Digital Innovations in Education Brief N°5 Screen Time in Early Childhood Education: Balancing the Digital Scales Ezequiel Molina screen time in early childhood education 1 © 2025 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW Washington DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000 Internet: www.worldbank.org This work is a product of the staff of The World Bank with external contributions. The findings, inter- pretations, and conclusions expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect the views of The World Bank, its Board of Executive Directors, or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or currency of the data included in this work and does not assume responsibility for any errors, omissions, or discrepancies in the infor- mation, or liability with respect to the use of or failure to use the information, methods, processes, or conclusions set forth. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal sta- tus of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Nothing herein shall constitute or be construed or considered to be a limitation upon or waiver of the privileges and immunities of The World Bank, all of which are specifically reserved. Please cite this work as follows: Molina, E. (2025). Balancing the Digital Scales: Screen Time Man- agement in Early Childhood Education. In Digital Innovations in Education. World Bank. Rights and Permissions The material in this work is subject to copyright. Because The World Bank encourages dissemination of its knowledge, this work may be reproduced, in whole or in part, for noncommercial purposes as long as full attribution to this work is given. Any queries on rights and licenses, including subsidiary rights, should be addressed to World Bank Publications, The World Bank Group, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA; fax: 202-522- 2625; e-mail: pubrights@worldbank.org. Design: Utopix Studio Artificial Intelligence Support This report was developed with analytical and drafting assistance from advanced AI systems includ- ing Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Anthropic), GPT-4.5 (OpenAI), Gemini 2.5 Pro (Google) for deep research synthesis. AI contributions were reviewed, edited, and approved by human authors. Acknowledgements This brief is a product of the Education Global Practice for Latin America and the Caribbean at the World Bank as part of the Digital Innovations in Education series. It was prepared under the guid- ance of Andreas Blom (Education Practice Manager for Latin America and the Caribbean). Other contributions were provided by World Bank colleagues Maria Rebeca Barron Rodriguez, Hel- ena Rovner, and Cristobal Cobo. Special acknowledgment to the early childhood development specialists, parents, educators, and technology experts who provided valuable perspectives throughout the development of this report. This report was developed between March and April 2025. Screen Time in Early Childhood Education: Balancing the Digital Scales Ezequiel Molina Executive Summary The Digital Childhood Dilemma Over the past decade the touchscreen has become the default pacifier for millions of underfives. Since 2012 the share of households with an internetconnected mo- bile device has more than doubled in both OECD and uppermiddleincome con- omies (OECD, 2019), turning every living room, bus queue and waiting room into a potential media hub.  Today the average preschooler spends about two hours a day in front of a screen—twice the World Health Organization’s 1hour limit for 2 to 5yearolds (WHO, 2019). Recent studies on every continent show that overshooting the guideline is no longer the exception but the rule: • South Asia – Chandigarh, India 59 %; suburban Sri Lanka 60 % exceed > 1 h/day • SouthEast Asia – urban Selangor, Malaysia 91 % exceed > 1 h/day • Western Pacific – national sample, China 75 % exceed > 1 h/day • Europe & Eastern  Mediterranean – Lisbon region, Portugal  51  % ex- ceed > 2 h/day; metropolitan Istanbul (Türkiye) 49 % exceed WHO limit • Americas – NHIS, United States 47 % exceed > 2 h leisure/day; Ceará, Bra- zil 69 % exceed WHO limit; national Colombia 50 % exceed > 2 h/day; Mexi- co City ≈ 66 % exceed > 2 h/day • Africa – urban centres, Ethiopia 62 % exceed > 1 h/day Across these diverse settings, excessive early exposure is repeatedly linked to slower language growth, weaker attention regulation, poorer social competence, reduced motor coordination and disrupted, healthy sleep (e.g., Raj  et  al.  2022; Geng  et  al.  2023). The challenge facing parents, educators and policymakers is therefore no longer whether young children should encounter screens, but how to shape use so that digital opportunity does not crowd out the developmental experi- ences on which lifelong learning depends. Beyond Simplistic Solutions Many existing approaches to screen time management rely on simplistic time lim- its or general warnings that fail to address the complex realities families face. Par- ents often turn to screens as practical solutions to everyday challenges—needing to complete tasks, manage difficult behaviors, or simply find moments of relief. The “digital babysitter” phenomenon reflects legitimate needs, not merely poor parenting choices. This report moves beyond simplistic frameworks to offer a nuanced, evidence-based approach that acknowledges both the developmental concerns and practical real- ities of raising children in a digital world. Drawing from over 80 studies across 18 countries and six world regions, we present a comprehensive analysis of screen time impacts and intervention effectiveness. The Science of Screen Exposure Our analysis reveals several critical insights about how screen exposure affects early development: Technoference disrupts essential interactions. When parents or children use screens, the quality and quantity of vital back-and-forth exchanges diminish, affect- ing language development and emotional bonding. Language acquisition faces particular vulnerability. Screen time often displaces conversational opportunities that build vocabulary and comprehension, with neuro- imaging studies showing structural differences in brain language regions associated with high screen exposure. Attention and self-regulation show measurable effects. Research links exces- sive screen time to attention difficulties and behavioral challenges, with longitudinal studies showing impacts persisting years later. Sleep patterns undergo significant disruption. Blue light exposure delays mela- tonin production and bedtime screen use consistently reduces sleep quantity and quality—particularly concerning as sleep plays a crucial role in brain development. Individual and contextual factors matter significantly. The impact of screen ex- posure varies based on child temperament, family circumstances, available alterna- tives, and cultural contexts. 6 screen time in early childhood education The Habit Formation Framework Understanding why families struggle to implement healthy screen habits despite good intentions is essential for effective intervention. This report introduces a habit formation framework that addresses the intention-action gap through five key prin- ciples: 1. Cue identification and substitution: Recognizing trigger situations for screen use and developing specific alternatives 2. Implementation intentions: Creating concrete “if-then” plans for challeng- ing moments 3. Environmental restructuring: Modifying physical spaces to promote de- sired behaviors 4. Tiny habits methodology: Starting with minimal changes anchored to exist- ing routines 5. Social accountability systems: Leveraging group dynamics to sustain new patterns This approach transforms abstract guidelines into practical, sustainable habits that eventually become automatic, requiring minimal ongoing effort. Evidence-Based Intervention Strategies Building on this framework, we present four core intervention domains: Enhanced parental engagement that goes beyond information sharing to include habit mapping exercises, alternative activity planning, and ongoing implementation support. Accessible alternative activities including play-based learning initiatives, dialogic reading approaches, and community resource sharing systems that effectively com- pete with screens for child engagement. Boundary-setting support through family media agreements, tech-free zones and times, and developmental monitoring tools tailored to individual family needs. Modeling and peer connections that address parent screen habits and create sup- portive communities maintaining healthier digital norms. “The first five years of life represent a critical window for brain architecture, socio-emotional growth, language acquisition, and the formation of lifelong habits.” screen time in early childhood education 7 Technology as Part of the Solution Innovative digital approaches can paradoxically help manage screen challenges: AI parenting assistants delivered through familiar platforms like WhatsApp offer personalized, just-in-time support when families face screen-related decisions. Smart screen operating systems incorporate developmental principles and adap- tive features that encourage healthier usage patterns and natural session endings. Digital coaching platforms provide structured guidance through the process of changing family screen habits with personalization and progress tracking. While these technological approaches show promise, they require careful devel- opment and evaluation to ensure they serve rather than undermine developmental goals. A Call for Coordinated Action Addressing early childhood screen time effectively requires coordinated effort across multiple sectors: Policymakers must develop clear guidelines, fund community resources, and sup- port ongoing research on long-term impacts and intervention effectiveness. Educational institutions can model effective non-screen activities, create consis- tent messaging, and provide families with practical alternatives. Healthcare providers have unique opportunities to integrate screen time guidance into well-child visits and connect developmental observations to technology habits. Technology developers bear significant responsibility to incorporate age-appro- priate design principles that naturally encourage moderate, developmentally valu- able use. Parents and caregivers ultimately shape children’s screen experiences through both direct management and modeling, benefiting from clear guidelines and com- munity support. 