboratories. http://www.sandia.gov/ PHMCOE/pdf/Sandia%27sFundamentalsofTech.pdf. Giordano, V., I. Onyeji, G. Fulli, M. Jimenez, and C. Filiou. 2012. “Guidelines for Conducting a Cost-Benefit Analysis of Smart Grid Projects.” JRC reference reports, European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu/energy/gas_electricity/smartgrids/ doc/20120427_smartgrids_guideline.pdf. IEA (International Energy Agency). 2011. “Smart Grids Technology Road Maps.” http:// www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/smartgrids_road map.pdf. IEC (International Electromechanical Commission). “Smart Grid Standards Map.” http:// smartgridstandardsmap.com/. Kempener, R., P. Komor, and A. Hoke. 2013. “Smart Grids and Renewables. A Guide for Effective Deployment.” Working paper by the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), United Arab Emirates. Lightner, Eric. 2008. “Evolution and Progress of Smart Grid Development at the Department of Energy.” Presentation by Eric Lightner, Director, Smart Grid Task Force, at the FERC/NARUC Smart Grid Collaborative Workshop, Washington, DC, July 23. ———. 2010. “How Smart Grid Can Enable Electricity to be the Fuel of the Future.” Presentation at SAE 2010 Government/Industry Meeting, Federal Smart Grid Task Force, Washington, DC, January 28. http://www.sae.org/events/gim/presenta- tions/2010/EricLightner.pdf. ———. 2012. “U.S. Smart Grid Development and Global Smart Grid Coordination.” Presentation to the Board on Global Science and Technology, Washington, DC, June 21. http://sites.nationalacademies.org/PGA/cs/groups/pgasite/documents/webpage/ pga_070811.pdf. Litos Strategic Communication. 2008. “What a Smart Grid Means to Our Nation’s Future: A Smarter Electric Grid Works to Strengthen Our Nation’s Economy, Environment, Security and Independence.” Report prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC. http://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/oeprod/ DocumentsandMedia/Policymakers.pdf. Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 Bibliography 121 McGranaghan, M., and R. Uluski. 2012. “Development of the Smart Distribution System.” Presented to the International Conference on Electricity Distribution (CIRED) con- ference, Frankfurt Germany, September 2011. NETL (National Energy Technology Laboratory). 2009. “Building a Smart Grid Business Case.” Report developed for the U.S. Department of Energy, August 2009. http:// www.netl.doe.gov/File%20Library/research/energy%20efficiency/smart%20grid/ whitepapers/Whitepaper_Building-A-Smart-Grid-Business-Case_ APPROVED_2009.pdf. NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology). 2010. “NIST Framework and Road Map for Smart Grid Interoperability Standards, Release 1.0.” NIST Special Publication 1108. http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/releases/upload/smartgrid_ interoperability_final.pdf. NREL (National Renewable Energy Laboratory). “About Distributed Energy.” http:// www.nrel.gov/learning/eds_distributed_energy.html. NYISO (New York Independent System Operator). 2010. “Envisioning a Smarter Grid for New York Consumer.” New York Independent System Operator (NYISO) white paper. http://www.nyiso.com/public/webdocs/media_room/publications_presenta- tions/White_Papers/White_Papers/Envisioning_A_Smarter_Grid_NYISO_White_ Paper_091710.pdf. Ohrn, Marina, and Hormoz Kazemzadeh. 2010. “The Convergence of Distribution Networks and Smart Grid Technologies.” Article published on Electric Light and Power website. http://www.elp.com/articles/powergrid_international/print/vol- ume-15/issue-9/features/the-convergence-of-distribution-networks-and-smart-grid- technologies.html. Provincial Electricity Authority. “Thailand Smart Grid Road Map.” https://www.pea.co.th/ en/introduction/Pages/PEA%20smart%20grid%20road map.aspx. PG&E (Pacific Gas and Electric). 2011. “Smart Grid Deployment Plan 2011–2020.” Smart Grid Technologies Order Instituting Rulemaking 08-12-009, California Public Utilities Commission Report. http://www.pge.com/includes/docs/pdfs/shared/ edusafety/electric/SmartGridDeploymentPlan2011_06-30-11.pdf. RAP (The Regulatory Assistance Project). 2011. “Energy Regulation in the U.S.: A Guide.” March. http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&sourc e=web&cd=1&ved=0CCkQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.raponline. org%2Fdocs%2FRAP_Lazar_ElectricityRegulationInTheUS_Guide_2011_03. pdf&ei=G0KHU_-NJMK2sATB7IEY&usg=AFQjCNGQmJpx6o94LjxdGMzSmrs BiezsFQ&sig2=v1DA0qPSBdUetAzcoQcX3A. Rodrigues, Da Costa M., G. Lorenz, and P. Schlosser. 2011. “Eurelectric Paper on Regulatory Incentives for Smart Grids.” Paper 0292 at Twenty-First International Conference on Electricity Distribution, Frankfurt, Germany, June 6–9. http://www. cired.net/publications/cired2011/part1/papers/CIRED2011_0292_final.pdf. Sachdeva, A., and P. Wallis. 2010. “Our Demand: Reducing Electricity Use in Victoria through Demand Management.” Monash Sustainability Institute Report 10/4, Melbourne. http://monash.edu/research/sustainability-institute/assets/documents/ dm-electricity-report.pdf. SDG&E (San Diego Gas and Electric Company). 