73937 Economy Profile: Indonesia Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 2 © 2013 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000; Internet: www.worldbank.org All rights reserved. 1 2 3 4 15 14 13 12 A copublication of The World Bank and the International Finance Corporation. This work is a product of the staff of The World Bank with external contributions. Note that The World Bank does not necessarily own each component of the content included in the work. The World Bank therefore does not warrant that the use of the content contained in the work will not infringe on the rights of third parties. The risk of claims resulting from such infringement rests solely with you. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect the views of The World Bank, its Board of Executive Directors, or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Nothing herein shall constitute or be considered to be a limitation upon or waiver of the privileges and immunities of The World Bank, all of which are specifically reserved. Rights and Permissions This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license (CC BY 3.0) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0. Under the Creative Commons Attribution license, you are free to copy, distribute, transmit, and adapt this work, including for commercial purposes, under the following conditions: Attribution—Please cite the work as follows: World Bank. 2013. Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises. Washington, DC: World Bank Group. DOI: 10.1596/978-0-8213-9615-5. License: Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 3.0 Translations—If you create a translation of this work, please add the following disclaimer along with the attribution: This translation was not created by The World Bank and should not be considered an official World Bank translation. The World Bank shall not be liable for any content or error in this translation . All queries on rights and licenses should be addressed to the Office of the Publisher, The World Bank, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA; fax: 202-522-2625; e-mail: pubrights@worldbank.org. Additional copies of all 10 editions of Doing Business may be purchased at www.doingbusiness.org. Cover design: Corporate Visions, Inc. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 3 CONTENTS Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 4 The business environment .......................................................................................................... 5 Starting a business ..................................................................................................................... 14 Dealing with construction permits ........................................................................................... 26 Getting electricity ....................................................................................................................... 37 Registering property .................................................................................................................. 45 Getting credit .............................................................................................................................. 55 Protecting investors ................................................................................................................... 62 Paying taxes ................................................................................................................................ 71 Trading across borders .............................................................................................................. 79 Enforcing contracts .................................................................................................................... 88 Resolving insolvency .................................................................................................................. 99 Employing workers .................................................................................................................. 105 Data notes ................................................................................................................................. 112 Resources on the Doing Business website ............................................................................ 117 Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 4 INTRODUCTION Doing Business sheds light on how easy or difficult it is the paying taxes indicators, which cover the period for a local entrepreneur to open and run a small to January–December 2011). medium-size business when complying with relevant The Doing Business methodology has limitations. Other regulations. It measures and tracks changes in areas important to business—such as an economy‘s regulations affecting 11 areas in the life cycle of a proximity to large markets, the quality of its business: starting a business, dealing with construction infrastructure services (other than those related to permits, getting electricity, registering property, trading across borders and getting electricity), the getting credit, protecting investors, paying taxes, security of property from theft and looting, the trading across borders, enforcing contracts, resolving transparency of government procurement, insolvency and employing workers. macroeconomic conditions or the underlying strength In a series of annual reports Doing Business presents of institutions—are not directly studied by Doing quantitative indicators on business regulations and the Business. The indicators refer to a specific type of protection of property rights that can be compared business, generally a local limited liability company across 185 economies, from Afghanistan to Zimbabwe, operating in the largest business city. Because over time. The data set covers 46 economies in Sub- standard assumptions are used in the data collection, Saharan Africa, 33 in Latin America and the Caribbean, comparisons and benchmarks are valid across 24 in East Asia and the Pacific, 24 in Eastern Europe economies. The data not only highlight the extent of and Central Asia, 19 in the Middle East and North obstacles to doing business; they also help identify the Africa and 8 in South Asia, as well as 31 OECD high- source of those obstacles, supporting policy makers in income economies. The indicators are used to analyze designing regulatory reform. economic outcomes and identify what reforms have More information is available in the full report. Doing worked, where and why. Business 2013 presents the indicators, analyzes their This economy profile presents the Doing Business relationship with economic outcomes and presents indicators for Indonesia. To allow useful comparison, it business regulatory reforms. The data, along with also provides data for other selected economies information on ordering Doing Business 2013, are (comparator economies) for each indicator. The data in available on the Doing Business website at this report are current as of June 1, 2012 (except for http://www.doingbusiness.org. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 5 THE BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT For policy makers trying to improve their economy‘s regulatory environment for business, a good place to ECONOMY OVERVIEW start is to find out how it compares with the regulatory environment in other economies. Doing Business provides an aggregate ranking on the ease of doing Region: East Asia & Pacific business based on indicator sets that measure and benchmark regulations applying to domestic small to Income category: Lower middle income medium-size businesses through their life cycle. Economies are ranked from 1 to 185 by the ease of Population: 242,325,638 doing business index. For each economy the index is calculated as the ranking on the simple average of its GNI per capita (US$): 2,940 percentile rankings on each of the 10 topics included in the index in Doing Business 2013: starting a business, DB2013 rank: 128 dealing with construction permits, getting electricity, registering property, getting credit, protecting DB2012 rank: 130* investors, paying taxes, trading across borders, Change in rank: 2 enforcing contracts and resolving insolvency. The ranking on each topic is the simple average of the percentile rankings on its component indicators (see * DB2012 ranking shown is not last year‘s published the data notes for more details). The employing workers ranking but a comparable ranking for DB2012 that indicators are not included in this year‘s aggregate ease captures the effects of such factors as data of doing business ranking, but the data are presented corrections and the addition of 2 economies in this year‘s economy profile. (Barbados and Malta) to the sample this year. See the data notes for sources and definitions. The aggregate ranking on the ease of doing business benchmarks each economy‘s performance on the indicators against that of all other economies in the Doing Business sample (figure 1.1). While this ranking tells much about the business environment in an economy, it does not tell the whole story. The ranking on the ease of doing business, and the underlying indicators, do not measure all aspects of the business environment that matter to firms and investors or that affect the competitiveness of the economy. Still, a high ranking does mean that the government has created a regulatory environment conducive to operating a business. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 6 THE BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT Figure 1.1 Where economies stand in the global ranking on the ease of doing business Source: Doing Business database. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 7 THE BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT For policy makers, knowing where their economy relative to the regional average (figure 1.2). The stands in the aggregate ranking on the ease of economy‘s rankings on the topics included in the doing business is useful. Also useful is to know how ease of doing business index provide another it ranks relative to comparator economies and perspective (figure 1.3). Figure 1.2 How Indonesia and comparator economies rank on the ease of doing business Source: Doing Business database. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 8 THE BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT Figure 1.3 How Indonesia ranks on Doing Business topics Source: Doing Business database. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 9 THE BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT Just as the overall ranking on the ease of doing business year Doing Business introduced the distance to frontier tells only part of the story, so do changes in that ranking. measure. This measure shows how far each economy is Yearly movements in rankings can provide some indication from the best performance achieved by any economy since of changes in an economy‘s regulatory environment for 2005 on each indicator in 9 Doing Business indicator sets. firms, but they are always relative. An economy‘s ranking Comparing the measure for an economy at 2 points in might change because of developments in other time allows users to assess how much the economy‘s economies. An economy that implemented business regulatory environment as measured by Doing Business regulation reforms may fail to rise in the rankings (or may has changed over time—how far it has moved toward (or even drop) if it is passed by others whose business away from) the most efficient practices and strongest regulation reforms had a more significant impact as regulations in areas covered by Doing Business (figure 1.4). measured by Doing Business. The results may show that the pace of change varies widely Moreover, year-to-year changes in the overall rankings do across the areas measured. They also may show that an not reflect how the business regulatory environment in an economy is relatively close to the frontier in some areas economy has changed over time—or how it has changed and relatively far from it in others. in different areas. To aid in assessing such changes, last Figure 1.4 How far has Indonesia come in the areas measured by Doing Business? Note: The distance to frontier measure shows how far on average an economy is from the best performance achieved by any economy on each Doing Business indicator since 2005. The measure is normalized to range between 0 and 100, with 100 representing the best performance (the frontier). The overall distance to frontier is the average of the distance to frontier in the 9 indicator sets shown in the figure. See the data notes for more details on the distance to frontier measure. Source: Doing Business database. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 10 THE BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT The absolute values of the indicators tell another part business regulation—such as a regulatory process that of the story (table 1.1). The indicators, on their own or can be completed with a small number of procedures in comparison with the indicators of a good practice in a few days and at a low cost. Comparison of the economy or those of comparator economies in the economy‘s indicators today with those in the previous region, may reveal bottlenecks reflected in large year may show where substantial bottlenecks persist— numbers of procedures, long delays or high costs. Or and where they are diminishing. they may reveal unexpected strengths in an area of Table 1.1 Summary of Doing Business indicators for Indonesia Best performer globally Philippines DB2013 Cambodia DB2013 Indonesia DB2013 Indonesia DB2012 Malaysia DB2013 Thailand DB2013 Indicator China DB2013 India DB2013 DB2013 Starting a Business 166 161 175 151 173 54 161 85 New Zealand (1) (rank) Procedures (number) 9 9 9 13 12 3 16 4 New Zealand (1)* Time (days) 47 47 85 33 27 6 36 29 New Zealand (1) Cost (% of income per 22.7 23.5 100.5 2.1 49.8 15.1 18.1 6.7 Slovenia (0.0) capita) Paid-in Min. Capital (% 42.0 46.6 28.5 85.7 140.1 0.0 4.8 0.0 91 Economies (0.0)* of income per capita) Dealing with Hong Kong SAR, Construction Permits 75 72 149 181 182 96 100 16 China (1) (rank) Hong Kong SAR, Procedures (number) 13 13 21 28 34 37 29 8 China (6)* Time (days) 158 158 652 270 196 140 84 157 Singapore (26) Cost (% of income per 95.0 105.3 36.9 375.3 1,528.0 17.5 103.0 9.2 Qatar (1.1) capita) Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 11 Best performer globally Philippines DB2013 Cambodia DB2013 Indonesia DB2013 Indonesia DB2012 Malaysia DB2013 Thailand DB2013 Indicator China DB2013 India DB2013 DB2013 Getting Electricity 147 158 132 114 105 28 57 10 Iceland (1) (rank) Procedures (number) 6 7 4 5 7 5 5 4 Germany (3)* Time (days) 108 108 183 145 67 46 50 35 Germany (17) Cost (% of income per 1,243.8 1,379.0 2,802.0 547.0 247.3 53.9 833.3 75.3 Japan (0.0) capita) Registering Property 98 99 115 44 94 33 122 26 Georgia (1) (rank) Procedures (number) 6 6 7 4 5 5 8 2 Georgia (1)* Time (days) 22 22 56 29 44 14 39 2 Portugal (1) Cost (% of property 10.8 10.8 4.3 3.6 7.3 3.3 4.8 6.3 Belarus (0.0)* value) Getting Credit (rank) 129 127 53 70 23 1 129 70 United Kingdom (1)* Strength of legal rights 3 3 8 6 8 10 4 5 Malaysia (10)* index (0-10) Depth of credit 4 4 3 4 5 6 3 5 United Kingdom (6)* information index (0-6) Public registry coverage 36.0 31.8 0.0 27.7 0.0 56.1 0.0 0.0 Portugal (90.7) (% of adults) Private bureau United Kingdom 0.0 0.0 12.1 0.0 14.9 81.8 9.0 44.1 coverage (% of adults) (100.0)* Protecting Investors 49 46 82 100 49 4 128 13 New Zealand (1) (rank) Extent of disclosure 10 10 5 10 7 10 2 10 Hong Kong SAR, Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 12 Best performer globally Philippines DB2013 Cambodia DB2013 Indonesia DB2013 Indonesia DB2012 Malaysia DB2013 Thailand DB2013 Indicator China DB2013 India DB2013 DB2013 index (0-10) China (10)* Extent of director 5 5 9 1 4 9 3 7 Singapore (9)* liability index (0-10) Ease of shareholder 3 3 2 4 7 7 8 6 New Zealand (10)* suits index (0-10) Strength of investor 6.0 6.0 5.3 5.0 6.0 8.7 4.3 7.7 New Zealand (9.7) protection index (0-10) United Arab Emirates Paying Taxes (rank) 131 129 66 122 152 15 143 96 (1) Payments (number per Hong Kong SAR, 51 51 40 7 33 13 47 22 year) China (3)* United Arab Emirates Time (hours per year) 259 266 173 338 243 133 193 264 (12) Trading Across Borders 37 40 118 68 127 11 53 20 Singapore (1) (rank) Documents to export 4 4 9 8 9 5 7 5 France (2) (number) Time to export (days) 17 17 22 21 16 11 15 14 Singapore (5)* Cost to export (US$ per 644 644 755 580 1,120 435 585 585 Malaysia (435) container) Documents to import 7 7 10 5 11 6 8 5 France (2) (number) Time to import (days) 23 27 26 24 20 8 14 13 Singapore (4) Cost to import (US$ per 660 660 900 615 1,200 420 660 750 Malaysia (420) container) Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 13 Best performer globally Philippines DB2013 Cambodia DB2013 Indonesia DB2013 Indonesia DB2012 Malaysia DB2013 Thailand DB2013 Indicator China DB2013 India DB2013 DB2013 Enforcing Contracts 144 145 142 19 184 33 111 23 Luxembourg (1) (rank) Time (days) 498 498 401 406 1,420 425 842 440 Singapore (150) Cost (% of claim) 139.4 139.4 103.4 11.1 39.6 27.5 26.0 15.0 Bhutan (0.1) Procedures (number) 40 40 44 37 46 29 37 36 Ireland (21)* Resolving Insolvency 148 149 152 82 116 49 165 58 Japan (1) (rank) Time (years) 5.5 5.5 6.0 1.7 4.3 1.5 5.7 2.7 Ireland (0.4) Cost (% of estate) 18 18 15 22 9 15 38 36 Singapore (1)* Outcome (0 as piecemeal sale and 1 as 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 going concern) Recovery rate (cents on 14.2 13.8 12.8 35.7 26.0 44.7 4.9 42.4 Japan (92.8) the dollar) Note: DB2012 rankings shown are not last year‘s published rankings but comparable rankings for DB2012 that capture the effects of such factors as data corrections and the addition of 2 economies (Barbados and Malta) to the sample this year. The ranking methodology for the paying taxes indicators changed in Doing Business 2013; see the data notes for details. For more information on “no practice� marks, see the data notes. Data for the outcome of the resolving insolvency indicator are not available for DB2012. * Two or more economies share the top ranking on this indicator. A number shown in place of an economy‘s name indicates the number of economies that share the top ranking on the indicator. For a list of these economies, see the Doing Business website (http://www.doingbusiness.org). Source: Doing Business database. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 14 STARTING A BUSINESS Formal registration of companies has many WHAT THE STARTING A BUSINESS immediate benefits for the companies and for business owners and employees. Legal entities can INDICATORS MEASURE outlive their founders. Resources are pooled as several shareholders join forces to start a company. Procedures to legally start and operate a Formally registered companies have access to company (number) services and institutions from courts to banks as Preregistration (for example, name well as to new markets. And their employees can verification or reservation, notarization) benefit from protections provided by the law. An additional benefit comes with limited liability Registration in the economy‘s largest companies. These limit the financial liability of business city company owners to their investments, so personal Postregistration (for example, social security assets of the owners are not put at risk. Where registration, company seal) governments make registration easy, more entrepreneurs start businesses in the formal sector, Time required to complete each procedure creating more good jobs and generating more (calendar days) revenue for the government. Does not include time spent gathering What do the indicators cover? information Doing Business measures the ease of starting a Each procedure starts on a separate day business in an economy by recording all Procedure completed once final document is procedures officially required or commonly done in received practice by an entrepreneur to start up and formally operate an industrial or commercial No prior contact with officials business—as well as the time and cost required to Cost required to complete each procedure complete these procedures. It also records the (% of income per capita) paid-in minimum capital that companies must deposit before registration (or within 3 months). Official costs only, no bribes The ranking on the ease of starting a business is No professional fees unless services required the simple average of the percentile rankings on by law the 4 component indicators: procedures, time, cost and paid-in minimum capital requirement. Paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita) To make the data comparable across economies, Doing Business uses several assumptions about the Deposited in a bank or with a notary before business and the procedures. It assumes that all registration (or within 3 months) information is readily available to the entrepreneur  Has a start-up capital of 10 times income per and that there has been no prior contact with capita. officials. It also assumes that the entrepreneur will  Has a turnover of at least 100 times income per pay no bribes. And it assumes that the business: capita.  Is a limited liability company, located in the  Does not qualify for any special benefits. largest business city.  Does not own real estate.  Has between 10 and 50 employees.  Is 100% domestically owned.  Conducts general commercial or industrial activities. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 15 STARTING A BUSINESS Where does the economy stand today? What does it take to start a business in Indonesia? costs 22.7% of income per capita and requires paid-in According to data collected by Doing Business, starting minimum capital of 42.0% of income per capita (figure a business there requires 9 procedures, takes 47 days, 2.1). Figure 2.1 What it takes to start a business in Indonesia Paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita): 42.0 Note: Time shown in the figure above may not reflect simultaneity of procedures. For more information on the methodology of the starting a business indicators, see the Doing Business website (http://www.doingbusiness.org). For details on the procedures reflected here, see the summary at the end of this chapter. Source: Doing Business database. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 16 STARTING A BUSINESS Globally, Indonesia stands at 166 in the ranking of 185 regional average ranking provide other useful economies on the ease of starting a business (figure information for assessing how easy it is for an 2.2). The rankings for comparator economies and the entrepreneur in Indonesia to start a business. Figure 2.2 How Indonesia and comparator economies rank on the ease of starting a business Source: Doing Business database. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 17 STARTING A BUSINESS What are the changes over time? While the most recent Doing Business data reflect how process have changed—and which have not (table 2.1). easy (or difficult) it is to start a business in Indonesia That can help identify where the potential for today, data over time show which aspects of the improvement is greatest. Table 2.1 The ease of starting a business in Indonesia over time By Doing Business report year Indicator DB2004 DB2005 DB2006 DB2007 DB2008 DB2009 DB2010 DB2011 DB2012 DB2013 Rank .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 161 166 Procedures 12 12 12 12 12 11 10 10 9 9 (number) Time (days) 168 151 151 97 105 76 62 49 47 47 Cost (% of income per 136.7 130.7 101.7 86.7 80.0 76.7 25.0 25.8 23.5 22.7 capita) Paid-in Min. Capital (% of 69.1 62.8 48.9 41.7 38.4 74.2 59.7 53.1 46.6 42.0 income per capita) Note: n.a. = not applicable (the economy was not included in Doing Business for that year). DB2012 rankings shown are not last year‘s published rankings but comparable rankings for DB2012 that capture the e ffects of such factors as data corrections and the addition of 2 economies (Barbados and Malta) to the sample this year. Source: Doing Business database. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 18 STARTING A BUSINESS Equally helpful may be the benchmarks provided by what is possible in making it easier to start a business. the economies that over time have had the best And changes in regional averages can show where performance regionally or globally on the procedures, Indonesia is keeping up—and where it is falling time, cost or paid-in minimum capital required to start behind. a business (figure 2.3). These benchmarks help show Figure 2.3 Has starting a business become easier over time? Procedures (number) Time (days) Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 19 STARTING A BUSINESS Cost (% of income per capita) Paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita) Note: Ninety-one economies globally have no paid-in minimum capital requirement. Source: Doing Business database. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 20 STARTING A BUSINESS Economies around the world have taken steps making greater firm satisfaction and savings and more it easier to start a business—streamlining procedures registered businesses, financial resources and job by setting up a one-stop shop, making procedures opportunities. simpler or faster by introducing technology and What business registration reforms has Doing Business reducing or eliminating minimum capital requirements. recorded in Indonesia (table 2.2)? Many have undertaken business registration reforms in stages—and they often are part of a larger regulatory reform program. Among the benefits have been Table 2.2 How has Indonesia made starting a business easier—or not? By Doing Business report year DB year Reform Indonesia made starting a business more complex by DB2008 increasing the minimum paid-in capital. DB2009 The minimum capital was increased by more than double. Indonesia eased incorporation and post incorporation processes for new business registration through use of on-line DB2010 service, deletion of certain licenses, increasing efficiency at the registry and cutting the company deeds legalization, publication, registration and business license fees. Indonesia eased business start-up by reducing the cost for company name clearance and reservation and the time DB2011 required to reserve the name and approve the deed of incorporation. Indonesia made starting a business easier by introducing a simplified application process allowing an applicant to DB2012 simultaneously obtain both a general trading license and a business registration certificate. DB2013 No reform as measured by Doing Business. Note: For information on reforms in earlier years (back to DB2005), see the Doing Business reports for these years, available at http://www.doingbusiness.org. Source: Doing Business database. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 21 STARTING A BUSINESS What are the details? Underlying the indicators shown in this chapter for STANDARDIZED COMPANY Indonesia is a set of specific procedures—the bureaucratic and legal steps that an entrepreneur must complete to incorporate and register a new City: Jakarta firm. These are identified by Doing Business through collaboration with relevant local Legal Form: Perseroan Terbatas (PT) professionals and the study of laws, regulations and Paid in Minimum Capital Requirement: IDR publicly available information on business entry in 12,500,000 that economy. Following is a detailed summary of those procedures, along with the associated time Start-up Capital: 10 times GNI per capita and cost. These procedures are those that apply to a company matching the standard assumptions (the ―standardized company‖) used by Doing Business in collecting the data (see the section in this chapter on what the indicators measure). Summary of procedures for starting a business in Indonesia—and the time and cost Time to No. Procedure Cost to complete complete Obtain the standard form of the company deed ; arrange for a notary electronically; obtain clearance for the Indonesian company's name at the Ministry of Law and Human Rights. The uniqueness of the company name must be checked to ensure that it has not been used by another Indonesian company, to avoid a rejection by the Ministry of Justice and Human Rights of the company's deed of establishment and articles of association. Because the process must be done through a computerized processing system, the reservation and clearance must be done by a notary public (because the new computerized system for nontax state revenue payments may be accessed only by a notary public). The reserved name will be blocked for 60 days. If the founding shareholders are confident that the same name has not been used by another Indonesian company, this included in procedure 1 4 days procedure is not necessary. 4 Under Article 16 of Law No. 40 of 2007 on Limited Liability Companies, company must not use a name which: • has been lawfully used by another company or is similar to the name of another company; • contravenes public order and/or decency; • is identical or similar to the name of a state agency, government agency, or international agency, except with their approval; • does not conform to the purposes and objectives and business activities of the company, or only designates the purposes and objectives of the company without having its own name; • consists of numbers or a set of figures, a letter or a set of letters that Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 22 Time to No. Procedure Cost to complete complete do not form any words; or • means a Company, a legal entity, or a civil enterprise (persekutuan perdata). The Ministry of Law and Human Rights may reject a name application reservation if the requested name is, among others, the same or resembles similarities to name of other companies. Government Regulation No. 26 of 1998 on Use of Names of Limited Liability Companies also provides that an application to use a name that is the same or similar to a well known trademark shall be rejected unless approval is obtained from the holder of the trademark Notarize company documents before a notary public Law No. 30 of 2004 concerning Notaries (Article 36 paragraph 3) 4 days IDR 4,464,464 2 stipulates that the maximum notary fee for objects of deed with an economical value of above IDR 100.000,000 up to IDR 1.000,000,000 is 1.5% of the total value of the object of the deed. Obtain a certificate of company domicile from the local municipality All Indonesian limited liability companies must have a certificate of 3 company domicile. This certificate is issued by the head of the village 2 days no charge (the Lurah) where the company is located or by the building management if office space is leased. There is no official fee for this certificate. This certificate is required for several documents (SIUP, TDP, etc.). Pay the State Treasury for the non-tax state revenue (PNBP) fees for legal services at a bank Because the new computerized system for nontax state revenue payments (PNBP)—which has been implemented by the Ministry of Justice and Human Rights—may be accessed only by a notary public, IDR 200,000 (name payment for registering or establishing a company is normally easier check) + IDR through the notary. 1 day 1,580,000 non-tax 4 state revenue (PNBP) The requirement to pay the non-tax state revenue (PNBP) fee for legal fees for legal services services in relation to the establishment of a PT is obtained from the information stated in the website of the Legal Entity Administration System (known as SABH (Sistem Administrasi Badan Hukum) (www.sisminbakum.go.id), where it is informed that there is a PBNP fee to be paid for the purpose of company establishment in the amount of IDR 200,000 and to be paid through the Notary. Apply to the Ministry of Law and Human Rights for approval of the deed of establishment included in procedure 5 Based on Article 9, 10, 29 and 30 Indonesian Company Law No. 40 year 7 days 4 2007, the application for approval of Ministry of Law and Human Right (the "Ministry of Law") on establishment of company should be be able to file electronically by attaching with the certificate of bank account, Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 23 Time to No. Procedure Cost to complete complete copy of the relevant bank transmittal advice, NPWP (Tax Registration Number), Certificate of Company Domicile. the process will be taken as follows: •The application should be filled at the latest 60 days since the date of establishment deed • Since the application has already fulfilled, the Ministry of Law directly electronically stated no objection on said application. However, if the application is not fulfilled, the Ministry of Law will directly electronically stated his objection on said application • In 30 days since the date of no objection by Ministry of Law, the applicant should submit the original application and supporting documents • 14 days after fulfillment of above requirements, Ministry of Law will issue the legalisation on the establishment of the company • Data of company which its establishment has been approved by Ministry of Law i.e name, domicile, object and purpose, period, capital company will be inserted into Company Registry • The Ministry of Law will announce the establishment of company in Supplement State Gazette (TBNRI) within 14 days of the Ministry's Approval Letter • The cost of this procedure is based on the Schedule to the Government Regulation Number 38 of 2009 concerning Types and Tariffs on Non Tax State Revenues Applied for in the Department of Law and Human Rights which comes into effect on 28 May 2009 Apply at the One Stop Service for the permanent business trading license (Surat Izin Usaha Perdagangan, SIUP) and the company registration certificate (Tanda Daftar Perusahaan/TDP) The Surat Izin Usaha Perdagangan (SIUP) constitutes the business license for a non-facility company engaging in trading business. The SIUP contains details about the company activities and the person in charge of the company (normally the President Director). The Ministry of Industry and Trade, which issues the SIUP for a nonfacility company, may require a letter of good conduct from the Indonesian police in support of the person in charge of the company. Normally, the following copy of documents should be attached for the application for 6 a SIUP: 15 days IDR 500,000 (TDP) • The articles of association (copy) • An attestation of location and address of the company‘s offices • Identity card of the company President Director • Notary deeds After reviewing the application, the Municipality passes it to the technical agency at the regional office for cooperatives for further review. It takes 2 days to get the signature of the head of that office as the authority is not delegated. Once the application is back, the SUIP is provided. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 24 Time to No. Procedure Cost to complete complete Although there is no official charge, there is usually an unofficial administrative fee. Fees depend on negotiation and usually start from IDR 400,000 to 500,000 for a small company, IDR 600,000 to IDR 700,000 for a medium-size company; and IDR 750,000 to IDR 1.000,000 for a large company. SIUP and TDP can be obtained at the One Stop Shop Service, through the Standard Operating Procedure. Based on Regulation of Ministry of Trading No. 36/M-Dag/PER/9/2007 on Issuing Business Trading License (SIUP), the SIUP will be issued in 3 days since the receiving of completed documents but in practice it takes 3-7 days. Register with the Ministry of Manpower According to Law No. 7/1981, companies with more than 10 workers or a monthly payroll of IDR 1 million must register with the Ministry of 7 Manpower. This procedure can be completed concurrently with other 14 days no charge post-registration procedures by filing the manpower compulsory report and company regulations with the Ministry of Manpower. Although there is no official fee, there may an unofficial administrative fee that depends on negotiation and usually starts at IDR 100,000. * Apply for the Workers Social Security Program (Jamsostek Program) According to legal provisions on workers‘ social security (Law No. 3/1992), it is mandatory for every company or individual employing 10 workers or more or generating a monthly payroll of at least IDR 1 million a month to apply for the Workers Social Security Program (Jamsostek), operated by the executing agency. This social security 7 days (simultaneous 8 program covers occupational accident security, death security, old age with previous no charge security, and health maintenance. procedure) A company or an individual is not obligated to enroll its employees in the social security program if it offers an independent employee social security program with benefits comparable or better than those offered by the Package of Basic Health Maintenance Security (according to Government Regulation No. 14/1993, as amended by Government Regulation No. 28 /2002). * Obtain a taxpayer registration number (NPWP) and a VAT collector number (NPPKP) Regulation of Directorate General of Taxation No. 44/PJ/2008 which comes into effect on 20 October 2008 concerning Procedures of Application of Taxpayer Registration and/or Taxable Enterpreneur 1 day (simultaneous 9 Number, Amendment of Data and Transfer of Taxpayer and/or Taxable with previous no charge Enterpreneur aimed to incease the service to the taxpayer. The procedure) regulation states that within 1 year as of the issuance of NPWP, the relevant Tax Office will conduct field confirmation regarding the correct data/identity of the taxpayer a. The person/entity can apply for NPWP in the relevant tax office where the company is located or can apply it online through Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 25 Time to No. Procedure Cost to complete complete http://www.pajak.go.id, choose e-registration to make account as a taxpayer and then follow the procedures therein, by filling the form and attaching copies of deed of establishment and its amendment if any, identity card/KTP of one of active Director, statement letter regarding confirmation on place of business from one of the active Director (form is provided), POA and identity card/KTP of the authorizee. The NPWP card and Registered Statement Letter is obtained within 1 calendar day upon the completeness of the required document without and fee, charge and/or retribution. * Takes place simultaneously with another procedure. Source: Doing Business database. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 26 DEALING WITH CONSTRUCTION PERMITS Regulation of construction is critical to protect the WHAT THE DEALING WITH CONSTRUCTION public. But it needs to be efficient, to avoid PERMITS INDICATORS MEASURE excessive constraints on a sector that plays an important part in every economy. Where complying with building regulations is excessively costly in Procedures to legally build a warehouse time and money, many builders opt out. They may (number) pay bribes to pass inspections or simply build Submitting all relevant documents and illegally, leading to hazardous construction that obtaining all necessary clearances, licenses, puts public safety at risk. Where compliance is permits and certificates simple, straightforward and inexpensive, everyone Completing all required notifications and is better off. receiving all necessary inspections What do the indicators cover? Obtaining utility connections for water, Doing Business records the procedures, time and sewerage and a fixed telephone line cost for a business to obtain all the necessary Registering the warehouse after its approvals to build a simple commercial warehouse completion (if required for use as collateral or in the economy‘s largest business city, connect it to for transfer of the warehouse) basic utilities and register the property so that it Time required to complete each procedure can be used as collateral or transferred to another (calendar days) entity. Does not include time spent gathering The ranking on the ease of dealing with information construction permits is the simple average of the Each procedure starts on a separate day percentile rankings on its component indicators: procedures, time and cost. Procedure completed once final document is received To make the data comparable across economies, Doing Business uses several assumptions about the No prior contact with officials business and the warehouse, including the utility Cost required to complete each procedure (% connections. of income per capita) The business: Official costs only, no bribes  Is a limited liability company operating in  Will be connected to water, sewerage the construction business and located in (sewage system, septic tank or their the largest business city. equivalent) and a fixed telephone line. The  Is domestically owned and operated. connection to each utility network will be 10 meters (32 feet, 10 inches) long.  Has 60 builders and other employees.  Will be used for general storage, such as of The warehouse: books or stationery (not for goods requiring  Is a new construction (there was no special conditions). previous construction on the land).  Will take 30 weeks to construct (excluding all  Has complete architectural and technical delays due to administrative and regulatory plans prepared by a licensed architect. requirements). Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 27 DEALING WITH CONSTRUCTION PERMITS Where does the economy stand today? What does it take to comply with the formalities to permits there requires 13 procedures, takes 158 days build a warehouse in Indonesia? According to data and costs 95.0% of income per capita (figure 3.1). collected by Doing Business, dealing with construction Figure 3.1 What it takes to comply with formalities to build a warehouse in Indonesia Note: Time shown in the figure above may not reflect simultaneity of procedures. For more information on the methodology of the dealing with construction permits indicators, see the Doing Business website (http://www.doingbusiness.org). For details on the procedures reflected here, see the summary at the end of this chapter. Source: Doing Business database. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 28 DEALING WITH CONSTRUCTION PERMITS Globally, Indonesia stands at 75 in the ranking of 185 other useful information for assessing how easy it is for economies on the ease of dealing with construction an entrepreneur in Indonesia to legally build a permits (figure 3.2). The rankings for comparator warehouse. economies and the regional average ranking provide Figure 3.2 How Indonesia and comparator economies rank on the ease of dealing with construction permits Source: Doing Business database. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 29 DEALING WITH CONSTRUCTION PERMITS What are the changes over time? While the most recent Doing Business data reflect how of the process have changed—and which have not easy (or difficult) it is to deal with construction permits (table 3.1). That can help identify where the potential in Indonesia today, data over time show which aspects for improvement is greatest. Table 3.1 The ease of dealing with construction permits in Indonesia over time By Doing Business report year Indicator DB2006 DB2007 DB2008 DB2009 DB2010 DB2011 DB2012 DB2013 Rank .. .. .. .. .. .. 72 75 Procedures (number) 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 Time (days) 186 186 158 158 158 158 158 158 Cost (% of income 276.6 235.7 217.4 167.8 135.1 120.1 105.3 95.0 per capita) Note: n.a. = not applicable (the economy was not included in Doing Business for that year). DB2012 rankings shown are not last year‘s published rankings but comparable rankings for DB2012 that capture the effects of such factors as data corrections and the addition of 2 economies (Barbados and Malta) to the sample this year. For more information on ―no practice‖ marks, see the data notes. Source: Doing Business database. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 30 DEALING WITH CONSTRUCTION PERMITS Equally helpful may be the benchmarks provided by possible in making it easier to deal with construction the economies that over time have had the best permits. And changes in regional averages can show performance regionally or globally on the procedures, where Indonesia is keeping up—and where it is falling time or cost required to deal with construction permits behind. (figure 3.3). These benchmarks help show what is Figure 3.3 Has dealing with construction permits become easier over time? Procedures (number) Time (days) Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 31 DEALING WITH CONSTRUCTION PERMITS Cost (% of income per capita) Source: Doing Business database. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 32 DEALING WITH CONSTRUCTION PERMITS Smart regulation ensures that standards are met while building safety while keeping compliance costs making compliance easy and accessible to all. reasonable, governments around the world have Coherent and transparent rules, efficient processes and worked on consolidating permitting requirements. adequate allocation of resources are especially What construction permitting reforms has Doing important in sectors where safety is at stake. Business recorded in Indonesia (table 3.2)? Construction is one of them. In an effort to ensure Table 3.2 How has Indonesia made dealing with construction permits easier—or not? By Doing Business report year DB year Reform Indonesia made obtaining construction permits easier by implementing a new building regulation which specifically DB2008 revoked the provisions on time period to complete building permits. As a result, the time to obtain a building permit decreased from 49 days to 21 days. DB2009 No reform as measured by Doing Business. DB2010 No reform as measured by Doing Business. DB2011 No reform as measured by Doing Business. DB2012 No reform as measured by Doing Business. DB2013 No reform as measured by Doing Business. Note: For information on reforms in earlier years (back to DB2006), see the Doing Business reports for these years, available at http://www.doingbusiness.org. Source: Doing Business database. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 33 DEALING WITH CONSTRUCTION PERMITS What are the details? The indicators reported here for Indonesia are BUILDING A WAREHOUSE based on a set of specific procedures—the steps that a company must complete to legally build a warehouse—identified by Doing Business through City : Jakarta information collected from experts in construction licensing, including architects, construction Estimated lawyers, construction firms, utility service providers IDR 4,552,100,000 Warehouse Value : and public officials who deal with building regulations. These procedures are those that apply The procedures, along with the associated time and to a company and structure matching the standard cost, are summarized below. assumptions used by Doing Business in collecting the data (see the section in this chapter on what the indicators cover). Summary of procedures for dealing with construction permits in Indonesia —and the time and cost Time to No. Procedure Cost to complete complete Request Pre-approval letter from Zoning Department The total cost to obtain Pre-approval letter is IDR 1,482,000.00 according to Article 123 of the Regional Regulation No. 1 Year 2006. The following is the detailed calculation: • Land measurement (based on the land certificate, namely 500 -- 1,000 sq. m.) a retribution of IDR 750,000.00 • Print out of the map (scale of 1:10000), a retribution of IDR 1,000.00 per copy x 12 copies or a total of IDR 12,000.00 1 day IDR 1,482,000 1 • KRK for plans to use of a land for warehouse construction (Karya pergudangan/Kpg) for a land area of up to 1,000 sq. m. is subject to a fee of IDR 40,000.00 • RTLB for plans to build warehouse construction is subject to a fee of IDR 40,000.00/100 sq. m. of floor surface, so the total fee for the RTLB: IDR 40,000.00 x 13 (based on a 1,300.6 sq. m. floor surface) = IDR 520,000.00 • Land marking for city planning implementation purposes (pematokan penerapan rencana kota) is subject to a fee of IDR 80,000.00 x 2 (because the building exceeds 1,000 sq. m.), or a total of IDR 160,000.00 Receive inspection from Zoning Department 2 1 day no charge Zoning Office inspects the site to confirm that application submitted by the builder meets the requirements. Obtain Pre-approval letter from Zoning Department 3 After the inspection, the application its forwarded to different offices 20 days no charge within the Zoning Office for approval. The location officer, the roads officer and the architectural officer approve the application. When Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 34 Time to No. Procedure Cost to complete complete internal procedure it's completed, builder it's notified (by phone, mail or electronically) and can pick up the Pre-approval letter. The recommendation letter includes the documents listed in procedure 1. * Request and obtain notarized copy of Land Ownership certificate 4 1 day IDR 25,000 Builder needs to notarize a copy of the Land Ownership certificate before applying for the building permit. Request and obtain the preparation of the Environmental Management Plan (UKL) and Environmental Monitoring Plan (UPL) BuildCo hires an external consultant that will prepare the Environmental 8 days IDR 15,000,000 5 Management Plan (UKL) and Environmental Monitoring Plan (UPL). When this is ready BuildCo will submit the documents to the Local Environmental Management Agency (BPLHD) for the Province of DKI Jakarta for approval. Request and obtain the approval for the Environmental Management Plan (UKL) and Environmental Monitoring Plan (UPL) The legal basis for this procedure is: 6 10 days no charge • Law No. 32 of 2009 regarding the Environment • Decision of the Minister of the Environment No 86 of 2002 on Implementation of UKL and UPL Request and obtain building construction permit (IMB) When applicant has the complete set of documents (see below) and application is submitted, the Permit Office will conduct an inspection. Given that the plot where the warehouse will be built is empty, no representative from BuildCo needs to be present. Officials from the Permit Office will only verify that the plot is vacant. The legal basis for this procedure is: • Decree of the Governor of the Province of DKI Jakarta No. 76 Year 2000, Article 2 paragraph (2) b • Regulation of the Head of the Local Building Supervision and Control (P2B) Office No. 21 Year 2009, Annex I point I.b 21 days IDR 9,104,200 7 • The legal basis for the time to complete this step in 14 days working days (21 calendar days) is the Regulation of the Governor of DKI Jakarta Number 85 of 2006, Article 11 paragraph • According to the Regional Regulation of the Province of DKI Jakarta Number 1 Year 2006 concerning Regional Retribution, the formula to calculate the fee for this permit is IDR 7,000.00 per sq. m. Since the warehouse considered in the case study has an area of 1,300.6 square meters the cost then will be IDR 7,000.00 * 1,300.6 = IDR 9,104,200.00 The supporting documents required are: • Photocopy of the ID Card • Photocopy of the Land Certificate (notarized) • KRK and RTLB from City Planning Office from the Local City Zoning Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 35 Time to No. Procedure Cost to complete complete Office (included in Pre-approval letter) • As Built Drawing (Architecture; Construction, and Installation) for the Warehouse Construction to be built • Photocopy of the license to operate as a Building Planner • Statement of uncontested ownership of the land for which IMB is applied • Company‘s Deed of Establishment • Completed Application Form • Receipt of UKL-UPL or UKL-UPL Recommendation from the BPLHD Request and obtain the building completion and compliance minutes The construction completion and compliance report is a prerequisite for obtaining a usage permit. The party issuing the official report on the 8 completion of the construction and compliance with the building 28 days IDR 62,500 permit is the Supervising Director, who can be an individual, a group of experts, or an entity appointed by the project owner to supervise the construction work. The individual or group of experts must be independent of BuildCo and cannot be its employees. Obtain building usage permit (IPB) BuildCo must submit the following documents to the City Planning Office: The supporting documents required are: • Building drawings • Copy of the IMB • Warehouse Construction Completion Report from the Supervising Directors/Consultant appointed by BuildCo • An official report from the Supervising Director comprising (Minutes of completion of the warehouse construction and compliance): 1. A copy of the letter of appointment of the contractor and Supervising Director and the Coordinator of the Supervising Director 49 days no charge 9 2. A copy of the TDR of the contractor and work permit of the Supervising Director. 3. A report on construction stages from the Supervising Director 4. A statement from the Coordinator of the Supervising Director that the warehouse has been completed in accordance with the building permit (IMB) The legal basis for this procedure is: • Decree of the Governor of the Province of DKI Jakarta No. 76 Year 2000, Article 9 paragraph (4) b • Regulation of the Head of the Local Building Supervision and Control Office No. 21 Year 2009, Annex I point II.b Register with land and building tax office 10 11 days no charge After the warehouse is built BuildCo needs to update its records at the Land and Building Tax Office. Even if this update is supposed to be Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 36 Time to No. Procedure Cost to complete complete done automatically, many builders do it personally to avoid delays. This is critical when builder wants to sell or obtain a loan with the property. Register the warehouse with the regional office of the ministry of industry and trade The company must submit the following documents: • A copy of the trade business license • A copy of company registration code • A copy of the owner‘s or shareholders‘ identity card(s) • A copy of the taxpayer number; a copy of warehouse lease agreement (if the warehouse is leased) • A copy of the building permit (IMB) 11 • A copy of the map of the warehouse 9 days IDR 100,000 Warehouses in a privately owned port, warehouses in a bonded zone, and warehouses adjacent to the plant are exempted from the registration requirement. Under the new government, the Ministry of Industry and Trade has been divided into the Ministry of Industry and the Ministry of Trade. The warehouse registration is conducted with the regional office of the Ministry of Trade. * Obtain water and sewerage connection 12 8 days IDR 2,000,000 The company notifies the industrial manager that the warehouse is ready for utility hook-ups. * Obtain phone connection 13 4 days IDR 500,000 The company notifies the industrial manager that the warehouse is ready for utility hook-ups. * Takes place simultaneously with another procedure. Source: Doing Business database. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 37 GETTING ELECTRICITY Access to reliable and affordable electricity is vital WHAT THE GETTING ELECTRICITY for businesses. To counter weak electricity supply, many firms in developing economies have to rely INDICATORS MEASURE on self-supply, often at a prohibitively high cost. Whether electricity is reliably available or not, the Procedures to obtain an electricity first step for a customer is always to gain access by connection (number) obtaining a connection. Submitting all relevant documents and What do the indicators cover? obtaining all necessary clearances and permits Doing Business records all procedures required for Completing all required notifications and a local business to obtain a permanent electricity receiving all necessary inspections connection and supply for a standardized warehouse, as well as the time and cost to Obtaining external installation works and complete them. These procedures include possibly purchasing material for these works applications and contracts with electricity utilities, Concluding any necessary supply contract and clearances from other agencies and the external obtaining final supply and final connection works. The ranking on the ease of getting electricity is the simple average of Time required to complete each procedure the percentile rankings on its component (calendar days) indicators: procedures, time and cost. To make the Is at least 1 calendar day data comparable across economies, several assumptions are used. Each procedure starts on a separate day The warehouse: Does not include time spent gathering information  Is located in the economy‘s largest business city, in an area where other Reflects the time spent in practice, with little warehouses are located. follow-up and no prior contact with officials  Is not in a special economic zone where Cost required to complete each procedure the connection would be eligible for (% of income per capita) subsidization or faster service. Official costs only, no bribes  Has road access. The connection works Excludes value added tax involve the crossing of a road or roads but are carried out on public land.  Is 150 meters long.  Is a new construction being connected to  Is to either the low-voltage or the medium- electricity for the first time. voltage distribution network and either overhead  Has 2 stories, both above ground, with a or underground, whichever is more common in total surface of about 1,300.6 square the economy and in the area where the meters (14,000 square feet), and is built on warehouse is located. The length of any a plot of 929 square meters (10,000 square connection in the customer‘s private domain is feet). negligible. The electricity connection:  Involves installing one electricity meter. The monthly electricity consumption will be 0.07  Is a 3-phase, 4-wire Y, 140-kilovolt-ampere gigawatt-hour (GWh). The internal electrical (kVA) (subscribed capacity) connection. wiring has been completed. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 38 GETTING ELECTRICITY Where does the economy stand today? What does it take to obtain a new electricity procedures, takes 108 days and costs 1243.8% of connection in Indonesia? According to data collected income per capita (figure 4.1). by Doing Business, getting electricity there requires 6 Figure 4.1 What it takes to obtain an electricity connection in Indonesia Note: Time shown in the figure above may not reflect simultaneity of procedures. For more information on the methodology of the getting electricity indicators, see the Doing Business website (http://www.doingbusiness.org). For details on the procedures reflected here, see the summary at the end of this chapter. Source: Doing Business database. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 39 GETTING ELECTRICITY Globally, Indonesia stands at 147 in the ranking of 185 regional average ranking provide another perspective economies on the ease of getting electricity (figure in assessing how easy it is for an entrepreneur in 4.2). The rankings for comparator economies and the Indonesia to connect a warehouse to electricity. Figure 4.2 How Indonesia and comparator economies rank on the ease of getting electricity Source: Doing Business database. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 40 GETTING ELECTRICITY Even more helpful than rankings on the ease of getting performers on these indicators may provide useful electricity may be the indicators underlying those benchmarks. rankings (table 4.1). And regional and global best Table 4.1 The ease of getting electricity in Indonesia Best performer in Best performer Indicator Indonesia DB2013 Indonesia DB2012 East Asia & Pacific globally DB2013 DB2013 Rank Hong Kong SAR, 147 158 Iceland (1) China (4) Procedures (number) 6 7 Timor-Leste (3) Germany (3)* Time (days) 108 108 Taiwan, China (24) Germany (17) Cost (% of income Hong Kong SAR, per capita) 1,243.8 1,379.0 Japan (0.0) China (1.6) Note: DB2012 rankings shown are not last year‘s published rankings but comparable rankings for DB2012 that capture the effects of such factors as data corrections and the addition of 2 economies (Barbados and Malta) to the sample this year. * Two or more economies share the top ranking on this indicator. For a list of these economies, see the Doing Business website (http://www.doingbusiness.org). Source: Doing Business database. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 41 GETTING ELECTRICITY Obtaining an electricity connection is essential to safety in the connection process while keeping enable a business to conduct its most basic operations. connection costs reasonable, governments around the In many economies the connection process is world have worked to consolidate requirements for complicated by the multiple laws and regulations obtaining an electricity connection. What reforms in involved—covering service quality, general safety, getting electricity has Doing Business recorded in technical standards, procurement practices and Indonesia (table 4.2)? internal wiring installations. In an effort to ensure Table 4.2 How has Indonesia made getting electricity easier—or not? By Doing Business report year DB year Reform Indonesia made getting electricity more difficult by increasing DB2012 connection fees. Indonesia made getting electricity easier by eliminating the requirement for new customers applying for an electricity DB2013 connection to show a neighbor‘s electricity bill as a way to help determine their address. Source: Doing Business database. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 42 GETTING ELECTRICITY What are the details? The indicators reported here for Indonesia are based OBTAINING AN ELECTRICITY CONNECTION on a set of specific procedures—the steps that an entrepreneur must complete to get a warehouse connected to electricity by the local distribution City: Jakarta utility—identified by Doing Business. Data are collected from the distribution utility, then completed and Name of Utility: PT PLN verified by electricity regulatory agencies and independent professionals such as electrical engineers, The procedures are those that apply to a warehouse electrical contractors and construction companies. The and electricity connection matching the standard electricity distribution utility surveyed is the one assumptions used by Doing Business in collecting the serving the area (or areas) in which warehouses are data (see the section in this chapter on what the located. If there is a choice of distribution utilities, the indicators cover). The procedures, along with the one serving the largest number of customers is associated time and cost, are summarized below. selected. Summary of procedures for getting electricity in Indonesia—and the time and cost Time to No. Procedure Cost to complete complete The client applies for and obtains a Certificate of “Guaranteed Electrical Installation� (JIL) from the Indonesian Electrical Contractors Association (AKLI) The electrical contractor who carried out the internal installation inspects it, then applies for a Certificate that guarantees its conformity with the Wiring Regulations. This Certificate, Jaminan Instalasi Listrik (JIL) is issued by the Electrical Contractors Association, known as Asosiasi Kontraktor Listrik dan Mekanikal Indonesia (AKLI). This is done in accordance with the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources decision number 45 Year 7 calendar days IDR 3,675,000.0 1 2005 about the Test Reports on the Correct Operation of the Low- Voltage (LV) Electrical Installation, Appendix VIII. Arrangements to obtain the certificate can be made with the Regional Executive Council of the local AKLI (www.akli.org). In 2011, PT PLN implemented a call center that made it possible for customers to request a new electricity connection on the phone. The application process was further simplified by eliminating the requirement to bring in a copy of a neighbor's bill that would help determine the exact address of the business. The client applies for and obtains inspection and Certificate of Operation Worthiness (SLO) of the Internal Installation from the National Committee for Electrical Installation (KONSUIL) 2 7 calendar days IDR 2,572,500.0 In addition to the certificate issued by AKLI, the client needs to obtain a certificate that guarantees the proper operation of the internal installation from the National Committee for Electrical Installation, Komite Nasional Keselamatan Untuk Instalasi Listrik (KONSUIL). Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 43 Time to No. Procedure Cost to complete complete KONSUIL (www.konsuil.or.id) acts as an independent body in charge of inspecting and verifying the conformity of LV Installation to the norms in place. This is in accordance with articles 21 paragraph (7) and 22 paragraph (2) of the Government Regulation number 3 Year 2005, amending Government Regulation number 10 Year 1989 on the Supply and Electricity Connections. The following documents need to be submitted: • Installation drawings • List of materials used: brand, size / specs • Copy of Guaranteed Electrical Installation (JIL) certificate The client submits application for electricity connection and awaits request approval including estimate of fees from PT Perusahaan Listrik Negara (PLN) The client needs to submit the following documents along with the 3 application: 12 calendar days no charge -Copy of Identity Card -Layout of the location -Guaranteed Electrical Installation Certificate (JIL), and -Certificate of Operation Worthiness (SLO) from KONSUIL * The client obtains external inspection from PT Perusahaan Listrik Negara (PLN) 4 1 calendar day no charge An inspection of the site is needed to carry out a technical study of the connection works. The client obtains external works from PT Perusahaan Listrik Negara (PLN)'s contractor Works consist of expanding the distribution network by installing an 5 overhead transformer and connecting to the warehouse and to the MV 72 calendar days IDR 250,000,000.0 network. PLN‘s contractor buys the materials needed (transformer and accessories, cables) and bills the customer for the price. The client obtains final connection from PT Perusahaan Listrik Negara (PLN) The costs are as follows: Connection fees: IDR 775/VA (capacity assumed is 147 kVA according to PLN's tariff classes) Stamp Duty: IDR 6000 3 calendar days IDR 113,931,000.0 6 In July 2010 a new Ministerial Regulation was introduced with the aim of increasing fairness and efficiency of connection costs. Based on that regulation, in early 2011 the Board of Directors of the utility PLN issued an official memo (PLN Board of Directors' decree No. 617.K/DIR/2010) to all PLN municipal branches instructing them to eliminate the security deposit. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 44 Time to No. Procedure Cost to complete complete Connection fees to pay to the utility were on the other hand, increased. These fees were adjusted for two reasons: to account for additional charges incurred by PLN in certain cases for the installation of new connections and to ensure all applicants receive the same treatment with respect to official connection charges. The other reasoning for the cost adjustment was the previous fee was a product of a calculation made in 2003, as such since then the market prices have gone up and PLN had made the adjustment to take into account the market price. * Takes place simultaneously with another procedure. Source: Doing Business database. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 45 REGISTERING PROPERTY Ensuring formal property rights is fundamental. WHAT THE REGISTERING PROPERTY Effective administration of land is part of that. If INDICATORS MEASURE formal property transfer is too costly or complicated, formal titles might go informal again. And where property is informal or poorly Procedures to legally transfer title on administered, it has little chance of being immovable property (number) accepted as collateral for loans—limiting access to Preregistration (for example, checking for liens, finance. notarizing sales agreement, paying property transfer taxes) What do the indicators cover? Registration in the economy‘s largest business Doing Business records the full sequence of city procedures necessary for a business to purchase property from another business and transfer the Postregistration (for example, filing title with the municipality) property title to the buyer‘s name. The transaction is considered complete when it is opposable to Time required to complete each procedure third parties and when the buyer can use the (calendar days) property, use it as collateral for a bank loan or Does not include time spent gathering resell it. The ranking on the ease of registering information property is the simple average of the percentile rankings on its component indicators: procedures, Each procedure starts on a separate day time and cost. Procedure completed once final document is received To make the data comparable across economies, several assumptions about the parties to the No prior contact with officials transaction, the property and the procedures are Cost required to complete each procedure used. (% of property value) The parties (buyer and seller): Official costs only, no bribes  Are limited liability companies, 100% No value added or capital gains taxes included domestically and privately owned.  Are located in the periurban area of the economy‘s largest business city.  Has no mortgages attached and has been under the same ownership for the past 10  Have 50 employees each, all of whom are years. nationals.  Consists of 557.4 square meters (6,000 square  Perform general commercial activities. feet) of land and a 10-year-old, 2-story The property (fully owned by the seller): warehouse of 929 square meters (10,000  Has a value of 50 times income per capita. square feet). The warehouse is in good The sale price equals the value. condition and complies with all safety standards, building codes and legal  Is registered in the land registry or requirements. The property will be transferred cadastre, or both, and is free of title in its entirety. disputes.  Is located in a periurban commercial zone, and no rezoning is required. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 46 REGISTERING PROPERTY Where does the economy stand today? What does it take to complete a property transfer in procedures, takes 22 days and costs 10.8% of the Indonesia? According to data collected by Doing property value (figure 5.1). Business, registering property there requires 6 Figure 5.1 What it takes to register property in Indonesia Note: Time shown in the figure above may not reflect simultaneity of procedures. For more information on the methodology of the registering property indicators, see the Doing Business website (http://www.doingbusiness.org). For details on the procedures reflected here, see the summary at the end of this chapter. Source: Doing Business database. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 47 REGISTERING PROPERTY Globally, Indonesia stands at 98 in the ranking of 185 regional average ranking provide other useful economies on the ease of registering property (figure information for assessing how easy it is for an 5.2). The rankings for comparator economies and the entrepreneur in Indonesia to transfer property. Figure 5.2 How Indonesia and comparator economies rank on the ease of registering property Source: Doing Business database. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 48 REGISTERING PROPERTY What are the changes over time? While the most recent Doing Business data reflect how process have changed—and which have not (table 5.1). easy (or difficult) it is to register property in Indonesia That can help identify where the potential for today, data over time show which aspects of the improvement is greatest. Table 5.1 The ease of registering property in Indonesia over time By Doing Business report year Indicator DB2005 DB2006 DB2007 DB2008 DB2009 DB2010 DB2011 DB2012 DB2013 Rank .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 99 98 Procedures (number) 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 Time (days) 39 39 39 39 39 22 22 22 22 Cost (% of property value) 10.3 10.4 10.5 10.5 10.7 10.7 10.9 10.8 10.8 Note: n.a. = not applicable (the economy was not included in Doing Business for that year). DB2012 rankings shown are not last year‘s published rankings but comparable rankings for DB2012 that capture the effects of such factors as data corrections and the addition of 2 economies (Barbados and Malta) to the sample this year. For more information on ―no practice‖ marks, see the data notes. Source: Doing Business database. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 49 REGISTERING PROPERTY Equally helpful may be the benchmarks provided by possible in making it easier to register property. And the economies that over time have had the best changes in regional averages can show where performance regionally or globally on the procedures, Indonesia is keeping up—and where it is falling time or cost required to complete a property transfer behind. (figure 5.3). These benchmarks help show what is Figure 5.3 Has registering property become easier over time? Procedures (number) Time (days) Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 50 REGISTERING PROPERTY Cost (% of property value) Source: Doing Business database. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 51 REGISTERING PROPERTY Economies worldwide have been making it easier for have cut the time required substantially—enabling entrepreneurs to register and transfer property—such buyers to use or mortgage their property earlier. What as by computerizing land registries, introducing time property registration reforms has Doing Business limits for procedures and setting low fixed fees. Many recorded in Indonesia (table 5.2)? Table 5.2 How has Indonesia made registering property easier—or not? By Doing Business report year DB year Reform DB2008 No reform as measured by Doing Business. DB2009 No reform as measured by Doing Business. Indonesia eased the process of property registration by DB2010 introducing time limits for standard operating procedures at the Land Registry. DB2011 No reform as measured by Doing Business. DB2012 No reform as measured by Doing Business. DB2013 No reform as measured by Doing Business. Note: For information on reforms in earlier years (back to DB2005), see the Doing Business reports for these years, available at http://www.doingbusiness.org. Source: Doing Business database. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 52 REGISTERING PROPERTY What are the details? The indicators reported here are based on a set of STANDARD PROPERTY TRANSFER specific procedures—the steps that a buyer and seller must complete to transfer the property to the buyer‘s name—identified by Doing Business City: Jakarta through information collected from local property Property Value: IDR 1,488,154,825 lawyers, notaries and property registries. These procedures are those that apply to a transaction The procedures, along with the associated time and matching the standard assumptions used by Doing cost, are summarized below. Business in collecting the data (see the section in this chapter on what the indicators cover). Summary of procedures for registering property in Indonesia—and the time and cost Time to No. Procedure Cost to complete complete Land certificate examination at the Land Office A land certificate examination is carried out by a Land Deed Official. If the land book concerned is available at the Land Office, it usually takes a few hours to 1 day. However, sometimes the land book is unavailable, misplaced or being used by another division of the Land Office, so then the examination process will be pending and it usually takes a few days to obtain the information from the Land Office. The land title search would also involve a check at the local city planning 1 day Rp. 50,000 1 office located at the local government office to determine the intended use of the said plot of land, whether for residences, industry or green belt. No written statement is given, but a note made on the certificate saying 'Has been examined and pursuant to Government Regulation No. 13 of 2010 regarding Types and Tarrifs of State Non Tax Income Applicable in National Land Offices. Dated January 22, 2010, the current cost is Rp. 50,000. * Seller pays transfer tax at a bank The seller must pay the Transfer Tax prior to the execution of the transfer deed. The tax on Transfer of Land and Building (Transfer Tax) in the amount of 5% which is calculated on the sale or transfer value. In case 1 day (simultaneous the sale value is higher than the Sales Value of the Tax Object ("NJOP"), with Procedure 3 & 5% of property price 2 then the sale value will be used. But the sale value is higher than the (Transfer Tax) 4) NJOP, then the sale value will be used. The Transfer Tax is paid to a Bank Persepsi - bank appointed by the Ministry of Finance to accept tax payments. Tax to the local government is paid at the Local Government Bank (Bank Badan Usaha Milik Daerah) Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 53 Time to No. Procedure Cost to complete complete and/or other private commercial bank (Article 4.2 of Law No. 7/1983, amended by Law No. 10/1994 and Law 17/2000 concerning Income Tax) and Parts 2.1 and 5.1 of the Director General of Taxation Circular No. SE- 04/P.J.33/1996 dated August 26, 1996. * Buyer pays Tax on Acquisition on Land and Building The buyer pays the Tax on Acquisition of Land and Building (BPHTB) in the amount of 5% of the sale value or transfer value. The BPHTB Formula: The buyer pays the BPHTB in the amount of 5% x Sale value or Transfer value or Nilai Perolehan Obyek Pajak or NPOP – Non-Taxable Sale Value or Nilai Perolehan Obyek Pajak Tidak Kena Pajak 5% of (property or NPOPTKP, which is determined regionally. (According to Article 7 of 1 day (simultaneous price minus Rp. Law No. 20/2000 concerning the amendment of law No. 21/1997 80,000,000 which is 3 with Procedure 2 & concerning the Tax on Acquisition of Land and Building). tax-free) (Tax on 4) Acquisition of Land In Jakarta, the NPOPTKP is Rp. 80,000,000 (according to Article 5 and Building) paragraph 7 of the Regional Decree of Special Province of Jakarta No. 18/2010 concerning the Tax on Acquisition of Land and Building (BPHTB). This tax is paid at a Bank Persepsi, appointed by the State Treasury to accept tax payments, or at a post office where the land is located. * Execution of sale and purchase of Land Deed by a PPAT official The execution of the sale and purchase of Land Deed is made before Land Officials (who are often public notaries as well) appointed by the Head of the National Land Office (PPAT) or a local Head of a District (Camat PPAT), after the taxes in Procedures 3 and 4 have been paid. For convenience, those payments are usually made by the notary three days before the execution of the sale-purchase deed. The documentation shall include: (i) Original land certificate (ii) Evidence of the latest payment of Tax on Land and Building (PBB). Every year, the local PBB Tax Office issues a tax assessment to land 3 days owners. By custom, the buyer usually wants to obtain the original of the (simultaneous with 1% of the property 4 payment of PBB for the past three years and utility bills for the last three value Procedure 2 & 3) months--though in practice the office will check the last 10 years. The Land Deed Officer drawing up the sale and purchase deed will only need to see the most recent PBB while the Land Office will need a copy of the most recent PBB for registering the land into the name of the new owner. (iii) Evidence of payment of Tax on Transfer of Land and Building (Transfer Tax) (obtained in Procedure 2) (iv) Evidence of payment of the Tax on Acquisition of Land and Building (BPHTB) (obtained in Procedure 3) (v) Evidence of deed of Company Establishment which was already authorized by the Ministry of Justice (vi)Company Tax-Registration Numbers (NPWP) of the seller and the purchaser (obtained in Procedure 4) Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 54 Time to No. Procedure Cost to complete complete (vii) Deed of Establishment and its amendments of both the seller and purchaser; (viii) Corporate approvals of the seller to dispose of the land and the purchaser to acquire the land as required in the Articles of Association of both the seller and purchaser (ix) Advise Planning from the City Administration Institution (x) Permit for Building Establishment Registration of the Land Deed at the local Land Office under the name of the buyer Registration of the Land Deed at the local Land Office to have the 1/1000 of the purchaser‘s name registered and recorded in the land certificate. property value + Rp. At the latest of 7 (seven) days as of the signing date of the sale and 50,000 purchase of Land Deed, the notary submits such deed including its 10-15 days (administrative fee) 5 supporting documents to the Land Office, but in practice the wait is + Stamp duty of Rp. much longer because of the backlog. (Article 40 sub 1 of Government 6,000 per document Regulation No. 24/1997 concerning the Land Registration). In theory, the (2 required) registration process should be completed within the 5 days statutory time limit. The Land Office crosses out the name of the previous owner and inserts the name of the buyer, stamps and signs it. Registration of the Land Deed at the Tax on Land and Building Office (PBB) under the name of the buyer In connection to the registration of the Land Deed at the Tax on Land 1 day no cost 6 and Building Office, the change of ownership must be registered with the Tax Office. The taxpayer should report manually to the Tax Office with regard to the transfer of land title. * Takes place simultaneously with another procedure. Source: Doing Business database. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 55 GETTING CREDIT Two types of frameworks can facilitate access to WHAT THE GETTING CREDIT INDICATORS credit and improve its allocation: credit information MEASURE systems and the legal rights of borrowers and lenders in collateral and bankruptcy laws. Credit information systems enable lenders to view a Strength of legal rights index (0–10) potential borrower‘s financial history (positive or Protection of rights of borrowers and lenders negative)—valuable information to consider when through collateral laws assessing risk. And they permit borrowers to Protection of secured creditors‘ rights through establish a good credit history that will allow easier bankruptcy laws access to credit. Sound collateral laws enable businesses to use their assets, especially movable Depth of credit information index (0–6) property, as security to generate capital—while Scope and accessibility of credit information strong creditors‘ rights have been associated with distributed by public credit registries and higher ratios of private sector credit to GDP. private credit bureaus What do the indicators cover? Public credit registry coverage (% of adults) Doing Business assesses the sharing of credit Number of individuals and firms listed in information and the legal rights of borrowers and public credit registry as percentage of adult lenders with respect to secured transactions population through 2 sets of indicators. The depth of credit Private credit bureau coverage (% of adults) information index measures rules and practices Number of individuals and firms listed in affecting the coverage, scope and accessibility of largest private credit bureau as percentage of credit information available through a public credit adult population registry or a private credit bureau. The strength of legal rights index measures whether certain features that facilitate lending exist within the applicable collateral and bankruptcy laws. Doing Business uses case scenarios to determine the scope of the  Has 100 employees. secured transactions system, involving a secured  Is 100% domestically owned, as is the lender. borrower and a secured lender and examining legal The ranking on the ease of getting credit is based on restrictions on the use of movable collateral. These the percentile rankings on the sum of its component scenarios assume that the borrower: indicators: the depth of credit information index and  Is a private, limited liability company. the strength of legal rights index.  Has its headquarters and only base of operations in the largest business city. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 56 GETTING CREDIT Where does the economy stand today? How well do the credit information system and Globally, Indonesia stands at 129 in the ranking of 185 collateral and bankruptcy laws in Indonesia facilitate economies on the ease of getting credit (figure 6.1). access to credit? The economy has a score of 4 on the The rankings for comparator economies and the depth of credit information index and a score of 3 on regional average ranking provide other useful the strength of legal rights index (see the summary of information for assessing how well regulations and scoring at the end of this chapter for details). Higher institutions in Indonesia support lending and scores indicate more credit information and stronger borrowing. legal rights for borrowers and lenders. Figure 6.1 How Indonesia and comparator economies rank on the ease of getting credit Source: Doing Business database. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 57 GETTING CREDIT What are the changes over time? While the most recent Doing Business data reflect how institutions and regulations have been strengthened — well the credit information system and collateral and and where they have not (table 6.1). That can help bankruptcy laws in Indonesia support lending and identify where the potential for improvement is borrowing today, data over time can help show where greatest. Table 6.1 The ease of getting credit in Indonesia over time By Doing Business report year Indicator DB2005 DB2006 DB2007 DB2008 DB2009 DB2010 DB2011 DB2012 DB2013 Rank .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 127 129 Strength of legal rights 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 index (0-10) Depth of credit 2 2 2 3 4 4 4 4 4 information index (0-6) Public registry 0.4 0.0 8.4 20.5 26.1 22.0 25.2 31.8 36.0 coverage (% of adults) Private bureau 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 coverage (% of adults) Note: n.a. = not applicable (the economy was not included in Doing Business for that year). DB2012 rankings shown are not last year‘s published rankings but comparable rankings for DB2012 that capture the e ffects of such factors as data corrections and the addition of 2 economies (Barbados and Malta) to the sample this year. Source: Doing Business database. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 58 GETTING CREDIT One way to put an economy‘s score on the getting shows the number of economies with this score in credit indicators into context is to see where the 2012 as well as the regional average score. Figure 6.3 economy stands in the distribution of scores across shows the same thing for the depth of credit economies. Figure 6.2 highlights the score on the information index. strength of legal rights index for Indonesia in 2012 and Figure 6.2 How strong are legal rights for borrowers Figure 6.3 How much credit information is shared— and lenders? and how widely? Number of economies with each score on strength of legal Number of economies with each score on depth of credit rights index (0–10), 2012 information index (0–6), 2012 Note: Higher scores indicate that collateral and bankruptcy Note: Higher scores indicate the availability of more credit laws are better designed to facilitate access to credit. information, from either a public credit registry or a private Source: Doing Business database. credit bureau, to facilitate lending decisions. Regional averages for the depth of credit information index exclude economies with no public registry or private bureau. Source: Doing Business database. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 59 GETTING CREDIT When economies strengthen the legal rights of lenders credit information, they can increase entrepreneurs‘ and borrowers under collateral and bankruptcy laws, access to credit. What credit reforms has Doing and increase the scope, coverage and accessibility of Business recorded in Indonesia (table 6.2)? Table 6.2 How has Indonesia made getting credit easier—or not? By Doing Business report year DB year Reform The public credit registry of Indonesia lowered the minimum DB2008 loan threshold was lowered from 50 million Rupiah (US$ 5,460) to zero. Borrowers have the right to inspect the data stored in the public credit registry, thanks to new regulations from the Bank DB2009 of Indonesia. Borrowers can now check their credit information and contribute to improve its quality. DB2010 No reform as measured by Doing Business. DB2011 No reform as measured by Doing Business. DB2012 No reform as measured by Doing Business. DB2013 No reform as measured by Doing Business. Note: For information on reforms in earlier years (back to DB2005), see the Doing Business reports for these years, available at http://www.doingbusiness.org. Source: Doing Business database. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 60 GETTING CREDIT What are the details? The getting credit indicators reported here for The data on the legal rights of borrowers and lenders Indonesia are based on detailed information collected are gathered through a survey of financial lawyers and in that economy. The data on credit information verified through analysis of laws and regulations as sharing are collected through a survey of a public well as public sources of information on collateral and credit registry or private credit bureau (if one exists). bankruptcy laws. For the strength of legal rights index, To construct the depth of credit information index, a a score of 1 is assigned for each of 8 aspects related to score of 1 is assigned for each of 6 features of the legal rights in collateral law and 2 aspects in public credit registry or private credit bureau (see bankruptcy law. summary of scoring below). Summary of scoring for the getting credit indicators in Indonesia East Asia & OECD high income Indicator Indonesia Pacific average average Strength of legal rights index (0-10) 3 7 7 Depth of credit information index (0-6) 4 4 5 Public registry coverage (% of adults) 36.0 36.4 31.5 Private bureau coverage (% of adults) 0.0 51.2 74.6 Note: In cases where an economy‘s regional classification is ―OECD high income,‖ regional averages above are only displayed once. Regional averages for the depth of credit information index exclude economies with no public registry or private bureau. Regional averages for the public registry coverage exclude economies with no public registry. Regional averages for the private bureau coverage exclude economies with no private bureau. Strength of legal rights index (0–10) Index score: 3 Can any business use movable assets as collateral while keeping possession of the assets; Yes and any financial institution accept such assets as collateral ? Does the law allow businesses to grant a non possessory security right in a single category No of movable assets, without requiring a specific description of collateral? Does the law allow businesses to grant a non possessory security right in substantially all of No its assets, without requiring a specific description of collateral? May a security right extend to future or after-acquired assets, and may it extend Yes automatically to the products, proceeds or replacements of the original assets ? Is a general description of debts and obligations permitted in collateral agreements; can all types of debts and obligations be secured between parties; and can the collateral agreement Yes include a maximum amount for which the assets are encumbered? Is a collateral registry in operation, that is unified geographically and by asset type, with an No electronic database indexed by debtor's names? Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 61 Strength of legal rights index (0–10) Index score: 3 Are secured creditors paid first (i.e. before general tax claims and employee claims) when a No debtor defaults outside an insolvency procedure? Are secured creditors paid first (i.e. before general tax claims and employee claims) when a No business is liquidated? Are secured creditors either not subject to an automatic stay or moratorium on enforcement procedures when a debtor enters a court-supervised reorganization procedure, or the law No provides secured creditors with grounds for relief from an automatic stay or Does the law allow parties to agree in a collateral agreement that the lender may enforce its No security right out of court, at the time a security interest is created? Private credit Public credit Depth of credit information index (0–6) Index score: 4 bureau registry Are data on both firms and individuals distributed? No Yes 1 Are both positive and negative data distributed? No Yes 1 Does the registry distribute credit information from retailers, trade creditors or utility companies as well No No 0 as financial institutions? Are more than 2 years of historical credit information No No 0 distributed? Is data on all loans below 1% of income per capita No Yes 1 distributed? Is it guaranteed by law that borrowers can inspect No Yes 1 their data in the largest credit registry? Note: An economy receives a score of 1 if there is a "yes" to either private bureau or public registry. Coverage Private credit bureau Public credit registry Number of firms 0 423,928 Number of individuals 0 58,641,671 Source: Doing Business database. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 62 PROTECTING INVESTORS Investor protections matter for the ability of WHAT THE PROTECTING INVESTORS companies to raise the capital they need to grow, INDICATORS MEASURE innovate, diversify and compete. If the laws do not provide such protections, investors may be reluctant to invest unless they become the controlling Extent of disclosure index (0–10) shareholders. Strong regulations clearly define Who can approve related-party transactions related-party transactions, promote clear and efficient Disclosure requirements in case of related- disclosure requirements, require shareholder party transactions participation in major decisions of the company and set clear standards of accountability for company Extent of director liability index (0–10) insiders. Ability of shareholders to hold interested What do the indicators cover? parties and members of the approving body liable in case of related-party transactions Doing Business measures the strength of minority Available legal remedies (damages, repayment shareholder protections against directors‘ use of of profits, fines, imprisonment and rescission corporate assets for personal gain—or self-dealing. of the transaction) The indicators distinguish 3 dimensions of investor protections: transparency of related-party Ability of shareholders to sue directly or transactions (extent of disclosure index), liability for derivatively self-dealing (extent of director liability index) and Ease of shareholder suits index (0–10) shareholders‘ ability to sue officers and directors for Access to internal corporate documents misconduct (ease of shareholder suits index). The (directly or through a government inspector) ranking on the strength of investor protection index is the simple average of the percentile rankings on Documents and information available during these 3 indices. To make the data comparable across trial economies, a case study uses several assumptions Strength of investor protection index (0–10) about the business and the transaction. Simple average of the extent of disclosure, The business (Buyer): extent of director liability and ease of shareholder suits indices  Is a publicly traded corporation listed on the economy‘s most important stock exchange (or at least a large private company with multiple the company purchase used trucks from another shareholders). company he owns.  Has a board of directors and a chief executive  The price is higher than the going price for used officer (CEO) who may legally act on behalf of trucks, but the transaction goes forward. Buyer where permitted, even if this is not specifically required by law.  All required approvals are obtained, and all required disclosures made, though the transaction The transaction involves the following details: is prejudicial to Buyer.  Mr. James, a director and the majority  Shareholders sue the interested parties and the shareholder of the company, proposes that members of the board of directors. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 63 PROTECTING INVESTORS Where does the economy stand today? How strong are investor protections in Indonesia? The index (figure 7.1). While the indicator does not economy has a score of 6.0 on the strength of investor measure all aspects related to the protection of protection index, with a higher score indicating minority investors, a higher ranking does indicate that stronger protections (see the summary of scoring at an economy‘s regulations offer stronger investor the end of this chapter for details). protections against self-dealing in the areas measured. Globally, Indonesia stands at 49 in the ranking of 185 economies on the strength of investor protection Figure 7.1 How Indonesia and comparator economies rank on the strength of investor protection index Source: Doing Business database. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 64 PROTECTING INVESTORS What are the changes over time? While the most recent Doing Business data reflect how ranking on the strength of investor protection index well regulations in Indonesia protect minority investors over time shows whether the economy is slipping today, data over time show whether the protections behind other economies in investor protections—or have been strengthened (table 7.1). And the global surpassing them. Table 7.1 The strength of investor protections in Indonesia over time By Doing Business report year Indicator DB2006 DB2007 DB2008 DB2009 DB2010 DB2011 DB2012 DB2013 Rank .. .. .. .. .. .. 46 49 Extent of disclosure 9 9 9 9 10 10 10 10 index (0-10) Extent of director liability index (0- 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 10) Ease of shareholder 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 suits index (0-10) Strength of investor protection 5.7 5.7 5.7 5.7 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 index (0-10) Note: n.a. = not applicable (the economy was not included in Doing Business for that year). DB2012 rankings shown are not last year‘s published rankings but comparable rankings for DB2012 that capture the effects of such factors as data corrections and the addition of 2 economies (Barbados and Malta) to the sample this year. Source: Doing Business database. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 65 PROTECTING INVESTORS One way to put an economy‘s scores on the protecting shows the number of economies with this score in investors indicators into context is to see where the 2012 as well as the regional average score. Figure 7.3 economy stands in the distribution of scores across shows the same thing for the extent of director liability economies. Figure 7.2 highlights the score on the index, and figure 7.4 for the ease of shareholder suits extent of disclosure index for Indonesia in 2012 and index. Figure 7.2 How strong are disclosure requirements? Figure 7.3 How strong is the liability regime for directors? Number of economies with each score on extent of Number of economies with each score on extent of director liability index (0–10), 2012 disclosure index (0–10), 2012 Note: Higher scores indicate greater liability of directors. Note: Higher scores indicate greater disclosure. No economy receives a score of 10 on the extent of Source: Doing Business database. director liability index. Source: Doing Business database. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 66 PROTECTING INVESTORS Figure 7.4 How easy is access to internal corporate documents? Number of economies with each score on ease of shareholder suits index (0–10), 2012 Note: Higher scores indicate greater powers of shareholders to challenge the transaction. Source: Doing Business database. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 67 PROTECTING INVESTORS The scores recorded over time for Indonesia on the changes over time in the regional average score on strength of investor protection index may also be this index. revealing (figure 7.5). Equally interesting may be the Figure 7.5 Have investor protections become stronger over time? Strength of investor protection index (0–10) Note: The higher the score, the stronger the investor protections. Source: Doing Business database. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 68 PROTECTING INVESTORS Economies with the strongest protections of minority time. So reforms to strengthen investor protections investors from self-dealing require more disclosure may move ahead on different fronts—such as through and define clear duties for directors. They also have new or amended company laws or civil procedure well-functioning courts and up-to-date procedural rules. What investor protection reforms has Doing rules that give minority investors the means to prove Business recorded in Indonesia (table 7.2)? their case and obtain a judgment within a reasonable Table 7.2 How has Indonesia strengthened investor protections—or not? By Doing Business report year DB year Reform Indonesia strengthened investor protections by deepening the DB2008 already high disclosure requirements of the Bapepam (Stock Exchange) regulation. DB2009 No reform as measured by Doing Business. Indonesia increased investors‘ protections by increasing its DB2010 disclosure requirements in cases of related-party transactions. DB2011 No reform as measured by Doing Business. DB2012 No reform as measured by Doing Business. DB2013 No reform as measured by Doing Business. Note: For information on reforms in earlier years (back to DB2006), see the Doing Business reports for these years, available at http://www.doingbusiness.org. Source: Doing Business database. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 69 PROTECTING INVESTORS What are the details? The protecting investors indicators reported here for shareholder suits indices, a score is assigned for each Indonesia are based on detailed information collected of a range of conditions relating to disclosure, director through a survey of corporate and securities lawyers as liability and shareholder suits in a standard case study well as on securities regulations, company laws and transaction (see the notes at the end of this chapter). court rules of evidence. To construct the extent of The summary below shows the details underlying the disclosure, extent of director liability and ease of scores for Indonesia. Summary of scoring for the protecting investors indicators in Indonesia East Asia & OECD high income Indicator Indonesia Pacific average average Extent of disclosure index (0-10) 10 5 6 Extent of director liability index (0-10) 5 5 5 Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) 3 6 7 Strength of investor protection index (0-10) 6.0 5.4 6.1 Note: In cases where an economy‘s regional classification is ―OECD high income,‖ regional averages above are only displayed once. Score Score description Extent of disclosure index (0-10) 10 What corporate body provides legally sufficient Shareholders meeting and Mr. James 3 approval for the transaction? is not allowed to vote Whether disclosure of the conflict of interest by Mr. 2 Full disclosure of all material facts James to the board of directors is required? Whether immediate disclosure of the transaction to Disclosure on the transaction and Mr. 2 the public and/or shareholders is required? James' conflict of interest Whether disclosure of the transaction in published Disclosure on the transaction and Mr. 2 periodic filings (annual reports) is required? James' conflict of interest Whether an external body must review the terms of 1 Yes the transaction before it takes place? Extent of director liability index (0-10) 5 Whether shareholders can sue directly or derivatively for the damage that the Buyer-Seller transaction 1 Yes causes to the company? Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 70 Score Score description Whether shareholders can hold Mr. James liable for Liable for negligence or influencing the damage that the Buyer-Seller transaction causes 1 the approval of the transaction to the company? Whether shareholders can hold members of the approving body liable for the damage that the Buyer- 0 Not liable Seller transaction causes to the company? Whether a court can void the transaction upon a Possible when the transaction is unfair 2 successful claim by a shareholder plaintiff? or entails a conflict of interest Whether Mr. James pays damages for the harm caused to the company upon a successful claim by 1 Yes the shareholder plaintiff? Whether Mr. James repays profits made from the transaction upon a successful claim by the 0 No shareholder plaintiff? Whether fines and imprisonment can be applied 0 No against Mr. James? Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) 3 Whether shareholders owning 10% or less of Buyer's shares can inspect transaction documents before 1 Yes filing suit? Whether shareholders owning 10% or less of Buyer's shares can request an inspector to investigate the 1 Yes transaction? Whether the plaintiff can obtain any documents from 0 No documents available the defendant and witnesses during trial? Whether the plaintiff can request categories of documents from the defendant without identifying 0 No specific ones? Whether the plaintiff can directly question the 1 Yes defendant and witnesses during trial? Whether the level of proof required for civil suits is 0 No lower than that of criminal cases? Strength of investor protection index (0-10) 6.0 Source: Doing Business database. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 71 PAYING TAXES Taxes are essential. They fund the public amenities, WHAT THE PAYING TAXES INDICATORS infrastructure and services that are crucial for a MEASURE properly functioning economy. But the level of tax rates needs to be carefully chosen—and needless Tax payments for a manufacturing company complexity in tax rules avoided. According to in 2011 (number per year adjusted for Doing Business data, in economies where it is more electronic or joint filing and payment) difficult and costly to pay taxes, larger shares of economic activity end up in the informal sector — Total number of taxes and contributions paid, where businesses pay no taxes at all. including consumption taxes (value added tax, sales tax or goods and service tax) What do the indicators cover? Method and frequency of filing and payment Using a case scenario, Doing Business measures Time required to comply with 3 major taxes the taxes and mandatory contributions that a (hours per year) medium-size company must pay in a given year as well as the administrative burden of paying taxes Collecting information and computing the tax and contributions. This case scenario uses a set of payable financial statements and assumptions about Completing tax return forms, filing with transactions made over the year. Information is proper agencies also compiled on the frequency of filing and Arranging payment or withholding payments as well as time taken to comply with tax laws. The ranking on the ease of paying taxes is Preparing separate tax accounting books, if the simple average of the percentile rankings on required its component indicators: number of annual Total tax rate (% of profit before all taxes) payments, time and total tax rate, with a threshold 1 Profit or corporate income tax being applied to the total tax rate. To make the data comparable across economies, several Social contributions and labor taxes paid by assumptions about the business and the taxes and the employer contributions are used. Property and property transfer taxes  TaxpayerCo is a medium-size business that Dividend, capital gains and financial started operations on January 1, 2010. transactions taxes  The business starts from the same financial Waste collection, vehicle, road and other taxes position in each economy. All the taxes  Taxes and mandatory contributions include and mandatory contributions paid during corporate income tax, turnover tax and all the second year of operation are recorded. labor taxes and contributions paid by the  Taxes and mandatory contributions are company. measured at all levels of government.  A range of standard deductions and exemptions are also recorded. 1 The threshold is defined as the highest total tax rate among the top 15% of economies in the ranking on the total tax rate. It is calculated and adjusted on a yearly basis. The threshold is not based on any economic theory of an ―optimal tax rate‖ that minimizes distortions or maximizes efficiency in the tax system of an economy overall. Instead, it is mainly empirical in nature, set at the lower end of the distribution of tax rates levied on medium-size enterprises in the manufacturing sector as observed through the paying taxes indicators. This reduces the bias in the indicators toward economies that do not need to levy significant taxes on companies like the Doing Business standardized case study company because they raise public revenue in other ways—for example, through taxes on foreign companies, through taxes on sectors other than manufacturing or from natural resources (all of which are outside the scope of the methodology). This year‘s threshold is 25.7%. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 72 PAYING TAXES Where does the economy stand today? What is the administrative burden of complying with Globally, Indonesia stands at 131 in the ranking of 185 taxes in Indonesia—and how much do firms pay in economies on the ease of paying taxes (figure 8.1). The taxes? On average, firms make 51 tax payments a year, rankings for comparator economies and the regional spend 259 hours a year filing, preparing and paying average ranking provide other useful information for taxes and pay total taxes amounting to 34.5% of profit assessing the tax compliance burden for businesses in (see the summary at the end of this chapter for Indonesia. details). Figure 8.1 How Indonesia and comparator economies rank on the ease of paying taxes Note: DB2013 rankings reflect changes to the methodology. For all economies with a total tax rate below the threshold of 25.7% applied in DB2013, the total tax rate is set at 25.7% for the purpose of calculating the ranking on the ease of paying taxes. Source: Doing Business database. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 73 PAYING TAXES What are the changes over time? While the most recent Doing Business data reflect how the process have changed — and which have not easy (or difficult) it is to comply with tax rules in (table 8.1). That can help identify where the potential Indonesia today, data over time show which aspects of for easing tax compliance is greatest. Table 8.1 The ease of paying taxes in Indonesia over time By Doing Business report year Indicator DB2006 DB2007 DB2008 DB2009 DB2010 DB2011 DB2012 DB2013 Rank .. .. .. .. .. .. 129 131 Payments (number per 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 year) Time (hours per year) 560 576 266 266 266 266 266 259 Total tax rate (% profit) 37.3 37.3 37.3 37.3 37.6 37.3 34.5 34.5 Note: n.a. = not applicable (the economy was not included in Doing Business for that year). DB2012 rankings shown are not last year‘s published rankings but comparable rankings for DB2012 that capture the effects of such factors as data corrections and the addition of 2 economies (Barbados and Malta) to the sample this year. DB2013 rankings reflect changes to the methodology. For all economies with a total tax rate below the threshold of 25.7% applied in DB2013, the total tax rate is set at 25.7% for the purpose of calculating the ranking on the ease of paying taxes. Source: Doing Business database. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 74 PAYING TAXES Equally helpful may be the benchmarks provided by possible in easing the administrative burden of tax the economies that over time have had the best compliance. And changes in regional averages can performance regionally or globally on the number of show where Indonesia is keeping up—and where it is payments or the time required to prepare and file falling behind. taxes (figure 8.2). These benchmarks help show what is Figure 8.2 Has paying taxes become easier over time? Payments (number per year) Time (hours per year) Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 75 PAYING TAXES Total tax rate (% of profit) Source: Doing Business database. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 76 PAYING TAXES Economies around the world have made paying taxes concrete results. Some economies simplifying tax faster and easier for businesses—such as by payment and reducing rates have seen tax revenue consolidating filings, reducing the frequency of rise. What tax reforms has Doing Business recorded in payments or offering electronic filing and payment. Indonesia (table 8.2)? Many have lowered tax rates. Changes have brought Table 8.2 How has Indonesia made paying taxes easier—or not? By Doing Business report year DB year Reform Indonesia made paying taxes easier by simplifying filing DB2008 requirements and encouraging the use of electronic systems. DB2009 No reform as measured by Doing Business. Indonesia reduced the burden on business by cutting its top DB2010 corporate income tax rate from 30% to 28%. DB2011 Indonesia reduced its corporate income tax rate. DB2012 No reform as measured by Doing Business. DB2013 No reform as measured by Doing Business. Note: For information on reforms in earlier years (back to DB2006), see the Doing Business reports for these years, available at http://www.doingbusiness.org. Source: Doing Business database. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 77 PAYING TAXES What are the details? The indicators reported here for Indonesia are LOCATION OF STANDARDIZED COMPANY based on a standard set of taxes and contributions that would be paid by the case study company used by Doing Business in collecting the data (see City: Jakarta the section in this chapter on what the indicators cover). Tax practitioners are asked to review standard financial statements as well as a standard list of transactions that the company completed The taxes and contributions paid are listed in the during the year. Respondents are asked how much summary below, along with the associated number of in taxes and mandatory contributions the business payments, time and tax rate. must pay and what the process is for doing so. Summary of tax rates and administrative burden in Indonesia East Asia & OECD high income Indicator Indonesia Pacific average average Payments (number per year) 51 25 12 Time (hours per year) 259 209 176 Profit tax (%) 23.7 16.7 15.2 Labor tax and contributions (%) 10.6 10.9 23.8 Other taxes (%) 0.1 6.9 3.7 Total tax rate (% profit) 34.5 34.5 42.7 Note: In cases where an economy‘s regional classification is ―OECD high income,‖ regional averages above are only displayed once. Total tax Tax or mandatory Payments Notes on Time Statutory Notes on Tax base rate (% of contribution (number) payments (hours) tax rate total tax rate profit) taxable Corporate income tax 13 75 25% 23.7 profit Employer paid - Health gross 12 0 6% 6.1 insurance contributions salaries Employer paid - Social security gross 12 94 4% 4.5 contributions salaries property Property tax 1 0 1% 0.1 value Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 78 Total tax Tax or mandatory Payments Notes on Time Statutory Notes on Tax base rate (% of contribution (number) payments (hours) tax rate total tax rate profit) Value added tax (VAT) 12 90 10% value added 0 not included Stamp duty 1 0 Rp 6,000 fixed fee 0 Totals 51 259 34.5 Source: Doing Business database. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 79 TRADING ACROSS BORDERS In today‘s globalized world, making trade between WHAT THE TRADING ACROSS BORDERS economies easier is increasingly important for INDICATORS MEASURE business. Excessive document requirements, burdensome customs procedures, inefficient port operations and inadequate infrastructure all lead to Documents required to export and import extra costs and delays for exporters and importers, (number) stifling trade potential. Research shows that Bank documents exporters in developing countries gain more from Customs clearance documents a 10% drop in their trading costs than from a similar reduction in the tariffs applied to their Port and terminal handling documents products in global markets. Transport documents What do the indicators cover? Time required to export and import (days) Doing Business measures the time and cost Obtaining, filling out and submitting all the (excluding tariffs and the time and cost for sea documents transport) associated with exporting and importing Inland transport and handling a standard shipment of goods by sea transport, and the number of documents necessary to Customs clearance and inspections complete the transaction. The indicators cover Port and terminal handling procedural requirements such as documentation Does not include sea transport time requirements and procedures at customs and other regulatory agencies as well as at the port. They also Cost required to export and import (US$ per cover trade logistics, including the time and cost of container) inland transport to the largest business city. The All documentation ranking on the ease of trading across borders is the simple average of the percentile rankings on its Inland transport and handling component indicators: documents, time and cost Customs clearance and inspections to export and import. Port and terminal handling To make the data comparable across economies, Official costs only, no bribes Doing Business uses several assumptions about the business and the traded goods. The business:  Is of medium size and employs 60 people.  Do not require refrigeration or any other special environment.  Is located in the periurban area of the economy‘s largest business city.  Do not require any special phytosanitary or environmental safety standards other than  Is a private, limited liability company, accepted international standards. domestically owned, formally registered and operating under commercial laws and  Are one of the economy‘s leading export or regulations of the economy. import products. The traded goods:  Are transported in a dry-cargo, 20-foot full container load.  Are not hazardous nor do they include military items. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 80 TRADING ACROSS BORDERS Where does the economy stand today? What does it take to export or import in Indonesia? Globally, Indonesia stands at 37 in the ranking of 185 According to data collected by Doing Business, economies on the ease of trading across borders exporting a standard container of goods requires 4 (figure 9.1). The rankings for comparator economies documents, takes 17 days and costs $644. Importing and the regional average ranking provide other useful the same container of goods requires 7 documents, information for assessing how easy it is for a business takes 23 days and costs $660 (see the summary of in Indonesia to export and import goods. procedures and documents at the end of this chapter for details). Figure 9.1 How Indonesia and comparator economies rank on the ease of trading across borders Source: Doing Business database. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 81 TRADING ACROSS BORDERS What are the changes over time? While the most recent Doing Business data reflect how process have changed—and which have not (table 9.1). easy (or difficult) it is to export or import in Indonesia That can help identify where the potential for today, data over time show which aspects of the improvement is greatest. Table 9.1 The ease of trading across borders in Indonesia over time By Doing Business report year Indicator DB2006 DB2007 DB2008 DB2009 DB2010 DB2011 DB2012 DB2013 Rank .. .. .. .. .. .. 40 37 Documents to export 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 (number) Time to export (days) 22 22 18 18 18 17 17 17 Cost to export (US$ per 486 486 607 644 644 644 644 644 container) Documents to import 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 (number) Time to import (days) 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 23 Cost to import (US$ per 675 675 623 660 660 660 660 660 container) Note: n.a. = not applicable (the economy was not included in Doing Business for that year). DB2012 rankings shown are not last year‘s published rankings but comparable rankings for DB2012 that capture the effects of such factors as data corrections and the addition of 2 economies (Barbados and Malta) to the sample this year. Source: Doing Business database. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 82 TRADING ACROSS BORDERS Equally helpful may be the benchmarks provided by These benchmarks help show what is possible in the economies that over time have had the best making it easier to trade across borders. And changes performance regionally or globally on the documents, in regional averages can show where Indonesia is time or cost required to export or import (figure 9.2). keeping up—and where it is falling behind. Figure 9.2 Has trading across borders become easier over time? Documents to export (number) Time to export (days) Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 83 TRADING ACROSS BORDERS Cost to export (US$ per container) Documents to import (number) Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 84 TRADING ACROSS BORDERS Time to import (days) Cost to import (US$ per container) Source: Doing Business database. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 85 TRADING ACROSS BORDERS In economies around the world, trading across borders systems. These changes help improve the trading as measured by Doing Business has become faster and environment and boost firms‘ international easier over the years. Governments have introduced competitiveness. What trade reforms has Doing tools to facilitate trade—including single windows, Business recorded in Indonesia (table 9.2)? risk-based inspections and electronic data interchange Table 9.2 How has Indonesia made trading across borders easier—or not? By Doing Business report year DB year Reform DB2008 No reform as measured by Doing Business. DB2009 No reform as measured by Doing Business. DB2010 No reform as measured by Doing Business. Indonesia reduced the time to export by launching a single- DB2011 window service. DB2012 No reform as measured by Doing Business. DB2013 No reform as measured by Doing Business. Note: For information on reforms in earlier years (back to DB2006), see the Doing Business reports for these years, available at http://www.doingbusiness.org. Source: Doing Business database. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 86 TRADING ACROSS BORDERS What are the details? The indicators reported here for Indonesia are LOCATION OF STANDARDIZED COMPANY based on a set of specific procedural requirements for trading a standard shipment of goods by ocean transport (see the section in this chapter on what City: Jakarta the indicators cover). Information on the procedures as well as the required documents and the time and cost to complete each procedure is The procedural requirements, and the associated time collected from local freight forwarders, shipping and cost, for exporting and importing a standard lines, customs brokers, port officials and banks. shipment of goods are listed in the summary below, along with the required documents. Summary of procedures and documents for trading across borders in Indonesia East Asia & OECD high income Indicator Indonesia Pacific average average Documents to export (number) 4 6 4 Time to export (days) 17 21 10 Cost to export (US$ per container) 644 923 1,028 Documents to import (number) 7 7 5 Time to import (days) 23 22 10 Cost to import (US$ per container) 660 958 1,080 Note: In cases where an economy‘s regional classification is ―OECD high income,‖ regional averages above are only displayed once. Procedures to export Time (days) Cost (US$) Documents preparation 11 150 Customs clearance and technical control 1 169 Ports and terminal handling 2 165 Inland transportation and handling 3 160 Totals 17 644 Procedures to import Time (days) Cost (US$) Documents preparation 13 210 Customs clearance and technical control 4 125 Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 87 Procedures to import Time (days) Cost (US$) Ports and terminal handling 4 165 Inland transportation and handling 2 160 Totals 23 660 Documents to export Documents to import Bill of lading Bill of lading Commercial Invoice Cargo release order Packing list Commercial invoice PEB (export declaration form) Insurance documentation Source: Doing Business database. Packing list PIB (IMPORT DECLARATION FORM) Terminal handling receipts Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 88 ENFORCING CONTRACTS Well-functioning courts help businesses expand WHAT THE ENFORCING CONTRACTS their network and markets. Without effective INDICATORS MEASURE contract enforcement, people might well do business only with family, friends and others with whom they have established relationships. Where Procedures to enforce a contract through contract enforcement is efficient, firms are more the courts (number) likely to engage with new borrowers or customers, Any interaction between the parties in a and they have greater access to credit. commercial dispute, or between them and the judge or court officer What do the indicators cover? Steps to file and serve the case Doing Business measures the efficiency of the judicial system in resolving a commercial dispute Steps for trial and judgment before local courts. Following the step-by-step Steps to enforce the judgment evolution of a standardized case study, it collects Time required to complete procedures data relating to the time, cost and procedural (calendar days) complexity of resolving a commercial lawsuit. The ranking on the ease of enforcing contracts is the Time to file and serve the case simple average of the percentile rankings on its Time for trial and obtaining judgment component indicators: procedures, time and cost. Time to enforce the judgment The dispute in the case study involves the breach of a sales contract between 2 domestic businesses. Cost required to complete procedures (% of The case study assumes that the court hears an claim) expert on the quality of the goods in dispute. This No bribes distinguishes the case from simple debt Average attorney fees enforcement. To make the data comparable across economies, Doing Business uses several Court costs assumptions about the case: Enforcement costs  The seller and buyer are located in the economy‘s largest business city.  The buyer orders custom-made goods,  The dispute on the quality of the goods then fails to pay. requires an expert opinion.  The seller sues the buyer before a  The judge decides in favor of the seller; there competent court. is no appeal.  The value of the claim is 200% of income  The seller enforces the judgment through a per capita. public sale of the buyer‘s movable assets.  The seller requests a pretrial attachment to secure the claim. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 89 ENFORCING CONTRACTS Where does the economy stand today? How efficient is the process of resolving a commercial Globally, Indonesia stands at 144 in the ranking of 185 dispute through the courts in Indonesia? According to economies on the ease of enforcing contracts (figure data collected by Doing Business, enforcing a contract 10.1). The rankings for comparator economies and the takes 498 days, costs 139.4% of the value of the claim regional average ranking provide other useful and requires 40 procedures (see the summary at the benchmarks for assessing the efficiency of contract end of this chapter for details). enforcement in Indonesia. Figure 10.1 How Indonesia and comparator economies rank on the ease of enforcing contracts Source: Doing Business database. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 90 ENFORCING CONTRACTS What are the changes over time? While the most recent Doing Business data reflect how identify which areas have changed and where the easy (or difficult) it is to enforce a contract in Indonesia potential for improvement is greatest (table 10.1). today, data on the underlying indicators over time help Table 10.1 The ease of enforcing contracts in Indonesia over time By Doing Business report year Indicator DB2004 DB2005 DB2006 DB2007 DB2008 DB2009 DB2010 DB2011 DB2012 DB2013 Rank .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 145 144 Time (days) 498 498 498 498 498 498 498 498 498 498 Cost (% of claim) 139.4 139.4 139.4 139.4 139.4 139.4 139.4 139.4 139.4 139.4 Procedures (number) 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 Note: n.a. = not applicable (the economy was not included in Doing Business for that year). DB2012 rankings shown are not last year‘s published rankings but comparable rankings for DB2012 that capture the effects of such factors as data corrections and the addition of 2 economies (Barbados and Malta) to the sample this year. Source: Doing Business database. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 91 ENFORCING CONTRACTS Equally helpful may be the benchmarks provided by help show what is possible in improving the efficiency the economies that over time have had the best of contract enforcement. And changes in regional performance regionally or globally on the number of averages can show where Indonesia is keeping up— steps, time or cost required to enforce a contract and where it is falling behind. through the courts (figure 10.2). These benchmarks Figure 10.2 Has enforcing contracts become easier over time? Time (days) Cost (% of claim) Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 92 ENFORCING CONTRACTS Procedures (number) Source: Doing Business database. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 93 ENFORCING CONTRACTS Economies in all regions have improved contract often work on reducing backlogs by introducing enforcement in recent years. A judiciary can be periodic reviews to clear inactive cases from the docket improved in different ways. Higher-income economies and by making procedures faster. What reforms tend to look for ways to enhance efficiency by making it easier (or more difficult) to enforce contracts introducing new technology. Lower-income economies has Doing Business recorded in Indonesia (table 10.2)? Table 10.2 How has Indonesia made enforcing contracts easier—or not? By Doing Business report year DB year Reform DB2008 No reform as measured by Doing Business. DB2009 No reform as measured by Doing Business. DB2010 No reform as measured by Doing Business. DB2011 No reform as measured by Doing Business. DB2012 No reform as measured by Doing Business. DB2013 No reform as measured by Doing Business. Note: For information on reforms in earlier years (back to DB2005), see the Doing Business reports for these years, available at http://www.doingbusiness.org. Source: Doing Business database. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 94 ENFORCING CONTRACTS What are the details? The indicators reported here for Indonesia are COMPETENT COURT based on a set of specific procedural steps required to resolve a standardized commercial dispute through the courts (see the section in this City: Jakarta chapter on what the indicators cover). These procedures, and the time and cost of completing The procedures for resolving a commercial lawsuit, and them, are identified through study of the codes of the associated time and cost, are listed in the summary civil procedure and other court regulations, as well below. as through surveys completed by local litigation lawyers (and, in a quarter of the economies covered by Doing Business, by judges as well). Summary of procedures for enforcing a contract in Indonesia—and the time and cost East Asia & OECD high income Indicator Indonesia Pacific average average Time (days) 498 522 510 Filing and service 98 Trial and judgment 220 Enforcement of judgment 180 Cost (% of claim) 139.4 48.6 20.1 Attorney cost (% of claim) 111.3 Court cost (% of claim) 3.1 Enforcement Cost (% of claim) 25.0 Procedures (number) 40 37 31 Note: In cases where an economy‘s regional classification is ―OECD high income,‖ regional averages above are only displayed once. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 95 ENFORCING CONTRACTS No. Procedure Filing and service: 1 Plaintiff requests payment: Plaintiff or his lawyer asks Defendant orally or in writing to comply with the contract. Plaintiff’s filing of summons and complaint: Plaintiff files his summons and complaint with the court, orally or in * writing. * Plaintiff’s payment of court fees: Plaintiff pays court duties, stamp duties, or any other type of court fee. Registration of court case: The court administration registers the lawsuit or court case. This includes assigning a 2 reference number to the lawsuit or court case. Assignment of court case to a judge: The court case is assigned to a specific judge through a random procedure, * automated system, ruling of an administrative judge, court officer, etc. Court scrutiny of summons and complaint: A judge examines Plaintiff's summons and complaint for formal 3 requirements. Delivery of summons and complaint to person authorized to perform service of process on Defendant: The 4 judge or a court officer delivers the summons to a summoning office, officer, or authorized person (including Plaintiff), for service of process on Defendant. First attempt at physical delivery: A first attempt to physically deliver summons and complaint to Defendant is 5 successful in the majority of cases. Application for pre-judgment attachment: Plaintiff submits an application in writing for the attachment of * Defendant's property prior to judgment. (see assumption 5) Decision on pre-judgment attachment: The judge decides whether to grant Plaintiff‘s request for pre-judgment * attachment of Defendant‘s property and notifies Plaintiff and Defendant of the decision. This step may include requesting that Plaintiff submit guarantees or bonds to secure Defendant Pre-judgment attachment.: Defendant's property is attached prior to judgment. Attachment is either physical or 6 achieved by registering, marking, debiting or separating assets. (see assumption 5) Custody of assets attached prior to judgment: Defendant's attached assets are put under enforcement officer's or 7 (private) bailiff's care. (see assumption 5) Hearing on pre-judgment attachment: A hearing takes place to resolve the question of whether Defendant‘s 8 assets can be attached prior to judgment. This process may include the submission of separate summons and petitions. (see assumption 5) Trial and judgment: Defendant’s filing of preliminary exemptions: Defendant presents preliminary exemptions to the court. * Preliminary exemptions differ from answers on the merits of the claim. Examples of preliminary exemptions are statute of limitations, jurisdictions, etc. Plaintiff’s answer to preliminary exemptions: Plaintiff responds to the preliminary exemptions raised by * Defendant. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 96 No. Procedure Judge’s resolution on preliminary exemptions: Judge decides on preliminary exemptions separately from the 9 merits of the case. Defendant’s filing of defense or answer to Plaintiff’s claim: Defendant files a written pleading which includes his 10 defense or answer on the merits of the case. Defendant's written answer may or may not include witness statements, expert statements, the documents Defendant relies on as evidence and the legal authori Deadline for Plaintiff to answer Defendant's defense or answer: Judge sets the deadline by which Plaintiff will be 11 allowed to answer Defendant's defense or answer. Plaintiff’s written response to Defendant's defense or answer: Plaintiff responds to Defendant‘s defense or 12 answer with a written pleading. Plaintiff's answer may or may not include a witness statements or expert (witness) statements. Filing of pleadings: Plaintiff and Defendant file written pleadings and submissions with the court and transmit 13 copies of the written pleadings or submissions to one another. The pleadings may or may not include witness statements or expert (witness) statements. Adjournments: Court procedure is delayed because one or both parties request and obtain an adjournment to 14 submit written pleadings. Court appointment of independent expert: Judge appoints, either at the parties' request or at his own initiative, * an independent expert to decide whether the quality of the goods Plaintiff delivered to Defendant is adequate. (see assumption 6-b of this case) Delivery of expert report by court-appointed expert: The independent expert appointed by the court delivers his * or her expert report to the court. (see assumption 6-b of this case) Pre-trial conference on procedure: The judge meets with the parties to discuss procedural issues (for example 15 which applications and motions parties intend to file, which documents parties intend to rely on, what will be presented as evidence the oral hearing or trial, etc.) Setting of date for mediation hearing: The judge sets a date for a mediation hearing, sometimes also called a * 'pre-trial conference,' and notifies the parties of the hearing date. Mediation hearing: The judge during this informal meeting with the parties encourages them to settle the case. The 16 judge acts as mediator. If the case cannot be settled, the judge may draft a pre-trial conference report, after which the case may be allocated to another judg * List of (expert) witnesses: The parties file a list of (expert) witnesses with the court. (see assumption 6-a) Adjournments: Court proceedings are delayed because one or both parties request and obtain an adjournment to 17 prepare for the oral hearing or trial. Oral hearing (prevalent in civil law): The parties argue the merits of the case at an oral hearing before the judge. 18 Witnesses and a court-appointed independent expert may be heard and questioned at the oral hearing. Order for submission of final arguments: The judge sets the deadline for the submission of final factual and legal 19 arguments. Final arguments: The parties present their final factual and legal arguments to the court either by oral presentation * or by a written submission. 20 Judgment date: The judge sets a date for delivery of the judgment. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 97 No. Procedure 21 Notification of judgment in court: The parties are notified of the judgment at a court hearing. 22 Writing of judgment: The judge produces a written copy of the judgment. 23 Registration of judgment: The court office registers the judgment after receiving a written copy of the judgment. Court notification of availability of the written judgment: The court notifies the parties that the written 24 judgment is available at the courthouse. 25 Plaintiff's receipt of a copy of written judgment: Plaintiff receives a copy of the written judgment. Notification of Defendant of judgment: Plaintiff or court formally notifies the Defendant of the judgment. The 26 appeal period starts to run the day the Defendant is formally notified of the judgment. Appeal period: By law, Defendant has the opportunity to appeal the judgment during a period specified in the law. 27 Defendant decides not to appeal. Judgment becomes final the day the appeal period ends. Reimbursement by Defendant of Plaintiff's court fees: The judgment obliges Defendant to reimburse Plaintiff for 28 the court fees Plaintiff has advanced, because Defendant has lost the case. Enforcement of judgment: Plaintiff's approaching of court enforcement officer or (private) bailiff to enforce the judgment: To enforce 29 the judgment, Plaintiff approaches a court enforcement officer such as a court bailiff or sheriff, or a private bailiff. Plaintiff’s request for enforcement order: Plaintiff applies to the court to obtain the enforcement order ('seal' on * judgment). 30 Plaintiff’s advancement of enforcement fees: Plaintiff pays the fees related to the enforcement of the judgment. Attachment of enforcement order to judgment: The judge attaches the enforcement order (‗seal‘) to the 31 judgment. Delivery of enforcement order: The court's enforcement order is delivered to a court enforcement officer or a * (private) bailiff. Request to Defendant to comply voluntarily with judgment: Plaintiff, a court enforcement officer or a (private) 32 bailiff requests Defendant to voluntarily comply with the judgment, giving Defendant a last chance to comply voluntarily with the judgment. Plaintiff’s identification of Defendant's assets for attachment: Plaintiff identifies Defendant's assets for 33 attachment. 34 Attachment: Defendant‘s movable goods are attached (physically or by registering, marking or separating assets). Report on execution of attachment: A court enforcement officer or private process server delivers a report on the 35 attachment of Defendant's movable goods to the judge. Enforcement disputes before court: The enforcement of the judgment is delayed because Defendant opposes 36 aspects of the enforcement process before the judge. Call for public auction: The judge calls a public auction by, for example, advertising or publication in the 37 newspapers. 38 Sale through public auction: The Defendant‘s movable property is sold at public auction. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 98 No. Procedure * Direct sale: Defendant's property is sold but not through a public auction. (assumption 9 is disregarded here) Reimbursement of Plaintiff’s enforcement fees: Defendant reimburses Plaintiff's enforcement fees which Plaintiff 39 had advanced previously. 40 Payment: Court orders that the proceeds of the public auction or the direct sale be delivered to Plaintiff. * Takes place simultaneously with another procedure. Source: Doing Business database. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 99 RESOLVING INSOLVENCY A robust bankruptcy system functions as a filter, WHAT THE RESOLVING INSOLVENCY ensuring the survival of economically efficient companies and reallocating the resources of INDICATORS MEASURE inefficient ones. Fast and cheap insolvency proceedings result in the speedy return of Time required to recover debt (years) businesses to normal operation and increase Measured in calendar years returns to creditors. By improving the expectations of creditors and debtors about the outcome of Appeals and requests for extension are insolvency proceedings, well-functioning included insolvency systems can facilitate access to finance, Cost required to recover debt (% of debtor’s save more viable businesses and thereby improve estate) growth and sustainability in the economy overall. Measured as percentage of estate value What do the indicators cover? Court fees Doing Business studies the time, cost and outcome Fees of insolvency administrators of insolvency proceedings involving domestic entities. It does not measure insolvency Lawyers‘ fees proceedings of individuals and financial Assessors‘ and auctioneers‘ fees institutions. The data are derived from survey Other related fees responses by local insolvency practitioners and verified through a study of laws and regulations as Recovery rate for creditors (cents on the well as public information on bankruptcy systems. dollar) The ranking on the ease of resolving insolvency is Measures the cents on the dollar recovered based on the recovery rate, which is recorded as by creditors cents on the dollar recouped by creditors through Present value of debt recovered reorganization, liquidation or debt enforcement Official costs of the insolvency proceedings (foreclosure) proceedings. The recovery rate is a are deducted function of time, cost and other factors, such as lending rate and the likelihood of the company Depreciation of furniture is taken into continuing to operate. account To make the data comparable across economies, Outcome for the business (survival or not) Doing Business uses several assumptions about the affects the maximum value that can be recovered business and the case. It assumes that the company:  Is a domestically owned, limited liability company operating a hotel.  Has 201 employees, 1 main secured creditor  Operates in the economy‘s largest business and 50 unsecured creditors. city.  Has a higher value as a going concern—and the efficient outcome is either reorganization or sale as a going concern, not piecemeal liquidation. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 100 RESOLVING INSOLVENCY Where does the economy stand today? Speed, low costs and continuation of viable businesses piecemeal sale. The average recovery rate is 14.2 cents characterize the top-performing economies. How on the dollar. efficient are insolvency proceedings in Indonesia? Globally, Indonesia stands at 148 in the ranking of 185 According to data collected by Doing Business, economies on the ease of resolving insolvency (figure resolving insolvency takes 5.5 years on average and 11.1). The rankings for comparator economies and the costs 18% of the debtor‘s estate, with the most likely regional average ranking provide other useful outcome being that the company will be sold as benchmarks for assessing the efficiency of insolvency proceedings in Indonesia. Figure 11.1 How Indonesia and comparator economies rank on the ease of resolving insolvency Source: Doing Business database. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 101 RESOLVING INSOLVENCY What are the changes over time? While the most recent Doing Business data reflect the changed—and where it has not (table 11.1). That can efficiency of insolvency proceedings in Indonesia help identify where the potential for improvement is today, data over time show where the efficiency has greatest. Table 11.1 The ease of resolving insolvency in Indonesia over time By Doing Business report year Indicator DB2004 DB2005 DB2006 DB2007 DB2008 DB2009 DB2010 DB2011 DB2012 DB2013 Rank .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 149 148 Time (years) 6.0 6.0 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 Cost (% of estate) 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 Recovery rate (cents on the 9.9 10.6 13.1 11.8 12.6 13.7 13.7 13.2 13.8 14.2 dollar) Note: n.a. = not applicable (the economy was not included in Doing Business for that year). DB2012 rankings shown are not last year‘s published rankings but comparable rankings for DB2012 that capture the effects of such factors as data corrections and the addition of 2 economies (Barbados and Malta) to the sample this year. ―No practice‖ indicates that in each of the previous 5 years the economy had no cases involving a judicial reorganization, judicial liquidation or debt enforcement procedure (foreclosure). This means that creditors are unlikely to recover their money through a formal legal process (in or out of court). The recovery rate for ―no practice‖ economies is 0. Source: Doing Business database. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 102 RESOLVING INSOLVENCY Equally helpful may be the benchmarks provided by possible in improving the efficiency of insolvency the economies that over time have had the best proceedings. And changes in regional averages can performance regionally or globally on the time or cost show where Indonesia is keeping up—and where it is of insolvency proceedings or on the recovery rate falling behind. (figure 11.2). These benchmarks help show what is Figure 11.2 Has resolving insolvency become easier over time? Time (years) Cost (% of estate) Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 103 RESOLVING INSOLVENCY Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) Note: Regional averages on time and cost exclude economies with a “no practice� mark. Source: Doing Business database. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 104 RESOLVING INSOLVENCY A well-balanced bankruptcy system distinguishes change. Many recent reforms of bankruptcy laws have companies that are financially distressed but been aimed at helping more of the viable businesses economically viable from inefficient companies that survive. What insolvency reforms has Doing Business should be liquidated. But in some insolvency systems recorded in Indonesia (table 11.2)? even viable businesses are liquidated. This is starting to Table 11.2 How has Indonesia made resolving insolvency easier—or not? By Doing Business report year DB year Reform DB2008 No reform as measured by Doing Business. DB2009 No reform as measured by Doing Business. DB2010 No reform as measured by Doing Business. DB2011 No reform as measured by Doing Business. DB2012 No reform as measured by Doing Business. DB2013 No reform as measured by Doing Business. Note: For information on reforms in earlier years (back to DB2005), see the Doing Business reports for these years, available at http://www.doingbusiness.org. Source: Doing Business database. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 105 EMPLOYING WORKERS Doing Business measures flexibility in the regulation of Particular data for Indonesia are presented here employment, specifically as it affects the hiring and without scoring. redundancy of workers and the rigidity of working hours. From 2007 to 2011 improvements were made to To make the data on employing workers comparable align the methodology for the employing workers across economies, several assumptions about the indicators with the letter and spirit of the International worker and the business are used. Labour Organization (ILO) conventions. Only 4 of the 188 ILO conventions cover areas measured by Doing The worker: Business: employee termination, weekend work, holiday with pay and night work. The Doing Business  Earns a salary plus benefits equal to the methodology is fully consistent with these 4 economy‘s average wage during the entire conventions. The ILO conventions covering areas period of his employment. related to the employing workers indicators do not  Has a pay period that is the most common for include the ILO core labor standards—8 conventions workers in the economy. covering the right to collective bargaining, the  Is a lawful citizen who belongs to the same elimination of forced labor, the abolition of child labor race and religion as the majority of the and equitable treatment in employment practices. economy‘s population.  Resides in the economy‘s largest business city. Between 2009 and 2011 the World Bank Group worked  Is not a member of a labor union, unless with a consultative group—including labor lawyers, membership is mandatory. employer and employee representatives, and experts from the ILO, the Organisation for Economic Co- The business: operation and Development, civil society and the private sector—to review the employing workers  Is a limited liability company. methodology and explore future areas of research.  Operates in the economy‘s largest business city. A full report with the conclusions of the consultative  Is 100% domestically owned. group is available at http://www.doingbusiness.org/  Operates in the manufacturing sector. methodology/employing-workers.  Has 60 employees.  Is subject to collective bargaining agreements Doing Business 2013 does not present rankings of in economies where such agreements cover economies on the employing workers indicators or more than half the manufacturing sector and include the topic in the aggregate ranking on the ease apply even to firms not party to them. of doing business. The report does present the data on  Abides by every law and regulation but does the employing workers indicators in an annex. Detailed not grant workers more benefits than data collected on labor regulations are available on the mandated by law, regulation or (if applicable) Doing Business website (http://www.doing business.org). collective bargaining agreement. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 106 EMPLOYING WORKERS What do some of the data show? One of the employing workers indicators is the worker in his or her first job. Doing Business data show difficulty of hiring index. This measure assesses, among the trend in the minimum wage applied by Indonesia other things, the minimum wage for a 19-year-old (figure 12.1). Figure 12.1 Has the minimum wage for a 19-year-old worker or an apprentice increased over time? Minimum wage (US$ per month) Note: A horizontal line along the x-axis of the figure indicates that the economy has no minimum wage. Source: Doing Business database. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 107 EMPLOYING WORKERS Employment laws are needed to protect workers from past 4 years did so in ways that increased labor market arbitrary or unfair treatment and to ensure efficient flexibility. What changes did Indonesia adopt that contracting between employers and workers. Many affected the Doing Business indicators on employing economies that changed their labor regulations in the workers (table 12.1)? Table 12.1 What changes did Indonesia make in employing workers in 2012? Reform No reform as measured by Doing Business. Source: Doing Business database. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 108 EMPLOYING WORKERS What are the details? The data on employing workers reported here for lawyers and public officials. Employment laws and Indonesia are based on a detailed survey of regulations as well as secondary sources are reviewed employment regulations that is completed by local to ensure accuracy. Rigidity of employment index The rigidity of employment index measures 3 areas of labor regulation: difficulty of hiring, rigidity of hours and difficulty of redundancy. Difficulty of hiring index The difficulty of hiring index measures whether fixed- worker. (The average value added per worker is the term contracts are prohibited for permanent tasks; the ratio of an economy‘s gross national income per capita maximum cumulative duration of fixed-term contracts; to the working-age population as a percentage of the and the ratio of the minimum wage for a trainee or total population.) first-time employee to the average value added per Difficulty of hiring index Data Fixed-term contracts prohibited for permanent tasks? Yes 24 Months extendable for another 12 Maximum length of a single fixed-term contract (months) months (Art. 59 (4) Maximum length of fixed-term contracts, including renewals (months) 36 Minimum wage for a 19-year old worker or an apprentice (US$/month) 151.1 Ratio of minimum wage to value added per worker 0.42 Source: Doing Business database. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 109 EMPLOYING WORKERS Rigidity of hours index The rigidity of hours index has 5 components: whether respond to a seasonal increase in production; and there are restrictions on night work; whether there are whether the average paid annual leave for a worker restrictions on weekly holiday work; whether the with 1 year of tenure, a worker with 5 years and a workweek can consist of 5.5 days or is more than 6 worker with 10 years is more than 26 working days or days; whether the workweek can extend to 50 hours or fewer than 15 working days. more (including overtime) for 2 months a year to Rigidity of hours index Data 8 hours for 5 workdays/week or 7 Standard workday in manufacturing (hours) hours for 6 workdays/week (Art.77 (2)) 50-hour workweek allowed for 2 months a year in case of a seasonal Yes increase in production? Maximum working days per week 6.0 Premium for night work (% of hourly pay) in case of continuous 0% operations Premium for work on weekly rest day (% of hourly pay) in case of 0% continuous operations Major restrictions on night work in case of continuous operations? No Major restrictions on weekly holiday in case of continuous operations? No Paid annual leave for a worker with 1 year of tenure (in working days) 12.0 Paid annual leave for a worker with 5 years of tenure (in working days) 12.0 Paid annual leave for a worker with 10 years of tenure (in working days) 12.0 Paid annual leave (average for workers with 1, 5 and 10 years of tenure, in 12.0 working days) Source: Doing Business database. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 110 EMPLOYING WORKERS Difficulty of redundancy index The difficulty of redundancy index has 8 components: worker; whether the employer needs approval from a whether redundancy is disallowed as a basis for third party to terminate a group of 9 redundant terminating workers; whether the employer needs to workers; whether the law requires the employer to notify a third party (such as a government agency) to reassign or retrain a worker before making the worker terminate 1 redundant worker; whether the employer redundant; whether priority rules apply for needs to notify a third party to terminate a group of 9 redundancies; and whether priority rules apply for redundant workers; whether the employer needs reemployment. approval from a third party to terminate 1 redundant Difficulty of redundancy index Data Dismissal due to redundancy allowed by law? Yes Third-party notification if 1 worker is dismissed? Yes Third-party approval if 1 worker is dismissed? Yes Third-party notification if 9 workers are dismissed? Yes Third-party approval if 9 workers are dismissed? Yes Retraining or reassignment obligation before redundancy? Yes Priority rules for redundancies? No Priority rules for reemployment? No Source: Doing Business database. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 111 EMPLOYING WORKERS Redundancy cost The redundancy cost indicator measures the cost of notice requirements and severance payments advance notice requirements, severance payments and applicable to a worker with 1 year of tenure, a worker penalties due when terminating a redundant worker, with 5 years and a worker with 10 years is used to expressed in weeks of salary. The average value of assign the score. Redundancy cost indicator Data Notice period for redundancy dismissal (for a worker with 1 year of tenure, in salary 0.0 weeks) Notice period for redundancy dismissal (for a worker with 5 years of tenure, in 0.0 salary weeks) Notice period for redundancy dismissal (for a worker with 10 years of tenure, in 0.0 salary weeks) Notice period for redundancy dismissal (average for workers with 1, 5 and 10 years 0.0 of tenure, in salary weeks) Severance pay for redundancy dismissal (for a worker with 1 year of tenure, in 17.3 salary weeks) Severance pay for redundancy dismissal (for a worker with 5 years of tenure, in 60.7 salary weeks) Severance pay for redundancy dismissal (for a worker with 10 years of tenure, in 95.3 salary weeks) Severance pay for redundancy dismissal (average for workers with 1, 5 and 10 years 57.8 of tenure, in salary weeks) Source: Doing Business database. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 112 DATA NOTES The indicators presented and analyzed in Doing Business measure business regulation and the ECONOMY CHARACTERISTICS protection of property rights—and their effect on businesses, especially small and medium-size domestic firms. First, the indicators document the complexity of Gross national income per capita regulation, such as the number of procedures to start a business or to register and transfer commercial Doing Business 2013 reports 2011 income per capita property. Second, they gauge the time and cost of as published in the World Bank‘s World Development achieving a regulatory goal or complying with Indicators 2012. Income is calculated using the Atlas method (current US$). For cost indicators expressed regulation, such as the time and cost to enforce a as a percentage of income per capita, 2011 gross contract, go through bankruptcy or trade across national income (GNI) in U.S. dollars is used as the borders. Third, they measure the extent of legal denominator. GNI data were not available from the protections of property, for example, the protections World Bank for Afghanistan; Australia; The Bahamas; of investors against looting by company directors or Bahrain; Barbados; Brunei Darussalam; Cyprus; the range of assets that can be used as collateral Djibouti; Guyana; the Islamic Republic of Iran; according to secured transactions laws. Fourth, a set of Kuwait; Malta; New Zealand; Oman; Puerto Rico indicators documents the tax burden on businesses. (territory of the United States); Sudan; Suriname; the Finally, a set of data covers different aspects of Syrian Arab Republic; Timor-Leste; West Bank and employment regulation. Gaza; and the Republic of Yemen. In these cases GDP or GNP per capita data and growth rates from The data for all sets of indicators in Doing Business the International Monetary Fund‘s World Economic 2 2013 are for June 2012. Outlook database and the Economist Intelligence Unit were used. Region and income group Methodology Doing Business uses the World Bank regional and The Doing Business data are collected in a income group classifications, available at standardized way. To start, the Doing Business team, http://data.worldbank.org/about/country- with academic advisers, designs a questionnaire. The classifications. The World Bank does not assign questionnaire uses a simple business case to ensure regional classifications to high-income economies. comparability across economies and over time —with For the purpose of the Doing Business report, high- assumptions about the legal form of the business, its income OECD economies are assigned the ―regional‖ size, its location and the nature of its operations. classification OECD high income. Figures and tables Questionnaires are administered through more than presenting regional averages include economies 9,600 local experts, including lawyers, business from all income groups (low, lower middle, upper consultants, accountants, freight forwarders, middle and high income). government officials and other professionals routinely Population administering or advising on legal and regulatory Doing Business 2013 reports midyear 2011 requirements. These experts have several rounds of population statistics as published in World interaction with the Doing Business team, involving Development Indicators 2012. conference calls, written correspondence and visits by the team. For Doing Business 2013 team members visited 24 economies to verify data and recruit The Doing Business methodology offers several respondents. The data from questionnaires are advantages. It is transparent, using factual information subjected to numerous rounds of verification, leading about what laws and regulations say and allowing to revisions or expansions of the information collected. multiple interactions with local respondents to clarify potential misinterpretations of questions. Having 2 The data for paying taxes refer to January – December 2011. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 113 representative samples of respondents is not an issue; 2013 would differ from the recollection of Doing Business is not a statistical survey, and the texts entrepreneurs reported in the World Bank Enterprise of the relevant laws and regulations are collected and Surveys or other perception surveys. answers checked for accuracy. The methodology is inexpensive and easily replicable, so data can be collected in a large sample of economies. Because Subnational Doing Business indicators standard assumptions are used in the data collection, This year Doing Business completed subnational comparisons and benchmarks are valid across studies for Indonesia, Kenya, Mexico, the Russian economies. Finally, the data not only highlight the Federation and the United Arab Emirates. Each of extent of specific regulatory obstacles to business but these countries had already asked to have subnational also identify their source and point to what might be data in the past, and this year Doing Business updated reformed. the indicators, measured improvements over time and Information on the methodology for each Doing expanded geographic coverage to additional cities or Business topic can be found on the Doing Business added additional indicators. Doing Business also website at http://www.doingbusiness.org/methodology/. published regional studies for the Arab world, the East African Community and member states of the Organization for the Harmonization of Business Law in Limits to what is measured Africa (OHADA). The Doing Business methodology has 5 limitations that The subnational studies point to differences in should be considered when interpreting the data. First, business regulation and its implementation—as well as the collected data refer to businesses in the economy‘s in the pace of regulatory reform—across cities in the largest business city (which in some economies differs same economy. For several economies subnational from the capital) and may not be representative of studies are now periodically updated to measure regulation in other parts of the economy. To address change over time or to expand geographic coverage this limitation, subnational Doing Business indicators to additional cities. This year that is the case for all the were created (see the section on subnational Doing subnational studies published. Business indicators). Second, the data often focus on a specific business form—generally a limited liability company (or its legal equivalent) of a specified size— Changes in what is measured and may not be representative of the regulation on The ranking methodology for paying taxes was other businesses, for example, sole proprietorships. updated this year. The threshold for the total tax rate Third, transactions described in a standardized case introduced last year for the purpose of calculating the scenario refer to a specific set of issues and may not ranking on the ease of paying taxes was updated. All represent the full set of issues a business encounters. economies with a total tax rate below the threshold Fourth, the measures of time involve an element of (which is calculated and adjusted on a yearly basis) judgment by the expert respondents. When sources receive the same ranking on the total tax rate indicate different estimates, the time indicators indicator. The threshold is not based on any economic reported in Doing Business represent the median theory of an ―optimal tax rate‖ that minimizes values of several responses given under the distortions or maximizes efficiency in the tax system of assumptions of the standardized case. an economy overall. Instead, it is mainly empirical in Finally, the methodology assumes that a business has nature, set at the lower end of the distribution of tax full information on what is required and does not rates levied on medium-size enterprises in the waste time when completing procedures. In practice, manufacturing sector as observed through the paying completing a procedure may take longer if the taxes indicators. This reduces the bias in the indicators business lacks information or is unable to follow up toward economies that do not need to levy significant promptly. Alternatively, the business may choose to taxes on companies like the Doing Business disregard some burdensome procedures. For both standardized case study company because they raise reasons the time delays reported in Doing Business public revenue in other ways—for example, through Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 114 taxes on foreign companies, through taxes on sectors investors, paying taxes, trading across borders, other than manufacturing or from natural resources enforcing contracts, and resolving insolvency. The (all of which are outside the scope of the employing workers indicators are not included in this methodology). Giving the same ranking to all year‘s aggregate ease of doing business ranking. In economies whose total tax rate is below the threshold addition to this year‘s ranking, Doing Business presents avoids awarding economies in the scoring for having a comparable ranking for the previous year, adjusted an unusually low total tax rate, often for reasons for any changes in methodology as well as additions of 3 unrelated to government policies toward enterprises. economies or topics. For example, economies that are very small or that are Construction of the ease of doing business index rich in natural resources do not need to levy broad- based taxes. Here is one example of how the ease of doing business index is constructed. In Finland it takes 3 procedures, 14 days and 4% of annual income per capita in fees to Data challenges and revisions register a property. On these 3 indicators Finland ranks in the 6th, 16th and 39th percentiles. So on average Most laws and regulations underlying the Doing Finland ranks in the 20th percentile on the ease of Business data are available on the Doing Business registering property. It ranks in the 30th percentile on website at http://www.doingbusiness.org. All the th starting a business, 28 percentile on getting credit, sample questionnaires and the details underlying the 24th percentile on paying taxes, 13th percentile on indicators are also published on the website. Questions enforcing contracts, 5th percentile on trading across on the methodology and challenges to data can be borders and so on. Higher rankings indicate simpler submitted through the website‘s ―Ask a Question‖ regulation and stronger protection of property rights. function at http://www.doingbusiness.org. The simple average of Finland‘s percentile rankings on all topics is 21st. When all economies are ordered by Ease of doing business and distance to their average percentile rankings, Finland stands at 11 frontier in the aggregate ranking on the ease of doing business. Doing Business 2013 presents results for 2 aggregate measures: the aggregate ranking on the ease of doing More complex aggregation methods—such as business and the distance to frontier measure. The principal components and unobserved components— ease of doing business ranking compares economies yield a ranking nearly identical to the simple average 4 with one another, while the distance to frontier used by Doing Business. Thus, Doing Business uses measure benchmarks economies to the frontier in the simplest method: weighting all topics equally and, regulatory practice, measuring the absolute distance to the best performance on each indicator. Both measures can be used for comparisons over time. 3 In case of revisions to the methodology or corrections to the underlying data, the data are back-calculated to provide a When compared across years, the distance to frontier comparable time series since the year the relevant economy or topic measure shows how much the regulatory environment was first included in the data set. The time series is available on the for local entrepreneurs in each economy has changed Doing Business website (http://www.doingbusiness.org). Six topics over time in absolute terms, while the ease of doing and more than 50 economies have been added since the inception business ranking can show only relative change. of the project. Earlier rankings on the ease of doing business are therefore not comparable. Ease of doing business 4 See Simeon Djankov, Darshini Manraj, Caralee McLiesh and Rita Ramalho, ―Doing Business Indicators: Why Aggregate, and How to The ease of doing business index ranks economies Do It‖ (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2005). Principal components from 1 to 185. For each economy the ranking is and unobserved components methods yield a ranking nearly calculated as the simple average of the percentile identical to that from the simple average method because both rankings on each of the 10 topics included in the index these methods assign roughly equal weights to the topics, since the pairwise correlations among indicators do not differ much. An in Doing Business 2013: starting a business, dealing alternative to the simple average method is to give different weights with construction permits, getting electricity, to the topics, depending on which are considered of more or less registering property, getting credit, protecting importance in the context of a specific economy. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 115 within each topic, giving equal weight to each of the ability of different government agencies to deliver 5 topic components. tangible results in their area of responsibility. If an economy has no laws or regulations covering a Economies that improved the most across 3 or more specific area—for example, insolvency—it receives a Doing Business topics in 2011/12 ―no practice‖ mark. Similarly, an economy receives a Doing Business 2013 uses a simple method to calculate ―no practice‖ or ―not possible‖ mark if regulation exists which economies improved the most in the ease of but is never used in practice or if a competing doing business. First, it selects the economies that in regulation prohibits such practice. Either way, a ―no 2011/12 implemented regulatory reforms making it practice‖ mark puts the economy at the bottom of the easier to do business in 3 or more of the 10 topics ranking on the relevant indicator. 6 included in this year‘s ease of doing business ranking. The ease of doing business index is limited in scope. It Twenty-three economies meet this criterion: Benin, does not account for an economy‘s proximity to large Burundi, Costa Rica, the Czech Republic, Georgia, markets, the quality of its infrastructure services (other Greece, Guinea, Kazakhstan, Korea, the Lao People‘s than services related to trading across borders and Democratic Republic, Liberia, Mongolia, the getting electricity), the strength of its financial system, Netherlands, Panama, Poland, Portugal, Serbia, the the security of property from theft and looting, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Sri Lanka, Ukraine, the macroeconomic conditions or the strength of United Arab Emirates and Uzbekistan. Second, Doing underlying institutions. Business ranks these economies on the increase in their ranking on the ease of doing business from the Variability of economies‘ rankings across topics previous year using comparable rankings. Each indicator set measures a different aspect of the Selecting the economies that implemented regulatory business regulatory environment. The rankings of an reforms in at least 3 topics and improved the most in economy can vary, sometimes significantly, across the aggregate ranking is intended to highlight indicator sets. The average correlation coefficient economies with ongoing, broad-based reform between the 10 indicator sets included in the programs. aggregate ranking is 0.37, and the coefficients between any 2 sets of indicators range from 0.19 Distance to frontier measure (between dealing with construction permits and A drawback of the ease of doing business ranking is getting credit) to 0.60 (between starting a business that it can measure the regulatory performance of and protecting investors). These correlations suggest economies only relative to the performance of others. that economies rarely score universally well or It does not provide information on how the absolute universally badly on the indicators. quality of the regulatory environment is improving Consider the example of Canada. It stands at 17 in the over time. Nor does it provide information on how aggregate ranking on the ease of doing business. Its large the gaps are between economies at a single ranking is 3 on starting a business, and 4 on both point in time. resolving insolvency and protecting investors. But its The distance to frontier measure is designed to ranking is only 62 on enforcing contracts, 69 on address both shortcomings, complementing the ease dealing with construction permits and 152 on getting of doing business ranking. This measure illustrates the electricity. distance of an economy to the ―frontier,‖ and the Variation in performance across the indicator sets is change in the measure over time shows the extent to not at all unusual. It reflects differences in the degree which the economy has closed this gap. The frontier is of priority that government authorities give to a score derived from the most efficient practice or particular areas of business regulation reform and the highest score achieved on each of the component indicators in 9 Doing Business indicator sets (excluding 5 6 A technical note on the different aggregation and weighting Doing Business reforms making it more difficult to do business are methods is available on the Doing Business website subtracted from the total number of those making it easier to do (http://www.doingbusiness.org). business. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 116 the employing workers and getting electricity The maximum (max) and minimum (min) observed indicators) by any economy since 2005. In starting a values are computed for the 174 economies included business, for example, New Zealand has achieved the in the Doing Business sample since 2005 and for all highest performance on the time (1 day), Canada and years (from 2005 to 2012). The year 2005 was chosen New Zealand on the number of procedures required as the baseline for the economy sample because it was (1), Slovenia on the cost (0% of income per capita) and the first year in which data were available for the Australia and 90 other economies on the paid-in majority of economies (a total of 174) and for all 9 minimum capital requirement (0% of income per indicator sets included in the measure. To mitigate the capita). Calculating the distance to frontier for each effects of extreme outliers in the distributions of the economy involves 2 main steps. First, individual rescaled data (very few economies need 694 days to indicator scores are normalized to a common unit: complete the procedures to start a business, but many th except for the total tax rate. To do so, each of the 28 need 9 days), the maximum (max) is defined as the 95 component indicators y is rescaled to (max − y)/(max percentile of the pooled data for all economies and all − min), with the minimum value (min) representing the years for each indicator. The exceptions are the getting frontier—the highest performance on that indicator credit, protecting investors and resolving insolvency across all economies since 2005. For the total tax rate, indicators, whose construction precludes outliers. consistent with the calculation of the rankings, the Take Ghana, which has a score of 67 on the distance to frontier is defined as the total tax rate corresponding th frontier measure for 2012. This score indicates that the to the 15 percentile based on the overall distribution economy is 33 percentage points away from the of total tax rates for all years. Second, for each frontier constructed from the best performances economy the scores obtained for individual indicators across all economies and all years. Ghana was further are aggregated through simple averaging into one from the frontier in 2005, with a score of 54. The distance to frontier score. An economy‘s distance to difference between the scores shows an improvement frontier is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 over time. represents the lowest performance and 100 the frontier. The distance to frontier measure can also be used for comparisons across economies in the same year, The difference between an economy‘s distance to complementing the ease of doing business ranking. frontier score in 2005 and its score in 2012 illustrates For example, Ghana stands at 64 this year in the ease the extent to which the economy has closed the gap to of doing business ranking, while Peru, which is 29 the frontier over time. And in any given year the score percentage points from the frontier, stands at 43. measures how far an economy is from the highest performance at that time. Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 117 RESOURCES ON THE DOING BUSINESS WEBSITE Current features Doing Business reforms News on the Doing Business project Short summaries of DB2013 business regulation http://www.doingbusiness.org reforms, lists of reforms since DB2008 and a ranking simulation tool Rankings http://www.doingbusiness.org/reforms/ How economies rank—from 1 to 185 http://www.doingbusiness.org/rankings/ Historical data Customized data sets since DB2004 Data http://www.doingbusiness.org/custom-query/ All the data for 185 economies—topic rankings, indicator values, lists of regulatory procedures and Law library details underlying indicators Online collection of business laws and regulations http://www.doingbusiness.org/data/ relating to business and gender issues http://www.doingbusiness.org/law-library/ Reports http://wbl.worldbank.org/ Access to Doing Business reports as well as subnational and regional reports, reform case Contributors studies and customized economy and regional More than 9,600 specialists in 185 economies who profiles participate in Doing Business http://www.doingbusiness.org/reports/ http://www.doingbusiness.org/contributors/doing- business/ Methodology The methodologies and research papers NEW! Entrepreneurship data underlying Doing Business Data on business density for 130 economies http://www.doingbusiness.org/methodology/ http://www.doingbusiness.org/data/exploretopics/e ntrepreneurship Research Abstracts of papers on Doing Business topics and More to come related policy issues Coming soon—information on good practices and http://www.doingbusiness.org/research/ data on transparency and on the distance to frontier Doing Business 2013 Indonesia 118