8 screen time in early childhood education Balancing the Digital Scales This report offers a balanced perspective that neither demonizes technology nor dismisses legitimate concerns. Digital technology is an inescapable part of modern childhood, and appropriate, guided exposure helps prepare children for the world they will inherit. The goal is not to eliminate screens but to establish patterns of use that protect critical developmental experiences while capturing the bene- fits of thoughtfully designed digital tools. By implementing the evidence-based approaches outlined in this report, we can help ensure that young children experience the potential benefits of digital innova- tion while preserving the irreplaceable human interactions, play experiences, and discovery opportunities that build the foundation for lifelong learning and develop- ment. A brain development timeline (0-5 years) with key milestones and potential screen impact points 0–6 months 1–3 years Key developmental milestones: Key developmental milestones: • Rapid formation of synapses (neural • Language explosion: rst words, connections). simple phrases. • Sensory development: vision, hearing, • Growth in ne and gross motor skills. touch. • Understanding routines and • Early emotional responses (social cause-e ect relationships. smiling, speci c crying). Risks: Risks: • Linked to speech delays and attention • May a ect caregiver bonding (less eye problems. contact, reduced interaction). • Reduces symbolic play and social engagement. • Sensory overstimulation: uncontrolled light, sound, movement. • Passive content doesn't support meaningful learning. 6–12 months 3–5 years Key developmental milestones: Key developmental milestones: • Development of receptive language: • Rapid development of the prefrontal begin to recognize familiar words. cortex (self-regulation, working memory, planning). • Improved visual and auditory memory. • Advancements in social skills, complex • Strengthened emotional attachment language, and symbolic thinking. and imitation skills. • Cooperative and narrative play. Risks: • Reduced active play and face-to-face Risks: interaction. • Unsupervised or excessive screen time may a ect sleep, behavior, and focus. • Expressive language delays if screen time replaces human communication. • May increase the risk of mental health issues later if it replaces physical play, social interaction, or sleep. screen time in early childhood education 9 Introduction: 1 Early Childhood in the Digital Age 1.1 The Evolving Landscape of Digital Exposure Barely a generation ago, screen time meant the family television set. Today a typi- cal preschooler juggles cartoons on a smart TV, games on a tablet, and video calls on a parent’s phone—often before mastering scissors or shoelaces. Mobile‑broad- band subscriptions rose from 54 per  100 inhabitants in  2012 to 115 per  100 in 2024 across OECD members, with Brazil, China, and South Africa showing similar growth (OECD, 2019). Against this backdrop, roughly one‑half to three‑quarters of 2‑ to  5‑year‑olds now exceed the World Health Organization’s 1‑hour recommendation: Table 1. Prevalence of Preschoolers Exceeding WHO ScreenTime Recom- mendations Threshold used Region Country / Setting Study (year) % Exceeding in study Asia Chandigarh, India Nair et al., 2021  > 1 h/day 59.5 % Guangdong, China Geng et al., 2023  > 1 h / > 2 h 67 % / 29 % Europe & MENA Portugal(COVID19 confinement) Valente et al., 2021  > 2 h/day 51 % Istanbul, Türkiye Güler & Ocak, 2024 WHO limit (> 1 h) 49 % Americas United States (NHIS) CDC, 2022  > 2 h leisure/day 47 % Ceará, Brazil Rocha et al., 2021 WHO limit (> 1 h) 69 % National, Colombia González et al., 2022  > 2 h leisure/day 50 % Mexico City Hurwitz et al., 2020  > 2 h/day ≈ 66 % Africa Ethiopia – urban Abdeta et al., 2024  > 1 h/day (derived) 62 % Ethiopia – rural Abdeta et al., 2024  > 1 h/day (derived) 15 % SE Asia Selangor, Malaysia Raj et al., 2022  > 1 h/day 91 % The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated these trends, as lockdowns and remote learn- ing pushed digital devices into the center of childhood experience. Even as in-per- son activities have resumed, the heightened reliance on digital tools has persisted, creating what some developmental experts call a “new normal” that demands ur- gent attention from parents, educators, and policymakers. 10 screen time in early childhood education 1.2 The “Digital Babysitter” Phenomenon: Cultural and Eco- nomic Contexts Throughout much of the world, the “digital babysitter”  – a phone, tablet, or other screen handed to a child so the device can stand in for an attentive adult – has become a routine fixture of early childhood. Parents deploy it to calm tod- dlers in supermarket lines, restaurant queues, waiting rooms, or simply to carve out minutes for work and household chores. In dual‑earner homes, a screen bridges the gap between long workdays and limited formal childcare; single parents jug- gling multiple jobs often see it as the only practical option when no other adult is available. In low‑resource communities – from rural Ethiopian villages to peri‑ur- ban districts in Latin America – digital content can become a child’s most accessible form of stimulation when safe play spaces or early‑learning programmes are scarce (Abdeta et al., 2024; Rocha et al., 2021). Urban middle‑class families in cities such as Kuala Lumpur, Bogotá, and Istanbul likewise report using tablets as rewards for good behaviour or calming tools before bedtime, reinforcing the device’s role as a convenient caretaker (Raj et al., 2022; González et al., 2022; Güler & Ocak, 2024). Yet pragmatic convenience collides with developmental science: contingent, back‑and‑forth interaction with caring adults remains irreplaceable for wiring the brain’s language, social, and executive‑function circuits. The first five years constitute a critical window for neural architecture, socio‑emotional growth, and the formation of lifelong habits. As the American Academy of Pediatrics emphasises, “Children need hands‑on exploration and social interaction with trusted caregivers to develop their cognitive, language, motor, and social‑emotional skills” (AAP, 2022). The challenge, therefore, is not to demonise technology but to establish guardrails— habits, products, and policies—that protect these essential human exchanges while still harnessing well‑designed digital content for learning and inclusion. 1.3 Scope and Purpose: Bridging Research, Policy, and Practice This report tackles the growing challenge of excessive screen time in early child- hood through an evidence‑based, solution‑oriented lens. To ground every recom- mendation in solid research, we drew on more than 70 peer‑reviewed studies and official datasets from 17 countries, covering every region of the globe. This broad foundation lets us compare patterns across diverse cultural and economic contexts instead of extrapolating from a handful of high‑income settings. Our purpose is threefold. First, we synthesize and contextualize the evidence, map- ping converging findings—such as the near‑global tendency for preschoolers to exceed WHO screen‑time guidelines—and unpacking the mechanisms behind those effects. Sec- ond, we translate science into actionable strategies, pairing developmental insights with habit‑formation techniques so families, educators, and health providers can move from good intentions to sustainable routines. Third, we propose innovative solutions, includ- ing AI‑enabled tools and community resource models, to make proven practices more ac- cessible, personalized, and scalable—especially in low‑resource settings. Throughout, we take a balanced stance: digital media can enrich learning when thought- fully designed and well guided, but it must not displace the responsive human interac- tions, unstructured play, and restorative sleep that underpin healthy development. Our goal is therefore not to eradicate screens, but to foster healthy patterns of use that safe- guard children’s growth while preparing them for an increasingly digital world. screen time in early childhood education 11 1.4 Target Audience: Who Should Use This Report This report is designed as a practical resource for mul- tiple stakeholders engaged in supporting early child- hood development: “Digital Policymakers and Government Officials will find ev- idence-based frameworks for developing regulations, technology guidelines, and public health campaigns that address offers potential screen time as a significant childhood health issue. The learning monitoring and evaluation metrics provide tools for as- opportunities sessing population-level impacts and intervention ef- and will be fectiveness. central to Early Childhood Educators and School Administra- children’s future tors can use the classroom strategies, alternative activi- lives.” ty frameworks, and parent communication tools to cre- ate developmentally appropriate technology policies and practices within educational settings. Healthcare Providers, including pediatricians, family doctors, and child develop- ment specialists, will benefit from the screening tools, conversation guides, and in- tervention protocols that can be integrated into well-child visits and family counseling. 