2011. “Smart Grid Deployment Plan 2011–2020.” https://www.sdge.com/sites/default/files/documents/smartgriddeploy- mentplan.pdf. Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 122 Bibliography SEAI (Sustainable Energy Authority of Ireland). “Road Map for Smart Grid in Ireland.” http://www.seai.ie/Publications/Energy_Modelling_Group/SEAI_2050_Energy_ Road maps/Smartgrid_Road map.pdf. SGCC (State Grid Corporation of China). 2010. “Framework and Road Map for Strong and Smart Grid Standards.” Report, State Grid Corporation of China, Beijing. http:// www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CB 0QFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fc1.cigre.org%2FMedia%2FSC%2FD2%2FSGCC- Standard-Roadmap_Raymond-Jean&ei=DrqgU53PB_SqsQSs0YGYAQ&usg=AFQjC NHGZavi7UbWd8rNj85YmW-cAbpPyw&sig2=xj-3oOOD805QgL1k0mvF6A&bv m=bv.68911936,d.cWc. ———. “Developing Strong and Smart Grid: The Best Practice of State Grid Corporation of China.” Summary Report, State Grid Corporation of China, Beijing. SNL (Sandia National Laboratories). “Sandia National Laboratories Technologies Available for Licensing.” SANDIA website. http://techportal.eere.energy.gov/lab/SNL. THESL (Toronto Hydro Electric System Limited). 2009. “Smart Grid Plan.” https://www. torontohydro.com/sites/electricsystem/Documents/2010EDR/G1_T01_S01_ INTRODUCTION%20AND%20SUMMARY_V07.pdf. Triplett, M. 2012. “Distributed Resource Integration: Present and Future.” Power point presentation at UISOL sponsored conference, Philadelphia, PA, September 16. U.S. Department of Energy. “The Smart Grid. An Introduction.” http://energy.gov/sites/ prod/files/oeprod/DocumentsandMedia/DOE_SG_Book_Single_Pages%281%29.pdf. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2007. “Aligning Utility Incentives with Investment in Energy Efficiency: A Resource of the National Action Plan for Energy Efficiency.” http://www.epa.gov/cleanenergy/documents/suca/incentives.pdf. World Economic Forum in partnership with Accenture. 2009. “Accelerating Smart Grid Investments.” http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_SmartGrid_Investments_ Report_2009.pdf. Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 Environmental Benefits Statement The World Bank is committed to reducing its environmental footprint. In support of this commitment, the Publishing and Knowledge Division leverages electronic publishing options and print-on-demand technology, which is located in regional hubs worldwide. Together, these initiatives enable print runs to be lowered and shipping distances decreased, resulting in reduced paper consumption, chemical use, greenhouse gas emissions, and waste. The Publishing and Knowledge Division follows the recommended standards for paper use set by the Green Press Initiative. Whenever possible, books are printed on 50 percent to 100 percent postconsumer recycled paper, and at least 50 percent of the fiber in our book paper is either unbleached or bleached using Totally Chlorine Free (TCF), Processed Chlorine Free (PCF), or Enhanced Elemental Chlorine Free (EECF) processes. More information about the Bank’s environmental philosophy can be found at http://crinfo.worldbank.org/wbcrinfo/node/4. Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0410-6 P ractical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy: The Case of Distribution guides stakeholders on how utilities can define their own smart grid vision, identify priorities, and structure investment plans. While most of these strategic aspects apply to any area of the electricity grid, the book focuses on distribution. The guidance includes key building blocks for modernizing the distribution grid and provides examples of grid modernization projects. The concept of the smart grid is relevant to all grids. What varies are the magnitude and type of the incremental steps toward modernization for achieving a specific smart grid vision. A utility that is at a relatively low level of grid modernization may leapfrog one or more levels of modernization to achieve some of the benefits of the highest levels of grid modernization. Smart grids impact electric distribution systems significantly. In developing countries, moderniz- ing the distribution grid promises to benefit the operation of electric distribution utilities in many and various ways. These benefits include improved operational efficiency (such as reduced losses and lower energy consumption), reduced peak demand, improved service reliability, and ability to accommodate distributed generating resources without adversely impacting overall power quality. Practical Guidance for Defining a Smart Grid Modernization Strategy concludes by describing funding and regulatory issues that may need to be taken into account when developing smart grid plans. The World Bank Studies series is available for free download online through the Open Knowledge Repository (https://openknowledge.worldbank.org). ISBN 978-1-4648-0410-6 SKU 210410