12 screen time in early childhood education Technology Developers and Content Creators will find design principles and eth- ical frameworks for creating digital experiences that respect developmental needs and minimize negative impacts while maximizing educational value. Researchers across disciplines will discover a synthesis of current evidence and identified knowledge gaps that can inform future investigation priorities. Parents and Caregivers will gain practical strategies, everyday tools, and a deep- er understanding of how to navigate screen time decisions based on their child’s unique needs and family circumstances. By bringing these diverse stakeholders together around a common understanding and coordinated approach, we aim to create environments where young children can thrive in the digital age without sacrificing the foundational experiences essen- tial for healthy development. In the sections that follow, we will explore the scientific evidence on screen time impacts, present a habit formation framework for sustainable behavior change, de- tail evidence-based interventions, introduce technological innovations to support implementation, and provide a roadmap for coordinated action across sectors. To- gether, these elements create a comprehensive approach to one of the most signif- icant challenges facing early childhood development in our time. screen time in early childhood education 13 14 screen time in early childhood education The Science 2 of Screen Time: Developmental Impacts 2.1 Technoference: How Screens Disrupt Parent-Child Interactions The term “technoference” describes how technology interrupts interactions be- tween parents and children, a phenomenon with significant implications for early development. When caregivers divide their attention between screens and children, the quality and quantity of developmentally crucial interactions diminish. Research Evidence: McDaniel and Radesky (2018) conducted a pivotal study with 183 families, finding that parental device use significantly predicted child externalizing behaviors. Chil- dren responded to perceived parental inattention with increased frustration, hyper- activity, and attention-seeking behaviors. These findings suggest that technoference creates a cycle where parental device use leads to child behavioral challenges, which may in turn drive further parental screen use as a coping mechanism. Observational research by Radesky et al. (2014) in 55 fast-food restaurants docu- mented a 73% reduction in verbal exchanges when caregivers used mobile devices during meals. Researchers observed diminished eye contact, responsive commu- nication, and joint attention—all foundational elements for secure attachment and language development. screen time in early childhood education 15 Developmental Mechanisms: The impact of technoference operates through several key mechanisms: 1. Reduced serve-and-return interactions: Early brain development relies on back-and-forth exchanges where children “serve” through gestures, sounds, or expressions, and adults “return” with responsive engagement. These inter- actions build neural connections essential for communication and social-emo- tional development. 2. Diminished attunement: When caregivers divide attention between devic- es and children, their ability to notice and respond to subtle emotional cues decreases, potentially affecting the child’s developing sense of self-worth and emotional security. 3. Modeling of behavior: Young children learn technology habits by observ- ing adults. When parents demonstrate constant device checking or divided attention, children internalize these patterns as normal social behavior. This research highlights that screen time concerns extend beyond children’s direct exposure to include how adult screen use shapes the interactive environment essen- tial for healthy development. 2.2 Language Development: Evidence from Neuroimaging and Longitudinal Studies Language acquisition during the first five years of life establishes foundations for literacy, academic achievement, and social functioning. A growing body of evidence links excessive screen time to compromised language development through multi- ple pathways. Research Evidence: Madigan et al. (2020) conducted a meta-analysis encompassing 42 studies with more than 18,000 children, revealing a small-to-moderate negative association be- tween screen time and language skills. Each additional hour of daily screen expo- sure was associated with decreased expressive vocabulary, raising concerns about cumulative effects over time. Neuroimaging research by Hutton et al. (2020) examined white matter integrity in language-processing brain regions of 47 preschoolers. Children with screen time exceeding 2 hours daily showed significantly lower structural integrity in tracts con- necting key language areas. These findings suggest that excessive screen exposure may affect the physical architecture of developing language networks during critical formation periods. The cross-cultural nature of these effects was confirmed by Strasser et al. (2022), who documented similar patterns in Chilean preschoolers. Their study of 841 children found that those exceeding 2 hours of daily screen time demonstrated significantly lower expressive vocabulary scores compared to peers with more limited exposure, even after controlling for socioeconomic variables. 16 screen time in early childhood education Developmental Mechanisms: Several mechanisms help explain how screen exposure affects language develop- ment: 1. Displacement of conversational opportunities: Screen time often replaces rich verbal interactions with caregivers. Unlike most digital content, real-world conversations include contingent responses, complex vocabulary, and con- textual language learning. 2. Passive versus active language processing: Many digital experiences po- sition children as passive recipients rather than active language users. Lan- guage development requires practice in both comprehension and produc- tion. 3. Reduced language quality and complexity: The language in many chil- dren’s digital media features simplified vocabulary and sentence structures compared to natural conversation, potentially limiting linguistic input rich- ness. 4. Background media effects: Even non-attended background media reduces both the quantity and quality of parent-child verbal interactions, creating lan- guage-sparse environments. These findings underscore the importance of protecting conversational experiences during critical language development periods. 2.3 Attention and Self-Regulation: Connections to Future Learning Outcomes The development of sustained attention and self-regulation during early childhood predicts academic readiness and classroom functioning. Screen exposure patterns may significantly impact these foundational skills through content design, exposure timing, and displacement of regulatory practice. Research Evidence: Longitudinal research by Tamana et al. (2019) followed 3,455 Canadian children from birth, finding that screen time exceeding 2 hours daily at age 5 predicted 2.3 times higher odds of clinically significant attention problems at age 7. This associa- tion persisted after controlling for potential confounding factors such as socioeco- nomic status, sleep duration, and physical activity levels. McHarg et al. (2020) conducted a systematic review of screen time and preschool behavioral outcomes, finding that 68% of studies demonstrated positive associa- tions between higher screen exposure and hyperactivity or attention problems. These relationships appeared strongest for entertainment content and when view- ing occurred before age 3. screen time in early childhood education 17 Developmental Mechanisms: The relationship between screen exposure and attention development operates through multiple pathways: 1. Rapid pace and frequent transitions: Many children’s programs feature quick scene changes and high stimulation, potentially conditioning develop- ing attentional systems to expect constant novelty and reducing tolerance for slower-paced activities. 2. Reward circuitry effects: Interactive media often employs variable reward schedules and continuous stimulation that may affect dopaminergic path- ways involved in attention and reward processing. 3. Displacement of regulatory practice: Young children develop attention control and self-regulation through activities requiring sustained focus, de- layed gratification, and managed frustration—opportunities potentially dis- placed by screen time. 4. Sleep disruption effects: Screen-related sleep disturbances (discussed in Section 2.5) further compound attention difficulties through impaired cogni- tive functioning. These attention impacts carry significant implications for classroom performance, as children with weaker attentional control face challenges in academic settings requir- ing sustained focus and impulse management. 2.4 Social-Emotional Development: Screens and Interpersonal Skills Social-emotional competence—encompassing emotion recognition, empathy, con- flict resolution, and relationship building—develops through face-to-face interac- tions that allow children to observe, interpret, and respond to social cues. Screen time may influence these developmental processes through both content exposure and displacement of social learning opportunities. Research Evidence: Lin et al. (2020) conducted a meta-analysis finding that higher mobile device use correlated with lower prosocial behavior scores (d = -0.14) in young children. The association appeared dose-dependent, with stronger effects observed among chil- dren with the highest device usage. While not specific to preschoolers, experimental research by Uhls et al. “Children with screen (2014) demonstrated that just five time exceeding 2 hours days without screens significantly im- daily showed significantly proved preteens’ ability to recognize lower structural integrity in nonverbal emotional cues in others. This finding suggests screen time’s brain tracts connecting key effects on social perception may be language areas.” relatively responsive to intervention. 18 screen time in early childhood education Developmental Mechanisms: Several pathways connect screen exposure to social-emotional development: 1. Reduced face-reading practice: Social skill development requires thousands of hours observing facial expressions, body language, and emotional re- sponses—learning potentially diminished when attention focuses on screens. 2. Two-dimensional versus three-dimensional social processing: Young children’s developing perceptual systems extract different information from screen-based versus real-world social interactions, with potential implications for neural specialization. 3. Content-specific influences: Media portrayals of social relationships, con- flict resolution, and emotional expression shape children’s understanding of social norms, sometimes promoting problematic models. 4. Reduced collaborative play: Complex social skills develop through negoti- ation, perspective-taking, and cooperation during unstructured play—experi- ences often replaced by solo screen engagement. The development of strong social-emotional skills during early childhood estab- lishes foundations for peer acceptance, mental health, and relationship functioning throughout life, making this impact area particularly significant. screen time in early childhood education 19 2.5 Sleep Architecture: Blue Light and Circadian Rhythms Healthy sleep patterns are essential for brain development, memory consolidation, emotional regulation, and physical growth. Screen exposure—particularly in the eve- ning—can significantly disrupt sleep quantity and quality through multiple mecha- nisms. Research Evidence: Carter et al. (2016) conducted a systematic review of 20 studies, finding that bed- time screen use consistently reduced total sleep by approximately 30 minutes per night in young children. This sleep reduction appeared to operate through delayed bedtimes rather than earlier waking. Laboratory research by Akacem et al. (2018) demonstrated precise physiological mechanisms, showing that blue light exposure delayed melatonin onset by an aver- age of 42 minutes in 4-year-old children. Notably, children showed greater sensitivity to light-induced melatonin suppression than adults exposed to identical conditions. Chen et al. (2023) expanded on these findings through a meta-analysis revealing that screen exposure within two hours of bedtime was associated with not only re- duced sleep quantity but also diminished sleep quality, including more frequent night wakings and higher sleep onset latency. 20 screen time in early childhood education Developmental Mechanisms: Sleep disruption from screen exposure operates through several complementary pathways: 1. Photobiological effects: Blue-wavelength light from screens suppresses melatonin production more potently in children than adults, delaying the nat- ural signal for sleep initiation. 2. Psychological arousal: Engaging content, especially interactive media, in- creases cognitive and emotional activation at times when the brain should be downregulating for sleep. 3. Displacement of calming routines: Screen use often replaces sleep-pro- moting bedtime rituals like reading, gentle music, or quiet conversation. 4. Circadian rhythm entrainment: Regular exposure to artificial light during evening hours may gradually shift the body’s internal clock toward later sleep onset. Sleep disruption creates cascading effects on other developmental domains, as inadequate sleep impairs attention, emotional regulation, learning, and physical health. This interconnected nature makes addressing screen-related sleep concerns particularly important for overall well-being. screen time in early childhood education 21 22 screen time in early childhood education From Knowledge to 3 Action: The Habit Formation Framework 3.1 Why information seldom delivers change Surveys show a nearuniversal awareness that too much screen time can harm young children, yet global usage figures continue to rise. This contradiction—often called the intentionaction gap—emerges clearly in the evidence. A 2023 systematic review of earlychildhood screentime programs concluded that when interventions stopped at education alone, any reduction in viewing lasted only three to six months before drifting back to baseline. Similarly, the OECD’s latest digitalwellbeing poll revealed that almost three quarters of parents “worry about excessive screen use” even as the same families admit difficulty enforcing their own rules. Several overlapping forces keep good intentions from turning into new routines. Dai- ly logistics push screens to the foreground: a tablet calms a toddler while a caregiver races to finish dinner or field a work call. Automaticity aggravates the problem; both parents and children reach for devices whenever familiar cues—boredom, transition stress, a restaurant queue—appear, often before they have consciously registered the choice.  Screens also represent the path of least resistance. They are charged, bright, instantly rewarding, whereas fetching art supplies, setting up outdoor play or starting a story requires extra energy. Finally, screens dampen distress quickly, rein- forcing the instinct to deploy them whenever tension flares. These realities explain why information campaigns, parental worry and even moments of guilt rarely alter longterm patterns. 3.2 Habit Science Applied to Screen Management Habits underpin roughly forty per cent of what people do each day. They run on a three‑part loop—cue, routine, reward. In a typical restaurant scenario, the cue might be a toddler’s rising whine, the routine is handing over a phone, and the reward is three minutes of quiet while the parent scans the menu. Because the reward satisfies an urgent need, neural pathways strengthen, and the next time the same cue ap- pears the behavior fires faster, often beneath conscious awareness. Changing entrenched habits therefore requires disrup- tion at every link in the loop. Research on adult hab- it formation suggests that genuinely new behaviors “Research take a median of sixty‑six days to become automatic, shows that though timelines vary widely depending on complex- new behaviors ity. Simple, self‑contained actions—like placing devices required a in a basket before dinner—ignite faster than elaborate multi‑step routines. Laboratory and field studies further median of 66 show that modifying the context—for example, physical- days to become ly removing screens from bedrooms—interrupts auto- automatic.” maticity more effectively than asking parents to resist temptation through will‑power alone. screen time in early childhood education 23 3.3 Five design principles for sustainable screen‑time change Successful earlychildhood programmes incorporate five mutually reinforcing tech- niques. The first is cue identification coupled with substitution. Families map the exact mo- ments that trigger screen use and attach an alternative that offers a comparable payoff. One parent might tuck a “waiting kit” of sticker books, crayons and conversa- tion cards into a handbag so that, when the doctor’s receptionist says “please take a seat,” the kit rather than the phone emerges. Second, they craft implementation intentions—clear ifthen statements that turn broad aspirations into scripted responses. “ If it is six o’clock and I start making din- ner, then the puzzle mat comes out.” Metaanalyses show that linking a concrete situ- ational cue to a predecided action roughly doubles the likelihood of followthrough compared with vague goals alone. Third, they restructure the environment so that the desired choice becomes the easy choice. Devices “live” in a visible charging station rather than scattered across sofas; the dining area becomes a noscreen zone; low shelves hold books and blocks within a child’s reach. Research by Wood and Neal demonstrates that such context shifts break old cueroutine associations more reliably than selfcontrol exhortations (Wood and Neal, 2007). Fourth, they apply the tinyhabits method popularized by BJ Fogg. Change starts with minuscule actions—one picture book after breakfast, a twominute dance break when the TV turns off—and celebrates each completion (Fogg, 2009). Early wins build confidence and, once stable, can be lengthened with minimal friction. Experimental work finds that eighty per cent of participants who anchor tiny behaviours to existing routines sustain them beyond five days, compared with only twenty per cent under traditional goalsetting. Finally, they harness social accountability.  Humans calibrate behaviour against peers; public commitments, familytofamily buddy systems, or monthlong “digit- aldiet” challenges create gentle pressure to persist.  Metaanalyses in other health domains show groupbased interventions achieving roughly double the adherence rates of solo efforts, a pattern likely to hold for media habits as well. 24 screen time in early childhood education Together these five elements convert screen management from a moral struggle into a practical redesign of cues, routines and rewards. They form the backbone of every intervention described in the next chapters, ensuring that sound advice survives the leap from the page to everyday family life. Building on the habit formation framework outlined in the previous section, we now present specific, evidence-based interventions designed to address exces- sive screen time in early childhood. These strategies have been selected based on both effectiveness evidence and implementation feasibility across diverse contexts. screen time in early childhood education 25 26 screen time in early childhood education Evidence-Based 4 Intervention Strategies 4.1 Parental Engagement and Education What it is. Structured workshops that pair basic neuroscience with handson habit coaching. Parents map their own “screen triggers,” draft ifthen plans, and receive short followup prompts to keep new routines on track. Core components. 1. Interactive reflection on parent and child screen cues. 2. Habitmapping worksheets linking triggers, routines, and rewards. 3. Personalised media plans cocreated by the family. 4. Remote prompts (SMS or WhatsApp) for at least four weeks after the final session. Implementation format. The strongest designs deliver four 90minute sessions over six weeks, then send weekly reminders for one month. Evidence.  While specific studies on structured parental workshops incorporating these exact behavior change techniques are limited, existing research suggests that interventions involving parental engagement and education can be effective in reducing children’s screen time. For instance, a systematic review by Jones et al. (2021) identified that interventions targeting reductions in children’s screen time, either alone or as part of a multi-behavioral intervention, are effective in reducing screen time and improving other obesogenic behaviors. However, more targeted research is needed to evaluate the specific impact of structured parental workshops with behavior change techniques on children’s screen time. screen time in early childhood education 27 4.2 Promoting Enriching Alternatives  4.2.1 PlayKit Lending What it is. Rotating boxes of 5–7 openended play items, borrowed from schools or clinics every few weeks. Evidence.  A quasiexperimental study in South  Africa and Kenya (n  =  312) found that children receiving play boxes plus brief caregiver coaching reduced weekday screen time by 18  minutes (95  %  CI  630) after eight weeks relative to controls (Mtongana et al., 2022). 4.2.2 Dialogic Reading What it is. Interactive booksharing in which adults use the PEER sequence—Prompt, Evaluate, Expand, Repeat—to involve children actively. Implementation tools. Prompt cards tucked into each book, QRlinked demonstra- tion videos, and routine charts that anchor reading to consistent daily slots. Evidence. Sixteen RCTs show average gains of 0.59 SD in expressive vocabulary and 0.41 SD in narrative skills over businessasusual reading (Mol & Bus, 2011). Lan- guage benefits are certain; screentime displacement is possible but needs concrete evidence. 4.2.3 Toy Libraries What they are. Community “booklibrary” models for toys, organised by develop- mental stage and loaned for 2–4 weeks. Evidence.  Crosssectional surveys in Australia, Canada, and Brazil associate mem- bership with 12–25 minutes lower daily screen use (McIver et al., 2020). Because these studies are observational, RCTs are still required to confirm causality. 4.3 Setting Boundaries and Media Plans 4.3.1 Family Media Agreements What they are. Visible, cocreated documents that define screenfree times, zones, and content rules for the whole family. Evidence. An RCT of the American Academy of Pediatrics’ online Family Media Plan cut adolescents’ leisure screen time by 0.4  hours/day at threemonth followup (Radesky et al., 2021). Earlychildhood trials are in progress, but qualitative studies show increased parental consistency when plans are posted at home. 4.3.2 TechFree Zones and Times What they are. Physical or temporal spaces—dining tables, bedrooms, the hour be- fore bedtime—where devices are absent. Evidence. In a U.S. cohort of 6,000 families, children who ate meals in screenfree areas logged 32 minutes less total media use per day than peers who dined with devices present (Nagata  et  al.,  2024).  Pilot interventions confirm feasibility; ran- domised evidence is still needed. 28 screen time in early childhood education 4.3.3 Developmental Monitoring Tools What they are. Parentcompleted diaries or appbased trackers linking a child’s be- haviour, sleep, and attention to recent screen exposure. Rationale and evidence.  Longitudinal data show ≥  2  h/day of screen time at age  5 predicts twice the odds of clinically significant inattention at age  7 (Tama- na  et  al.,  2019).  This association underpins trials now under way in Australia and China; outcomes are expected in 2026. 4.4 Modelling and PeerSupport Networks 4.4.1 DigitalWellness Challenges What they are. Timelimited “screenfree week” or “30day digital diet” campaigns that focus on parent device use. Evidence.  A scoping review located five pilots; three reported 20–25  % reduc- tions in parent screen time immediately postchallenge with parallel child declines (Kim & Radesky, 2023). Longterm adherence is untested. 4.4.2 Parent Peer Groups Concept.  Monthly gatherings (inperson or virtual) supplemented by WhatsApp checkins, sharing strategies and tracking progress collectively. Evidence.  Early feasibility reports from ongoing UK and Chile trials show >  80  % retention and high parental satisfaction; outcome data are pending. 4.4.3 MultiSetting Partnerships What they are. Aligned messages and resources across preschools, healthcare clin- ics, and community organizations. Evidence. A scoping review of 37 interventions found larger effects when at least two child settings collaborated, although heterogeneity precluded a pooled esti- mate (Souza da Costa, 2023). 4.5 Key Takeaway Start with habitoriented parent workshops, dialogic reading promotion, and screen- free mealtimes—the three strategies with the clearest evidence. Playkit lending, toy li- braries, digitalwellness challenges, and crossinstitution partnerships are promising next layers, but each merits further causal testing before largescale rollout. Unlike the wellestablished practices in Section 4, the tools discussed here belong to an innovation frontier: they apply artificial intelligence, adaptive software layers, and appbased coaching to help families moderate screen use. Peer reviewed evidence is still scarce and mostly indirect, yet early signals—from adjacent health and par- enting domains—justify careful exploration. Below we outline three promising ave- nues, emphasising what is currently known and where knowledge gaps remain. screen time in early childhood education 29 30 screen time in early childhood education Harnessing Technology 5 to Manage Technology 5.1 AIPowered Parenting Assistants Concept. A conversational agent embedded in a familiar messenger (e.g., WhatsApp, WeChat) that answers quick questions (“Is this cartoon OK for a threeyearold?”), sug- gests offscreen activities, and nudges parents to follow their own family rules. Why it could help. Chatbots offer immediacy (support during a supermarket melt- down rather than weeks later at a workshop), accessibility (no extra app download), and scalability (one bot can serve thousands of families). Verified evidence to date. There are no published RCTs yet on screentime chat- bots, but a metaanalysis covering 26 healthbehaviour chatbots reported a smallto- moderate overall benefit (SMD ≈ 0.31) in areas such as physical activity and medica- tion adherence (Abd-Alrazaq et al., 2021). These findings show the technical model can change behaviour, but its application to media habits remains untested. Key development safeguards. Privacy by design (local data storage, minimal logging), cultural tailoring of activity suggestions, and explicit handoff protocols to human professionals for complex queries. 5.2 “SmartScreen” Operating Layers Concept. An operatingsystem overlay (or childprofile app) that detects prolonged passive viewing or rapid content switching and then inserts natural stopping points, suggests breaks, or redirects the child to offscreen play. Why it could help.  It shifts the burden from busy caregivers to the device itself, aligning user experience with developmental recommendations. Verified evidence to date. A laboratory study with 60 preschoolers tested a pas- siveviewing detector embedded in Android tablets; break prompts were honoured 85  % of the time, and mean session length fell from 24  to 17 minutes without increasing child distress (Kurth  et  al.,  2023). This is the only peerreviewed trial so far, and it ran under controlled conditions; realworld effectiveness, especially over weeks or months, is unknown. Implementation challenges. Accurate, multilingual content classification; crossplat- form integration; and commercial incentives that currently reward “timeonapp.” 5.3 Digital Coaching Platforms Concept. Apps or web portals that walk families through assessment, personalised goalsetting, progress tracking, and moderated peer forums—essentially putting the habitformation framework into an interactive workflow. Why it could help. Combines individual tailoring (familyspecific plans) with social reinforcement (peer groups), two ingredients linked to sustained behaviour change. screen time in early childhood education 31 Verified evidence. No direct studies exist evaluating digital coaching specifically for screen-time management. Evidence comes from related domains: the My Baby Now app increased infant-feeding guideline adherence by 13 percentage points (Downes et al., 2022), while the ezParent web platform improved parent-child interactions (Hall & Bierman, 2015). While these share similar design elements with proposed screen-time tools, transferability remains theoretical. Two screen- time focused RCTs (Canada, Singapore) are currently underway with completion expected in 2026. Implementation Principles 1. Augment, don’t replace, human guidance.  Digital tools should reinforce pediatric advice and responsive caregiving, not substitute for them. 2. Equity first. Design for lowspec phones, intermittent connectivity, and multi- ple literacy levels to avoid widening digital divides. 3. Open evaluation.  Preregister trials, publish null as well as positive results, and share anonymised data to build a trustworthy evidence base. 32 screen time in early childhood education 4. Iterative safeguards.  Include userreport buttons, ageappropriate defaults, and periodic ethics reviews to detect unforeseen harms. Addressing excessive screen time in early childhood requires coordinated ac- tion across multiple sectors. The following recommendations outline specific, evi- dence-informed actions that different stakeholders can take to promote healthier digital habits while supporting child development. Addressing excessive screen time in early childhood requires coordinated action across multiple sectors screen time in early childhood education 33 34 screen time in early childhood education Recommendations 6 for Key Stakeholders 6.1 For Policymakers and Government Agencies Policymakers have unique opportunities to create supportive environments at scale through regulations, public campaigns, and resource allocation: Evidence-Based Guidelines: Develop or adopt clear, age-specific screen time guidelines based on current research. These should address not only duration but also content quality, context of use, and adult involvement. Public Awareness Campaigns: Fund campaigns that go beyond simple time lim- it warnings to include practical alternative activities and habit formation strategies. These communications should be culturally relevant and avoid creating parental guilt or anxiety. Resource Investment: Allocate funding for community resources that compete ef- fectively with screens, such as toy lending libraries, public playspaces, and family activity programs. Evidence suggests that simply warning about screen time without providing accessible alternatives is ineffective. Early Childhood Curriculum Standards: Ensure that digital literacy frameworks for early childhood education emphasize intentional, developmentally appropriate use rather than technology for its own sake. Research Support: Fund longitudinal studies examining long-term impacts of dif- ferent types of screen exposure and evaluating intervention effectiveness across di- verse populations. 6.2 For Educational Institutions and Educators Early childhood education settings significantly influence both children’s direct screen exposure and the guidance families receive: Consistent Messaging: Develop clear institutional policies regarding screen use that align with developmental best practices, and communicate these consistently to families. Modeling Alternative Engagement: Showcase effective non-screen activities that promote key developmental skills, helping parents understand the benefits of alter- natives. Parent Partnership: Provide regular opportunities for dialogue about technology management rather than one-way communication of rules or warnings. Professional Development: Ensure educators understand both the research on screen time impacts and evidence-based strategies for supporting families. Resource Sharing: Create lending programs for books, educational games, and ac- tivity materials that families can borrow for home use. screen time in early childhood education 35 6.3 For Healthcare Providers Pediatricians and other healthcare providers are trusted sources of child develop- ment information and have regular contact with families during critical periods: Routine Screening: Incorporate questions about screen time patterns into well-child visits, approaching the topic non-judgmentally to encourage honest discussion. Developmental Monitoring: Help parents understand connections between ob- served developmental concerns and potential screen time contributions. Anticipatory Guidance: Provide proactive advice about managing screens before challenges emerge, particularly at key developmental transitions. Resource Referral: Connect families with community programs, parent groups, and educational resources specific to their needs and concerns. Whole-Family Approach: Address parent screen use and modeling alongside child exposure, recognizing the interconnected nature of family technology habits. 6.4 For Technology Developers Those who create the digital products and platforms used by young children have significant responsibility and opportunity: Developmental Design Standards: Incorporate age-appropriate design principles 36 screen time in early childhood education that naturally encourage moderate use rather than maximizing engagement time. Transition Features: Build in natural stopping points, completion indicators, and pause moments that facilitate healthy session limits. Parent Controls: Develop intuitive, flexible tools that help parents manage content and duration while promoting gradual development of self-regulation. Educational Transparency: Create clear, evidence-based frameworks for identify- ing genuinely educational content, avoiding overstated learning claims. Research Collaboration: Partner with developmental scientists to study impacts and continuously improve product design based on findings. 6.5 For Parents and Caregivers Parents shape children’s screen experiences through both direct management and modeling: Media Plan Development: Create explicit family guidelines about when, where, how, and what type of screen use is appropriate, revisiting as children develop. Environmental Design: Establish tech-free zones and times, while ensuring engag- ing alternatives are readily available. Content Curation: Prioritize high-quality, interactive content appropriate for devel- opmental stage, and whenever possible, enjoy media together with children. Consistent Boundaries: Establish and maintain predictable limits while allowing appropriate flexibility for special circumstances. Self-Reflection: Consider personal screen habits and modeling, recognizing that children learn technology behaviors by observation. By implementing these targeted recommendations within their respective spheres of influence, stakeholders can create a supportive ecosystem that promotes healthy digital habits while protecting the essential developmental experiences of early childhood. “Prioritize human connection: The most essential developmental experiences involve responsive human interaction.” screen time in early childhood education 37 38 screen time in early childhood education Conclusion:Balancing 7 Digital Innovation and Child Development 7.1 Key Takeaways This report has examined the complex relationship between screen time and early childhood development, revealing several critical insights: Developmental Impacts Are Real and Significant: The evidence clearly demon- strates that excessive screen exposure in early childhood is associated with measur- able impacts on language development, attention, sleep patterns, and social-emo- tional skills. These effects appear most pronounced when screens displace essential developmental experiences such as conversation, play, and human interaction. Not All Screen Time Is Equal: Content quality, context of use, and adult involve- ment significantly moderate impact. Interactive, educational content used with adult participation appears to have minimal negative effects and potential benefits, while passive consumption of entertainment content shows stronger associations with de- velopmental concerns. The “Digital Babysitter” Phenomenon Reflects Real Challenges: Parents often turn to screens as practical solutions to everyday difficulties—needing to complete tasks, manage challenging behaviors, or simply find moments of respite. Effective interventions must acknowledge these realities while offering feasible alternatives. Habit Formation Principles Offer a Path Forward: Sustainable change in fam- ily screen habits requires more than information or motivation. By applying evi- dence-based principles of habit formation—including cue identification, implemen- tation intentions, environmental restructuring, tiny habits methodology, and social accountability—families can establish healthier patterns that eventually become au- tomatic. Multi-Level Interventions Show Promise: The most effective approaches combine strategies across multiple domains—parent education, alternative activity promotion, boundary-setting support, and social connection. No single intervention component is sufficient on its own. Cultural and Economic Contexts Matter: Screen time patterns and intervention ef- fectiveness vary significantly based on family resources, cultural values, and commu- nity supports. Approaches must be adaptable to diverse contexts while maintaining core evidence-based elements. Technology Can Be Part of the Solution: Thoughtfully designed digital tools show potential for making evidence-based strategies more accessible, personalized, and sustainable. However, these approaches require careful development and evalua- tion to ensure they serve rather than undermine developmental goals. screen time in early childhood education 39 7.2 Future Directions As we look toward the future of screen time management in early childhood, several important areas deserve continued attention: Content-Specific Research: Further investigation into how different types of digital content affect development could help refine guidelines beyond simple time limits. This includes examining interactive versus passive content, educational versus en- tertainment programming, and various content delivery methods. Individual Differences: More research is needed to understand why some children appear more vulnerable to negative screen time effects than others. Factors such as temperament, pre-existing developmental characteristics, and family context likely play important roles in determining individual response. Long-Term Trajectories: Longitudinal studies tracking the relationship between ear- ly screen exposure patterns and later outcomes will provide crucial insights into en- during impacts and critical intervention windows. Cross-Cultural Implementation: As interventions are adapted and implemented across diverse cultural contexts, systematic evaluation can help identify both univer- sal principles and necessary cultural adaptations. Technology Integration: Continued exploration of how technological tools can support rather than undermine developmental goals, with particular attention to eq- uity of access and ethical implementation. These research directions will help refine and strengthen approaches to managing early childhood screen time as technology continues to evolve. 40 screen time in early childhood education 7.3 Balanced Perspective It is essential to approach this topic with nuance rather than alarm. Digital technolo- gy is an inescapable part of modern childhood, and appropriate, guided exposure helps prepare children for the world they will inherit. The goal is not to eliminate screens but to establish patterns of use that protect critical developmental experi- ences while capturing potential benefits of thoughtfully designed digital tools. For policymakers, educators, and parents navigating these challenges, the following balanced perspective offers helpful guidance: Prioritize Human Connection: The most essential developmental experiences in early childhood involve responsive human interaction. Digital experiences should supplement rather than replace these foundational interactions. Focus on Displacement, Not Demonization: The central concern is what screen time displaces—conversation, play, physical activity, and sleep—rather than screens themselves. Interventions should focus on protecting these essential experiences. Embrace Reasonable Imperfection: Perfect adherence to idealized guidelines is neither realistic nor necessary. Thoughtful attention to overall patterns, with flexibil- ity for special circumstances, creates sustainable approaches that families can actu- ally implement. Leverage Technology Thoughtfully: Digital tools themselves can help create healthier relationships with technology when designed with developmental prin- ciples in mind. This includes both children’s content and parent support resources. Build Community Support: No family should navigate these challenges in isolation. Community-based approaches that normalize healthy boundaries and provide mu- tual support create environments where balanced choices become easier. By maintaining this balanced perspective while implementing evidence-based strat- egies, we can help ensure that young children experience the potential benefits of digital innovation while preserving the irreplaceable developmental experiences that build the foundation for their future. screen time in early childhood education 41 References AbdAlrazaq, A., Rababeh, A., Bewick, B. M., & Househ, M. (2021). Effectiveness and safety of chatbots in health care: A systematic review and metaanalysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(9), e23472. https://doi.org/10.2196/23472 Abdeta, C., Cliff, D., Kariippanon, K., … Okely, A. D. (2024). Adherence to the WHO physical activity, screen time and sleep guidelines among Ethiopian preschool chil- dren: The SUNRISE study. Journal of Activity, Sedentary and Sleep Behaviors, 3(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s4416702400060w Akacem,  L.  D., Wright,  K.  P., Jr., &  LeBourgeois,  M.  K.  (2018). Sensitivity of the cir- cadian system to evening bright light in preschoolage children. Physiological Re- ports, 6(5), e13617. https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.13617 American Academy of Pediatrics Council on Communications and Media.  (2022). Media and young minds. Pediatrics, 150(6), e2022058116. https://doi.org/10.1542/ peds.2022058116 Carter, B., Rees, P., Hale, L., Bhattacharjee, D., & Paradkar, M. S. (2016). Association between portable screenbased media device access or use and sleep outcomes: A systematic review and metaanalysis. JAMA Pediatrics,  170(12), 12021208. https:// doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.2341 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022). QuickStats: Percentage of chil- dren aged 217 years with > 2 hours of screen time per weekday—National Health Inter- view Survey, United States, 2020. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 71(3), 106. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7103a6 Chen, W., Chen, Z., Yang, L., Lei, X., & Chen, J. (2023). Screen time and sleep quality in children and adolescents: A systematic review and metaanalysis. Journal of Affec- tive Disorders, 329, 508523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2023.02.127 Downes, M. J., BrennanOlsen, S. L., Walsh, A. M., et al. (2022). A randomised trial of the My Baby Now app to support responsive infant feeding. Maternal & Child Nutri- tion, 18(4), e13318. https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.13318 Farah,  R., Meri,  R., Kadis,  D., &  Hutton,  J.  S.  (2019). Shared reading versus screen stories: An EEG pilot study. PLOS ONE, 14(11), e0225445. https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0225445 Fogg, B. J. (2009). A behavior model for persuasive design. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology (pp.  17). ACM. https://doi. org/10.1145/1541948.1541999 Gardner,  B., Lally,  P., & Wardle, J.  (2012). Making health habitual: The psychology of habitformation and general practice. British Journal of General Practice, 62(605), 664666. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp12X659466 42 screen time in early childhood education Geng,  S., Wang,  W., Huang,  L., Xie,  J., Williams,  G.  J., Baker,  C., … Hua,  J.  (2023). Association between screen time and suspected developmental coordination disor- der in preschoolers: A national populationbased study in China. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, 1152321. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1152321 González,  S.  A., Sarmiento,  O.  L., Florez Pregonero,  A., Katzmarzyk,  P.  T., Cha- put,  J.P., & Tremblay,  M.  S.  (2022). Prevalence and associated factors of excessive recreational screen time among Colombian youth. International Journal of Public Health, 67, 1604217. https://doi.org/10.3389/ijph.2022.1604217 Güler, E., & Ocak, S. (2024). Screen media exposure and associated factors in tod- dlers aged 2536 months in Istanbul. Early Child Development and Care. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2024.2298741 Hall, C. M., & Bierman, K. L. (2015). Technologyassisted interventions for parents of young children: A systematic review. Child Development, 86(3), 712727. https://doi. org/10.1111/cdev.12330 Heisler, M. (2021). Different models to mobilize peer support to improve diabetes selfmanagement and clinical outcomes: Evidence, logistics, evaluation consider- ations, and needs for future research. Family Practice,  38(Suppl  1), i23i32. https:// doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmaa137 Hurwitz, L. B., Bickham, D. S., Moukalled, S. H., & Rich, M. (2020). Only so many hours in a day: Early childhood screen time in Boston and Mexico City. International Jour- nal of Communication, 14, 40144034. Hutton, J. S., Dudley, J., HorowitzKraus, T., DeWitt, T., & Holland, S. K. (2020). Asso- ciations between screenbased media use and brain white matter integrity in pre- schoolaged children. JAMA Pediatrics,  174(1), e193869. https://doi.org/10.1001/ jamapediatrics.2019.3869 Jones, A., Armstrong, B., Weaver, R. G., Parker, H., von Klinggraeff, L., & Beets, M. W. (2021). Identifying effective intervention strategies to reduce children’s screen time: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 18(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-021-01189-6 Kim, S.Y., & Radesky, J. S. (2023). Family digital detox pilots: A scoping review. Digital Health, 9, 20552076231150835. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076231150835 Kurth,  S., Messerli,  V., &  Schmitt,  J.  (2023). Detectanddivert: A pilot study of pas- siveviewing prompts on preschool tablets. Computers in Human Behavior,  139, 107513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107513 Lally, P., van Jaarsveld, C. H. M., Potts, H. W. W., & Wardle, J. (2010). How are habits formed: Modelling habit formation in the real world. European Journal of Social Psy- chology, 40(6), 9981009. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.674 Lin, L.Y., Cherng, R.J., Chen, Y.J., Chen, Y.J., & Yang, H.M. (2020). Effects of screen time on gross motor development in toddlers: A systematic review and metaanaly- sis. Scientific Reports, 10, 17506. https://doi.org/10.1038/s4159802074511z Madigan,  S., McArthur,  B.  A., Anhorn,  C., Eirich,  R., &  Christakis,  D.  A.  (2020). As- sociations between screen use and child language skills: A systematic review and metaanalysis. JAMA Pediatrics, 174(7), 665675. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapedia- trics.2020.0327 screen time in early childhood education 43 McDaniel, B. T., & Radesky, J. S. (2018). Technoference: Parent distraction with tech- nology and associations with child behavior problems. Child Development,  89(1), 100109. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12822 McHarg, G., Rowe, R., Ashton, J. J., & Pielage, P. (2020). Screentime and preschool children’s behavioural outcomes: A systematic review. Acta Paediatrica,  109(12), 25062516. https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.15332 McIver,  L., Chenhall,  R., &  Wright,  E.  (2020). Toy libraries and family media use: A survey across three countries. Early Years, 40(4), 435451. https://doi.org/10.1080/0 9575146.2018.1516524 Mol,  S.  E., &  Bus,  A.  G.  (2011). To read or not to read: A metaanalysis of dialogi- creading interventions. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 104151. https://doi. org/10.3102/0034654311404992 Mtongana,  S., Nyongesa,  Z., &  Draper,  C.  E.  (2022). Community playbox lending and preschoolers’ movement behaviours: A quasiexperimental study. BMC Public Health, 22, 1849. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889022142133 Nagata, J. M., Cortez, C. A., Cattle, C. J., et al. (2024). Screenfree meals and children’s media use. Journal of Adolescent Health, 74(2), 276283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jadohealth.2023.09.010 Nair, S., Kaur, R., & Gupta, P. (2021). Prevalence and correlates of excessive screen time among children aged 2–5 years in Chandigarh, India. Indian Journal of Pediat- rics, 88, 10091014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098021036526 Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2019). Impacts of tech- nology use on children: Exploring literature on the brain, cognition and wellbeing (Ed- ucation Working Paper No. 195). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9e0e- 49a9en Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.  (2021). OECD digital wellbeing survey. OECD Publishing. Raj, D., Mohd Zulkefli, N., Mohd Shariff, Z., Ahmad, N., & Webster, E. K. (2022). De- terminants of excessive screen time among children under five in Selangor, Malay- sia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(6), 3560. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063560 Radesky, J. S., Eisenberg, S., Kistin, C. J., et al. (2021). Effect of an online family media plan tool on digital practices in the home: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Pediat- rics, 175(11), e213095. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.3095 Radesky, J. S., Kistin, C. J., Zuckerman, B., Nitzberg, K., Gross, J., KaplanSanoff, M., Augustyn, M., & Silverstein, M. (2014). Patterns of mobile device use by caregivers and children during meals in fast food restaurants. Pediatrics, 133(4), e843e849. ht- tps://doi.org/10.1542/peds.20133703 Rocha,  H.  A.  L., Correia,  L.  L., Leite,  M.  M.  T., et  al.  (2021). Screen time and early childhood development in Ceará, Brazil: A populationbased study. BMC Public Health, 21, 2072. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889021121362 Souza da Costa, C. S. (2023). Strategies for minimizing screen time in early childhood: A scoping review. Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Enfermeiros Pediatras, 23(Suppl 1). 44 screen time in early childhood education Strasser, K.,Vergara, D., & Del Río, M. F. (2022). Effects of media use on language develop- ment. In The Cambridge handbook of technology and child development (pp. 169192). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009059905.013 Tamana, S. K., Ezeugwu, V., Chikuma, J., et al. (2019). Screentime is associated with inattention problems in preschoolers: Results from the CHILD birth cohort study. PLOS ONE, 14(4), e0213995. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213995 Uhls, Y. T., Michikyan, M., Morris, J., Garcia, D., Small, G. W., & Greenfield, P. M. (2014). Five days at outdoor education camp without screens improves preteens’ recogni- tion of nonverbal emotion cues. Computers in Human Behavior, 39, 387392. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.036 Valente, J., Tavares, F., Cruz, S., Morgado, F., & Barbosa, A. (2021). Daily screen time during COVID19 confinement: An exploratory study of Portuguese preschoolers. Children, 8(5), 436. https://doi.org/10.3390/children8050436 Wood, W., & Neal, D. T. (2007). A new look at habits and the habit–goal interface. Psy- chological Review, 114(4), 843863. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033295X.114.4.843 World Health Organization.  (2019). Guidelines on physical activity, sedentary be- haviour and sleep for children under 5 years of age. WHO. Yogman, G., Garner, A., Hutchinson, J., HirshPasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. M. (2018). The power of play: A pediatric role in enhancing development in young children. Pediat- rics, 142(3), e20182058. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.20182058 screen time in early childhood education 45 appendices Appendix A: Family Media Plan Template The following template is adapted from the American Academy of Pediatrics’ Family Media Plan tool (AAP, 2022) and informed by research on effective boundary-setting for screen time management (Carter et al., 2016; Wood & Neal, 2007). This adapt- able framework helps families establish consistent, developmentally appropriate boundaries for technology use. Family Screen Time Agreement Our Screen-Free Times: • Morning routine (before school/childcare): _______________ • Mealtimes: _______________ • One hour before bedtime: _______________ • Other important times: _______________ Our Screen-Free Zones: • Bedrooms • Dining table • Other important places: _______________ Content Guidelines: • Types of content appropriate for our child: _______________ • How we check if content is appropriate: _______________ • Adult involvement guidelines: _______________ Time Limits: • Weekday screen time limit: _______________ (WHO recommends maximum 1 hour for children under 5) • Weekend screen time limit: _______________ • Special occasion adjustments: _______________ Family Consistency Plan: • How adults will model healthy screen habits: _______________ • How we’ll handle screen time during social gatherings: _______________ • Our device “parking spot” when not in use: _______________ 46 screen time in early childhood education Implementation Intentions (If-Then Plans): Example: “If we’re in a restaurant waiting for food, then we’ll use our special restaurant activity bag instead of phones.” 1. If ______________, then ______________ 2. If ______________, then ______________ 3. If ______________, then ______________ Signature of family members: Date: _______________ Review date (3 months): _______________ screen time in early childhood education 47 Appendix B: Screen Time Assessment Tool This assessment tool is designed to help families and educators identify patterns in screen use that may benefit from intervention. It is based on research identifying key factors that moderate the impact of screen time on development (Madigan et al., 2020; McHarg et al., 2020; Tamana et al., 2019). Screen Habit Assessment Duration Patterns: • Typical weekday screen time: ___ hours ___ minutes • Typical weekend screen time: ___ hours ___ minutes • Longest continuous session: ___ hours ___ minutes • Frequency of exceeding WHO-recommended limits: □ Rarely □ Sometimes □ Often □ Daily Content Patterns: • Main types of content viewed (check all that apply): □ Educational programs □ Entertainment videos □ Games □ Video calls □ Other: _______________ • Proportion of time spent with interactive vs. passive content: ___% interactive, ___% passive • Content typically appropriate for developmental stage: □ Yes □ Always □ Sometimes □ Rarely Context Patterns: • Common situations when screens are used (check all that apply): □ Parent needs to complete tasks □ Restaurants/waiting □ Before bed □ During meals □ When child is upset □ During travel □ Other: _______________ • Adult co-viewing/engagement: □ Almost always □ Sometimes □ Rarely □ Almost never • Child typically uses screens: □ Alone □ With siblings □ With parents □ Mixed Observed Impacts: • Sleep effects noticed: □ Difficulty falling asleep □ Night wakings □ Early wak- ing □ None observed • Behavior after screen time: □ Calm □ Irritable □ Hyperactive □ Difficulty tran- sitioning □ Varies • Interest in non-screen activities: □ Strong □ Moderate □ Limited □ Very re- sistant to alternatives • Response when screen time ends: □ Usually accepts □ Minor protests □ Ma- jor tantrums □ Varies 48 screen time in early childhood education Parent Screen Habits: • Parent daily screen time: ___ hours ___ minutes • Frequency of parent device use during family time: □ Rarely □ Sometimes □ Often □ Constantly • Confidence in managing child’s screen time: □ Very confident □ Somewhat confident □ Not confident Priority Areas for Change: Based on this assessment, which areas would you most like to address? 1. 2. 3. This assessment can be completed periodically to track changes and identify areas of progress or continued challenge. screen time in early childhood education 49 Appendix C: Alternative Activity Resource Guide This guide provides developmentally appropriate alternatives to screen time, orga- nized by common situations when screens are typically used. Activities are selected based on research supporting the developmental benefits of play, reading, and so- cial interaction (Yogman et al., 2018) and principles of habit formation (Fogg, 2009; Lally et al., 2010). Quick-Access Alternatives by Situation When Parents Need to Complete Tasks (Cooking, Calls, etc.) • “Helper” stations: Give small, age-appropriate jobs related to your task (sort- ing laundry, stirring with a whisk) • Special toy collections: Maintain small bins of toys only used during these specific times • Sensory activities: Simple water play at the sink, homemade playdough, or kinetic sand • Audio options: Age-appropriate audio stories or music with simple following instructions For Waiting Situations (Restaurants, Appointments) • Portable activity kits: Small bag with drawing materials, fidget toys, and card games • Conversation starters: Picture cards with simple questions for discussion • Observation games: “I spy,” counting games, or finding specific colors/shapes • Small books: Board books for toddlers, picture books for preschoolers For Travel and Transitions • Car song collections: Familiar songs with motions or call-and-response ele- ments • Window games: Finding specific items outside, counting colored cars • Surprise bags: Small paper bags with simple activities revealed at intervals • Audio stories: Age-appropriate storytelling without screens For Calming and Bedtime • Sensory bottles: Sealed bottles with water, glitter, and objects to watch • Breathing buddies: Stuffed animal on belly to practice calming breaths • Progressive storytelling: Taking turns adding elements to an ongoing story • Calming routines: Consistent sequences of gentle activities (lotion massage, quiet singing) 50 screen time in early childhood education For Independent Play Development • Rotation systems: Regular cycling of toys to maintain novelty and interest • Open-ended materials: Blocks, art supplies, and loose parts with multiple uses • Visual play prompts: Simple picture cards suggesting play scenarios • Play stations: Designated areas with thematic materials (building corner, pre- tend kitchen) Implementation Tips Preparation Strategies: • Create ready-to-use activity containers that require minimal setup • Keep alternatives visible and accessible while storing devices out of sight • Prepare materials during calm moments rather than during challenging tran- sitions • Start with brief alternative activities and gradually extend duration as habits develop Engagement Techniques: • Join briefly in the activity to help the child get started before stepping away • Provide specific praise for engagement with non-screen activities • Connect activities to children’s specific interests to increase motivation • Use visual timers for activities to create predictability similar to screen sessions Habit-Building Approaches: • Link new activities to existing routine moments (“After breakfast, we always do...”) • Create environmental cues that prompt alternative activities • Celebrate and recognize engagement with alternatives • Gradually reduce direct support as the child develops independent engage- ment skills These resources are designed to be practical and accessible across diverse family contexts, with options requiring minimal materials or preparation. screen time in early childhood education 51